
North Carolina governor vetoes anti-DEI and transgender rights bills, calling them 'mean-spirited'
Stein criticized the Republican-controlled legislature for focusing on these measures while they've yet to enact a budget for the fiscal year that started this week. Instead, Stein said in a news release, it 'wants to distract us by stoking culture wars that further divide us. These mean-spirited bills would marginalize vulnerable people and also undermine the quality of public services and public education.'
The measures cutting or eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in state and local governments, K-12 public schools and the university system have been a major priority for GOP lawmakers. They argue the programs targeted have overemphasized identity to the detriment of merit and societal unity.
The other vetoed bill initially ran as a bipartisan measure curbing sexual exploitation of women and minors by implementing age verification and consent requirements for people who appear on pornography websites. But the final measure was loaded up with several contentious provisions. One would prevent state-funded gender transition procedures or gender-affirming hormone therapy for prisoners. It also affirms the recognition of two sexes and requires the state to officially attach a transgender person's new birth certificate to their old one if they change their sex assigned at birth.
The bills align with President Donald Trump's agenda to dismantle DEI practices and press against transgender rights. The legislation is now back at the General Assembly, which could return from a recess later this month to attempt veto overrides and advance other legislation. Republicans are one House seat short of a veto-proof majority. No Democrats voted for the final three anti-DEI measures.
However, one House Democrat did vote for the other vetoed bill. By vetoing that measure, House Speaker Destin Hall said in a release, Stein 'has sided with radical activists over the overwhelming majority of North Carolinians who believe in parental rights, biological reality, and protecting women and children.' The bill also would order local school districts to adopt policies so parents can ask that their child be excused from activities or readings that would "impose a substantial burden on the student's religious beliefs.'
Stein said in a veto message that he strongly supported the sexual exploitation provisions in the bill, but the final measure went too far. 'My faith teaches me that we are all children of God, no matter our differences, and that it is wrong to target vulnerable people, as this bill does," he added.
As for the anti-DEI measures, one bill would ban training, staff positions and hiring decisions that incorporate DEI in state agencies. The legislation also would outlaw those agencies or local governments from using state funds for DEI programs. Workers who violate the law could face civil penalties and litigation. The two other bills would bar 'divisive concepts' and 'discriminatory practices' across public education statewide.
A Stein veto message said the bill addressing state and local governments in part 'is riddled with vague definitions yet imposes extreme penalties for unknowable violations.' As for the education measures, Stein wrote, 'we should not whitewash history' and 'should ensure our students learn from diverse perspectives and form their own opinions.'
Stein has now vetoed 11 measures since taking office in January — all of them in the past two weeks.
Of the eight bills he signed Friday, one will block certain abuse and neglect charges for parents or caregivers raising transgender children 'consistent with the juvenile's biological sex.' The bill also says that adoption agencies can't be permitted to deny someone from adopting a child because of their unwillingness to allow the child to transition.
Bill sponsors said the restrictions were needed to allow parents and guardians to raise children in line with their family values. But opponents said the measure would harm transgender children and intrude in family matters already governed by other laws. Nine House Democrats voted for the final bill. Stein's office didn't immediately respond Friday to a request for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump signs ‘big, beautiful bill' into law
President Trump on Friday signed a massive reconciliation package that will extend tax cuts and phase-in cuts to Medicaid, finalizing a significant legislative victory for his administration after months of difficult negotiations with Republicans on Capitol Hill. Trump signed the one big, beautiful bill into law at a military family picnic at the White House for the Fourth of July. Trump and his aides had long pegged Independence Day as a deadline for when they hoped to see the legislation on his desk, a timeline that appeared in peril just days ago. 'We made promises, and it's really promises made, promises kept, and we've kept them,' Trump said from the balcony overlooking the South Lawn of the White House. 'This is a triumph of democracy on the birthday of democracy. And I have to say, the people are happy.' Friday's ceremony was attended by first lady Melania Trump, several Cabinet officials and numerous Republican lawmakers, including Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.), House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) and Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.). The event was marked by other flourishes, including a flyover of two B-2 bombers, the same type of planes that carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last month. The Senate passed its version of the bill early Tuesday morning, with Vice President Vance breaking a 50-50 tie after three Republicans voted no. The House passed the bill without making any changes on Thursday afternoon after an hours-long slog to persuade a number of holdouts on a procedural vote. The final vote in the House was 218-214. Two Republicans voted against it. Friday's signing was an exclamation point to what has been a positive stretch for Trump in terms of foreign policy accomplishments, a strong jobs report and historic low numbers of apprehensions at the southern border. 'We've I think had probably the most successful almost six months as a president and the presidency,' Trump said. 'I think they're saying it was the best six months, and I know for a fact they're saying the last two weeks, there has never been anything like it as far as winning, winning, winning.' The legislation contains numerous major campaign promises from Trump's 2024 bid for the White House. It extends the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017, which were set to expire later this year. It also eliminates some taxes on tipped wages and increases the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, which had emerged as one of the thorniest sticking points throughout negotiations. The bill provides a $150 billion increase in funding for a border wall, immigration enforcement and deportations. It provides $150 billion in new defense spending for priorities like shipbuilding and a 'Golden Dome' missile defense project. It cuts incentives that promote green energy and expands domestic production of oil, coal and natural gas. It will hike the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, forestalling the threat of a federal default. Democrats have seized on how the bill contains cuts to low-income health and nutrition programs — reductions designed to help offset the loss of revenues from the tax cuts but that are also expected to eliminate health coverage for millions of people. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-Calif.) delivered a historically long speech on Friday railing against the bill and warning that it would hurt working families. Trump on Friday mocked Jeffries and dismissed Democratic criticisms as a 'con job.' White House officials have similarly waved off negative polling on the bill and argued the public will have a positive view of the legislation once Republicans have time to educate constituents on what's in it.


New York Post
38 minutes ago
- New York Post
Black New Yorkers rage over Mamdani's ‘African American' claim: ‘He's a fraud'
Black New York isn't buying it. A slew of black Big Apple residents fumed Friday over mayoral front-runner Zohran Mamdani's claim on an Ivy League college application that he is African American — with them raging the socialist pol is a 'fraud' and 'trickster.' 'He's just trying to get over,' an 86-year-old Harlem resident, identifying herself only as Marjorie, said of Mamdani, a socialist of Asian Indian descent. 'You can look at him and see he's not' black, she said. 'Absolutely not. 4 Zohran Mamdani checked off 'African American' as well as 'Asian' on his Columbia University application in 2009, leading to controversy. AFP via Getty Images 'I don't like him. I didn't like him from the first time I heard him. You can look at him and see he's a trickster,' she said of the pol, who struggled mightily to make inroads among black voters at the Democratic primary-race polls last month, despite his stunning win. Another longtime local who asked not to be identified seethed, 'He's a fraud. 'He's a foreigner. He ain't no African American,' the man said of Mamdani, who was born in Uganda but became a naturalized US citizen in 2018 and holds dual citizenship between the countries. A Bronx resident named Joshua added, 'He's a liar. Point-blank, period. 'We don't need a lying mayor or a mayor that says he's black so he can get black people to vote for him. 4 Mamdani told street performer Crackhead Barney in April that it would be 'misleading' to identify himself as African American. 'We black,' he said. 'We ain't stupid.' Mamdani, a Democratic socialist, had checked off the 'black or African American' and 'Asian' boxes on his 2009 Columbia University application regarding his race, the New York Times reported last week. The university, where Mamdani's father was and still is a professor, had affirmative-action-friendly admissions policies at the time, which the pol's critics allege he may have been trying to take advantage of. Either way, Mamdani failed to get into the prestigious school. Mamdani told the Times that while he doesn't consider himself black or African American, he is 'an American who was born in Africa' — and simply felt the other choices on the form didn't fully address who he is. 4 The socialist checked off the questionable box about race in his application to Columbia University. GHI/Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images But when asked by a performance artist on the street in April whether he considers himself African American, he admitted it would be 'misleading' to say so. A Bronx resident said Mamdani's claim in 2009 was shameful. 'I always knew something was off about him,' said Maria R., 37, to The Post. 'Why are you claiming something that you are not? He could've potentially took away an opportunity for someone else. 'He can look in the mirror and see he's not black,' she said. Tiffany Francis, a 31-year-old from Brooklyn who moved to Harlem in 2019, agreed that his claim was 'not fair. 'I think people should tell the truth,' Francis said. 'No matter the circumstances, just be truthful. Don't try to persuade or lie to get your way.' 4 Black New Yorkers said Mamdani's 'African American' claim makes him a 'fraudster' and a 'trickster.' Kyle Mazza/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Earlier this week, Mayor Eric Adams, who is black, called Mamdani's college-application claim 'deeply offensive. 'The African American identity is not a checkbox of convenience,' the mayor griped of his foe. 'It's a history, a struggle and a lived experience. For someone to exploit that for personal gain is deeply offensive.' But some black New Yorkers said they have no issue with Mamdani's claim — and even appreciate it. 'I think it's nice that he's from Uganda,' said Temisan Bazunu, 22, a summer intern and Nigerian native. 'I feel like he will be a great mayor if he wins. It's nice to see someone close to your country. 'I don't think he's a liar,' Bazunu said. Michelle Hart, a native of Trinidad and Tobago, said she understood Mamdani's choice on the application. 'There's always that question when you're filling out paperwork,' Hart said. 'So I can see him identifying as African American because he saw 'African,' where as 'other' connotes to something other than African. So he saw 'African' in 'African-American,' and I think that's OK.' Mamdani's camp did not respond to a Post request for comment on the controversy Friday. -Additional reporting by Hannah Fierick


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Immigrants' deportation to South Sudan briefly blocked after Supreme Court cleared the way
A federal judge on Friday briefly halted deportations of eight immigrants to war-torn South Sudan, sending the case to another judge, in Boston, the day after the Supreme Court greenlighted their removal. District Judge Randolph Moss sent the case north from Washington after an extraordinary Fourth of July hearing on Friday afternoon. He concluded that the judge best equipped to deal with the issues was Brian Murphy, the one whose rulings led to the initial halt of the Trump administration's effort to begin deportations to the eastern African country. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled on Friday to halt the deportations of eight migrants to South Sudan. AP He extended his order halting the deportation until 4:30 p.m. Eastern time, but it was unclear whether Murphy would act on the federal holiday to further limit the removal. Moss said new claims by the immigrants' lawyers deserved a hearing. The administration has been trying to deport the immigrants for weeks. None are from South Sudan, which is enmeshed in civil war and where the U.S government advises no one should travel before making their own funeral arrangements. The case has been sent to another judge after the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration could deport the eight immigrants convicted of violent crimes back to South Sudan. AP The government flew them to the U.S. Naval Base at Djibouti but couldn't move them further because Murphy had ruled no immigrant could be sent to a new country without a chance to have a court hearing. The Supreme Court vacated that decision last month, then Thursday night issued a new order clarifying that that meant the immigrants could be moved to South Sudan. Lawyers for the immigrants, who hail from Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and other countries, filed an emergency request to halt their removal later that night.