‘Anam' a remarkable political personality: Ponguru
On Sunday, he unveiled the statue of late Anam Venkata Reddy at Ramalingapuram center in the city. Addressing the gathering, the Minister said Anam family has been running politics for the last four decades in the district. He recalled that he studied in VR High School and VR College and later worked as a lecturer in the same educational institutions.
Narayana said that this is fourth generation from Anam family in the politics in the district. Later Anam Venkata Reddy rendered selfless service to the public as Nellore District Cooperative Central Bank chief and Minister for several years.
Nellore MP Vemireddy Prabhakar Reddy has lauded that the role of Anam Venkata Reddy was most crucial in bringing irrigation projects like Somasila, Gandipalem Rallapadu for the benefit farming community in the district. He said that he felt fortunate to unveil the statue of Anam Venkata Reddy, who had run diplomatic politics as NDCCB chairman and irrigation minister.
Endowments Minsiter Anam Ramanarayana Reddy said that he feels proud for belonging to Anam family, which has been in public service for the last four decades. He recalled that his father Anam Venkata Reddy had played crucial role in 'Jai Andhra Movement' to keep Andhra Pradesh united. 'My father was responsible for promoting several upcoming leaders occupied higher positions in politics,' he added. On this occasion, six vehicles were provided to six police stations in Atmakur constituency in the memory of Anam Venkata Reddy.
MLAs Kotamreddy Sridhar Reddy, Dagumati Venkatakrishna Reddy, Inturu Nageswara Rao, Kakarla Suresh, and Pasem Sunil Kumar, ZP chairperson Anam Arunamma, NDCCB chairman Metturu Dhanunjaya Reddy and others were present.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
4 days ago
- Hans India
Harish Rao is making false allegations, says Cong
Hyderabad: The Chairman of State Food Corporation MA Faheem accused BRS leader Harish Rao of making false allegations regarding the State government's handling of a fire accident at the Sigachi Industries Limited factory in Pashamylaram. He accused Harish Rao of playing politics over dead bodies. Speaking to media persons, he said that the government was doing its best to provide compensation to the families of those who died in the Sigachi industry fire. He explained that 46 families have been provided with compensation of Rs 1 lakh, while 15 people have received compensation of 10 lakh. The Food Corporation chairman said that as soon as the Sigachi incident happened, the authorities reached the scene. 'Health Minister Damodara Rajanarsimha and Medak In-charge Minister Vivek Venkat Swamy rushed to the scene. Harish Rao and KTR are speaking falsehoods about the government,' he said, accusing BRS leaders of spreading misinformation. 'I have collected the details of the compensation received by the victims from the district authorities. We gave 15 lakh each to the families of missing. People are being misled with false information. These leaders are trying to defame the present government,' he pointed out.
Mint
5 days ago
- Mint
India should take a cue from Vietnam, Japan and insist written statement before announcing US trade deal: GTRI
New Delhi [India], July 27 (ANI): Referring to purported differences in understanding of US trade agreements and their clauses with Vietnam and Japan, think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) suggested that India tread carefully as it negotiates its trade agreement with the US. GTRI, in a report released on Sunday, called for India to take a cue from the experiences of countries like Vietnam and Japan and insisted that India should ask for a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement. There appears to be a contradiction in the understanding of the recently agreed-upon trade deals between the US and Vietnam, as well as the US and Japan. Citing a Japanese government document released on July 25, GTRI asserted that it revealed significant discrepancies between Japan's understanding of a new trade deal with the US and how President Donald Trump had portrayed it. "To avoid similar misrepresentation, India must insist on a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement," GTRI suggested. Trump claimed on July 22 that the agreement secures massive Japanese investments, strong tariff protections, and guaranteed access for U.S. farm exports, including rice. However, Japan's official summary, published by its Cabinet Secretariat, describes a far more limited framework--still under negotiation and lacking binding commitments, according to GTRI analysis. Trump stated that Japan would invest USD 550 billion in the U.S., with 90 per cent of the profits remaining in America. But Japan's version tells a different story. It says the USD 550 billion includes a mix of equity, loans, and guarantees from state-backed institutions, not a lump-sum investment. Trump announced that Japan would significantly open its markets to US agricultural exports, including rice. However, according to a Japanese government document cited by GTRI, this limitation is restricted to procurement under its existing Minimum Access (MA) scheme, and only applies "depending on domestic demand and supply conditions." In effect, Japan reserves the right not to import US rice if there is no market need. Another area of divergence is found in automotive exports, as noted by GTRI. Trump claimed Japan would remove additional safety testing for US-made vehicles. Japan's document, according to GTRI, confirms that it will allow imports of American cars without additional testing, provided they meet Japanese road safety standards. "In other words, this is not a blanket exemption; US manufacturers must still comply with Japanese technical norms," GTRI inferred. (ANI)
Time of India
5 days ago
- Time of India
India should take a cue from Vietnam, Japan and insist written statement before announcing US trade deal: GTRI
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Referring to purported differences in understanding of US trade agreements and their clauses with Vietnam and Japan , think tank Global Trade Research Initiative GTRI ) suggested that India tread carefully as it negotiates its trade agreement with the in a report released on Sunday, called for India to take a cue from the experiences of countries like Vietnam and Japan and insisted that India should ask for a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any appears to be a contradiction in the understanding of the recently agreed-upon trade deals between the US and Vietnam, as well as the US and a Japanese government document released on July 25, GTRI asserted that it revealed significant discrepancies between Japan's understanding of a new trade deal with the US and how President Donald Trump had portrayed it."To avoid similar misrepresentation, India must insist on a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement," GTRI claimed on July 22 that the agreement secures massive Japanese investments, strong tariff protections, and guaranteed access for U.S. farm exports, including rice. However, Japan's official summary, published by its Cabinet Secretariat, describes a far more limited framework, still under negotiation and lacking binding commitments, according to GTRI stated that Japan would invest USD 550 billion in the U.S., with 90 per cent of the profits remaining in America. But Japan's version tells a different story. It says the USD 550 billion includes a mix of equity, loans, and guarantees from state-backed institutions, not a lump-sum announced that Japan would significantly open its markets to US agricultural exports, including according to a Japanese government document cited by GTRI, this limitation is restricted to procurement under its existing Minimum Access (MA) scheme, and only applies "depending on domestic demand and supply conditions."In effect, Japan reserves the right not to import US rice if there is no market area of divergence is found in automotive exports, as noted by claimed Japan would remove additional safety testing for US-made document, according to GTRI, confirms that it will allow imports of American cars without additional testing, provided they meet Japanese road safety standards."In other words, this is not a blanket exemption; US manufacturers must still comply with Japanese technical norms," GTRI inferred.
