BRICS member grants Russian oil giant exploration rights
The Russian oil giant will invest a minimum of $22.5 million over a period of six years into the South Wadi Al-Sahel concession, Al Mal wrote on Monday. Unlike traditional bidding processes, the concession was awarded through a direct agreement between Egypt's Ministry of Petroleum and Lukoil.
Lukoil has not yet confirmed the deal to the Russian media.
The reported deal comes as part of several oil and gas development projects that the Egyptian government reached agreements with foreign companies about earlier this month. Totaling approximately $225.3 million, the projects include ventures in the Western Desert and North Sinai regions.
Lukoil is one of the largest publicly traded oil and gas companies in the world, accounting for around 2% of the world's oil production. It is Russia's largest privately owned company in terms of revenue.
READ MORE:
Trump ready to 'double down' on Russia sanctions – envoy
Last month, the US imposed new sanctions on the Russian energy sector, targeting several oil firms, including Lukoil and its CEO, Vadim Vorobyov. Shortly after the restrictions were introduced, the company appointed a new CEO. Lukoil's founder, Vagit Alikperov, was placed under US sanctions in 2022, shortly after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict.
The company has been active in Egypt's energy sector for more than two decades. It is currently implementing the West Esh El-Mallaha production project in the Eastern desert, in which it acts as operator with a 50% stake. The company also owns a 24% stake in the Meleiha project in the Western Desert.
READ MORE:
'Find another sucker': Trump threatens BRICS with massive tariffs, but who will suffer the most?
Egypt became a member of BRICS – previously comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – in 2024. Alongside Egypt, the group also welcomed as members the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Iran, and Indonesia. Cairo has maintained a neutral stance on the Ukraine conflict, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and a diplomatic solution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
10 hours ago
- Russia Today
US senators propose $55bn Ukraine aid bill
A group of US senators have introduced a bill to allocate $54.6 billion in aid to Ukraine over the 2026 and 2027 fiscal years. President Donald Trump has repeatedly opposed more US aid to Ukraine, insisting Europe should cover the costs. The bill includes provisions for direct military assistance to Kiev and proposes using income generated from frozen Russian assets held in the United States to help finance the aid. Moscow has repeatedly warned that the seizure or use of its sovereign assets would constitute a violation of international law. The proposed legislation would also increase funding under Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) from the current $100 million to $6 billion annually. The mechanism allows the US president to authorize emergency weapons transfers without congressional approval. Additionally, the bill proposes allocating $1 billion to military drone production involving the US, Ukraine, and Taiwan. It also calls for the transfer of confiscated and illegal weapons seized by US authorities to Kiev and suggests counting American military aid toward Washington's contributions to the US-Ukrainian investment fund for the country's reconstruction. Separate legislation advanced by the Senate Appropriations Committee would provide an additional $1 billion in 'security assistance' for Ukraine, including $225 million earmarked for Baltic nations supporting Kiev. Last month, Trump claimed that billions of dollars allocated by the Biden administration may have been misused by Ukraine, saying he doubts the money was spent on weapons as intended. He has also backed NATO-led purchases of American weapons as a business opportunity. Former Trump adviser Steve Cortes has also criticized continued aid, calling Ukraine 'corrupt' and warning that its leadership 'cannot be trusted' following a recent crackdown on anti-corruption bodies. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has likewise condemned Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky as a 'dictator' and called for his removal, accusing him of blocking peace efforts. Russia has consistently denounced Western military and financial assistance to Kiev, saying it fuels further escalation and leads to more bloodshed rather than a negotiated settlement.
Russia Today
13 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump's onslaught: Why India and BRICS will not bend
US President Trump has rattled Washington's ties with New Delhi to an unexpected degree. Countries, including, India were prepared for rough diplomatic weather after Trump won his second term, but did not anticipate the kind of onslaught he has unleashed on the global system and diplomatic norms. Trump's latest attack on India and the BRICS countries explains this underlying dynamic. The BRICS aspire to play a greater political, economic and financial role in global affairs. This aspiration is based on shifts of economic and concomitant political and financial power towards the so-called emerging powers or middle-income countries. BRICS countries have already begun to use their national currencies in trading with each other as much as possible. The use of draconian financial sanctions on Russia by the West has accelerated this process. Today, almost all trade operations between Russia and China are conducted in rubles and yuan. India too is encouraging the use of its national currency in payment transactions with select countries. A significant portion of the trade between India and Russia is now settled using a rupee-ruble mechanism. Washington cannot use secondary sanctions to prevent countries, including India, from using the US dollar to trade with Russia and then oppose de-dollarization if these countries are compelled to use alternative payment mechanisms. If the US continues to weaponize the dollar, it will inevitably lead to the very 'de-dollarization' that Trump is concerned about. India has officially disowned any de-dollarization agenda – not the least because the US is its biggest trade partner in goods and services. India seeks more investments and technology transfers from the US. In many ways, New Delhi's ties with Washington are the most important for achieving its growth and developmental goals. But that does not preclude India from establishing other partnerships to reduce over-dependence on one country, balance its external relations and hedge against the excesses of US foreign policy. Trump has exacerbated the disruptions caused by Washington's frequent use of sanctions as a political weapon by also weaponizing tariffs. He is convinced that by imposing arbitrarily determined tariffs on imports from other countries he will compel them to enter into negotiations with the US to obtain relief by lowering their high tariffs on American products. But India on Wednesday sent a clear message: it is determined to protect the interests of its own businesses, farmers and people. Trump's use of tariffs as lever, like in the case of Brazil, where he has cited President Lula's treatment of his predecessor Bolsanaro as reason for imposing 50% levies, is being closely monitored by the world's governments. Trump has repeatedly targeted BRICS since his return to the Oval Office. He had threatened the countries with tariffs if they contonie to pledge to create a new common currency or support any alternative to the US dollar. Trump appeared to harbor the illusion that BRICS was 'dead' following his threats – which have now materialized into action. In reality, the BRICS summit held in Brazil this July showed no visible signs of intimidation. On the contrary, such overt displays of American economic coercion may well drive more countries toward alliances that seek to challenge the dominance of any single global power. The administration in Washington appears to lack realism in its assessment of global trends. Trump positions himself as a peacemaker and openly aspires to win a Nobel Peace Prize, while at the same time bombing Iran and assisting Israel in perpetuating the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Similarly, threatening China as a BRICS member with 100% tariffs so casually – along with talk of bombing Beijing if the People's Republic were to invade Taiwan – makes little sense, especially given that an interim trade deal has already been reached and further negotiations are imminent. The US cannot reasonably claim that forums like BRICS have no right to determine their own agenda in pursuit of their shared interests. At the same time, the US has walked out of or subverted key international agreements and institutions. It has withdrawn from the Paris Climate Change agreement, the WHO, the UN Human Rights Commission and UNESCO. Trump seems to believe that these organizations cannot function or survive without the presence of the US and its financial contributions. In reality, the US will lose its voice and its leadership in these international forums. The space it vacates will be filled by others, especially China. Beijing has already carved out enormous influence in the UN institutions as it is now the second largest contributor to the UN. With Washington also bullying Europe and thereby damaging Western solidarity, the US absence from these organizations will have even less impact. The more the world learns to manage without the US in these international bodies, the more America's international influence will erode. These US decisions will also accelerate the dispersal of influence at the global level, as other centers of influence develop.
Russia Today
19 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine showing ‘borderline savagery'
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has accused Ukrainian officials of 'cultural degradation bordering on savagery' after the exhumed remains of Soviet soldiers were offered for a prisoner exchange. In an article published on Friday, Lavrov referenced an incident in which the mayor of the Ukrainian city of Lviv, Andrey Sadovy, offered to exchange the exhumed remains of soldiers from a World War II memorial – whom he described as 'occupiers' – for Ukrainian service members captured by Russia in the current conflict. Moscow and Kiev have conducted prisoner swaps on an equal basis throughout the conflict, although Ukraine's pool of POWs for exchanges is reportedly seriously depleted. 'The neo-Nazis have turned their fight toward the dead who once liberated Ukraine from Hitlerism,' Lavrov wrote, branding the gesture emblematic of Ukraine's discriminatory policies. He accused Western governments of ignoring such actions to shield their 'client state' from criticism. Several Eastern European states have framed the Soviet era as a period of occupation. Russia firmly rejects this characterization, stressing the USSR's role in the defeat of Nazi Germany and its contributions to post-war reconstruction across the region. The removal of Soviet war memorials has been used by some governments to strengthen their narrative and to display political defiance towards Russia. Lavrov's remarks were part of an opinion piece he penned on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act, a Cold War-era agreement aimed at strengthening European security, economic cooperation, and human rights protections. The Russian foreign minister argued that the West has weaponized the treaty and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to pressure post-Soviet states, while selectively ignoring its principles for its own benefit. According to Lavrov, the OSCE may no longer have a reason to exist at this point.
