Can speed cameras catch you from the front? Expert explains
That's why speed cameras have become essential in a bid to save lives.
There are many myths around speed cameras, including how far one can record your speed and what speed actually triggers the roadside technology.
But some might be wondering if speed cameras can catch you from the front and if a picture of your face can be taken.
Let's find out, according to motoring experts at the RAC and AA.
The RAC explains: 'Most speed cameras are rear-facing, however, there are exceptions.
'Truvelo Combi cameras, radar and laser speed guns, and the new 'Long Ranger' camera – that can measure speed and check for other driving violations from a kilometre away – all work by facing the front of vehicles.'
The AA says: 'If the camera detects speeding, it takes a digital image.
'The image will catch the vehicle's colour, type, make and registration plate.
'It may also capture the face of the driver, depending on the type of camera and which way it's facing.'
Yet the AA adds not all cameras will get a clear picture of the driver.
But speed cameras will also record:
When caught speeding, the minimum penalty is usually a £100 fine and three points on your licence.
Recommended reading:
Warning to motorists as thousands of UK drivers being wrongly fined
How fast can you go before triggering a speed camera? Car expert explains
Drivers warned they are risking £1,000 fine for common summer driving mistake
The AA continues: 'However, this could be higher if you've gone over the speed limit by a lot. You can even get a court summons.
'If it's a first offence and you don't have points on your licence, you could be offered a speed awareness course instead of penalty points.
You can find more information about speed cameras on the RAC and AA websites.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
a day ago
- Daily Record
Businesses in Stirling urged to sign up to crime-fighting tool
Traders can view real-time information and alerts about thefts and anti-social behaviour happening in the city. Stirling retailers are being encouraged to sign up to a crime-fighting tool which features real-time alerts about offenders in a bid to tackle shoplifting and anti-social behaviour in the city centre. Business owners were invited to an intelligence briefing, hosted by Go Forth Stirling BID and Retailers Against Crime (RAC), where crime prevention experts emphasised the importance of partnership working and information sharing to enhance community vigilance and combat crime. They were introduced to the work of RAC and the not-for-profit organisation's SentrySIS device which allows users to view real-time information and alerts about thefts and other crimes happening in the city. Go Forth covers the cost of RAC membership for all BID (Business Improvement District) levy-paying members giving them access to the SentrySIS (Secure Intelligence System) platform to report crime, receive alerts about criminal activity and create evidence logs to help police detect offences. Go Forth Stirling Community Engagement and Business Improvement Officer Fiona McMillan urged more businesses to sign up for membership and help tackle the ongoing problem of retail crime. She said: 'Our partnership with RAC allows us to make the SentrySIS tool available to all our businesses and it's all about investing in the city and into community safety to help make Stirling a better place to live, work and visit. 'It's so important that businesses report what's happening to them and, through sharing intelligence and making the consequences more serious for repeat offenders, we can send a message that Stirling is not a place which is open for crime.' The briefing was the first of three meetings being hosted by RAC and the BID at the Golden Lion Hotel to support business owners and the challenges they face due to the ongoing rise in retail crime. Stephanie Karté, National Operations Manager at RAC, told the briefing how incidents of violent crime are rising annually with 1674 reported to the organisation during 2024 while overall losses to their retailer members have risen by 26%, totalling £1.85 million, in the past year. She demonstrated how retailers can use the SentrySIS tool – on a desktop or as a phone app - to find out which criminals are currently active in the Stirling area along with photographs and information about them; be alerted to the latest crime incidents and access a database with details on more than 16,000 offenders. And she highlighted major successes the system has had across Scotland where police officers have been able to identify crime patterns, link crime reports and apprehend criminals responsible for a series of offences due to retailers using SentrySIS to report crime. She said: 'With SentrySIS, we have a real-time alerts system and we are trying to bring the business community together to forewarn each other and prevent or, try to prevent, the problem of retail crime. 'If an offender is in the city targeting one store, it's likely they will be round every store in the area to try and get what they can. So, the more retailers who use the system to report crime, the more effective we can be, and the more businesses can be forewarned about potential offenders in the area. 'The system also enables us to gather evidence and reports together and provide information to give to the police to take forward.' The meeting, which was attended by two Police Scotland officers and representatives from Stirling Council, also heard from local retailers and taxi operators about the problems they are facing with theft and anti-social behaviour in the city centre. The next intelligence briefing takes place on Tuesday September 16 at 9.30am when Intelligence Co-ordinator at RAC, Natasa Wilson, will present information about the latest tricks and techniques used by shoplifters to evade security systems and show footage demonstrating how crime gangs work in teams to steal goods. Ms Karté encouraged business owners to come along to the September briefing and help build a united front when it comes to tackling crime in Stirling. She said: 'These meetings are an essential opportunity for local businesses to stay informed, connected and better equipped to tackle retail crime. 'They are key to strengthening local partnerships, enhancing prevention strategies and creating a safer trading environment in Stirling. 'And they are about more than just sharing information - they're about building a united front against crime. By working together, sharing intelligence and utilising crime prevention tools like SentrySIS effectively, we can make a real difference in reducing retail crime and protecting our communities.' Any BID levy-payers who want to try out the SentrySIS tool can request more information at any time by contacting admin@ Businesses who are not levy payers and who would like to access SentrySIS can also get in touch to discuss a voluntary BID membership. Stirling-based Retailers Against Crime is a national retail crime partnership, established in 1997, which aims to detect and prevent crime by sharing information on local and travelling offenders with members and partners throughout the UK. More information is available on their website - Go Forth Stirling is the city's BID representing more than 600 business owners with a key objective of increasing visitors to the city and devising initiatives to help make it a more welcoming destination for businesses and shoppers. For more information visit
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Labour's EV grant is an expensive mess
As chief executive of dedicated electric car website and a long-time advocate of electric vehicles, you'd be forgiven for thinking I've been celebrating this week's news that Labour is bringing back grants for EVs. The government press release that landed in my inbox on Monday proudly trumpeted discounts of up to £3,750 on electric cars - saying it was set to slash costs for thousands of UK drivers with an impressive £650million fund. It boasted that the scheme would be up and running within days, with manufacturers handling the paperwork. Taking the news at face value, I initially welcomed such a bold move. But having delved into the detail, this is nothing short of an ill-conceived policy that raises more questions than answers. Instead of encouraging electric car uptake, it will instead restrict consumer choice. Labour really needs to go back to the drawing board on this one... Despite a new EV being registered every 60 seconds in June, private buyer sales have stalled. They now make up just under 20 per cent of registrations, with the bulk going to company car drivers who enjoy generous tax breaks if they go electric. In our November 2024 survey with the AA - responded to by over 11,000 UK drivers - 76 per cent told us that the upfront cost was the biggest barrier to switching. I believed fresh incentives would reignite momentum and give more drivers the confidence to switch. My calculations suggested almost half of all new electric models on sale would fall below the £37,000 price cap. Crucially, this support appeared to be aimed where it was needed most: from school-run staples to budget-friendly runarounds. How wrong I was. As they say, the devil is in the details - and as the week has unfolded, the details behind those upbeat headlines have painted a very different picture. Instead of a straightforward grant on all EVs under £37,000 - designed to help hard-working people make a sustainable choice - the rigid rules and baffling conditions surrounding which cars qualify (and by how much) have left even the carmakers scratching their heads. At the heart of this complexity is something called a Science Based Target (SBT), which requires manufacturers to commit to cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with limiting global warming to 1.5C or below 2C, as set out in the Paris Agreement on climate change. You'd assume the government would have a simple list of eligible manufacturers. Apparently not. Instead, car makers - with customers in dealerships already asking about discounts - are left wading through bureaucracy to figure it all out. Even if a company has signed up to an SBT - like Renault or Ford - the scheme may still reject cars assembled in countries with poor overall sustainability records or high emissions. And, surprise surprise, even that isn't as simple as it sounds. The emissions calculations are split between where the battery is made and where the car itself is built. This means a car assembled in the UK or Europe may score well for manufacturing and earn the minimum £1,500 grant, but fail to reach the additional 70 per cent score needed for the full £3,750 if its battery is sourced from a country with a lower environmental score. Transport Minister Lilian Greenwood told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Wednesday: 'We don't expect any cars that are assembled in China to be eligible for this scheme.' This rules out cars like the Volvo EX30, the Mini electric (which incidentally, is built in factories powered by renewable energy), the MG4 and the Dacia Spring - family favourites which it seems won't qualify for a penny. Making matters worse, many manufacturers striving to make EVs cheaper have switched to LFP batteries, which are predominantly made in China. So much for my celebrations that the grant was focused on more affordable models. The reality is that car making is a global business. Even if your car doesn't bear a Chinese badge, the chances are part of it was manufactured there. And it's not just Chinese-made cars at risk of ending up with nothing - brands from other nations like Korea which make some of the UK's most popular cars could also end up with many models being excluded. The government is effectively limiting consumer choice at the very moment they should be encouraging it. Far from being the shot in the arm that private buyers need, this ill-conceived grant scheme has only created questions and confusion. I'm now telling anyone in the market for a new EV to pause before making a decision - especially since, bizarrely, it appears that if the entry-level model of a car costs under £37,000, the more expensive versions and trims in the same range might still be eligible for discounts. This scheme encapsulates everything that's wrong with government policymaking: good intentions, badly thought through and buried under layers of bureaucracy. It simply seems half-baked, with an announcement which was made too early. If Labour truly wants to accelerate EV adoption, they need to go back to the drawing board and design something that actually works for the people it's supposed to help and gives everyone some clarity. My advice? Start with the used market.
South Wales Guardian
2 days ago
- South Wales Guardian
Can speed cameras catch you from the front? Expert explains
Plus, more than 2,500 are left seriously injured, and that's all because drivers are travelling too fast, the RAC reports. That's why speed cameras have become essential in a bid to save lives. There are many myths around speed cameras, including how far one can record your speed and what speed actually triggers the roadside technology. But some might be wondering if speed cameras can catch you from the front and if a picture of your face can be taken. Let's find out, according to motoring experts at the RAC and AA. The RAC explains: 'Most speed cameras are rear-facing, however, there are exceptions. 'Truvelo Combi cameras, radar and laser speed guns, and the new 'Long Ranger' camera – that can measure speed and check for other driving violations from a kilometre away – all work by facing the front of vehicles.' The AA says: 'If the camera detects speeding, it takes a digital image. 'The image will catch the vehicle's colour, type, make and registration plate. 'It may also capture the face of the driver, depending on the type of camera and which way it's facing.' Yet the AA adds not all cameras will get a clear picture of the driver. But speed cameras will also record: When caught speeding, the minimum penalty is usually a £100 fine and three points on your licence. Recommended reading: Warning to motorists as thousands of UK drivers being wrongly fined How fast can you go before triggering a speed camera? Car expert explains Drivers warned they are risking £1,000 fine for common summer driving mistake The AA continues: 'However, this could be higher if you've gone over the speed limit by a lot. You can even get a court summons. 'If it's a first offence and you don't have points on your licence, you could be offered a speed awareness course instead of penalty points. You can find more information about speed cameras on the RAC and AA websites.
