Father of Oxford High School shooting victim tells board to "shove" $500K settlement offer
During public comment at an Oxford Community Schools meeting on Tuesday, Steve St. Juliana called the settlement "insulting" after receiving the offer via email from the district's attorney, Tim Mullins. According to St. Juliana, the offer was available until 8 a.m. on Wednesday, June 11, less than 24 hours after he received it.
"That's how little you value our children? How little the state value our children? Because they're on the hook just as much as you are," he said during the meeting. "I am not going to stop striving for the changes necessary to save our kids ... so you can shove your offer."
He also said that the way the offer was delivered was unacceptable.
A spokesperson for attorney Ven Johnson, who represents the victims' families, confirmed the $500,000 offer and said other parents were also offered the same amount.
The Board of Education issued the following statement on Wednesday:
"Last night, during the public comment portion of our board meeting, we heard from a father who tragically lost his child in the school shooting at Oxford High School that forever changed the lives of so many, most deeply the families whose children were taken. His words were powerful and heartbreaking.
"We understand that the letter from legal counsel caused additional pain. We are deeply sorry for the impact it had, especially on those already carrying profound grief. The Board was unaware of this specific correspondence. It does not reflect the depth of our compassion or the level of support these families deserve. We recognize that the approach felt impersonal and insufficient, and for that, we are deeply apologetic.
"The Board remains steadfast in our commitment to treating every family with dignity, compassion, and respect as we navigate these difficult legal proceedings."
Hana St. Juliana, Tate Myre, Madisyn Baldwin, and Justin Shilling were killed in the Nov. 30, 2021, shooting. Six other students and a teacher were injured.
The shooter, Ethan Crumbley, is serving a life sentence after her pleaded guilty in 2023 to multiple charges. He was 15 years old at the time of the shooting. His parents, James and Jennifer Crumbley, were convicted of four counts of involuntary manslaughter in 2024. The prosecutors argued that the parents should be held partially responsible for the students' deaths because they ignored signs of their son's mental health needs and purchased the gun that was used in the shooting.
The Crumbleys made history as the first parents to be convicted for a mass shooting committed by their children. They were given separate trials that included testimonies from school officials, law enforcement and other witnesses.
In the months after convictions, the Crumbleys filed appeals, claiming that they did not get a fair trial and accused the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office of offering secret agreements with two school officials who testified at their trials.
On Wednesday, Oakland County Circuit Court Judge Cheryl Matthews upheld the convictions, adding in her ruling that "Jennifer Crumbley received a trial and verdict worthy of confidence based on the cumulative effect of the significant evidence against her."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs juror hits back at 'insulting' public reaction to verdict
A juror in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs case has hit back at the "insulting" public response to the verdict. The 55-year-old rapper was found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution relating to ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and a woman who testified under the name 'Jane' but was acquitted on the more serious charges of sex trafficking and racketeering and a jury member has denied claims that Diddy's celebrity status influenced their decision. The unnamed juror told ABC News: "We spent over two days deliberating. Our decision was based solely on the evidence presented and how the law is stated. We would have treated any defendant in the same manner regardless of who they are. I have nothing else to say." Diddy's attorney Anna Estevao described Wednesday's (02.07.25) verdict as a "huge win" for the I'll Be Missing You hitmaker as he avoided the possibility of life in prison, although he was denied bail by US District Judge Arun Subramanian. She said outside the courtroom in Manhattan: "This is a reminder to everyone I hope of the flaws in the criminal justice system and for everybody to take a second look when the government charges people with crimes. "This is a huge win. He was acquitted of sex trafficking, acquitted of RICO conspiracy and he will sleep well at night knowing that." Diddy - who has been in custody in Brooklyn since his arrest last September - was convinced of flying people around the US to engage in sexual encounters and Judge Subramanian denied bail as he noted the prosecution's argument that a Mann Act violation means the detention is "mandatory". The original 1919 law prohibited interstate or foreign commerce transport of a woman or girl "or prostitution, debauchery or for any other immoral purpose". In 1986, the law was made gender-neutral, and the wording altered to change "debauchery" and "immoral purpose" to "any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offence". Judge Subramanian said that "for present purposes, the defendant is unable to meet his burden" to show "lack of danger to any person or the community" with clear and convincing evidence. He added: "Prior to the trial, the court denied bail, and sees no reason to reverse that now." Diddy could now face a combined sentence of up to 20 years in federal prison, with Judge Subramanian scheduling a sentencing hearing for October 3.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Star Lawyer Who Defended Trump's Family Issues Stark Warning About Presidency
The super-lawyer who kept Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump out of legal jeopardy during Robert Mueller's Russian investigation now fears Donald Trump will demolish the very institutions that protected them. 'I have never been as concerned as to whether our system can withstand the pressure it is being put to,' Abbe Lowell told the Financial Times, warning that the White House is 'pushing the tree to the point that it could break,' noting that during Trump's first term, critics of the president said democracy was 'tested but didn't break.' The legal eagle has defended several high-profile Democrat figures—including Bill Clinton and Joe Biden's son, Hunter. But he is perhaps best known for his high-stakes work for Trump's daughter and son-in-law. In June 2017, the Daily Beast reported that Kushner, 44, who is married to Ivanka, 43, had hired Lowell to join his defense team as Robert Mueller's Russia probe heated up. The following month, Ivanka followed suit, tasking the prominent lawyer to provide 'legal and ethical advice' as investigators examined possible campaign ties to Moscow, bringing both Trump family members under the same high-powered counsel. Now, Lowell says, Ivanka father's behavior in his second term threatens to smash the constitutional 'wall' separating courts from executive muscle. 'The crack you put in the wall today becomes the gash tomorrow,' Lowell had told Congress in 1998. That was 'not a bad prophecy', Lowell told the FT, saying that the structure is 'more than cracked, not yet crumbled.' In an attempt to fight back, Lowell, 73, has launched Lowell & Associates to combat what he calls government 'over-reach.' Nine law firms, he says, have already 'buckled' under Trump-era intimidation—agreeing to nearly $1 billion in work that advances the president's agenda while muzzling internal critics. Several defectors from those firms have signed up to Lowell's boutique organization, Lowell said, with many more showing interest. Clients include New York Attorney General Letitia James—now under federal investigation after winning a massive civil-fraud judgment against Trump—and former DHS official Miles Taylor, whose security clearance vanished after he blasted the president. Both hope Lowell's aggressive strategy can blunt a barrage of executive orders targeting universities, NGOs and even courthouses. 'I don't know the administration has the ability, breadth, depth and expertise to handle all' the resulting lawsuits, Lowell said. Yet the veteran litigator is under no illusion every legal action will stick. With a Supreme Court that 'believes in an executive branch with broad power,' reports the FT, Lowell says challengers must craft cases on First Amendment grounds rather than on presidential authority. Because if Trump diminishes the authority of the country's courts, Lowell warns, 'there will just be rubble from that wall.' The Daily Beast has approached the White House for comment.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Police in one Colorado city work with community partners, repurpose stolen bikes for those in need
Bike thefts are a bigger problem than you might think. Nearly 150,000 bikes were reportedly stolen across the country last year, and it's rare that an owner gets their bike back. A law enforcement department in the Denver metro area has started a program that hopes to solve an issue that has resulted from all of that theft. CBS The Wheat Ridge Police Department is not necessarily a very large police department, and when they come across bikes -- be they part of an investigation for evidence, whether it's because they are stolen or whether they're just found in unclaimed property -- they find themselves with too many bikes and nowhere to put them. In an attempt to fix that issue, they've partnered up with a couple of community organizations that are taking those bikes and giving them back to the community. Steve Selly works for the city of Wheat Ridge and is part of the group that loads up the bikes and gets them to the community groups. "It seems like there have been more and more bikes available over the course of the last, I'd say, two to three years," he said. CBS Kelly Blinn is part of one those community groups, and said the bikes sometimes go to students. "This can help us connect high school students or, you know, people who can't afford a bike without access to transportation," Blinn said. Wheat Ridge police spokesman Alex Rose said bikes are becoming a more common item picked up by police departments across the Denver metro area, and there's a question of what to do with them. "This is the best thing that we can do with these bikes and this property in general, to put it to good use," he said. "You collect a lot of evidence through the course of all of these hundreds and thousands of investigations that happen throughout the course of the year," said Rose. Rose said he's proud of the program that gets bikes back into the community and out of police storage. "We need to find homes for them, and so the more relationships that we have with folks in the community that are interested in transportation and interested in giving these bikes some TLC and giving them to families who really need them, or sending them to places where they could go to good use, that's a win win for everybody," he said. Rose says there are some things bike owners can do in the unfortunate case that a bike were to get stolen. "Write down that serial number, because if your bike gets lost or it gets stolen, that is a key to report that to your local law enforcement agency," Rose said. When the serial number of a stolen bike is shared with police, if it ends up in another Colorado municipality, there's a chance that serial number is going to pop up on another jurisdiction's database. That means there's a better chance a stolen bike might be found, even if it's not in the town or city it was stolen from.
