Show cause notice to MCH doctor a routine procedure, says Minister Veena George
The Director of Medical Education had on Thursday issued a show cause notice to Haris Chirackal, asking why action should not be taken against him for criticising the government in violation of the Kerala Government Servants' Conduct Rules,1960, causing disgrace to the government.
Through a Facebook post on June 27, Dr Chirakkal had expressed his resentment against the non-availability of an equipment accessory for an important surgery in his department at the medical college.
The post was widely discussed in the public domain and several such inadequacies at various government hospitals in the state were highlighted by the media.
The minister said a four-member expert panel was constituted to examine the doctor's action and based on its report, the DME had sought an explanation from the doctor. 'It is a routine official procedure,' she said.
George said the expert panel had found that Dr Chirakkal had violated service rules by going public about the issue and not approaching higher-ups in the department.
The panel had also reported that part of an equipment at the Urology department was found missing and recommended a separate enquiry into the matter.
Besides this, the panel also suggested that the purchasing power of superintendents of medical college hospitals, who are also Hospital Development Committee secretaries, be increased, George said.
Sharply reacting to the action against the doctor who complained about lack of facilities at the MCH, Leader of the Opposition in Kerala Assembly V D Satheesan said on Friday that the state is being ruled by a few people who will not shy away from doing whatever they want.
'The government is even trying to trap the doctor in a theft case now,' he alleged.
Dr Chirakkal told reporters that he would give a reply to the notice within seven days as directed by the DME.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Minister invites actor to partake of school midday meal
Minister for General Education V. Sivankutty has invited actor Kunchacko Boban to visit a government school during the midday meal. In a Facebook post on Tuesday in response to the actor's comments that better food was available in jails, the Minister said he would accompany the actor to a school. This would make the students happy. 'We can have lunch together with the students and know first-hand the midday meal menu and the taste of the food,' Mr. Sivankutty said. While inaugurating the Subiksham Thrikakkara breakfast scheme initiated by Uma Thomas, MLA, in the Thrikkakara Assembly constituency on Monday, the actor had said that any government should pay attention to creating best conditions for the innocent, not nurture criminals. This situation should change, he had said, expressing hope that the scheme became a success. The Minister, in his social media response, said graphics cards that said 'Best food should be given not in jails, but to students – Kunchacko Boban' first came to his attention. He listened to the actor's words since he wanted to know what was actually said. What the actor had said with good intentions was reported in this way, the Minister's post said. He went on to invite the actor to partake of a midday meal at a school.
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
Animal cruelty penalty as low as ₹10 for first offence: Govt
New Delhi, Aug 5 (PTI) The penalty for acts of cruelty to animals, including killing or maiming, under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 is currently as low as ₹ 10-50 for the first offence, Parliament was informed on Tuesday. Minister of State for Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying S P Singh Baghel, in his written reply to the Lok Sabha, said as per Section 11(1) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, any person who treats an animal cruelly shall, for the first offence, be punishable with a fine not less than ₹ 10 but which may extend to ₹ 50. For the second or subsequent offence committed within three years of the previous offence, the person is punishable with a fine of not less than ₹ 20 but which may extend to ₹ 100, or with imprisonment for a term that may extend to three months, or with both, he said. The minister said the subject of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals falls under the Concurrent List (List III) of the 7th Schedule of the Constitution of India. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, also contains enabling provisions for penalising acts of cruelty to animals, he said. While enforcement primarily rests with the respective state governments, the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) actively pursues complaints received from across the country by forwarding them to the state governments, district collectors, magistrates, and superintendents of police. Over the last five years, AWBI has addressed 4,589 complaints, forwarding them to the appropriate authorities for necessary legal action, he added. Complaints of animal cruelty are primarily dealt with by local authorities, as enforcement of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 is under the jurisdiction of state governments and Union Territory Administrations. "AWBI does not maintain any data on penalties imposed or nature of punishments awarded," he said. Of the 4,589 complaints forwarded to state governments, action taken reports have been received for 306 cases, he said. The government and AWBI continues to promote animal welfare through education, training, awareness programmes, and financial assistance. Training initiatives have been launched for police personnel, gaushala workers, and honorary animal welfare officers. Awareness campaigns, advisory issuance, and collaborative efforts with state governments and NGOs are ongoing. AWBI has published handbooks on animal laws, supports colony animal caretaker authorisations, and provides financial aid to recognised shelters and gaushalas under various schemes -- for rescue operations, shelter management, ambulances, birth control programmes, and disaster relief. In the past five years, AWBI has received 269 complaints from Karnataka, of which 217 relate to animal deaths.
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
Animal cruelty penalty as low as ₹10 for first offence: Govt
New Delhi, Aug 5 (PTI) The penalty for acts of cruelty to animals, including killing or maiming, under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 is currently as low as ₹ 10-50 for the first offence, Parliament was informed on Tuesday. Minister of State for Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying S P Singh Baghel, in his written reply to the Lok Sabha, said as per Section 11(1) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, any person who treats an animal cruelly shall, for the first offence, be punishable with a fine not less than ₹ 10 but which may extend to ₹ 50. For the second or subsequent offence committed within three years of the previous offence, the person is punishable with a fine of not less than ₹ 20 but which may extend to ₹ 100, or with imprisonment for a term that may extend to three months, or with both, he said. The minister said the subject of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals falls under the Concurrent List (List III) of the 7th Schedule of the Constitution of India. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, also contains enabling provisions for penalising acts of cruelty to animals, he said. While enforcement primarily rests with the respective state governments, the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) actively pursues complaints received from across the country by forwarding them to the state governments, district collectors, magistrates, and superintendents of police. Over the last five years, AWBI has addressed 4,589 complaints, forwarding them to the appropriate authorities for necessary legal action, he added. Complaints of animal cruelty are primarily dealt with by local authorities, as enforcement of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 is under the jurisdiction of state governments and Union Territory Administrations. "AWBI does not maintain any data on penalties imposed or nature of punishments awarded," he said. Of the 4,589 complaints forwarded to state governments, action taken reports have been received for 306 cases, he said. The government and AWBI continues to promote animal welfare through education, training, awareness programmes, and financial assistance. Training initiatives have been launched for police personnel, gaushala workers, and honorary animal welfare officers. Awareness campaigns, advisory issuance, and collaborative efforts with state governments and NGOs are ongoing. AWBI has published handbooks on animal laws, supports colony animal caretaker authorisations, and provides financial aid to recognised shelters and gaushalas under various schemes -- for rescue operations, shelter management, ambulances, birth control programmes, and disaster relief. In the past five years, AWBI has received 269 complaints from Karnataka, of which 217 relate to animal deaths. AWBI has also received complaints concerning the deaths of tigers and 20 monkeys in Karnataka, which were forwarded to the state forest department for appropriate action under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. As per available information, the accused have been arrested and remanded to judicial custody.
