Raymond H Seagers Jr. Raymond (Ray) Seagers Jr. passed away
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tucker Carlson claims Jeffrey Epstein worked for Israel to blackmail US officials: ‘Every single person in DC thinks that'
Tucker Carlson has claimed that deceased child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was working for the Israeli government and that 'every single person in Washington D.C.' thinks the same. 'I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel. But no one feels they can say that,' the former Fox News host told an audience in Florida on Friday. Carlson also suggested that the disgraced financier may have been running 'a blackmail operation' as he discussed new information recently released by the Department of Justice. A two-page memo from the DOJ and FBI said that Epstein had no 'client list,' and that the convicted pedophile died by suicide in his jail cell in 2019, shortly before going to trial – angering some among the MAGA faithful. Speaking about the development at a Turning Point USA summit in Tampa, Carlson slammed the findings of the administration.'The real question is, why was he doing this, on whose behalf, and where did the money come from?' he said. 'I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask, on whose behalf was he working? 'Now, no one's allowed to say that the foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed into thinking that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that, Carlson said. 'There's nothing anti-Semitic about saying that. There's nothing even anti-Israel about saying that. 'And you have the right to expect your government will not act against your interests, and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interests.' Carlson has become one of the the big names on the list of MAGA luminaries who are irate over the DOJ's conclusions and previously insisted there was an 'obvious' reason why Attorney General Pam Bondi was 'covering up' the 'client list.' In addition, footage capturing Epstein's final hours – also released by the DOJ – has fuelled further conspiracy theories, after it appeared to have a minute of footage missing. A digital clock visible on the bottom left corner of the footage jumps from 11:58:58 p.m. to 12:00:00 a.m. Officials have not yet offered an explanation for the time gap to The Independent or the New York Times.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why NuScale Power Stock Soared 120.6% Higher in the First Half of 2025
Shares of small modular reactor developer NuScale Power skyrocketed in 2024 and continued soaring in the first half of 2025. President Trump's executive orders addressing advancement of the nuclear energy industry represented the primary catalyst for the stock's rise. There are still considerable risks with an unprofitable company like NuScale Power, so investors looking to mitigate risk may prefer a nuclear energy ETF. 10 stocks we like better than NuScale Power › To the chagrin of investors, NuScale Power (NYSE: SMR) stock dipped lower more than 7% through the first four months of 2025, giving back a bit of the whopping 445% gain that it had logged in 2024. But then May rolled around. Thanks to President Trump's enthusiastic support of the nuclear energy industry, shares of small modular reactor (SMR) developer NuScale Power ripped higher and extended their gain in June. All in all, NuScale Power stock soared 120.6% through the first six months of 2025, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence. The lack of President Trump's enthusiasm for clean energy-affiliated business from electric cars to wind power has been clear for some time. What became glaringly apparent in late May, however, was his affinity for nuclear energy. On May 23, President Trump issued executive orders meant to spur advancement of the nation's nuclear energy industry -- and NuScale Power investors were paying attention. Providing a plan for modernizing the country's nuclear energy reactors, Trump's executive orders address several areas of the industry. For one, the orders are meant to expedite the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's process for licensing new reactors. Plus, the orders seek to reduce the time it takes to test advanced reactors -- something of particular note for NuScale Power, which is working toward commercial deployment of its SMR NuScale Power Module. Particularly noteworthy in the executive orders is President Trump's direction to the Department of Energy to recognize artificial intelligence (AI) data centers as "critical defense facilities." In concert with this, the orders direct the secretary of energy to use "all available legal authorities to site, approve, and authorize deployment of advanced reactors to power them." With AI companies making hefty investments in developing data center infrastructure, the opportunities for SMR developers like NuScale Power are ample. While the executive orders represented the major catalyst behind the stock's rise in the first half of the year, that's not to say that there was nothing in June that stoked investors' excitement. On June 5, John Hopkins, the company's CEO, revealed in a discussion with Axios Pro that NuScale Power is communicating with several "tier 1" hyperscalers that are interested in purchasing power from the company. In light of NuScale Power stock's climb in 2024 and through the last six months, it seems reasonable to expect that shares will pull back at some point. Growth stocks like NuScale Power often demonstrate considerable volatility in the early innings of their development. For those uncomfortable with enduring the stock's potential vicissitudes and the inherent risks associated with a company that's not yet profitable, it may be more prudent to consider a nuclear energy-focused exchange-traded fund (ETF) at this point. Before you buy stock in NuScale Power, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and NuScale Power wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,432!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,005,854!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Scott Levine has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends NuScale Power. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why NuScale Power Stock Soared 120.6% Higher in the First Half of 2025 was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
How Watch Duty became a go-to app during natural disasters
During January's unprecedented wildfires in Los Angeles, Watch Duty—a digital platform providing real-time fire data—became the go-to app for tracking the unfolding disaster and is credited with saving countless lives. Six months out from the fires, Watch Duty's founder and CEO, John Mills, shares how his small nonprofit responded in the heat of the crisis and became a trusted source—even for government agencies. As wildfire season rages on and Texas recovers from devastating floods, Watch Duty's story underscores both our growing vulnerability to natural disasters driven by climate change and the power of community-based solutions to keep us safe and connected when it matters most. This is an abridged transcript of an interview from Rapid Response, hosted by Robert Safian, former editor-in-chief of Fast Company. From the team behind the Masters of Scale podcast, Rapid Response features candid conversations with today's top business leaders navigating real-time challenges. Subscribe to Rapid Response wherever you get your podcasts to ensure you never miss an episode. As I understand it, Watch Duty is a nonprofit and it's an app that gathers information largely from volunteers, right? From regular people who are monitoring fires? It's like a community? Very much so. You can look at Reddit and Wikipedia in a similar way. The difference is, we do it live. We have about 200 volunteers, about 20 paid staff, about 10 of those are radio operators themselves. But the information really comes from fire service radio. So after going through a couple of disasters, you realize that there's not a Starlink in every truck. The communication systems aren't very good. The firefighters are in danger, and the only way to hear what's actually going on is through them collaborating with each other in real time, through the radio. And so we hear: 'Fire starting here, burning over this ridge.' 'Tankers and dozers are coming.' 'Holding the line to Highway 87.' 'Now the wind's picking up, the fire's spotting over the ridge.' 'It's burning over so-and-so, houses are being impacted.' You hear this live. There is no data source for this. There's not a place for this to happen without us. So that's how we do what we do. And this community of volunteers, are they fire workers? Or are some of them just watching and sharing what they're seeing? A lot of them were 30-, 40-year wildland firefighters, dispatchers, reporter types, sons and daughters of firefighters who grew up in the fire service with the radio chatting in the background. So it sounds like there was a community that was there that you tapped into. I understand you had to persuade them a little bit to see you as more than just a tech guy. That's the beauty of this. We just saw the human behavior and helped enable them to do it better. One of the fires I went through, which was one of the big ones in 2020, when the sky turned red up in Northern California, I was watching them on Facebook and Twitter already doing this. So they were kind of regionalized. There was someone in Red Bluff, someone in Redding, someone in SoCal, someone in Sonoma, Napa. They were independently doing this. They knew each other. They would talk and collaborate a little bit, but they wouldn't organize together. They weren't adversarial, they just didn't spend time really collaborating. The innovation was really [to] convince them all to work together—that I was not [just] a techie. That I lived here, like them, in the same danger that they did. The key was to convince them that I'm here to help. I'm part of this community. I'm not sitting in my laboratory in Silicon Valley trying to profiteer off of your disaster. And the information that they're sharing, the app puts it into a more usable form or a more accessible form? Yeah, it's a great question. We didn't change their behavior. They were always listening to radios and speaking the language of the fire service and putting it on Facebook and Twitter. What happens behind the scenes is actually a lot more data. There's a lot of signals coming in, and a lot of it is very tactical and minor, and we don't want that to go out on Watch Duty. And so they're collaborating in Slack. They're all talking and listening. It's very rare where there's one person running an incident. There are many people in real time content editing: '15 acres heading north-northwest. Was it 50 or 15?' 'Oh shoot, let's wait for the next transmission, air attack's about to be overhead.' 'We're going to get a size-up on the fire.' Then we deploy the information on Watch Duty. So in real time, they're collaborating. Someone has the con, or control, and that person's essentially incident commander. So of the folks who are on duty or running the event at that time, some of them may be volunteers and some of them may be your staff people? advertisement Yeah, it's a mixed bag. Like many nonprofits, there's paid staff and then there's volunteers. And a lot of our volunteers are now either changing careers or having a second career, because first, they contribute and they listen, and then they start to report, and then they become a staff reporter or a regional captain in the area and help run and collaborate certain parts of a state or a region. And then many of them actually become full-time employees. During the fires I saw that Watch Duty passed ChatGPT as the No. 1 downloaded app. The traffic must have really caught you by surprise, just like the fire did. Yeah, it did. Here's the sad part: We've been the No. 1 app in the App Store three times. This time was the worst, by far. Yeah, I mean, L.A.'s own emergency alert system, there was one, but it was buggy. It was sending false alerts. So it wasn't just L.A. residents that were using Watch Duty, right? It was government officials and firefighters and the helicopter pilots. Everybody seemed to be on it. Yes, the government also uses Watch Duty. We're on all the big screens and all the emergency operation centers. We've done something that others haven't been able to crack, and it's a usable format. So whether you're a little old lady or a 'hose dragger' or a 'brush bunny,' as firefighters refer to themselves as in the wildlands, they all use it and it's done something that we didn't see coming. We assumed that the government had all that information and they just weren't telling us, not out of malice, but they're busy, they're trying to fight the fire. It's very granular, the information we share, and then quickly we realize that we're getting emails from tanker pilots and dozer operators and others telling us that we give them more information than overhead gives them. And that's when we really realized this is a much bigger company than we ever thought possible. It's strange. Is Watch Duty's success, I don't know, an example of the government's failure or the failure of tax-funded technology? Or was there just no investment in this? Yeah, look, I mean, we work so closely with a lot of these government organizations and there's failure abound. It's everywhere. It's how we voted as individuals. It's the other software vendors who were selling lackluster products. It's the government having no other options. There are so many points of failure here. It just really compounded that day and it was very apparent how necessary we were. It's hard to just point blame at one person or one org. I know that's what everybody wants is they want to blame the boogeyman so we can go fix it. And it's not just climate change, it's bad forest management. It's like there's so many things that are all working against us here. It's making this problem extraordinarily bad.
