
NJAC Act to Basic Structure doctrine, Jagdeep Dhankhar kept asking questions of the Supreme Court during his tenure
In 2022, his term as the Rajya Sabha Chairman began on a controversial note during the Winter Session as he called the Supreme Court's 2015 judgment striking down the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act a 'glaring instance' of 'severe compromise' of parliamentary sovereignty and disregard of the 'mandate of the people'. He said Parliament, being the custodian of the 'ordainment of the people', was duty-bound to 'address the issue' and expressed confidence that 'it will do so'. The remarks, made in the House on December 7, were a reiteration of what he had said a week earlier.
Dhankhar also said it was time for 'all constitutional institutions to reflect and give quietus to public display of adversarially challenging stance/trading or exchange of advisories emanating from these platforms'. The comments came at a time when the Opposition was planning to seek a discussion in the House on alleged government interference in the functioning of constitutional bodies, including a faceoff with the judiciary. A month earlier, then Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju had said the Collegium system of appointing judges was 'opaque' and 'not accountable' and 'alien' to the Constitution. His remarks had attracted the displeasure of the Supreme Court.
Comments on Basic Structure doctrine
A month later, on January 11, 2023, he rekindled the debate on the doctrine of separation of powers, citing the Supreme Court's landmark 1973 judgment in the Kesavananda Bharati case in which it ruled Parliament had the authority to amend the Constitution but not its basic structure. Dhankhar, in his inaugural address at the 83rd All-India Presiding Officers Conference in Jaipur, said it would be difficult to answer the question, 'Are we a democratic nation?'
'In a democratic society, the basic of any basic structure is supremacy of the people, sovereignty of the people, sovereignty of Parliament. Executive thrives on the sovereignty of Parliament. Legislatures and Parliament decide who will be the Chief Minister, who will be the Prime Minister. The ultimate power is with the Legislature. The Legislature decides who will be in other institutions. In such a situation, all Constitutional institutions – the Legislative, Executive, Judiciary – are required to be within their limits,' he said.
'In 1973, in the Kesavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court gave the idea of basic structure saying that Parliament can amend the Constitution, but not its basic structure. With due respect to the Judiciary, I cannot subscribe to this,' Dhankhar said.
Reviving the NJAC debate
This March, amid the row over the discovery of wads of currency notes at the New Delhi home of High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma, Dhankhar again revived the NJAC debate. He said 'things would have been different' if the Supreme Court had not struck down the mechanism for judicial appointments. His remarks on March 25 came on a day a three-member committee constituted by the Supreme Court began its inquiry into the conduct of Justice Varma and visited his residence.
The NJAC Act had proposed that appointment of judges be done by a six-member body, headed by the Chief Justice of India, and comprising two most senior SC judges, the Union Law Minister and two 'eminent' persons. The two eminent persons were to be selected by a panel comprising the Prime Minister, the CJI and the leader of the largest Opposition party in Lok Sabha.
However, the Supreme Court was of the view that there was no question of accepting an alternative procedure which did not ensure primacy of the judiciary in the matter of selection and appointment of judges in the higher judiciary.
On the judiciary and the President
On April 22, Dhankhar minced no words in questioning the judiciary soon after the Supreme Court imposed a three-month time limit on the President and governors to give their assent to a Bill. At a gathering at a Delhi University event to commemorate 75 years of the Constitution, Dhankhar said, 'There is no visualisation in the Constitution of any authority above Parliament … elected representatives … They are the ultimate masters as to what (the) Constitution content will be.'
Dhankhar also said that India cannot have a situation where the judiciary directs the President. 'So, we have judges who will legislate, who will perform executive functions, who will act as super Parliament, and absolutely have no accountability because the law of the land does not apply to them,' he said the same day in his address to the sixth batch of the Rajya Sabha interns at the Vice President's Enclave.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
No plan to remove 'socialism', 'secularism,' says Centre
New Delhi: The Union government has 'no current plan or intention' to reconsider or remove the words 'socialism' and 'secularism' from the Preamble of the Constitution inserted during the Emergency period, the Rajya Sabha was informed on Thursday. The House was also told that the government has not 'formally' initiated any legal or constitutional process to remove the two words from the Preamble of the Constitution. In a written reply, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal said while there may be discussions or debates in certain public or political circles, 'no formal decision or proposal has been announced by the government' regarding amendments to these terms. "The government's official stand is that there is no current plan or intention to reconsider or remove the words 'socialism' and 'secularism' from the Preamble of the Constitution. Any discussions regarding amendments to the Preamble would require thorough deliberation and broad consensus, but as of now, the government has not initiated any formal process to change these provisions," the minister asserted. He pointed out that in November 2024, the Supreme Court had also dismissed petitions challenging the 1976 amendment (42nd Constitutional Amendment), which affirmed that Parliament's power to amend the Constitution extends to the Preamble. The court clarified that 'socialism' in the Indian context signifies a welfare state and does not impede private sector growth, while 'secularism' is integral to the Constitution's basic structure.


Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
Can't allow dead on voters' list: CEC Kumar
New Delhi: Facing flak over voter roll revision in Bihar, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Thursday asked if the poll body can come under influence and allow the dead, those who have migrated permanently or have registered themselves as electors at multiple places be included in the voters' list. His remarks came amid stepped up attacks by the opposition parties which have been targeting the poll authority over the special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral roll. The Opposition has claimed that the move will disenfranchise crores of eligible citizens. "Isn't a pure voter list being prepared by the Election Commission through a transparent process, the foundation for fair elections and a strong democracy?" he said, according to the EC. Kumar said allowing ineligible people to vote, first in Bihar and later in the entire country, is against the Constitution. "On these questions, someday or the other, all of us and all the citizens of India will have to think deeply, going beyond political ideologies," he underlined.


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru stampede: D'Cunha report blames RCB, KSCA, DNA for tragedy; firm moves HC, calls it ‘biased, hasty'
The Karnataka cabinet has accepted the Justice John Michael D'Cunha report on the Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede, which resulted in 11 fatalities. Consequently, the cabinet has announced legal action against the RCB franchise, KSCA, and DNA Entertainment Networks. BENGALURU: The Siddaramaiah cabinet on Thursday decided to initiate legal action based on retired high court judge John Michael D'Cunha's report indicting IPL franchise Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) and event management firm DNA Entertainment Networks for the June 4 stampede outside Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium in which 11 cricket fans died and over 50 others were injured. 'Action against (suspended) govt officials depends on the outcome of the departmental inquiry,' law and parliamentary affairs minister H K Patil said after the cabinet meeting, in which the inquiry report into the stampede was formally accepted. DNA Entertainment immediately filed a petition in Karnataka high court, asking for the inquiry commission's report to be quashed on grounds of alleged procedural lapses and bias. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru CM Siddaramaiah suspended former Bengaluru police chief B Dayananda and four other senior cops on charges of crowd-management lapses, while fending off allegations that his govt was just as responsible for clearing a victory parade for IPL champions RCB even before the final in Ahmedabad got over on June 3. The Central Administrative Tribunal has since stayed the suspensions. DNA Entertainment's petition alleges that the report was submitted in 'undue haste', ignoring 'critical documentation' demonstrating the firm's efforts to manage the event inside the stadium. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 15 Prettiest Icons In The History The Noodle Box Undo It argues that an event management company can not be held liable for crowd mismanagement outside the venue, which is under govt's jurisdiction. The firm has also flagged simultaneous inquiries in alleged violation of Article 20(2) of the Constitution, which prohibits multiple proceedings for the same offence. The high court had taken suo motu cognisance of the stampede deaths and sought a report from the state govt, following which the commission of inquiry was announced. A parallel CID investigation and a magisterial inquiry led by the deputy commissioner (Bengaluru urban) are underway. The D'Cunha Commission named KSCA chief Raghuram Bhat, former secretary A Shankar, ex-treasurer E S Jayaram, RCB vice-president Rajesh Menon, DNA Entertainment managing director T Venkatavardhan and vice-president Sunil Mathur, among others, as being responsible for the stampede.