Manifold problems at BP: New boss must restore confidence at board level and with investors, says MAGGIE PAGANO
Now they are even more anxious following the surprise choice of Irishman Albert Manifold as the long-awaited chairman, a role they prayed would be filled with someone of enough stature to steer the oil giant back to being a fossil fuel company again.
The muted response in BP shares certainly bore out their concern. Analysts were equally underwhelmed at the appointment, describing the move as panic after industry heavyweights turned the top job down.
There are also worries that Manifold, unquestionably a brilliant chief executive of the Dublin-based construction materials group CRH Holdings, will be tempted to switch BP's listing to the US to get a higher valuation, as he did with CRH.
Others say that he doesn't have any experience of the oil and gas sector, nor the skills required to be a chairman –rather than a chief executive – as the focus needs to be on accountability and governance rather than running operations.
That's the case against Manifold. My own hunch is that the City has been far too swift to judge his experience so negatively.
If Manifold's reputation is as formidable as his background suggests, the Dublin-trained accountant with an MBA and an MBS under his belt, could prove to be just the man to turn the tide at BP.
In fact, the fast-talking, fiercely driven yet modest 62-year-old sounds rather a good egg, one who prefers to be out on the road meeting clients overseas rather than the high life like so many of his peers. Something that high-flying BP executives might want to watch out for.
Manifold is credited with turning CRH from a small cement and other base-materials supplier into a fully-fledged billion pound construction giant. He joined CRH some 26 years ago, rising to become chief executive in 2014.
Since then, Manifold totally reshaped CRH's portfolio, buying up assets from Lafarge and Holcim during their 2015 merger, snapping up the US-based Ash Grove Cement Company and at the same time divesting of non-core businesses.
As CRH moved deeper into the US, he did the sensible thing, which was to list CRH in New York as well as keeping its FTSE 100 London listing.
That was a smart move – CRH's share price has soared by almost 400 per cent with its market value shooting to $50billion.
While it's true that Manifold's skills have been in operations, it's also evident from his achievements that he had a long-term vision and the nous to deliver that strategy.
Turning tactics into strategy is just what BP needs after the misguided ambition of former chairman Helge Lund and ex-boss Bernard Looney, and the mad dash for renewables.
Manifold takes the hot seat at a crucial time. BP has a mountain of debt, a mutinous investor in the activist US hedge fund Elliott and is in the middle of a $20billion fire-sale of non-core assets like wind farms and petrol stations. The company also had to deal with speculation of a Shell takeover, since denied.
Yet despite BP's underperforming shares, it still has a decent dividend yield and the board is clearly working flat out to put its 'reset' strategy into operation.
If BP can achieve this, and if it can get oil production up to 2.5m barrels of oil a day by the end of the decade, then Barclays reckon the shares could rise as high as £5.25.
Most of us have BP shares via our pensions. So we should all hope that Manifold proves the City wrong, and that even a fraction of his magic rubs off.
Before he gets going, he must focus on restoring confidence at board level as well as with long-suffering investors.
German reboot
Who would ever have imagined that Europe's great industrial powerhouse would have to launch a Made in Germany project to restore confidence?
But that's what 61 of the country's leading companies are doing with their promise to spend €631million on new investments over the next three years.
They hope to kick-start the economy, which is still looking bleak after two years of recession.
What they don't say is how they will bring down the sky-high cost of energy which is one of their biggest problems.
Sounds familiar.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a minute ago
- Reuters
Mainland China capital surge fuelling Hong Kong investment boom
HONG KONG, July 24 (Reuters) - Surging investment into Hong Kong by mainland Chinese investors is increasing market liquidity and depth while strengthening the island's position as a gateway to China. Short-term headwinds could slow this capital flood, but market innovation and the push for diversification are likely to propel this trend over time. The Stock Connect programme, launched by the Hong Kong, Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges in November 2014, enabled mainland Chinese investors to trade selected stocks listed in Hong Kong – the so-called "Southbound Stock Connect" – while also facilitating flows in the opposite direction. The Connect programme was expanded between 2017 and 2023 to include bonds, ETFs and interest rate swaps. Since 2015, the first full year of the programme's operation, onshore trades through the Southbound route have grown at an impressive 32% compound annual growth rate. In fact, Southbound's share of average daily turnover grew from 1.6% in 2015 to 18% in 2024, according to data from the Hong Kong Exchange (HKE). Onshore investors have consistently bought more through Southbound than they have sold, resulting in net inflows every year since the programme began. The flows were healthy but somewhat volatile until 2023, after which they skyrocketed. Net inflows more than doubled in 2024, and that figure has been nearly matched in just the first six months of 2025. What explains this appetite for Hong Kong-listed stocks? Geographic diversification is clearly a strong motive, as mainland Chinese investors have limited avenues for owning overseas assets. Investors may also seek to gain exposure to companies in key sectors that are under-represented in domestic markets, such as technology or insurance. For example, leading Chinese internet platforms Tencent and Alibaba, insurance market leader AIA and global bank HSBC are not listed on onshore indices. However, many of stocks popular among mainland investors are listed both onshore and in Hong Kong, again raising the question of why capital is increasingly flooding into the latter. The answer may simply be price. Many of these dual-listed stocks trade at far cheaper valuations in Hong Kong than in Shanghai or Shenzhen. The average premium of onshore "A-shares", tracked by the Hang Seng AH Premium Index, was only 3.2% prior to the commencement of the Stock Connect programme. This figure jumped to 34.1% soon after, as international money flowed into mainland Chinese equities through Northbound Connect, inflating valuations. The premium remains elevated, though it has declined recently. The influx of capital has increased the Hong Kong equity market's liquidity and depth, making it increasingly attractive for local companies seeking new listings and for onshore Chinese companies seeking additional listings. Indeed, in the first half of 2025, Hong Kong has been the world's largest IPO market, with $14 billion of issuance, easily outstripping Nasdaq, which was in second place with just over $9 billion. At the same time, the Stock Connect programme has also strengthened Hong Kong's position as an offshore renminbi hub, as the HKE has argued, opens new tab, and driven robust cross-border regulatory cooperation, involving regular meetings and exchange of ideas. The flip side of the onshore money avalanche could be increased volatility in Hong Kong markets, especially given that the trading style of mainland Chinese investors has historically been characterised by rapid transition from one sector or theme, to another. For example, onshore investors flocked to the internet platforms Alibaba and Tencent, and technology giant Xiaomi, throughout 2024 and early 2025, only to sell significant volumes this past May and June. It is also possible that some common preferences among onshore Chinese investors, such as the attraction to high dividend yields, could begin to affect the relative performance of stocks in Hong Kong. CNOOC, China Construction Bank and China Mobile – all characterised by low growth but high dividends – have remained Southbound favourites this year, based on monthly "Top 10" lists. What could derail this exuberance? The potential weakening of the renminbi could be one headwind, as it would make HKD-denominated stocks more expensive for mainlanders. Additionally, improved performance among mainland markets could also discourage Chinese investors from overseas diversification. In 2025 so far, Hong Kong's Hang Seng index is up 23.8%, dwarfing the Shanghai Composite's 5.5% gain. A reversal of return prospects could obviously reverse the direction of flows. Finally, U.S.-China geopolitical tensions are a perennial bugbear. Hong Kong permits money to be moved in and out of the city without many restrictions, which exposes it to risks from such political conflicts. Any adverse political outcome could make Chinese investors more inclined to keep their capital onshore. However, most of these potential headwinds are likely short-term phenomena, and ultimately, the long-term direction of travel is clear. Mainland Chinese savings represent a gigantic pool of still mostly untapped capital. Total deposits at the end of June 2025 were RMB 320 trillion ($44 trillion), according to PBOC reports, opens new tab. And total overseas portfolio investments in March 2025 were only $1.58 t, opens new tabrillion, less than 4% of households' domestic deposits. The need for greater diversification among mainland Chinese investors thus remains significant, meaning the surge of capital into Hong Kong markets may just be getting started. (The views expressed here are those of Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd. and the former head of Asia-Pacific Equity Research at BNP Paribas Securities.) Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labor lifts ban on US beef, saying new measures ‘effectively' manage biosecurity risks
Labor will lift restrictions on imports of US beef, easing tensions with the Trump administration as the federal government seeks relief from punishing US tariffs on steel and aluminium. The government confirmed on Thursday morning that the Department of Agriculture would allow the imports into Australia, saying the US now 'effectively' manages biosecurity risks in beef production. A ban on beef from cows raised and slaughtered in the US was lifted in 2019 but restrictions remained on beef from cattle raised in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US. Changes to make protections more robust introduced in late 2024 and early 2025 allow for meat from those countries to be traced through supply chains to their source farm. The concession is expected to help pave the way for the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, to argue the case to Donald Trump that Australia should be given exemptions from the US's 50% tariff on steel and aluminium, and a looming 200% tariff planned for pharmaceuticals. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The US president specifically cited Australia's restrictions on beef imports when he announced his 'Liberation Day' tariff regime. Australia faces a 10% baseline tariff on all products exported to the US. During the federal election campaign, Albanese said Australia would not change or compromise any biosecurity rules, 'full stop, exclamation mark'. Despite the comments, a concession on beef had been expected from Australia. The agriculture, fisheries and forestry minister, Julie Collins, said the government wanted fair and open trade, which significantly benefited the cattle industry. 'The US beef imports review has undergone a rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade,' she said. 'The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks. 'Australia stands for open and fair trade – our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this.' The new arrangements are due to come into place from 28 July, with Australian importers able to apply for permits to handle fresh beef products from the US, the largest buyer of Australian beef, ahead of China, in a $14bn market. The shadow finance minister, James Paterson, called for Albanese to explain the new arrangements. He said farmers needed reassurance there would be no risk to their businesses. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The prime minister himself has said that we couldn't relax the restrictions on the importation of US beef because of serious biosecurity concerns,' Paterson told Sky News. 'So if the government has found some way of dealing with that issue, protecting our domestic agricultural industry from the introduction of foreign diseases and pests, then they should say so.' The Nationals frontbencher Bridget McKenzie warned against sacrificing farmers for 'deficiencies' in the government's handling of the US alliance. 'We need a biosecurity arrangement that's based on science,' she told Channel Nine. 'We would be concerned around, particularly the protocols on the slaughtering of beef out of Canada and Mexico, because we do not want to bring those diseases into our country and our farmers and our industry shouldn't be sacrificed because the PM can't get his act together on this relationship.' McKenzie said Nationals MPs 'will be very concerned if our $11bn beef export industry is sacrificed to actually make up for the deficiencies in the Anthony Albanese-United States diplomatic relationship.'
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Welsh business confidence up but still in negative zone
The increase was identified in a survey of business leaders, although this still remains in the negative zone. ICAEW's Business Confidence Monitor (BCM) for Wales, published on July 24, put confidence at -3.7 on the index for Q2 2025, an improvement from -17.6 in the previous quarter. However, this reading was still below the historic average for the country. ICAEW pointed out that confidence remains fragile due to weak domestic and export sales growth. Manufacturing, engineering, retail, and wholesale in Wales reported some of the UK's lowest confidence levels. The institute added that uncertainty around the outcome of next year's Senedd elections could be a contributing factor, although the UK-US trade deal has likely provided a boost, particularly for exporters. Both domestic sales and exports grew at a lower rate in Q2 than their respective historic averages, according to the BCM. Welsh businesses forecast improvement in both domestic sales and exports growth within the year ahead. The tax burden remained the most prominent challenge for Welsh businesses following April's rise in employer's National Insurance Contributions, with more than half of the nation's companies citing it as a growing source of difficulty. Customer demand and marketplace competition were also cited as challenges. Minimal employment growth in the year to Q2 2025 reflects the increases in National Insurance and the National Living Wage in April, as well as the performance of key sectors. Robert Lloyd Griffiths OBE, ICAEW director for Wales, said: "It's heartening to see that sentiment has increased and is now broadly on par with the UK average. "Nevertheless, our companies are underperforming across most of the key metrics, suggesting we are not out of the woods yet." Nationally, business confidence declined quarter on quarter to -4.2 in Q2 2025.
