2025 Budget Provides Welcome Relief For Older Ratepayers
Press Release – LGNZ
This was always expected to be a tight budget due to the current economic conditions, so were pleased to see the Government has opted to ease the financial pressure on older New Zealanders many of whom are facing a cost-of-living crisis, says …
Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) says that yesterday's Budget 2025 announcement of changes to the rates rebate scheme is a win for the community – particularly older people struggling to afford rates.
'This was always expected to be a tight budget due to the current economic conditions, so we're pleased to see the Government has opted to ease the financial pressure on older New Zealanders – many of whom are facing a cost-of-living crisis,' says LGNZ acting chief executive Scott Necklen.
'LGNZ has been advocating for the income threshold for rates rebate eligibility to be raised for low-and fixed-income property owners for some time. As a further step we'd like to see the Government investigate options for data sharing between councils, Internal Affairs and MSD to proactively identify households that qualify for a rates rebate, rather than waiting for people to apply.
'But an expanded rebate and new abatement threshold for SuperGold card holders is a great start.'
Scott Necklen says that local and central government are in full agreement that rates cannot keep rising at the level they have been, and that many councils need more funding levers to address pressing infrastructure needs.
'Rates are – and will continue to be – councils' main source of income, and play a vital role in councils being able to meet their community's infrastructure needs.
'It's a welcome relief to see the Government implicitly acknowledging that rates rises are inevitable due to the growing pressure on local government, especially in the face of councils' rising insurance costs, inflation and infrastructure needs.
'We acknowledge that Government has already added some tools in our toolkit – such as moving from development contributions to development levies. New tools like this help keep rates at bay. But we need to keep working with the Government on more incentives for councils, so that ratepayers are not disincentivised by housing and wider economic growth,' says Scott Necklen.
Scott Necklen also acknowledged several other budget outcomes that will have an effect on local government:
Regional Deals: 'While regional deals have been touted by the Government as something that will help unlock funding and resource opportunities to support councils to improve roads, infrastructure and housing in their regions, it's disappointing to see that no funding is available to invest in the initiatives agreed as part of any future deals. If regional deals are to replicate the success of city deals overseas, they will need dedicated government funding.'
Transport: 'While it's great to see increased investment in rail and ferry initiatives, we also know there's a real need for widespread investment in our aging transport network. We're disappointed to see some reductions in transport funding. These costs will instead be covered by the National Land Transport Programme (NLTP), which creates additional pressure on the fund and on the transport network. Without additional tools or further funding, as a country we'll have to make tough choices soon around where we defer maintenance and leave it up to future generations.'
Recovery works: 'We're happy to see the Government commit extra funding to complete recovery works on local roads affected by the 2023 North Island weather events, as these communities continue to get back on their feet following widespread damage to their roading infrastructure.'
Funding to support local journalism: 'We're pleased to see the Government recognises the key role that local journalism plays in telling local stories, while raising transparency and awareness around community issues. This is particularly important for local elections later this year.'
About LGNZ:
LGNZ champions, connects and supports local government. We represent the national interest of councils across New Zealand to deliver more of what matters in their communities. LGNZ is involved in policy, reforms, programmes, and advocacy as well as providing advice, consultancy and training to councils and their staff.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Government Restores Real Consequences For Crime
Minister of Justice Today the Government's sentencing reforms take effect, restoring real consequences for crime, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. 'Communities and hardworking New Zealanders should not be made to live and work in fear of criminals who clearly have a flagrant disregard for the law, corrections officers and the general public. 'We know that undue leniency has resulted in a loss of public confidence in sentencing, and our justice system as a whole. We had developed a culture of excuses. 'This Government promised to restore real consequences for crime. That's exactly what we're delivering. It's part of our plan to restore law and order, which we know is working. 'This is a significant milestone in this Government's mission to restore law and order. It signals to victims that they deserve justice, and that they are our priority.' The reforms strengthen the criminal justice system by: Capping the sentence discounts that judges can apply at 40 per cent when considering mitigating factors unless it would result in manifestly unjust sentencing outcomes. Preventing repeat discounts for youth and remorse. Lenient sentences are failing to deter offenders who continue to rely on their youth or expressions of remorse without making serious efforts to reform their behaviour. Responding to serious retail crime by introducing a new aggravating factor to address offences against sole charge workers and those whose home and business are interconnected, as committed to in the National-Act coalition agreement. Encouraging the use of cumulative sentencing for offences committed while on bail, in custody, or on parole to denounce behaviour that indicates a disregard for the criminal justice system, as committed to in the National-New Zealand First coalition agreement. Implementing a sliding scale for early guilty pleas with a maximum sentence discount of 25 per cent, reducing to a maximum of 5 per cent for a guilty plea entered during the trial. This will prevent undue discounts for late-stage guilty pleas and avoid unnecessary trials that are costly and stressful for victims. Amending the principles of sentencing to include requirement to take into account any information provided to the court about victims' interests, as committed to in both coalition agreements. Two aggravating factors are also included. These respond to:
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
More Rights For Victims, Consequences For Crime From Today
ACT MP Nicole McKee is welcoming sentencing reforms coming into force today that put rights for victims first and create tougher consequences for crime. Today's changes deliver on an ACT coalition commitment to introduce new aggravating factors at sentencing for offences against sole charge workers and those whose home and business are interconnected. 'For years under Labour, New Zealand saw a steady erosion of public confidence in the justice system. Offenders faced fewer and shorter prison sentences, while communities paid the price,' says McKee. "Police data showed a 134% increase in serious assault leading to injury from 2017-2023 under Labour's failed experiment of being kind to criminals. 'We've restored three strikes, and from today additional measures are coming into force to make the message even clearer.' The changes to sentencing laws strengthen the justice system by: Capping sentence discounts when considering mitigating factors Preventing repeat discounts for youth and remorse Cracking down on retail crime by introducing new aggravating factors at sentencing to address offences against sole charge workers and those whose home and business are interconnected. Encouraging the use of cumulative sentencing when someone commits a crime on bail, in custody or on parole. Putting victims at the heart of the justice system by requiring courts to take victims' needs and interests into account at sentencing. 'People working alone feel especially vulnerable, as do those who work in a business attached to the family home, because they can't flee without putting loved ones at risk. Now, these workers' vulnerability will be recognised in law, as set out in ACT's coalition agreement,' says McKee. 'I know people remain concerned about retail crime. These changes send a clear message that violence and thuggery will not be tolerated, deterring potential criminals and locking away those who commit crimes for longer so they can't harm anyone else. 'These are practical, common-sense changes that ensure the justice system prioritises victims, not offenders. Law-abiding New Zealanders deserve to feel safe, and that starts with holding criminals to account.'
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Never mind the swear words, politicians need to raise debate quality
I don't believe people are genuinely shocked by the language we're all hearing every night on our streaming TV shows. What is shocking is the standard of argument being employed by politicians and parties as they seek to score points with silly populist arguments. On my Facebook and Instagram feeds, the Labour Party has been trying to tell me that the Government is to blame for soaring butter prices. It has posted a chart of butter prices pointing out that they have doubled since the National-led coalition came to power. That's annoyed me on a number of levels. Despite the fact it seems to enrage many Kiwis, soaring dairy prices are clearly a net gain for the economy. We sell a lot more internationally than we consume locally and the current dairy price spike is expected to bring in an additional $10 billion in export revenue over this year and next. It's exactly what our economy needed. The impact on consumers is overstated. Butter prices have doubled in two years. You used to be able to get a 500g block for about $4.50 now it's about $8.50. That's an extra $4 a week, far less than petrol prices fluctuate on a regular basis. Also, there are numerous butter substitutes and blends that haven't risen nearly that much. I understand why someone on the Labour Party team has tried to milk the dairy price story (sorry for the pun). It is a headline grabber and an easy online meme. I bet the analytics on it look great. But it makes no sense in the real world. The Government has no control over international dairy prices. There are things a government could do to reduce the cost of butter for local consumers. They could subsidise the price with taxpayer money. Or they could impose price controls on farmers and force them to sell a certain amount locally. These would be terrible policies, and there is no chance Labour is about to adopt them. So butter prices would be exactly the same right now if they had won the last election. More broadly, inflation is running rampant like it was throughout 2021 and 2022. It has edged up to 2.5% but remains within the Reserve Bank's 1-3% target band. The same Stats NZ release that included the butter price graph also pointed out that annual rent price increases haven't been below 2.8% since 2011. Of course, much lower inflation isn't all good news. The fact it is underperforming so badly is giving economists confidence that inflation will stay subdued. The economy is struggling to get any momentum and there is no doubt a lot of people are doing it tough. There's no shortage of real issues with this recovery, which the current Government ought to take some responsibility for. Labour could legitimately be attacking the Government on unemployment and job security. There are tens of thousands more people on the Jobseeker benefit now than there were when Labour was in power. I don't mean to single out Labour either. The National Party spent a lot of time in opposition attacking Labour for letting those Jobseeker numbers rise. It also drives me crazy when the Government holds press conferences after the Official Cash Rate announcement to take credit for falling interest rates. Interest rates are falling because inflation is under control and the economy is underperforming. If they go much lower, it will be because things are getting worse, not better. Meanwhile, in the past week, we've had David Seymour running 'victim of the day' social media attacks on opponents of his regulatory standards bill. Seymour says he is being 'playful' and having 'fun' with his line, suggesting opponents are suffering from 'Regulatory Standards Derangement Syndrome'. Surely if the bill is worth putting before Parliament, then it must have been aimed at delivering some sort of meaningful change to the status quo. Let's have a grown-up debate about what that intended change is. What's frustrating about political debate in 2025 is that politicians are so quick to build 'straw man' arguments because they seem easy to sell as memes and headlines. A 'straw man', for the record, is where you present a weak version or flawed version of your opponent's argument so you can easily dismiss it. It's lazy and doesn't do anything to boost the quality of policy-making in this country. It's probably too much to ask, but wouldn't it be nice if our politicians were confident enough in their view to employ the opposite of a 'straw man' argument? That's called a 'steel-man' argument. It requires you to consciously present the strongest and most charitable version of your opponent's argument. Then you explain why it still doesn't stack up. It requires you to do a bit of homework and think through the logical basis for your argument. I'm pretty sure all the leaders of our political parties are smart enough to do that. But we seem to be following a depressing international trend which sees social media debate reduce everything to simplistic points which appeal to an increasingly tribal political base. New Zealand has a cyclical recovery underway that would have happened, at a greater or lesser pace, regardless of who was in power. Scrapping over that is pointless. We need to be looking ahead to how we lift the economy at a structural level and enable higher levels of cyclical growth. That requires some serious work and will need a higher quality of debate than what we've been seeing this year. This column will take a two-week break as the author is on holiday with his family. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for theNew Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined theHeraldin 2003.
