
The desperate drive to secure passports for thousands of US-born Haitian kids – before it's too late
It's been just a few days since Kristi Noem, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, announced that Haitian nationals with temporary protected status (TPS) would face termination proceedings in a matter of months. By 2 September, they would be forced out of the US.
On 1 July, a federal judge in New York blocked the Department of Homeland Security's attempt to end TPS for Haitian nationals. However, that's done little to alleviate the growing sense of fear: in May the supreme court sided with the Trump administration in a similar case, lifting a ruling that had previously prevented 350,000 Venezuelans on TPS from being forced to leave the country.
From pew to pew inside the church, booklets containing advice to help prepare families for raids and immigration enforcement actions are passed around. Three immigration law advocates from a local firm are bombarded with questions such as what to do when in the presence of suspected Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) officers.
Among the group is a small number of charity volunteers working to avoid a potential humanitarian disaster: that thousands of US-born Haitian children could become stateless, or separated from their families.
'In the last several months we realized that the closer we got to the deportations and revocation of statuses meant that all these people who have babies … if they don't have passports for their children, how are they going to take them out of the country with them?' says Casey Rollins, a volunteer at the local St Vincent de Paul chapter.
'All you have to look at is the previous [Trump] administration.' A Reuters report from 2023 found that nearly 1,000 children separated from their parents at the US-Mexico border in 2017 and 2018 had never been reunited.
Springfield is home to about 1,217 and counting American-born Haitian children under the age of four, with several thousand more dependants under the age of 18. While the number of adults in the Ohio town of 60,000 people legally in the country on TPS is not known, local leaders estimate 10,000 to 15,000 Haitian nationals have come to Springfield, drawn by employment opportunities, since 2017. In April, data provided by the Springfield city school district to the Springfield News-Sun found that the district had 1,258 students enrolled as English language learners in K-12 schools, though that doesn't mean all are children of Haitian descent.
For three months, Rollins, volunteers at Springfield Neighbors United and others have been working with dozens of Haitians who turn up at charity organizations seeking advice and help every day. One of the most requested issues from parents, Rollins says, is figuring out how to apply for birth certificates for their children, before it's too late.
'If we can't stop the deportations, we want to help get them a passport. That way, if they are deported or go to Canada or another welcoming nation, they'd be able to take the child,' she says.
'If it takes three or four months [to complete the bureaucratic process from securing a birth certificate to acquiring a passport], we have got to get moving on this.'
With no prepared and notarized family plan or custodial arrangements in place, vulnerable children could be at risk of being placed in custody as dependants of the state and then being placed with foster families indefinitely. Adding further angst for Haitians is the supreme court's ruling on 27 June limiting injunctions nationwide against the Trump administration's efforts to end birthright citizenship.
The humanitarian and security situation in Haiti has been dire for more than a decade.
Due to the longstanding war-like conditions prevalent there, successive administrations had been extending TPS for Haitians in the US since 2010.
However, based on a recent review by US Citizenship and Immigration Services in consultation with the Department of State: 'The environmental situation in Haiti has improved enough that it is safe for Haitian citizens to return home,' a homeland security spokesperson claimed on 27 June, when the decision to end TPS for the more than 500,000 Haitian nationals in the US was announced.
That's despite the state department posting a 'Do not travel' status update for Haiti that has been in place since last year that finds: 'Since March 2024, Haiti has been under a State of Emergency. Crimes involving firearms are common in Haiti. They include robbery, carjackings, sexual assault, and kidnappings for ransom.'
Commercial flights to Haiti's main international airport in Port-au-Prince have been halted due to the adverse security situation. Members of the Haitian community in Springfield say that flying people to regional airports would leave them open to attacks.
'It's an illusion for people to say that Haiti is safe now. There's over a million Haitians internally displaced. People living in shelters without water and food. They've been displaced by the violence. Even the US embassy cannot operate properly,' says Viles Dorsainvil, the executive director of the Haitian Community Help & Support Center in Springfield.
'They are not here because they want to be here, but because the situation pushed them away. I don't understand why the Department of Homeland Security says the situation has improved. It's just not true.'
Experts say the likelihood of a repeat of the scenes that saw families pulled apart and children held in cages at the southern border, as happened during the first Trump administration, is low. However, the potential alternatives are not much more comforting.
'Haitians have entered lawfully. But if the administration follows through with its threats to put people who entered lawfully in expedited removal, that would subject many Haitians to mandatory detention,' says Katie Kersh, managing attorney for the non-profit Advocates for Basic Legal Equality.
'If they have US citizen children, that would result in separation, and I don't think that we are equipped to handle all of those children. We don't have many family detention facilities.'
In April, the Clark County Combined Health District estimated that approximately 10,000 Haitians were residing in Springfield. Prior reports suggested some Haitians had left the Ohio city for Canada and elsewhere following the election of Donald Trump in November. Last month, Springfield's Republican mayor, Rob Rue, lamented that Trump 'can't keep our city out of his mouth'.
The volunteers have only completed a handful of passport applications so far, having been awaiting the supreme court ruling on birthright citizenship on 27 June. But they are crippled by fear.
'It's a double-edged sword,' says Rollins of the effort they are trying to get going.
'If we do nothing, that's bad. But we are terrified that it could be shut down by the administration.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The other winner in New York's mayoral contest: ranked-choice voting
The polls did not look good for New York progressives this winter when the Working Families party began making its endorsements for city elections. An early February poll from Emerson College showed Andrew Cuomo with a 23-point lead in a hypothetical Democratic primary matchup. None of the four leading progressives even approached double-digit support – including the then unknown assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. He polled at 1%. In the days before ranked-choice voting, the Working Families party's endorsement process might have looked quite different. Like-minded candidates would have drawn sharp distinctions between each other. Party officials might have looked to nudge candidates toward the exits, behind closed doors. Before any votes had been cast in the primary, the party would consolidate behind just one choice. It would have been bloody and left a bitter taste for everyone. Instead, the opposite happened. Working Families, knowing that majorities rule and that no one can spoil a ranked-choice race, endorsed four candidates. Instead of a single endorsement that served as a kiss of death for other progressives, they backed a slate, allowing voters time to tune in and for candidates to make their pitches. Now Mamdani is the Democratic nominee and the overwhelming favorite to go from 1% all the way to Gracie Mansion. There are many reasons why this 33-year-old pulled off a seemingly unthinkable upset and soared from obscurity to the most talked about Democrat in the nation overnight. He energized young people, reached voters where they are on social media and built an unstoppable coalition. He and his volunteers talked to everyone, everywhere. Ranked-choice voting (RCV) encouraged and incentivized that joyous, barnstorming approach. And while Mamdani ultimately would have won a plurality contest or a ranked-choice one, his super-long-shot candidacy might have been squelched at the very beginning under the old system with its different electoral incentives. His victory shows how much more real power voters have under ranked-choice voting. To be clear: RCV is a party-neutral and candidate-neutral tool. Its job is to produce a majority winner with the widest and deepest support from any field of more than two candidates. It puts an end to spoilers and to the impossible, wish-and-a-prayer calculation that voters otherwise have to make when faced with multiple candidates, some of whom they really like and some of whom they do not. Liberals, conservatives, independents and moderates have run and won under RCV, from coast to coast. But while RCV might be strictly non-partisan, it is decidedly pro-voter – and almost always produces a more positive, issue-focused campaign that looks to drive up turnout and appeal to as many people as possible. A ranked-choice campaign rewards engagement and encourages coalitions; it's a race where instead of tearing down opponents, candidates point out areas of agreement and ask to be a voter's second choice. Voters love RCV and find it easy to use. According to a new SurveyUSA poll of New York voters, 96% said their ballot was easy to fill out. More than three-quarters of voters want to keep or expand RCV. And 82% said they had taken advantage of RCV and ranked at least two candidates. (These numbers are similar across RCV elections, and a powerful rejoinder to critics who insist, despite evidence to the contrary, that it's too confusing.) A remarkable number of New Yorkers saw first-hand how RCV makes our votes more powerful – they had the freedom to express themselves and rank a long-shot first, but still had their vote count for either Mamdani or Cuomo in the ranked choice tally. Perhaps the high marks are of little surprise: voters received a campaign unlike most any other. The tone remained positive and issue-based. Instead of cutting each other down, candidates lifted each other up: Mamdani and Brad Lander cross-endorsed each other, cutting joint ads, riding bicycles together to shared events, sharing the couch on Stephen Colbert, and even sharing a stage at Mamdani's victory party. Jessica Ramos and Whitney Tilson endorsed Cuomo and said that they would rank him second. Mamdani helped Adrienne Adams with fundraising. Sign up to Fighting Back Big thinkers on what we can do to protect civil liberties and fundamental freedoms in a Trump presidency. From our opinion desk. after newsletter promotion Voters always say that they want more choice at the polls, candidates who engage with them, and a genuine, issue-based campaign. They got exactly that in New York City because of ranked choice. And the historic turnout levels – more than 1 million New Yorkers cast ballots, the highest number since the 1980s – shows that when voters get that kind of elevated, engaging campaign, they show up and get involved. When voters have the opportunity to consider new candidates campaigning in creative new ways, the frontrunner with the early name recognition and largest donors can be eclipsed by a newcomer who started at 1%. And instead of going scorched-earth on each other before the general election, even some of the 'losers' seem to have had their status elevated: Lander finished third, and instead of being an asterisk, he has now expanded his base and likability for a future campaign. The majority winner in this race was Zohran Mamdani. But it's also easy to suggest the real winner might be ranked-choice voting. In a moment when so many of our elections are fraught and polarized, all of us looking for a more unified and hopeful path forward – the 'politics of the future', as Mamdani called it when he declared victory – should take a close look at what just happened in New York as proof that stronger elections are truly possible. Outside of Washington, cities and states are becoming laboratories of democracy once again. New York's adoption of ranked-choice voting led to just the kind of campaign our politics so desperately needs: a giant field of candidates presenting their vision of the future, building coalitions, without any time squandered on 'spoilers' or anyone pushed to drop out and consolidate early. In Portland, Oregon, meanwhile, voters modernized government and moved to proportional representation to elect the city council, broadening representation to groups and neighborhoods that have never before had a seat at the table. When voters make these changes, they like them, defend them, and expand them, as we have seen in New York, Maine and Alaska. And it won't take long for people to ask why they can't have ranked choice and proportionality in all their elections. David Daley is the author of Antidemocratic: Inside the Right's 50-Year Plot to Control American Elections as well as Ratf**ked: Why Your Vote Doesn't Count
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump scorches Elon Musk's plans for a third party: ‘TRAIN WRECK'
President Donald Trump delivered a brutal takedown of Elon Musk 's plans to launch a third party Sunday evening - calling his former ally a 'train wreck.' In a lengthy Truth Social tirade, Trump said Musk has gone 'off the rails' in recent weeks, and repeated his theory that the tech mogul's problem with the sweeping tax bill signed into law on Friday was its elimination of incentives for electric vehicles. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks,' Trump wrote. 'He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States – The System seems not designed for them,' he added. 'The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds!' Trump first addressed Musk's plans for the new-found 'America Party' during a press gaggle Sunday afternoon before he boarded Air Force One. 'I think it's ridiculous to start a third party,' Trump said, adding later: 'So he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
How Trump's tariff chaos is reshaping Asia's businesses
Tan Yew Kong, who works at one of the world's largest chipmakers, says his company is like a tailor's shop - it customises chips to meet client's needs."We provide the fabric, we provide the cufflinks and everything. You tell us what you like, what design you like and we make it for you," says Mr Tan, who runs GlobalFoundries' operations in Singapore. Nowadays, the firm is also customising its future to accommodate US President Donald Trump's unpredictable tariff policy. Businesses and countries have been offering to appease Washington ahead of 9 July, when the 90-day pause on Trump's steep "Liberation Day" tariffs ends. And yet again, it's unclear what happens president said on Friday that the US government is to start sending out letters with details of higher tariff rates that will take effect on 1 August. He said as many as 12 letters will be sent out over the coming days and the levies will range from "60% or 70% tariffs to 10 to 20% tariffs" but did not name the countries due to receive far, semiconductors are exempt from tariffs but Trump has threatened levies on them several times, and that uncertainty is making it near impossible for businesses to plan for the future. Also last week Bloomberg reported the White House is planning to further tighten controls over artificial intelligence (AI) chips by restricting shipments to Malaysia and Thailand to crack down on suspected smuggling of the technology to US Commerce Department did not immediately respond to a BBC request for cannot "flip the switch every other alternate week or day. That makes it very difficult for businesses to plan long term", Mr Tan GlobalFoundries is contracted by some of the world's biggest semiconductor designers and manufacturers - AMD, Broadcom, Qualcomm - to make their chips. Its factories are spread across the world, with many in Asia, from India to South Korea. It recently announced plans to increase its investments to $16bn (£11.7bn) as demand for artificial intelligence (AI) hardware skyrockets. To protect that sprawling footprint, the company has also pledged to work with the Trump administration to move parts of its chip manufacturing and supply chain to US manufacturers, textile producers and car industry suppliers - whose tightly-knit supply chains run through Asia - are rushing to fulfil orders, cut costs and find new customers as they navigate a market in turmoil."Businesses need to rethink buffers, increasing their inventory and lead times to account for volatility," said Aparna Bharadwaj of Boston Consulting Group. She adds this could create new opportunities, but also impact their competitiveness and market share in certain countries. In other words, it's hard to say. "Uncertainty is the new normal." Winners and losers When Trump announced levies in April against much of the world, some of the steepest rates were aimed at Asian economies - from long-time allies Japan (24%) and South Korea (25%) to major trading partner Vietnam (46%). He then hit pause soon after, lowering tariffs on most countries to 10% for the next 90 days. Still the higher rates could return as early as Wednesday. Malaysia's prime minister has said tariffs will adversely affect many industries, including textiles, furniture, rubber and plastics. Singapore will be subject to a 10% levy despite having a free trade deal with the US - the prime minister said these are "not actions one does to a friend".South East Asian countries accounted for 7.2% of global GDP in 2024. So the extra costs that come with tariffs could have severe, long-lasting the region only Vietnam has managed to strike a deal so far - US imports from there will now face 20% tariffs, while US exports to Hanoi will face no levies. Japan and South Korea have been pursuing trade negotiations during the pause, although Trump has threatened Tokyo with an even higher rate - up to 35% - as the deadline looms. Japanese car makers could be amongst the worst hit. Companies including Mazda have said they are in survival mode because of the time and lengthy processes involved in changing suppliers and adapting their despite being a key security ally and importing more US goods than it exports, has said it has been telling Washington the rate on it "should be zero". Indonesia and Thailand have offered to buy more American products and reduce taxes on US countries like Cambodia, which have limited bargaining power, face a staggering 49% tariff but cannot afford to buy more US goods."Asian economies are reliant on both China and the US... they sort of sit at the heart of the global supply chain," said Pushan Dutt, professor of economics and political science at INSEAD. "If there are shifts in this global supply chain, if there are shifts in trading patterns, it is going to be much more difficult for them." He adds that countries with big domestic demand like India may be insulated from trade shocks, but economies that are more reliant on exports - like Singapore, Vietnam and even China - will see a major impact. A new world order? In the years after Trump was first elected, Singapore and Malaysia invested in growth industries like chip manufacturing and data was partly about so-called friend-shoring – where companies make goods in countries that have good relations with the US. Asian economies also benefited from a "China + 1" supply chain strategy, which involved firms diversifying supply chains beyond China and Taiwan to South East Asian of this was to be able to continue reaching the US, which Ms Bharadwaj says is "a critical market for many". "No matter what happens with tariffs, the US remains an important customer for many Asian businesses," she adds. "It's the largest world economy and has a dynamic consumer base." Beyond the South East Asian producers, Trump's tariffs also raise costs for American companies that have been operating in the region for decades. The clothing and footwear industry stands to suffer - brands like Nike have long outsourced manufacturing to countries like Vietnam and US brands have already said they'll need to pass costs onto customers because tariffs make the price of imported goods significantly say foreign investments could shift from Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia to countries with lower tariffs, like the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia and may also look for new customers - with the European Union, the Middle East and Latin America emerging as alternative markets."We are no longer doing globalisation but more of a regionalisation," said Mr Tan of GlobalFoundries. "Find a place that we feel safe. We feel that the supply will be continued. And people will have to get used to the fact that it is not as cheap as it used to be."Just as Asia's trade alliances shift, the US has emerged as an increasingly unreliable partner. "This has actually created a massive opportunity for China to become, sort of, guardian of the world trading order," Prof Dutt US-Vietnam deal is only the third announced so far, after agreements with the UK and China. Until more happen, businesses and economies in Asia may have to forge a new path."As the US and others embrace increased protectionism, Asia is moving in the opposite direction, as pro-business governments are increasing trade openness," Ms Bharadwaj says."Tariffs are accelerating two macro trends: slowing of trade between China and the West, and accelerating trade between China... and emerging Asian countries." Trump's policies have created trade turmoil that could transform the global economic order, and the US may not necessarily come out as the Dutt sums up what is happening in the words of an old proverb: "Bow to the ruler, and then go your own way."