Belgassem Haftar Presents Libya's Reconstruction Budget to Ageela Saleh
On Tuesday, the Director General of the Libyan Reconstruction and Development Fund, Belgassem Haftar, met with House of Representatives Speaker Ageela Saleh to present detailed explanations regarding the fund's proposed budget and long-term development strategy. The meeting took place at Saleh's residence in the city of Qubba.
According to Saleh's media office, Haftar outlined the fund's budget framework along with its sustainable development plan for the years 2025, 2026, and 2027.
The discussion followed a separate session held on Monday between Haftar and members of a parliamentary committee tasked with reviewing the fund's financial and operational plans. The committee was formed under Resolution No. 1 of 2025.
During the meeting, Saleh expressed appreciation for Haftar's efforts and praised the work of the Reconstruction Fund team. He voiced confidence in their ability to deliver on national priorities through a coordinated program of reconstruction and development across various Libyan cities and regions.
Parliamentarian Saleh Afhema, a member of the committee, confirmed that the group reached an agreement with Haftar to include feedback from representatives of all electoral districts in the final version of the fund's budget and plan.
The committee session also included Hatem Al-Araibi, the fund's project director, and was held at the House of Representatives headquarters in Benghazi.
The discussions come amid growing political tension surrounding the parliamentary session held on June 3 in Benghazi, during which lawmakers unanimously approved the Reconstruction Fund's development budget.
Shortly afterward, 115 members of parliament submitted a formal request challenging the legality of the vote, arguing that key procedures were not followed before the approval.
Despite the dispute, the fund continues to function under Haftar's leadership and is moving forward with its mandate to implement major reconstruction projects across Libya. Tags: Belgassem HaftarBudgetlibyaParliament SpeakerReconstruction
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Libya Review
5 hours ago
- Libya Review
Greek Navy Joins EU Push to Stop Migration from Libya
In a decisive move, Greece has deployed two naval frigates to patrol international waters near Libya aimed at thwarting irregular migrant crossings to islands like Crete and Gavdos. According to local media, including Kathimerini, the warships are equipped with advanced sensors and radars to detect vessels linked to smuggler networks operating in the Central Mediterranean. Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis announced the deployment following a surge in migrant departures from eastern Libya—many escaping conflict zones such as Sudan and the Middle East—as part of broader efforts to protect national borders and maintain regional stability. Once suspicious boats are spotted, the navy flags the vessels and coordinates with Libyan authorities to intercept them before they enter international search-and-rescue zones. Due to their size, Greek frigates refrain from direct interception, instead acting as deterrents while maintaining constant surveillance. This action aligns with similar EU maritime security initiatives like Frontex's Operation Themis and the naval Operation Irini enforcing the UN arms embargo on Libya. Critics caution that the emphasis on containment may clash with international legal obligations against 'pushbacks,' particularly if migrant vessels are turned back without proper screening or assistance. Experts note the move comes amidst a coordinated strategy: an EU delegation—including migration ministers from Greece, Italy, and Malta—is set to visit Libya in early July to enhance cooperation on migration management. Tags: euGreecelibyamigrants
Libya Review
6 hours ago
- Libya Review
Libyan Official Blames UNSMIL for Delaying Elections & Unity
A member of Libya's High Council of State, Saad bin Sharada, has strongly criticised the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), accusing it of obstructing a Libyan-led resolution to the country's political deadlock. In comments to Independent Arabia, Ben Sharada insisted that Libya has all the necessary tools to resolve its crisis internally. 'We have a constitutional framework and a finalized electoral law,' he said. 'But the UN mission and the foreign powers behind it refuse to support a Libyan solution.' He argued that the real obstacle to progress lies not with Libyan institutions or rival political factions, but with the international community's refusal to let Libyans chart their own course. 'UNSMIL is no longer a neutral party,' Ben Sharada claimed. 'It represents the interests of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council.' Ben Sharada expressed concern that UNSMIL continues to dismiss Libyan-driven initiatives, citing the latest example of the Advisory Committee's proposals to resolve the crisis. According to him, the committee offered four different political plans, but the UN insists on pursuing only one of them, which involves creating a new political dialogue body whose members would be selected by the mission itself. He likened this to the flawed 2021 Geneva dialogue process, which led to the formation of the current interim government under Abdulhamid Dbeibah. That process, Ben Sherada recalled, was marred by allegations of bribery and political manipulation, undermining its legitimacy from the start. 'The Libyan public now understands that the main obstacle to national elections and political unification is the UN mission,' he said, warning that international interference risks prolonging instability rather than resolving it. Ben Sharada concluded by calling for all foreign actors to step back and allow Libyans to reach a consensus on their future through inclusive, sovereign dialogue free from external influence. Tags: ElectionsHigh Council of StatelibyaNational Dialogueunsmil
Libya Review
6 hours ago
- Libya Review
Libya's Central Bank Governor Calls for Ban on Non-Banking Imports
The Governor of the Central Bank of Libya, Naji Essa, called on the Economy and Trade Minister, Mohamed Al-Hwaij, to reinstate a suspended regulation banning imports and exports conducted outside official banking channels. Essa cautioned that the suspension of this rule could have serious financial and security repercussions for the country. The policy, known as Decision No. 42 of 2025, was introduced by the Economy Ministry in January and took effect on April 1. It required all international trade transactions to be processed through accredited banks. However, in early April, the ministry decided to pause the law, a move that the Central Bank says undermines Libya's efforts to restore financial order. In his letter, Essa expressed 'regret and surprise' at the ministry's decision to halt the ban. He warned that the reversal has fueled the growth of a parallel foreign exchange market, encouraged smuggling, and opened avenues for illicit financial activities. These practices not only place pressure on the Libyan dinar's exchange rate but also risk Libya's standing with international correspondent banks that demand compliance with global standards. Essa also flagged potential economic risks from importing goods outside official channels, including the depletion of foreign reserves and the invasion of substandard or unregulated products into the market. Such developments endanger consumer safety and undermine quality standards. Calling for the swift restoration of the banking-only regulation, Essa urged the Economy Ministry to direct the Customs Authority to enforce the ban without delay. He emphasized that this step is vital for achieving financial stability, ensuring legal compliance, and protecting Libya's reintegration into the global financial system. This appeal comes at a critical moment as Libya continues efforts to rebuild its economy following years of political upheaval and fractured governance. Financial authorities have consistently warned that informal trade undermines fiscal discipline, drains reserves, and weakens state control over strategic sectors.
