
NJAC Act to Basic Structure doctrine, Jagdeep Dhankhar kept asking questions of the Supreme Court during his tenure
In 2022, his term as the Rajya Sabha Chairman began on a controversial note during the Winter Session as he called the Supreme Court's 2015 judgment striking down the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act a 'glaring instance' of 'severe compromise' of parliamentary sovereignty and disregard of the 'mandate of the people'. He said Parliament, being the custodian of the 'ordainment of the people', was duty-bound to 'address the issue' and expressed confidence that 'it will do so'. The remarks, made in the House on December 7, were a reiteration of what he had said a week earlier.
Dhankhar also said it was time for 'all constitutional institutions to reflect and give quietus to public display of adversarially challenging stance/trading or exchange of advisories emanating from these platforms'. The comments came at a time when the Opposition was planning to seek a discussion in the House on alleged government interference in the functioning of constitutional bodies, including a faceoff with the judiciary. A month earlier, then Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju had said the Collegium system of appointing judges was 'opaque' and 'not accountable' and 'alien' to the Constitution. His remarks had attracted the displeasure of the Supreme Court.
Comments on Basic Structure doctrine
A month later, on January 11, 2023, he rekindled the debate on the doctrine of separation of powers, citing the Supreme Court's landmark 1973 judgment in the Kesavananda Bharati case in which it ruled Parliament had the authority to amend the Constitution but not its basic structure. Dhankhar, in his inaugural address at the 83rd All-India Presiding Officers Conference in Jaipur, said it would be difficult to answer the question, 'Are we a democratic nation?'
'In a democratic society, the basic of any basic structure is supremacy of the people, sovereignty of the people, sovereignty of Parliament. Executive thrives on the sovereignty of Parliament. Legislatures and Parliament decide who will be the Chief Minister, who will be the Prime Minister. The ultimate power is with the Legislature. The Legislature decides who will be in other institutions. In such a situation, all Constitutional institutions – the Legislative, Executive, Judiciary – are required to be within their limits,' he said.
'In 1973, in the Kesavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court gave the idea of basic structure saying that Parliament can amend the Constitution, but not its basic structure. With due respect to the Judiciary, I cannot subscribe to this,' Dhankhar said.
Reviving the NJAC debate
This March, amid the row over the discovery of wads of currency notes at the New Delhi home of High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma, Dhankhar again revived the NJAC debate. He said 'things would have been different' if the Supreme Court had not struck down the mechanism for judicial appointments. His remarks on March 25 came on a day a three-member committee constituted by the Supreme Court began its inquiry into the conduct of Justice Varma and visited his residence.
The NJAC Act had proposed that appointment of judges be done by a six-member body, headed by the Chief Justice of India, and comprising two most senior SC judges, the Union Law Minister and two 'eminent' persons. The two eminent persons were to be selected by a panel comprising the Prime Minister, the CJI and the leader of the largest Opposition party in Lok Sabha.
However, the Supreme Court was of the view that there was no question of accepting an alternative procedure which did not ensure primacy of the judiciary in the matter of selection and appointment of judges in the higher judiciary.
On the judiciary and the President
On April 22, Dhankhar minced no words in questioning the judiciary soon after the Supreme Court imposed a three-month time limit on the President and governors to give their assent to a Bill. At a gathering at a Delhi University event to commemorate 75 years of the Constitution, Dhankhar said, 'There is no visualisation in the Constitution of any authority above Parliament … elected representatives … They are the ultimate masters as to what (the) Constitution content will be.'
Dhankhar also said that India cannot have a situation where the judiciary directs the President. 'So, we have judges who will legislate, who will perform executive functions, who will act as super Parliament, and absolutely have no accountability because the law of the land does not apply to them,' he said the same day in his address to the sixth batch of the Rajya Sabha interns at the Vice President's Enclave.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
21 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
'Will uphold this honour': Kamal Haasan ahead of oath-taking as RS MP
Hello readers. After a day of disruptions over the Special Electoral Roll (SIR) revision exercise in poll-bound Bihar that saw proceedings of both Houses interrupted, the Parliament is set to convene again today, with Kamal Haasan slated to take oath as a Rajya Sabha member. That said, with the government reportedly unwilling to discuss the SIR issue despite Opposition protests, it remains to be scene whether, and for how long, proceedings continue on Thursday before an adjournment is announced. Follow this space for the latest updates from the Monsoon Session of the Parliament.


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Domicile rule of T'gana for med seats flawed: SC
New Delhi: Supreme Court on Wednesday faulted the Telangana govt's domicile policy, which mandates a student to have pursued Classes 9 to 12 in the state to be eligible for admissions to state quota medical seats through NEET and said it was far removed from the ground reality, reports Dhananjay Mahapatra. "These days, many students, to avail of better coaching facilities for competing in medical and engineering entrance examinations, pursue their Class 11 and 12 at places like Kota. Should they be barred from getting admitted on the ground that they are not domiciles of Telangana?" a bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and Joymalya Bagchi asked. "You must have a humane approach." We do not want such students to be harassed. All students whose parents are domiciled in Telangana would be eligible for state quota seats irrespective of the place from where they passed Class 11 and 12," the CJI said, with a warning, "Either you (the govt) resolve the issue, or we will set it right." Appearing for students facing the domicile bar despite their parents being born in Telangana and continuously residing in the state, advocate Raghenth Basant told the bench that it has created a piquant situation. "Children of a person from Kerala, who is posted in Telangana for the last four years, on completing Class 9-12 in Telangana would be eligible for admissions to medical seats under state quota. But students who study outside, despite their parents being natural residents of Telangana, would not be eligible to avail these state quota medical seats," he said. He urged the court to modify the domicile criteria by allowing children of every resident of Telangana, irrespective of where they completed their schooling, to get admitted to medical colleges under state quota seats. The SC posted the matter for further hearing on July 29, by when the Telangana govt will have to come with an answer to the court's query.


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dhankhar resigns: Has the VP been asked to vacate his residence immediately? Govt clarifies
NEW DELHI: The government has dismissed social media rumours claiming that former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has been asked to vacate his official residence immediately following his surprise resignation earlier this week. The Press Information Bureau (PIB) issued a public clarification, stating: 'It is being widely claimed on social media that Vice President's official residence has been sealed and former VP has been asked to vacate his residence immediately. These claims are Fake. Don't fall for misinformation. Always verify news from official sources before sharing it,' the PIB Fact Check team posted on X. The clarification came as speculation mounted online over the circumstances surrounding Dhankhar's abrupt resignation, nearly two years before his term was due to end in August 2027. While the official reason cited was health concerns, several opposition leaders have questioned the timing and suggested that the former vice president may have been pressured to step down. According to PTI, Dhankhar, 74, has begun packing and is preparing to move out of the Vice President's Enclave, where he had been residing since April last year. Constructed under the Central Vista redevelopment plan, the Enclave is located on Church Road near the Parliament House complex. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More 'He will be offered a Type VIII bungalow in Lutyens' Delhi or another area,' an Urban Development Ministry official told PTI. As per protocol, former vice presidents are entitled to government accommodation, and the transition is being handled in accordance with standard procedures. The PIB reiterated that the residence has not been sealed and that the move is not sudden or forced. Congress President and Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, Mallikarjun Kharge, questioned the narrative, saying: 'The government should answer why he resigned. I can see 'dal mein kuch kaala hai'. His health is fine. He used to defend RSS and BJP always. Who and what is behind his resignation should be known to the country.' Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee went a step further, alleging Dhankhar was 'forced' to resign by the Prime Minister and senior ministers and was 'threatened' with impeachment. Meanwhile, the Election Commission has initiated the process for electing a new vice president. The electoral college comprises elected and nominated members of both Houses of Parliament. According to Article 68(2) of the Constitution, a new vice president must be elected 'as soon as possible' after a vacancy arises. The NDA currently holds a comfortable majority in both Houses, giving it an edge in the upcoming election.