America Movil's Income Misses as Prepaid Disconnections Rise
Net income in the second quarter was 22.3 billion pesos ($1.2 billion), below analysts' estimates of 29.3 billion pesos. Revenue was 233.8 billion pesos, higher than analysts had expected, while a gauge of profitability known as Ebitda, which excludes items such as taxes and depreciations, beat estimates to reach 92.4 billion pesos.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Food Prices Will Rise Under Trump, Group Warns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's tariffs, scheduled to increase on August 1, could result in significantly higher prices for a range of food groups. This is according to an analysis published Monday by the bipartisan Tax Foundation, which found that these will impact nearly 75 percent of U.S. food imports, which it said will "likely lead to higher food prices for consumers." Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment. Why It Matters It has repeatedly been warned that the higher import taxes implemented as a result of the Trump administration's economic agenda will increase costs for U.S. businesses reliant on foreign goods or components, and that this will translate into higher consumer prices as companies pass along these added expenses. What To Know According to the Tax Foundation, citing data from the U.S. International Trade Commission, 74 percent of the $221 billion worth of imported food products last year would be subject to the new administration's tariff policies. Among specific products, liqueurs and spirits were the most imported category last year, followed by baked goods, coffee, fish, and beer. Together, these accounted for roughly 21 percent of total food imports. Should reciprocal tariffs go into effect on August 1, following a second delay after their announcement in early April, exporting countries will again face duties ranging from the global baseline of 10 percent to over 30 percent in many cases. The administration has defended tariffs as a necessary tool to amend historic trade imbalances, while boosting U.S. manufacturing and increasing demand for domestically sourced goods. However, the think tank notes that many organic foods, such as bananas, cannot be "onshored" due to the climates required for production, the land necessary to meet U.S. demand and the fact that consumers "often prefer the foreign alternative to American-grown products." Main: File photo of Chiquita brand bananas for sale at a grocery store in Zelienople, Pennsylvania. Inset: President Donald Trump at the White House on July 22, 2025. Main: File photo of Chiquita brand bananas for sale at a grocery store in Zelienople, Pennsylvania. Inset: President Donald Trump at the White House on July 22, 2025. Chip Somodevilla // AP Photo file The Tax Foundation noted that there are several exemptions to the tariffs, which could lessen the overall price impact, including for goods covered by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This allows around 63 percent of agricultural imports from Canada and Mexico—America's top two food exporters—to flow into the U.S. without being subject to Trump's import taxes. In addition, trade deals struck by the Trump administration, including with Indonesia, Japan and, most recently, the European Union, cap tariffs at rates below the levels originally unveiled by the president on "Liberation Day." However, the president has also announced new duties in recent weeks, including a 50-percent tariff on Brazil, the fourth-largest exporter of food products to the U.S., according to the Tax Foundation. Meanwhile, Trump has increased tariffs on imports not covered by the USMCA, which are currently set at a 25 percent tariff, but set to rise to 30 percent and 35 percent for Mexico and Canada, respectively, come August 1. What People Are Saying The Tax Foundation, in the report released Monday, wrote: "President Trump has often defended tariffs on the grounds that they will boost domestic production and create jobs. However, in the case of food imports, it is often difficult or impossible to onshore production due to land scarcity and a lack of suitable climates for certain goods. Consumers also often prefer the foreign alternative to American-grown products. This means tariffs on food imports will likely lead to higher food prices, making consumers worse off." What Happens Next On Friday, the pause on reciprocal tariffs will end, and countries unable to secure deals before this deadline will see their rates revert to early April levels. Speaking to Fox News recently, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that there would be no further tariff extensions beyond this date. "No extensions. No more grace periods," Lutnick said. "August 1, the tariffs are set. They'll go into place."
CNN
6 hours ago
- CNN
Trump's trade war victory is already under siege
The economy was supposed to crumble. The trade war was expected to escalate out of control. Markets were forecast to plunge. None of that happened – at least, not yet. President Donald Trump has pulled off what few outside the White House predicted: A trade war victory of sorts that sets America's taxes on imported goods higher than the infamous Smoot-Hawley era, without any of the damaging fallout so far. Customs revenue has increased sharply while inflation remains reasonably low. And America's trading partners, for the most part, have been willing to accept the higher tariffs without significant retaliation. Multiple framework agreements between the United States and other trading partners have jacked up tariffs on foreign goods imported to America while setting levies on US exports at or near zero. Overseas trading partners have agreed to open previously closed markets to some US goods, pledged increased investments in the United States and dropped some of what the Trump administration has lambasted as non-trade barriers, like taxes on digital services. But Trump's early trade victory may be short-lived. In fact, it is already showing signs that it may not last. The European Union, fresh off its 11th-hour compromise to get a trade agreement done before Trump's self-imposed August 1 deadline, is already in revolt. French Prime Minister François Bayrou called Sunday a 'dark day.' Hungarian Prime Minister and Trump ally Viktor Orban said Trump steamrolled the EU. Belgium's Prime Minister Bart De Wever lambasted the Trump administration's 'delusion of protectionism.' And Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, said the deal is 'not satisfactory.' The 27-member bloc has to hammer out key aspects of its framework, and the fragile trade truce between two of the world's largest economies could quickly break apart if sentiment turns against the arrangement. The Trump administration's trade talks with its northern neighbor and one of its largest trading partners have been effectively shut down. Despite Canada relenting on its digital services tax that the president has lambasted, Trump continued to threaten higher tariffs on some Canadian goods, including lumber. Although many goods imported from Canada continue to be tariff-free because of the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement, the USMCA only covers just about half of Canadian goods. So higher tariffs on Canada could raise some costs for American consumers down the road. And the fact that America is even embroiled in a trade spat with Canada in the first place is a sign that the recent cooling off in the trade war may not last: Trump negotiated and signed the United States' current trade agreement with Canada during his first term. At any time, even after an agreement is inked, Trump could turn around and decide to raise tariffs again. A third round of talks between China and the United States' trade negotiators is expected to result in a continued pause of their historically high tariffs on one another. But it's unclear what else might come from the discussions, and the Trump administration has grown frustrated by what it has described as China's slow-walking of its previous agreements. Both sides have aimed to reduce more regulatory barriers on shipments of key technologies. China has sought more access to critical semiconductors, and the United States wants the flow of rare earth magnets to increase further. But the Trump administration has tried repeatedly to speed up China's slow progress, claiming the country has failed to live up to its agreement to approve the critical materials for crucial electronics. Trump has also said he wants China to open up its market to more US goods – a desire that Chinese Premier Xi Jinping is unlikely to give in to significantly. Trump's rhetoric against China has cooled in recent months, but the truce appears to be on a knife's edge. A crucial appeals court hearing Thursday could determine whether most of Trump's tariffs are legal at all. For most of his tariffs, Trump has cited powers listed in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. But a federal court in May ruled that Trump overstepped his authority to levy tariffs on that basis. An appeals court paused that ruling from taking effect and will hear oral arguments Thursday. It's not clear when the court will rule, and the White House would likely appeal to the Supreme Court if it loses. If Trump ultimately loses his ability to levy tariffs using emergency powers, he has plenty of other options – but legal experts have said those alternatives could limit his ability to set tariffs without Congress. For example, Trump may be able to impose some tariffs as high as just 15% but only for 150 days, potentially taking some of the bite out of his tariff regime. Although the US economy remains strong, with rebounding retail sales, a still-robust labor market and rising consumer confidence, there is some evidence that inflation in key areas is starting to creep higher – slowly – because of tariffs. That's a potential warning sign as the tariffs take full effect. The Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index earlier this month showed that some tariff-affected goods have started to gain in price. Clothing, appliances, computers, sporting goods, toys, video equipment, hardware and tools prices have been on the rise. And it's starting to become a trend – in many of those categories, the rise has been happening for a few months. Many major retailers, including Walmart, have said they will raise prices because of tariffs. And GM, Volkswagen and Stellantis all reported tariff charges of $1 billion or more over the past quarter. Economists widely expect inflation to pick up in the late summer and throughout the rest of the year as retailers work through the inventories of goods they had stockpiled before tariffs went into effect. No one expects anything close to the inflation crisis of a few years ago. But with consumers still dealing with price-hike PTSD, that won't be a welcome change from the return to healthy inflation levels over the past year.
CBS News
6 hours ago
- CBS News
Stellantis warns of $1.7 billion earnings hit from tariffs
Stellantis, the maker of more than a dozen automotive brands, on Tuesday said that President Trump's tariffs will cost the auto manufacturer 1.5 billion euros, or about $1.7 billion, in 2025. The parent company of brands like Chrysler, Fiat, Jeep and Peugeot announced the projected earnings hit as Mr. Trump clinches deals with U.S. trade partners that include steep tariffs on U.S. imports, ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline. Stellantis said it expects the majority of the hit, about 1.2 billion euros, will come in the second half of 2025. "Stellantis updates its estimate of 2025 net tariff impact to approximately €1.5 billion, of which €0.3 billion was incurred in H1 2025. The Company remains highly engaged with relevant policymakers, while continuing long-term scenario planning," the company said in a statement Tuesday as it reported financial results for the first half of 2025. The automaker acknowledged that Mr. Trump's 25% tariffs on imports of autos and auto parts to the U.S. are hurting its business, particularly in North America. Stellantis builds its Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep brand vehicles in factories in Canada and Mexico, meaning they're subject to the new levies. While Mr. Trump's deal with the EU, calling for 15% tariffs across the board will make BMW and Mercedes-Benz vehicles more expensive for U.S. consumers, according to analysts. Stellantis is largely unaffected by the EU agreement. "Stellantis isn't much affected by the EU/US tariff news — the question for STLA is if the Detroit-3 will want to renegotiate the [U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)] tariff after the EU and Japan got a better deal," UBS analysts said in a research note. Other automobile manufacturers, including General Motors, have been bracing for impact from tariffs. GM CEO Mary Barra said the company took a $1.1 billion hit from tariffs in the second quarter, and that the company is taking steps to reduce its tariff exposure by investing in U.S. assembly plants. European automaker Volkswagen also said last week that tariffs cost the company $1.5 billion in the first half of 2025.
