Vincennes University to host a traveling exhibit on Holocaust
The exhibit will debut March 17 and run through April 28 at the Shake Library. The news release states that the exhibit will explore the motives, pressures, and fears that shaped the American response to Nazism, war, and genocide in Europe during the 1930s and 1940s. The exhibit was provided to the University thanks to a collaboration with the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and the American Library Association.
VU Director of Library Services Charla Gilbert said, 'The 'Americans and the Holocaust' exhibit holds deep significance as it examines a pivotal and sobering chapter in history, reminding us of the importance of understanding our past to shape a more compassionate future. The Shake Library is honored to host this exhibit at VU, offering community members, VU students, faculty, and staff an opportunity to engage with its powerful message through tours and accompanying events. Together, we hope to foster important dialogue, deepen understanding, and honor the memory of those impacted by this tragic period in history.'
Shake Library has also created something they call the Butterfly Project. The school is encouraging people in the community to create butterflies through different artistic mediums such as paper, ceramics, photography, and more to honor the lives lost in the Holocaust. The school recommends visiting the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum's database of the over 600 ID cards to get inspiration for the lives being honored. The butterflies were inspired by Pavel Friedmann, a Jewish Czechoslovak poet who wrote the poem 'The Butterfly' while in the Theresienstadt Ghetto according to the Butterfly Project site. The butterflies will be displayed throughout the campus.
The Shake Library's exhibit will be open while the library operating hours are in effect. 25 minute guided tours are available, but you have to sign up for them at this link, or if you're bringing a large party. For additional information, to submit photos or digital files of your butterflies, or to schedule a time to drop them off, you can contact Tiarra Basham at tiarra.basham@vinu.edu. Several other events relating to the Holocaust will be taking place on campus as well throughout March and April, and you can find those here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Friday's briefing: England beat Sweden on penalties to reach Euro 2025 semis
England needed a tense penalty shoot-out to see off Sweden and reach the semi-finals of Euro 2025. Meanwhile, American rapper Snoop Dogg has officially become co-owner of Championship club Swansea. Lionesses on spot to reach Euro semis Defending champions England reached the semi-finals of Euro 2025 after a dramatic penalty shoot-out victory over Sweden. An error-strewn opening 30 minutes from the Lionesses gifted Sweden a 2-0 lead through goals from Kosovare Asllani and Stina Blackstenius. It took 79 minutes for Lucy Bronze to pull one back, but just 103 seconds later sub Michelle Agyemang sent the match into extra time. Then, in a barmy shoot-out, Sweden goalkeeper Jennifer Falk saved from Lauren James, Beth Mead, Alex Greenwood and Grace Clinton, while also blazing her own penalty over. Meanwhile, England keeper Hannah Hampton kept out spot-kicks from Filippa Angeldahl and Sofia Jakobsson while Magdalend Eriksson hit a post. When Bronze calmly stepped up to blast her penalty into the roof of the net Smilla Holmberg needed to score to keep Sweden in it – but she fired over the crossbar meaning England will face Italy for a place in the final. Dogg days at Swansea Global rap music megastar Snoop Dogg was announced as co-owner of Championship club Swansea. The 53-year-old, who hinted at investing in the club by helping promote the club's shirt launch earlier this week, has joined Croatian midfielder Luka Modric in linking up with the Swans. He said: 'My love of football is well known, but it feels special to me that I make my move into club ownership with Swansea City. 'The story of the club and the area really struck a chord with me. This is a proud, working class city and club. An underdog that bites back, just like me.' United close in on Mbeumo Manchester United have made an improved bid worth up to £70million for Brentford frontman Bryan Mbeumo, the PA news agency understands. The 25-year-old has been a key target for Ruben Amorim's Red Devils, who made a first approach of £45m plus £10m in potential add-ons six weeks ago. United followed that up with an improved proposal exceeding £60m a few weeks later but talks stalled as Brentford held on for a greater fee for Mbeumo. The Old Trafford club have now made a new offer that PA understands to be worth £65m plus an additional £5m in potential add-ons as they attempt to sign the player before their pre-season tour to the United States. Reds step up Ekitike bid Liverpool are set to make an offer for striker Hugo Ekitike as talks with Eintracht Frankfurt progress, the PA news agency understands. The highly-rated 23-year-old has attracted interest from the Premier League this summer having scored 22 goals in all competitions after making a loan move from Paris St Germain permanent last year. Newcastle had looked at bringing in Ekitike as Liverpool considered a big-money move for Alexander Isak, who it is understood the Magpies valued at around £150million in an attempt to ward off potential suitors. But the Reds are now pressing ahead with a deal for France international Ekitike, with it a case a matter of when rather than if a bid is submitted following talks. Liverpool are reportedly preparing a deal in the region of 80million euros (£69.2million), with sources close to the player indicating that Newcastle look out of the race to sign a striker that Manchester United also hold interest in. What's on today? Euro 2025 favourites Spain take on hosts Switzerland in the third quarter-final. The winners will face whoever comes out victorious between France and Germany on Friday.

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show' on CBS is getting canceled. Lawmakers want to know if it's because of his political views.
CBS announced on Thursday that "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert" will be canceled after next year, ending a series that has been running for more than three decades. Colbert announced the talk show's cancellation on Thursday via a clip of his new episode, posted on Instagram. "Before we start the show, I want to let you know something I found out just last night," he said. "Next year will be our last season. The network will be ending 'The Late Show' in May." His announcement was followed by a long wave of boos from the audience. Colbert took over as host of the talk show previously helmed by David Letterman in 2015, and has been running it for the last 10 years. The show was first aired in 1993. CBS executives said in a statement to The New York Times on Thursday that the cancellation was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night." "It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount," the statement to the NYT added. Ratings from the American audience measurement company, Nielsen, seen by several news outlets, show that "The Late Show" performed well in its timeslot. The show notched 2.417 million viewers across 41 new episodes, and was the only late-night show to gain viewers in 2025. The cancellation comes shortly after Paramount, on July 1, agreed to pay President Donald Trump a $16 million settlement over a lawsuit the president filed against it. The lawsuit accused CBS's "60 Minutes" of "deceptive editing" of his interview with presidential rival Kamala Harris. Colbert referenced the settlement in an episode on July 14, titled "A Big Bribe." Making a joke about the settlement, he said, "As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I am offended, and I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company. But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help." Lawmakers have sounded out concerns about the show's cancellation, asking CBS if the decision was political in nature. Sen. Adam Schiff of California was one of the first to comment on it. "Just finished taping with Stephen Colbert who announced his show was cancelled," Schiff wrote in a late Thursday evening X post. "If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better," Schiff added. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts released a statement just hours after the cancellation announcement. "CBS canceled Colbert's show just three days after Colbert called out CBS owner Paramount for its $16 settlement with Trump — a deal that looks like bribery. America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons," Warren said. Trump has been a regular topic on Colbert's show — particularly during his opening monologues. He's also touched on some of the administration's major scandals, including in his Wednesday episode, where he mentioned Trump and the disgraced financier, Jeffrey Epstein.


Atlantic
3 hours ago
- Atlantic
Is Colbert's Ouster Really Just a ‘Financial Decision'?
Building an empire takes decades. Destroying it can only take a few years, and sometimes the vandals are in the palace, not outside the gates. For much of the 20th century, American broadcast television revolved around three networks: NBC, ABC, and CBS. William S. Paley, CBS's longtime CEO, made sure that his company—the Columbia Broadcasting Service—was a leader among them. The network was home to Edward R. Murrow, who brought World War II in Europe home to Americans on CBS Radio; after the war, Murrow's reporting played a pivotal role in bringing down Senator Joseph McCarthy. Walter Cronkite dominated American evenings from his perch at the Evening News. And from the days of Mike Wallace to the more recent era of Lesley Stahl and Scott Pelley, 60 Minutes set the standard for longform television reporting. Yet CBS's current ownership seems determined to demolish this legacy. This evening, the network announced plans to end The Late Show With Stephen Colbert when the host's contract ends next May. Late-night personalities come and go, but usually that happens when their ratings sag. Colbert, however, has consistently led competitors in his timeslot. CBS said this was 'purely a financial decision,' made as traditional linear television fades. Perhaps this is true, but the network that once made Cronkite the most trusted man in America no longer gets the benefit of the doubt. CBS's owners have made a series of decisions capitulating to President Donald Trump, and the surprise choice to allow Colbert—a consistent, prominent Trump critic—to walk seems like part of that pattern. One reasonable starting date for the trouble would be 2016. That was both the year that Trump was first elected president and the year that Sumner Redstone, the cussed but aging owner of CBS's parent company Paramount, surrendered control to his daughter, Shari Redstone. In 2023, Shari Redstone began seeking a buyer for the company, eventually striking a deal, in 2024, with Skydance. The merger requires federal approval. During the 2024 presidential campaign, 60 Minutes interviewed Kamala Harris, Trump's Democratic opponent. Trump sued CBS, alleging that the network improperly edited her interview. As supposed evidence, he cited different excerpts of the interview that had aired on different CBS shows. (If CBS was seeking to hide anything, then airing the clips on their network wasn't a very effective way to do it.) He demanded $20 billion, a sum that was preposterous especially because—as most First Amendment lawyers agreed—the suit had no merit. But Trump had major leverage: He won the November presidential election, giving him a role in approving the proposed Skydance-Paramount merger. During his first term, he'd already demonstrated his willingness to use his approval power to punish political opponents in the media, unsuccessfully seeking to block the merger of AT&T and Time Warner. Since the election, CBS has seemed eager to please Trump however it can, though the company continues to insist the merger has no bearing on its decisions. The network handed over transcripts of the 60 Minutes interview to Brendan Carr, the close Trump ally appointed to lead the Federal Communications Commission. In April, 60 Minutes chief Bill Owens, a widely respected journalist, stepped down. 'It's clear the company is done with me,' he told staff during a meeting. In a memo, he elaborated: 'Over the past months, it has become clear that I would not be allowed to run the show as I have always run it, to make independent decisions based on what was right for '60 Minutes,' right for the audience.' Some of the shows' reporters, who are not prone to histrionic statements or partisanship, raised alarms in interviews and speeches. Earlier this month, CBS agreed to a $16 million settlement to end Trump's lawsuit. The agreement doesn't pay Trump directly, but the network agreed to pay legal fees for him and a co-plaintiff, and to contribute to Trump's future presidential library. Trump has stated that the deal also includes unspecified 'advertising,' reportedly for public-service announcements that boost Trump-approved causes. Paramount denies this. Now comes Colbert's departure. If the reasons are truly financial, one wonders how his salary compares to the money spent to settle a dubious lawsuit. The president now seems favorably disposed toward the merger. Last month, he spoke highly of Skydance head David Ellison, who is the son of Oracle founder and Trump pal Larry Ellison. Still, the deal has not yet been approved by the FCC. Paramount and Skydance's executives have demonstrated that they aren't interested in defending CBS's journalism or its editorial independence, to the detriment not only of the network's historical reputation but also the many excellent journalists still working there. Journalism, along with Colbert's program, make up only a small portion of Paramount's portfolio, and so business executives might view sacrificing them to preserve a deal as a prudent, if cold-blooded, maneuver. But the recent experience of another Columbia— Columbia University —offers a warning. When assailed by the Trump administration, the university's administration struck a conciliatory stance, trying to make a deal with the president. The capitulation only encouraged Trump, who then sought a judicial decree for oversight of the school. (The two parties are still in talks.) What happened at Columbia is the same thing Trump has done to many other adversaries: If you give him an inch, he'll take a yard, and immediately scheme to grab a mile, too. Institutions that are willing to sacrifice their values for the government's favor are likely to end up with neither.