White House branded 'disgusting' for using Jet2 holiday sound in ICE video
A Jet2 voiceover for a holiday advert has been used by the White House to mock migrants being deported from the United States.
Footage was shown of handcuffed people being taken by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials onto a GlobalX flight - an airline provider used by the American authorities. And along with a familiar jig for British viewers of a Jet2 advert, the post is captioned: 'When ICE books you a one-way Jet2 holiday to deportation. Nothing beats it!' It was immediately blasted as 'disgusting' by social media users and is just the latest provocative social media post by the Trump administration.
The video showed migrants in shackles making their way onto deportation flights and while the faces of the ICE agents were blurred out, those of the immigrants, many of whom looked dejectedly at the ground, were clear. The cameraperson even worked to get their faces in the shots. It comes after Donald Trump was seen with a mystery mark in Scotland after his chronic health diagnosis.
READ MORE Donald Trump was seen with a mystery mark in Scotland after his chronic health diagnosis
"Our country is an embarrassment posting s*** like this," one social media user wrote. "There is no bigger a****** on this site than this account," another added.
'Further proof that the world ended and we're just living in a simulation. The ACTUAL White House account hopping on the Jet2 trend to poke fun at deportees is mind blowing,' read a further comment.
And another followed: 'The White House make me sick using the Jet2 sound for an ICE deportation video. How can any decent human being support this?'
One person simply wrote, "Disgusting," while another agreed: "You'd have to be a complete moron to find this acceptable on an official WH account. Just another reason why MAGA isn't credible."
Another appeared to support President Donald Trump's efforts to deport undocumented immigrants, but they slammed the way he promoted his policies. "This is shameful," that user wrote. "Enforce the law, don't flaunt misery in our faces like it is some accomplishment. Have some respect and human decency ffs."
Trump recently signed into law his flagship "big, beautiful bill," which includes a provision that sets aside $170 billion for border and immigration enforcement - including $45 billion (£33.9 billion) for detention.
The number of illegal border crossings into the US has plunged, however. ICE is expected to see its budget grow by $76.5 billion (£57.6 billion) over the next five years, which is nearly 10 times its current annual budget. Trump vowed to deport millions of immigrants living in the US illegally, but his efforts have been slower than he seems to want.
The Jet2 holiday advert is from 2022 and it features Jess Glynne's 2015 single, Hold My Hand, as well as a voice-over by actress Zoe Lister. "Nothing beats a Jet2 holiday!" she cheerily says in the clip before going on to detail the benefits of the particular package the clip is advertising.
And Jess Glynne herself was quick to blast the latest use of her song on Instagram: 'This post honestly makes me sick. My music is about love, unity, and spreading positivity - never about division or hate." While Zoe Lister asked her followers on her story, 'What can be done about the White House using Jet2's sound and my voiceover to promote their nasty agenda?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
26 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Russia says it will no longer abide by self-imposed missile moratorium
It is a warning that potentially sets the stage for a new arms race as tensions between Moscow and Washington rise again over Ukraine. In a statement on Monday, the Russian Foreign Ministry linked the decision to efforts by the US and its allies to develop intermediate-range weapons and preparations for their deployment in Europe and other parts of the world. It specifically cited US plans to deploy Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting next year. The ministry noted that such actions by the US and its allies create 'destabilising missile potentials' near Russia, creating a 'direct threat to the security of our country' and carry 'significant harmful consequences for regional and global stability, including a dangerous escalation of tensions between nuclear powers'. It did not say what specific moves the Kremlin might take, but President Vladimir Putin has previously announced that Moscow was planning to deploy its new Oreshnik missiles on the territory of its neighbour and ally Belarus later this year. 'Decisions on specific parameters of response measures will be made by the leadership of the Russian Federation based on an interdepartmental analysis of the scale of deployment of American and other Western land-based intermediate-range missiles, as well as the development of the overall situation in the area of international security and strategic stability,' the Foreign Ministry said. The Russian statement follows US President Donald Trump's announcement on Friday that he is ordering the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of Dmitry Medvedev, who was president in 2008-12 to allow Mr Putin, bound by term limits, to later return to the office. Mr Trump's statement came as his deadline for the Kremlin to reach a peace deal in Ukraine approaches later this week. Mr Trump said he was alarmed by Mr Medvedev's attitude. Mr Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council chaired by Mr Putin, has apparently sought to curry favour with his mentor by making provocative statements and frequently lobbing nuclear threats. Last week he responded to Mr Trump's deadline for Russia to accept a peace deal in Ukraine or face sanctions by warning him against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' and declaring that 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step toward war'. Mr Medvedev also commented on the Foreign Ministry's statement, describing Moscow's withdrawal from the moratorium as 'the result of Nato countries' anti-Russian policy'. 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with,' he wrote on X. 'Expect further steps.' Intermediate-range missiles can fly between 500 to 5,500 kilometres (310 to 3,400 miles). Such land-based weapons were banned under the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Washington and Moscow abandoned the pact in 2019, accusing each other of violations, but Moscow declared its self-imposed moratorium on their deployment until the US makes such a move. The collapse of the INF Treaty has stoked fears of a replay of a Cold War-era European missile crisis, when the US and the Soviet Union both deployed intermediate-range missiles on the continent in the 1980s. Such weapons are seen as particularly destabilising because they take less time to reach targets, compared with intercontinental ballistic missiles, leaving no time for decision-makers and raising the likelihood of a global nuclear conflict over a false launch warning. Russia's missile forces chief has declared that the new Oreshnik intermediate-range missile, which Russia first used against Ukraine in November, has a range to reach all of Europe. Oreshnik can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Mr Putin has praised the Oreshnik's capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds up to Mach 10 are immune to being intercepted and are so powerful that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. Mr Putin has warned the West that Moscow could use it against Ukraine's Nato allies who allowed Kyiv to use their longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump to sign order punishing banks that discriminate against conservatives: report
President Donald Trump is set to crack down on Wall Street banks accused of dropping customers over their conservative beliefs and shutting out cryptocurrency companies, a new report states. Trump, the self-professed first ' crypto-president,' is expected to sign an executive order as soon as this week that threatens financial penalties in response to so-called politically motivated 'debanking,' sources told the Wall Street Journal. A draft of the order viewed by the Journal directs bank regulators to investigate whether financial institutions have violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, a federal law that bars discrimination in access to credit. Investigators are reportedly also directed to look into whether antitrust or consumer financial protection laws have been breached. In some cases, the newspaper said, violations are to be reported by regulators to the attorney general, according to the order. The draft is said to urge regulators to strike any policies that might have contributed to banks dropping certain customers. The Small Business Administration is directed to review bank practices that guarantee the agency's loans. The directive also criticizes the role that some banks played in an investigation into the riots at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021, according to the newspaper. The draft reportedly states that violating lenders could be slapped with fines and consent decrees, among other disciplinary measures. While the order doesn't explicitly name any offenders, the Journal said it appears to refer to an instance where a Christian organization operating in Uganda had its accounts shut down by the Bank of America, citing religious beliefs. The bank contested that it does not serve small businesses operating outside the U.S. Conservatives have long accused banks of denying them services on the grounds of their political or religious beliefs. In January, Trump said the CEOs Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase – Brian Moynihan and Jamie Dimon respectively – did not provide banking services to conservatives. While speaking to Fox Business last week, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott pointed fingers at regulators for shutting down bank accounts of Americans they 'just don't like.' Regulators operate under an 'alphabet soup' of federal agencies, sources told the news station, while Scott called the situation in D.C. a 'financial swamp.' Meanwhile, crypto firms have repeatedly complained they were denied access to banking services while former President Joe Biden was in office. Financial institutions have cited legal, regulatory and financial risks and blamed pressure from regulators for their previous decisions to largely avoid the cryptocurrency industry. A Bank of America spokesperson on Monday welcomed efforts to provide regulatory clarity. They told the Journal that the bank is committed to working with the Trump administration and supporting Congress to 'improve the regulatory framework.' In late April, the Justice Department said it was launching a task force in Virginia to 'combat illegal debanking.' The task force was set to review allegations of banks refusing customers access to credit or other services based on 'impermissible factors.'
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US environmental agency freezing $3bn in climate funds is ‘capricious', court to hear
The Trump administration's decision to abruptly terminate a $3bn program helping hundreds of communities prepare for climate disasters and environmental hazards is unconstitutional and should be overturned, a court will hear on Tuesday. A coalition of non-profits, tribes and local governments is suing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the agency's administrator Lee Zeldin for terminating the entire Environmental and Climate Justice (ECJ) block grant program – despite a legally binding mandate from Congress to fund the Biden-era initiative. It's the first-of-a-kind proposed class action lawsuit that would force the EPA and Zeldin to reinstate the program and each individual grant, rather than forcing the recipients to sue individually. The $3bn ECJ program was created by Congress through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) – a long standing source for ire for Trump and his polluting industry allies – to help historically disadvantaged communities come up with local solutions to improve resilience in the face of worsening climate shocks and environmental degradation. It was intended by Congress to fund community-based projects across the country to tackle longstanding and pressing environmental harms that cause death and ill health from hazards including industrial pollution, lead pipes, flooding and urban heat islands. Almost 350 rural and urban groups, towns and tribes were selected by the EPA from 2,700 applicants, through a rigorous process that included longterm accountability and oversight over the funds. In February, Zeldin's EPA, under the direction of the Trump administration, began terminating the entire ECJ program, as part of a broader assault on climate science, climate action and environmental justice measures. In June, 23 grant recipients sued after the entire block grant was terminated and the funds frozen overnight. The plaintiffs come from every region of the country and include the Indigenous village of Pipnuk in Alaska, the Deep South Centre for Environmental Justice in New Orleans, Appalachian Voices which works with legacy coal communities and Kalamazoo county in Michigan. Several non-profit legal advocacy groups – EarthJustice, Southern Environmental Law Center, Public Rights Project and Lawyers for Good Government – filed the proposed class action lawsuit alleging that the wholesale termination violated the separation of powers and is therefore unconstitutional. They also argue that the Trump administration's decision was both 'arbitrary and capricious' – in other words, made without proper reasoning or consideration of the consequences, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. On Tuesday, attorneys representing the coalition will argue for preliminary relief at the US district court for the District of Columbia (DDC), to force the EPA to immediately reinstate the ECJ program and unfreeze the funds. 'This was an unlawful action that went against the will of Congress and violated the separation of powers,' said , senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center. 'The administration terminated the entire program simply because they don't like it, without any reasoned decision making or consideration of the impacts. The decision was both arbitrary and capricious, and unconstitutional, and should be overturned.' The Trump administration has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the DDC does not have jurisdiction, and this is a contractural case for the US court of federal claims. Under contract law, the 349 grant recipients would be forced to sue individually for breach of contract and damages, but with no possibility of the ECJ program being reinstated as Congress intended. A ruling on if and where the case continues is expected later this month. The judge will rule separately on the plaintiffs' motion for the case to proceed as a class action. The EPA said it did not comment on pending litigation.
