
Ashoka Co-Founder Reacts To Mahmudabad Row: 'Activism, Liberal Arts University Not Joined At The Hip'
Sanjeev Bikhchandani, co-founder and trustee of Ashoka University, has expressed concerns over growing 'activism" within the institution, suggesting it has become a 'headache" and hinting at the possibility of distancing himself from the university. His remarks came in an email response to an alumnus's criticism regarding the university's handling of Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad's arrest.
In a candid email shared on an internal mailing list, Bikhchandani emphasised that activism is not an inherent component of a liberal arts education. He stated, 'Activism and a Liberal Arts University are not joined at the hip. Ashoka is a Liberal Arts and Sciences University. Whether to be activists or not is a conscious choice people make." He further noted that his previous attempts to question the extent of activism at Ashoka were met with hostility, suggesting that some individuals have 'captured the institution" and resist any challenge to their views.
Bikhchandani also highlighted the financial contributions of the university's founders, pointing out that while they are often criticised as 'dirty filthy capitalists," they are the ones funding the institution. He questioned the assumption that liberal arts education must be synonymous with activism, citing his own experience at a liberal arts and sciences college where activism was minimal, yet students thrived.
'In the past I have questioned the activism at Ashoka—each time, I have been pounced upon by the activists and their supporters, both within and outside Ashoka: students, faculty, activists, etc., saying that 'if you are running a liberal arts university, then activism goes with the territory', that 'I am an arrogant owner', that 'dirty filthy capitalists don't understand how a university runs' (they somehow forget that the same capitalists are paying their salaries)," Bikchandani wrote.
Mentioning how he asked Google AI if all liberal arts universities are activist in nature, he wrote, 'The fundamental point I am making is that activism at Ashoka is a choice and it does not go with the territory. You can be a great liberal arts university and not be activist. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar."
Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, head of the Political Science Department at Ashoka University, was arrested on May 18, 2025, by Haryana Police over a social media post related to Operation Sindoor, India's percision strike against terrorist bases in Pakistan and PoK. Mahmudabad had in his social media post praised India's strategic doctrine and the outcome of Operation Sindoor, but criticised 'symbolic optics' and the treatment of minorities.
His arrest followed complaints alleging that his post was inflammatory and disrespectful to women in the armed forces. However, colleagues have defended Mahmudabad, asserting that his post supported the Indian government's stance and praised the strategic restraint of the armed forces.
The Supreme Court granted Mahmudabad interim bail, extending it until the third week of July. The court has directed the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to limit its probe to the two FIRs filed in relation to Mahmudabad's Facebook post and has restrained him from posting any content online related to the ongoing case.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
16 minutes ago
- India.com
‘Deals Working Out Very Well': Trump Talks Sweet About ‘Good Friend' India, Hints At Bitter 25% Tariff
Washington: Inside the humming cabin of Air Force One, President Donald Trump leaned back and spoke to reporters as casually as one might comment on the weather. But his words carried weight, especially for India. With just a couple of days left before an August 1 deadline, he said things between Washington and New Delhi were 'working out very well'. But at the same time warned tariffs as high as 20% to 25% might be on the way. He did not make the comment out of nowhere. A reporter had asked about whispers from New Delhi that India might be bracing for steep new duties. Trump shrugged off the speculation but made his stance clear. 'India has charged basically more tariffs than almost any other country over the years. But now I am in charge. And you just cannot do that,' he said. Though there has been no formal communication to India so far and no signed letter like those sent to other nations, the possibility of new tariffs is very much on the table. Despite the tense undertone, Trump called India 'a good friend'. Back in April, the Trump administration had already slapped a 26% tariff on Indian imports, only to hit the brakes later, describing them as 'reciprocal' measures that could be revisited. On the Indian side, the mood has been more optimistic. Speaking this past Sunday, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said India is negotiating from a position of strength. 'India today negotiates from a position of strength, a position of confidence. It is this very confidence that continuously encourages us to make good free trade agreements. Our discussions with the United States are progressing very well,' he said. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri echoed similar confidence during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent trip to the United Kingdom. He told the media that India is in regular touch with U.S. officials on the possibility of a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), though those talks are being handled under a separate track. 'We are discussing that under a different vertical. All I can say is that our engagement is underway. The contacts are underway, and we will see how that goes,' Misri said after the India-UK Free Trade Agreement signing ceremony. Back on July 14, a senior Indian official said the government was moving ahead with 'concrete progress' on the BTA with Washington, describing the deal as something both nations are committed to finalising under the leadership of Modi and Trump. India's goal? A win-win deal. 'We are moving in terms of a BTA. We are looking at a mutually beneficial deal,' the official said. But trade was not the only card Trump played in the air that day. He also took a moment to reflect on what he called his role in halting the conflict between India and Pakistan earlier this year. The standoff began after the April 22 terror attacks in Pahalgam, which claimed 26 lives. India's response, now widely discussed Operation Sindoor, involved targeted precision strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Trump claimed he had helped broker the peace. 'Look, India, they are my friends and he is (PM Modi) my friend. And you know they ended the war with Pakistan and by request and I was great and Pakistan did also. We did a lot of great settlements,' he said. India, however, had offered a different version of events. According to New Delhi, it was Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations who made the first move and reached out to his Indian counterpart to ask for a ceasefire. Only then did hostilities ease. Whether Trump's version holds up or not, trade and geopolitics are once again tied together, with India and the United States carefully maneuvering, with each step being closely watched. (With ANI inputs)


Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC refuses to quash FIR against Pune teacher over Op Sindoor linked remarks
The Bombay high court on Tuesday refused to quash the first information report (FIR) registered against 46-year-old Farah Deeba, a Pune-based former teacher, for allegedly ridiculing India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the WhatsApp group of her housing society following Operation Sindoor. her neighbour told the police in a complaint. (REPRESENTATIVE PIC) Deeba's reference to India as 'makkar' (deceitful) and her connection with Pakistan through her parents' families who resided there revealed the mens rea (guilty mind) behind her alleged crime, the division bench of justices AS Gadkari and Rajesh Patil said while dismissing her petition. Deeba, a resident of Margosa Heights housing society in Pune's Mohammadwadi neighbourhood, worked as a school teacher. After the Indian armed forces launched 'Operation Sindoor' on May 7, targeting alleged terror camps in Pakistan, her housing society's WhatsApp group was abuzz with congratulatory messages for the armed forces and the central government. Deeba responded to these messages by posting a laughing emoji, followed by a video ridiculing Narendra Modi. She referred to India as 'makkar' and posted a burning Indian flag as her WhatsApp status, her neighbour told the police in a complaint. Based on the neighbour's complaint, an FIR was registered against Deeba at the Kalepadal police station in Pune under sections 152 (acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India), 196 (promoting enmity between different groups), 197 (making imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration), 352 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace) and 353 (statements conducing to public mischief) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Deeba then approached the high court for quashing the FIR, contending that she was not in a mentally sound condition at the time as the families of both her parents were from Pakistan. As soon as she realised that a few members on the WhatsApp group were offended by her messages, she immediately deleted them and apologised to the complainant, she said in her plea. She also lost her job as a teacher due to the controversy generated by the case against her, she mentioned. Additional public prosecutor MM Deshmukh opposed the petition, saying prima facie, there was enough material to make out the alleged offences and the investigation needed to be completed and taken to its logical end. The court accepted the prosecutor's contentions, saying the petitioner, being well-educated with a masters in English and a BEd degree, should have thought about the pros and cons of her actions before posting the videos and messages. 'Though the petitioner tendered her apology to the complainant, damage had already been caused by the petitioner's messages which were circulated,' the judges said. Her acts attracted the sections she was booked under while her reference India as 'makkar' and her admission about her parents' families hailing from Pakistan were indicative of her guilty mind, the court noted, dismissing her plea.


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Himanta slams Gaurav over Op Sindoor debate in House
1 2 3 4 Guwahati: Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday launched a scathing attack on Congress MP from the state and deputy LoP in Lok Sabha, Gaurav Gogoi, following his speech during the debate on Operation Sindoor on Tuesday, escalating their ongoing political confrontation into a bitter war of words over national security and alleged Pakistani connections. Sarma, who is currently in New Delhi, took to social media platform X, writing, "Speech delivered by our MP from Jorhat in Parliament yesterday proved beyond doubt that he acts on behalf of Pakistan," Sarma went further, describing Gogoi as "a disgrace to Assam and a betrayal of our pride as proud Indians". Sarma's attack centred on several key allegations. He claimed that Gogoi's "secret trip and close ties with the Pakistani establishment speak volumes". The CM also highlighted what he characterized as a vulnerability in Gogoi's position, stating: "With his wife and both the kids holding foreign citizenship, he can leave India any time". Joining Sarma on X, former Manipur chief minister N Biren Singh wrote that Gogoi's "ignorance of modern warfare is a bit concerning" and added, "Truly ashamed to say that he is from the North East." Singh wrote, "Questioning why our fighter jets did not engage at a close range ignores the strategic brilliance of long-range precision strikes that protected our soldiers and ensured that the mission was successful. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Ridiculing our brave defenders, who are working tirelessly at the frontline, is not just highly unbecoming of a political leader, but it is a disservice to the nation they safeguard." In his speech during the Operation Sindoor debate, Gogoi had questioned the govt's transparency regarding the military operation that followed the Pahalgam terror attack . The Congress MP criticised defence minister Rajnath Singh for not explaining how terrorists managed to reach Pahalgam and kill 26 innocent people.