MSPs pass bill to scrap SQA for new Scottish exams body
MSPs have passed legislation which will see Scotland's school exams agency replaced.The Scottish Qualifications Authority is to be scrapped in favour of a new body called Qualifications Scotland. The Education (Scotland) Bill also sets out plans for a new inspector of education. The changes follow controversies over exam marking in recent years, with government ministers arguing they will improve the system.But opposition parties have raised concerns that the reforms are a "superficial rebrand".
After two days of debate at Holyrood which stretched late into the evening, the bill passed by a vote of 69 to 47.Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said the passing of the Bill showed that the Scottish government was "serious about implementing the changes needed to drive improvement across Scotland's education and skills system".She added: "The creation of a new national qualifications body is about building the right conditions for reform to flourish."The new body will ensure that knowledge and experience of pupils and teachers are at the heart of our national qualifications offering. "The new inspectorate body will also have greater independence and the power to set the frequency and focus of inspections, moving this function away from ministers, to His Majesty's Chief Inspector."
'Superficial rebrand'
Ahead of the final vote, Scottish Labour said they would vote against the Bill.The party's education spokeswoman Pam Duncan-Glancy called the plans a "superficial rebrand".She argued that Scotland's education system, which "was once the envy of the world", was "declining" under the SNP.Duncan-Glancy added: "A catalogue of failures and scandals by the SQA and the SNP has left trust in our education system in tatters."Her amendment of the Bill to establish Curriculum Scotland, a new body to take charge of setting what pupils should learn, was voted down by MSPs.In a late-night sitting on Tuesday, MSPs rejected the proposal, despite Duncan-Glancy insisting it would not increase costs for the Scottish government.Gilruth said Education Scotland was already leading on improvements to the curriculum.She said: "I do not believe there are sufficient advantages to establishing a new standalone curriculum body in legislation and the expense that will incur, when we already have a national education agency being refocused on curriculum improvement and supporting implementation across the system."SNP MSP George Adam said the Bill had been "shaped" with input from pupils, parents and teachers.He added: "The SNP Scottish government is proud of this Bill and is committed to implementing the system and culture change required to improve outcomes and support professionals in classrooms and education settings all over Scotland."
This vote has been a long time coming, following years of promises and debate and several independent reviews about the future of the education system.But how big of a deal is it?Some have characterised this as a rebrand rather than a revolution, claiming that Qualifications Scotland will end up looking an awful lot like the SQA.It is fair to reflect that a body delivering exams and qualifications is a rather specific thing. There was always going to be significant overlap between the legacy organisation and its successor.But the government insists the new body will look and act differently, and will have much more input from teachers and pupils, giving them the chance to drive change.We already know there will be some changes to the role of exams too, with a greater focus on coursework and classroom assessments in final grades.The education system is notoriously difficult to reform.Councils retain significant responsibility for much of what goes on in schools, there are powerful unions looking out for teachers, and the government has no majority in Holyrood.So a "big bang" moment was always unlikely.And having waited years for this change to happen, we may have to wait a bit longer to see how significant it proves to be.
In June 2021, Shirley-Anne Somerville, then education secretary, announced that the SQA would be replaced as part of a "substantial" overhaul of education.The proposal came after a report from the OECD - the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development - on the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) .The report backed the curriculum as a whole, but said there was too much focus on exams in later years of schooling.It said the "visionary ideals" of the curriculum - which was meant to be focused on producing more rounded individuals rather than teaching to tests - had not fully succeeded. It also claimed the qualifications system was a "barrier" to its aims in secondary education.The Covid pandemic brought particular focus onto the school qualifications system, with criticism of how grades have been decided after formal exams were cancelled.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
14 minutes ago
- Sky News
PM faces threat of major rebellion during key vote today
Why you can trust Sky News Sir Keir Starmer continues to face the threat of a major rebellion during a key vote on welfare reforms later - despite making last-minute concessions to disgruntled Labour MPs. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has confirmed that all existing claimants of the personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability benefit, will be protected from changes to eligibility. The combined value of the standard Universal Credit allowance and the health top-up will rise "at least in line with inflation" every year of this parliament. And an additional £300m for employment support for sick and disabled people in 2026 has been announced, which will rise every year after. 10:54 Ms Kendall has also promised that a consultation into PIP - "co-produced" with disabled people - will be published next autumn. She said the U-turn on welfare cuts will cost taxpayers about £2.5bn by 2030 - less than half the £4.8bn the government had expected to save with its initial proposals. Modelling by Ms Kendall's own department, released yesterday, suggested the proposals would push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030, down from the 250,000 estimated under the original plan. But after announcing the U-turns, Labour MPs were still publicly saying they could not back the plans as they do not go far enough to allay their concerns. Disabilities minister Stephen Timms would not say he was "confident" the proposals would pass the Commons when asked on Sky News' Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge. "We've got a very strong package, I certainly hope it passes," he replied. 1:49 A total of 86 charities united yesterday to call on MPs to reject the reforms, saying they will harm disabled people and calling it "a political choice". The likes of Oxfam, Child Action Poverty Group, Mind and Shelter said the bill has been brought to a vote without consulting disabled people and without any assessment "of its impact on health and employment outcomes". When asked to name "a single" disability organisation in favour of the reforms, Ms Kendall declined to do so. Several Labour MPs indicated they would still vote against the changes, leaving the government in the dark over how big a rebellion it still may face. Ms Kendall tried to allay their fears, telling MPs: "I believe we have a fair package, a package that protects existing claimants because they've come to rely on that support." Richard Burgon presented a petition to parliament yesterday evening against the cuts, signed by more than 77,000 people. Several Labour MPs questioned why the vote was going ahead before the review into PIP is published - including Rachael Maskell, who said she could not "countenance sick and disabled people being denied support" and added: "It is a matter of conscience." Connor Naismith said the concessions "undoubtedly improve efforts to secure welfare reform which is fair", but added: "Unfortunately, I do not believe these concessions yet go far enough." Nadia Whittome accused the government of "ignoring" disabled people and urged ministers to go "back to the drawing board". Ian Byrne told the Commons he will vote against the "cruel cuts" to disability benefits because the "so-called concessions go nowhere near far enough".
Times
39 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer says trans ruling must be enacted ‘as soon as possible'
Hospitals and government departments refusing to implement the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman must do it 'as soon as possible', Sir Keir Starmer has said, as public bodies continue to defy the law. The prime minister said guidance on how to interpret the court's decision must be 'consistent with the ruling', after reports civil servants and some public bodies were attempting to ignore the judgment that the definition of a woman was to be based on biological sex. The prime minister told reporters he 'accepted the ruling; welcomed the ruling, and everything else flows from that as far as I'm concerned'. He said: 'All guidance of whatever kind needs to be consistent with the ruling and we need to get to that position as soon as possible.' Every organisation in Britain was told to revisit their equality policies after the country's highest court ruled that transgender women were not legally women in reference to the Equality Act in April. However, The Times revealed last month that Whitehall was refusing to implement single-sex spaces in government departments until the equality regulator intervenes. Human resources and staff networks have advised civil servants that the policies remain in effect while they are under review, despite many advising that transgender people are able to use whichever facilities they feel most comfortable with. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is drawing up new guidance that will help public bodies and organisations implement the ruling. The regulator said the guidelines should only be seen as a tool to implement the law and the Supreme Court's judgment 'is effective immediately'. The Times also reported that hospital managers ignored official guidance and said that policies would not change until NHS England responded to the ruling. Maya Forstater, the chief executive of Sex Matters, said: 'This is an important intervention from the prime minister, given the huge number of public bodies failing to implement the Supreme Court judgment and operating outside the law. Political leadership is essential if women whose rights are being stolen are not to be forced to turn to the courts, where public bodies will end up losing, at great expense to taxpayers. 'It's no coincidence that the private sector has been faster to bring their policies in line with the judgment, recognising what is at stake for the bottom line. Meanwhile most NHS, university and civil service leaders are sitting on their hands. 'The law is clear and there is no need to wait for further guidance from the EHRC or anyone else. Unlike the small businesses and services for which the regulator's guidance is intended, public sector organisations have access to specialist legal advice, as well as extra statutory obligations under the public sector equality duty.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Chris Mason: Labour still has a big persuasion job ahead
"I've not had as much quality time with my colleagues since the Brexit wars," a minister told me with a wry smile.A remark that gets to the heart of this benefits row within the Labour Party: this is a government with a big majority, that has already performed a big U-turn and yet is still involved in a big persuasion is not meant to happen, one year into government, with a working majority of prime minister himself will be getting stuck into some persuading today, making the case that these changes are, as he sees it, not only in keeping with Labour values but essential to ensure the long-term stability of the welfare if Monday's Commons statement from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall was intended to reassure Labour MPs, it is an open question as to whether it worked."It turned a fair few colleagues off. I think it will get through, but it'll be close," said one MPs press Kendall on rollout of benefit changesWelfare cuts: What are the Pip and universal credit changes?What has been driving the rise in disability benefit claims?Faisal Islam: How much will U-turn on disability benefits cost?There has been plenty of talk of there being 40 to 50 Labour MPs who are opposed, but things remain the size of the working majority, rebels would need to amass around 80 of their colleagues to vote against the government to defeat them, everything else being a key factor could be how many choose to abstain in the vote on Tuesday Prof Philip Cowley of Queen Mary University of London notes that the biggest backbench rebellion Sir Keir Starmer has suffered so far is largest rebellion in Tony Blair's first year in Downing Street was 47 and also on the welfare state - over lone parent largest backbench rebellion for any governing party in 200 years was in 2003, over the Iraq the heart of plenty of the concern over these benefits changes is what is being proposed for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip) at the end of next November 2026, the plan is the eligibility criteria for the main disability benefit will be Labour MPs and ministers had hoped a review of Pip, conducted by Work and Pensions Minister Sir Stephen Timms and involving disabled people, would reassure colleagues the government's intentions were something they could over and over again in the Commons concerns were raised that the timeframe of the review - itself due to report in the autumn of next year - would mean it would be too late to have an influence on the eligibility criteria for Pip beginning that beneath that there is an underlying critique: that the reason the plans for late next year remain in place is because that way it makes it (a bit) easier for Chancellor Rachel Reeves' numbers to add up - and, to use the jargon, for the measures to be "scored" by the Office for Budget Responsibility when it produces its forecasts, which are so central to the government's management of the plenty of Labour MPs this is wrong-headed, topsy turvy and an increasingly hard-to-defend approach to it is also worth emphasising, as it always is when there is a debate dominated by noisy people, that there are quieter Labour MPs, many keeping their heads down right now, who find this whole row gratuitous and fundamentally naive - and, they argue, it is Labour's duty to grapple with a spiralling benefits Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves have long argued that Labour being seen as credible custodians of the economy is the building block upon which everything else is Chief Whip, Sir Alan Campbell, in charge of winning the vote for the prime minister, has issued a plea for unity - something that only happens when there isn't a surplus of it - and told Labour MPs they should "act as a team". The party, he said, would have to come back together after this difficult vote for will debate the plans all over again later, and the vote is expected early this even if the government does win, that won't be the end of the arguments and votes are expected in the next few weeks.
