logo
It's (still) a no-hire/no-fire job market

It's (still) a no-hire/no-fire job market

Axios2 days ago
If you look only at how many Americans are losing their jobs, this appears to be a pretty terrific labor market.
If you look only at how many are being hired for new jobs, it is the weakest in years.
Why it matters: It makes for a labor market in which those who have a job are able to hold onto it — but the outlook for new entrants to the workforce, or those unhappy with their current positions, is much gloomier.
It is a likely factor, for example, in a sky-high unemployment rate among recent college graduates, which has spiked far above the rates for other workers.
Driving the news: New Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey data out Tuesday morning tells the tale. The number of layoffs fell by 188,000 in May, dropping to a rate only a tick above its multidecade lows.
But the number of people hired into new jobs also fell by 112,000, to a rate significantly below its pre-pandemic levels.
Separately, the Institute for Supply Management said Tuesday morning that manufacturing activity remained in contraction territory in June, adding that "managing head count is still the norm, as opposed to hiring."
State of play: Similarly, if you look solely at initial jobless claims — the number of people who have lost their jobs and therefore file for unemployment benefits — everything looks good.
But the number of continuing claims — people receiving ongoing benefits — has been gradually rising since 2022.
There have been an average of 1.94 million continuing claims for the last four weeks, well above the 1.6 million trend in 2019.
Between the lines: That suggests that while not many people are losing their jobs involuntarily, those who do are finding themselves on the jobless rolls for longer, as employers are reluctant to hire.
What they're saying: "With employers in a holding pattern, job seekers are left in the lurch," NerdWallet senior economist Elizabeth Renter wrote in a note. "It certainly isn't a labor market friendly to the unemployed, even if it remains on solid footing."
"Ultimately, employers are reluctant to make decisions they have to unwind later," Renter added.
Of note: Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell described this as "a more concerning thing" in his news conference last month — even as he and his colleagues view the labor market as being in basically sound shape.
He noted that "there's not a lot of layoffs, but there's not a lot of job creation. ... If you're out of work, it's hard to find a job."
"So that's an equilibrium we watch very, very carefully, because if there were to be significant layoffs and the job finding rate were to remain this low ... you would have an increase in unemployment fairly quickly."
Reality check: There could be better news on the horizon. The number of job openings spiked by 374,000 in May, perhaps reflecting business confidence rebounding after trade war de-escalation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stock Futures Steady Ahead of Key Jobs Report
Stock Futures Steady Ahead of Key Jobs Report

Business Insider

time35 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Stock Futures Steady Ahead of Key Jobs Report

U.S. stock futures were near the flatline on Wednesday evening as investors eagerly awaited the June jobs report, due tomorrow. This key report is expected to offer insights into the labor market's health and its potential impact on the Federal Reserve's policy decisions. Futures on the Nasdaq 100 (NDX), the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), and the S&P 500 (SPX) were up 0.01%, 0.06%, and 0.02%, respectively, at 8:09 p.m. EDT on July 2. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Earlier on Wednesday, the S&P 500 climbed 0.47% to close at a new record high, also reaching a fresh intraday peak. Also, the Nasdaq Composite surged 0.94% to a record close. However, the Dow Jones was down 0.02%. Market sentiment was lifted by President Donald Trump's announcement on Truth Social about a trade agreement with Vietnam. This positive news partially offset the impact of a disappointing report from ADP (ADP), which indicated a decrease of 33,000 private-sector jobs last month.

Why hosting a July Fourth pool party may cost less this year
Why hosting a July Fourth pool party may cost less this year

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Why hosting a July Fourth pool party may cost less this year

NEW YORK (AP) — Americans have one more reason to celebrate this Fourth of July: getting all the gear needed to host a pool party costs less than it has in years, according to a market research company's preliminary data. The total price to buy beach towels, a beverage cooler, bathing suits and other accountrements of summer fun averaged $858 in June, the lowest amount for the month since 2020, consumer data provider Numerator said in an analysis prepared for The Associated Press. The finding from the firm's seasonal snapshot comports with broader economic measures indicating that U.S. consumers so far have not seen major impacts from President Donald Trump's vigorous application of tariffs on foreign goods. Numerator tracks U.S. retail prices through sales receipts, online account activity and other information from a panel of 200,000 shoppers. To see how prices are shaping up for the summer, the company looked at the average purchase price for 16 seasonal items typically made in China. Along with four towels, a cooler and bathing suits for two adults and a toddler, the hypothetical shopping list for a poolside gathering included a grill, four patio chairs, four cushions, a patio umbrella and four outdoor pillows. Recreation supplies included a cornhole set, two pairs of swim goggles, a set of diving rings, two beach balls and two pool floats or noodles. Leo Feler, Numerator's chief economist, offered a few theories for why buying all that stuff cost 11% less last month than it did in June 2023, when the average cost reached a high of $966, and 8.4% less than it did in June 2024. Wholesale suppliers and retailers that order from Chinese manufacturers may have imported too much stock while trying to stay ahead of high tariff bills, Feler said. As declining consumer confidence measures pointed to the possibility of weak sales, those businesses might have offered early discounts rather than risking their merchandise going unsold, he said. Given wide swings in Trump's trade posture toward China, retail vendors may have decided to absorb any initial tariff costs instead of trying to figure out how much more to charge their business customers, Feler said. The tariff rate on Chinese products soared to 145% in April before China and the U.S. reached a deal last month that brought the overall rate down to 55%. Suppliers often work on six-month contracts that are signed in January or February and again in June or July. That means many contracts for patio tables and chairs, for example, were signed before the White House included metal furniture in the aluminum or steel products that would be subject to a 25% tariff that went up to 50% last month. Customers who want to buy a new set of beach towels or to replace an old cooler still might want to hold off until August since prices will get lower in late summer, Feler said. But waiting until next year may prove costly, if the tariffs on products from China remain in place, he said. Just because preparing for a backyard bash might be comparatively less expensive right now, many economists and retail industry analysts still expect consumers to feel the weight of Trump's favorite trade negotiation tool. Shoppers are likely to see higher prices for back-to-school items starting in July and August, according to Feler. 'It wasn't like there was a sudden surge," Feler said. "It was a few prices increased here, then a few more prices, and a few other prices, and a couple more prices. And it started gaining speed.'

Fannie, Freddie overseer wages online war against Fed chief
Fannie, Freddie overseer wages online war against Fed chief

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Fannie, Freddie overseer wages online war against Fed chief

The overseer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is waging an online battle to force out Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Over the span of 24 hours, Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte has written or shared more than a dozen posts on social media calling for Powell's resignation and sharing the rationale for doing so, throwing his politically independent agency into a partisan battle. 'I am calling for Federal Reserve Chairman, Jay Powell, to resign,' Pulte wrote in a Thursday post on social platform X, which he pinned to the top of his profile. In another post in response to The Hill's reporting, Pulte said he was doing so '[b]ecause he is hurting Americans and hurting the mortgage market, which I am responsible for regulating.' The campaign against Powell began shortly before the Fed announced Wednesday, as was widely expected, it would keep interest rates unchanged for another month. President Trump has raged against Powell and the Fed for not cutting interest rates by levels only seen during economic crises, even though the unemployment rate remains close to historic lows. Several of Pulte's posts featured criticism of Powell from Trump, who has spent most of his time in the White House berating and threatening his hand-picked Fed chief. Trump and Pulte both claim the Fed is hurting the U.S. economy by keeping its baseline interest rate at a moderate level of 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent. Pulte has specifically pointed to slowness in the housing market, where average 30-year fixed mortgage rates are close to 7 percent. 'As Chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, I can tell you that Jay Powell is hurting the housing market by being Too Late to lower rates. He needs to resign, effective immediately,' Pulte wrote Wednesday. Powell, however, is just one of 12 Fed officials who decide where to set rates. All 12 of those officials, including several Trump appointees, voted unanimously Wednesday to keep rates steady. The Fed is also bound under federal law to use interest rates to balance unemployment and inflation — not to kickstart any one sector of the economy. The central bank typically does this by cutting interest rates to a level meant to stimulate the economy or raising them to cool it off. Fed officials and experts refer to the central bank's charge as its 'dual mandate.' While federal law does give the Fed responsibility to maintain moderate interest rates, cutting rates only to spur the housing market could risk a spike in inflation and violate the dual mandate. Powell said Wednesday he and his Fed colleagues prefer to keep interest rates unchanged as the economy holds sturdy in the face of major policy changes. 'It takes some time for tariffs to work their way through the chain of distribution to the end consumer,' Powell said at a press conference Wednesday. 'We're beginning to see some effects, and we do expect to see more of them over coming months.' He added that the Fed feels comfortable with its current interest rate level as it waits to see the impact of Trump's tariffs. 'What we're waiting for, to reduce rates, is to understand what will happen with the tariff inflation. There's a lot of uncertainty about that,' Powell said. 'Someone has to pay the tariffs … between the manufacturer, the exporter, the importer, the retailer, ultimately somebody putting it into a good of some kind — or just the consumer buying it.' While Powell has faced plenty of political pressure from Trump since taking over as Fed chief in 2018, the attacks from another independent financial regulator are a stunning escalation. Pulte is responsible for overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — two companies under federal conservatorship that package U.S. mortgages into investment products. Both companies have been under control of the federal government and housed under the FHFA since the collapse of the housing market during the 2007-08 financial crisis. Both the Fed and FHFA are independent federal agencies charged with overseeing critically important parts of the U.S. financial system. Congress designed those agencies to be immune from the political pressures exhibited by both Trump and Pulte. Powell, as he has for years, shot down questions Wednesday about Trump's criticism and has insisted he will not leave the Fed before the end of his term. While Powell's term as chair ends in 2026, he could stay on the Fed board as a governor through 2028 if he so chooses. Updated at 4:53 p.m. EDT. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store