Bryson and McKay cleared in Nama trial
The charges had related to a Stormont committee hearing that examined the sale of the National Asset Management Agency's (Nama) Northern Ireland assets in 2015.
Mr McKay, 43, from Loughan Road in Dunnamanagh – who was chairman of the finance committee at the time – was found not guilty of misconduct in public office.
Mr Bryson and Mr McKay said there are now questions for the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) over why the prosecution was brought.
The PPS has said the available evidence had indicated it was in the public interest to prosecute.
Trial judge Gordon Kerr KC said he believed Mr Bryson had lied while giving evidence in the case, but said he was not involved in a criminal conspiracy.
The long-running Nama trial had related to Mr Bryson's 2015 appearance before the Stormont committee, chaired by Mr McKay, which was investigating the sale of Nama's Northern Ireland assets to a US investment fund.
The criminal probe was launched after the publication of leaked Twitter messages between Mr Bryson, Mr McKay and the account of Mr O'Hara, who at the time was a Sinn Fein activist in north Antrim.
Mr McKay quit as an MLA within hours of the Twitter messages being published in August 2016.
The Stormont Finance Committee inquiry was set up in 2015 amid political controversy over the multimillion-pound sale of Nama's property portfolio.
Nama, the so-called bad bank created by the Irish government to deal with the toxic loans of bailed-out lenders during the economic crash, sold its 800 Northern Ireland-linked properties to investment fund Cerberus for £1.2 billion.
Giving evidence to the committee in 2015, Mr Bryson used Assembly privilege to name former DUP leader Peter Robinson as a beneficiary of the sale.
The then-first minister of Northern Ireland strongly rejected any suggestion he benefited from the deal. All other parties involved in the transaction also denied wrongdoing.
Delivering his judgment in the non-jury trial on Thursday, the judge said: 'Despite his lies in court, I am sure that Mr Bryson was at all times communicating with Mr McKay.
'I am sure that the communications were designed to give Mr Bryson the best advice and guidance to maximise his chances of giving evidence.
'My analysis of the messages do not show any occasion where Mr McKay undertook to say or do anything outside his duties as chairman to ensure Mr Bryson's evidence would be in open session.
'Clearing Mr Bryson, the judge said the evidence did not establish there had been a criminal conspiracy between him and Mr McKay.
He said: 'In the absence of an agreement, the conspiracy charge must fail.'
Turning to Mr McKay, the judge said there was 'no doubt he deliberately misled the committee to ease the way for Mr Bryson's presentation'.
The judge pointed out the Assembly had its own code of conduct and said there was 'no precedent for a prosecution in these circumstances'.
Clearing Mr McKay, he added: 'I do not consider it my role to expand the offence.'
The judge said the evidence against Mr O'Hara 'fell well short' of anything which would convince him of his guilt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
4 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Glasgow man jailed after racist rants at flat block
Robert Bryson, 58, of Govan, was sentenced at Glasgow Sheriff Court recently after pleading guilty to multiple charges. He admitted to two charges of acting in a manner that was racially aggravated, which caused or was intended to cause other people alarm or distress, breaching bail conditions, and two charges of behaving in a threatening or abusive manner. The court heard that at 9pm on November 21, 2023, Kanwal Chaudhry and Sehr Chaudhry were within a property on Elder Street when they heard a sudden and continuous banging on the living room wall coming from the next flat where Bryson lived. They banged on the wall in the hopes of Bryson stopping; however, the loud banging continued, and the pair heard Bryson shouting and swearing. He stated: 'ya p***k, f**k off, you bloody b***h, you black b*****d.' The pair deemed the comments as racially prejudiced based on their Pakistani descent and believed the verbal abuse to be directed at them. They contacted 101 and at 9.45pm police attended and arrested Bryson, to which he replied, 'I did say black b*****d, I was shouting at my son'. READ NEXT: Electrician caught with psychedelic Wonka bars in Clydebank In a separate incident at 1.05am on December 24, 2024, Sarmad Ikram was asleep when he was woken by a loud banging noise coming from next door, where Bryson lived. Bryson was heard shouting 'illegal immigrants, black b******s, your gran and grampa are illegal immigrants, get them the f**k out of my country, this is Scotland not Pakistan, f**k off, get yourselves to f**k. 'It's Scotland, we will beat you black b******s.' Police attended that evening to take statements. Then, at 00.18am on December 25, 2024, officers had cause to force entry to Bryson's property. He was cautioned and charged. In a further incident on January 7, 2025, Mr Chaudhry and Mr Ikram were within a property on Elder Street when they could hear Bryson shouting from his flat. He stated: 'black b******s, p****s, monkeys'. Police were contacted, and at 00.50am on January 8, officers attended. They overheard Bryson shout 'ya black b******s' from within his home. READ NEXT: Clydebank woman faked pregnancy to extort man out of £6k At 1.30am the same day, Bryson was cautioned and informed he was under arrest. He was later charged. In a fourth incident at 11pm on January 13, 2025, Mr Ikram was outside a flat block on Elder Street in Govan. He saw Bryson enter the street and as he approached Mr Ikram he shouted 'b******s, a*******s, d**khead, f**k'. Mr Ikram believed these comments were aimed at him as there was no one else in the street at the time. Bryson went inside, and police were contacted. At 00.05am on January 15, Bryson was traced at his home where he was arrested and cautioned. Bryson's lawyer told the court that her client's offending 'could be attributed to alcohol consumption'. READ NEXT: Diocese launch appeal after 'vandalism' at Barrhead cemetery The defence solicitor said: 'These are very serious offences. He doesn't appear to remember all of them. 'His offending is attributed to alcohol consumption. That being said, he has expressed a willingness to attend alcohol anonymous meetings, but he has yet to do so. 'In the view of the social worker, he was attending appointments consistently, but his attitude remains the same to alcohol misuse. 'The report states there is no evidence that his needs cannot be met by a community payback order with supervision.' Addressing Bryson, Sheriff Joanna McDonald commented: 'The difficulty I have in dealing with you is you will not address your alcohol issue. 'You still have these entrenched views. You keep saying you're not racist, but you have been racist. You subjected them to abuse by you since 2023. 'On the first matter, I dealt with you and at that time I was told it was a one off but there have been three further offences against the same people.' Bryson was jailed for 411 days.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Stormont's end of term report card - could do better?
This week, with no fanfare, the Speaker of the Northern Ireland Assembly wrote to members informing them things were about to move up a Poots said a number of Executive Bills had been introduced over the past few weeks, which would change the focus of business in the second half of 2025 and reduce the time for Private Members' other words, Stormont would cease to be the meaningless talking shop many say it has become and look more like the legislative assembly it is supposed to be."About time", some critics will say. "Too little too late", others will chime. When Stormont reached the first anniversary of its return following the two-year hiatus of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) boycott there was a little self-congratulation, but also the realisation that mere survival would no longer cut short, the honeymoon was over. Almost immediately there was a marked rise in sharp exchanges across the chamber over issues like Casement Park and stasis is still the pervading feeling. Stormont's inability to get the big things done is embodied by a lack of movement over things like Casement Park (not entirely Stormont's fault, but undoubtedly now its problem) and the upgrading of the A5 - a major infrastructure project -hamstrung because it fell foul of Stormont's own climate change could not make it even when the four-party executive manages to achieve what predecessors have failed to achieve it is seen by critics to fall first Programme for Government agreed in more than a decade was said to lack finally produced an Anti-Poverty strategy, albeit nearly 20 years instead of winning praise, a group of local charities say it was so flawed it was worse than no strategy at all. What has the executive achieved in its 500+ days back? Apart from still being no particular order:A total of £688m allocated for public sector payAn extra £1.3 billion secured through successful negotiations with the TreasuryA £25m plan for a new Childcare Subsidy SchemeA strategic Framework to End Violence Against Women and GirlsBut still, Stormont's capacity to achieve defeat from the jaws of victory was encapsulated by the gleaming new edifice known as Belfast's Grand Central Station - all £340m of sooner were the parties basking in the reflected glory than the DUP and Sinn Féin were at each other's throats over a plan by the Sinn Fein Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins to introduce Irish language signage. This week at her final first minister's questions of this term Michelle O'Neill and the Social Democratic and Labour Party's leader of the opposition Matthew O'Toole clashed over what had - and had not - been achieved.O'Toole told her: "With respect, first minister, staged photo ops and platitudes are not enough anymore. You are, with respect, an elected leader, not a royal. "You are blaming others when your ministers have failed to do the basics. "If the government in Dublin had the delivery record of the government that you lead here, your party would have, rightly, roasted them."She countered: "I have heard the member at this all day. He talks flippantly about an end-of-term report. "Well, let me tell you about your end-of-term report. "I have heard three things from the now funded and resourced opposition. I repeat: the funded and resourced opposition. "The three things that I have heard are negativity, negativity and negativity." When the former DUP First Minister Peter Robinson returned recently to unveil his portrait in the Great Hall he gave a more optimistic prognosis from the outside."It almost seems normal around here," he said."Obviously more can be done and as a small country you should be able to turn things around more quickly."The fact that you have roughly the same composition of government means you should be able to have more long term planning because you're not moving from one government to a different government."At least it's a variation on the "what can you do in a four-party coalition comprised of parties with competing agendas?" as Speaker Poots reminded MLAs this week, when they return from summer recess there will be little more than 18 months before the Assembly dissolves for the next you know what elections can mean for inter-party relations.
Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Special forces chiefs unite to demand an end to Labour's legal witch hunts against veterans
Special Forces leaders have united in an unprecedented move to stop legal witch hunts against veterans. The heads of the UK's three most elite military units have said 'enough is enough' after Labour seeks to leave troops exposed. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act was introduced by then veterans minister Johnny Mercer in 2023 and established an independent commission, away from criminal and legal proceedings, to promote reconciliation. Sir Keir Starmer 's government has promised to dismantle the Legacy Act, in fact including a pledge to amend it in their election manifesto last year. The Mail's Stop the SAS Betrayal campaign has demanded a U-turn to stop former soldiers being hounded in their old age. The Government's failure to fight their corner has led to a joint move by veterans from the Special Air Service (SAS), the Special Boat Service (SBS) and the Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR) associations. They have written to Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS), Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, demanding action now to stop the 'lawfare'. At the centre of the campaign are 12 SAS soldiers who could face murder charges after a coroner ruled their shooting of four IRA terrorists in 1992 was unlawful. The men were cleared after an extensive investigation into events at Clonoe, County Tyrone. But campaigners have claimed their relatives' human rights were ignored. That night the terrorists had been equipped with a Russian-made heavy machine gun and three assault rifles. Remarkably, this February coroner Mr Justice Humphreys ruled the SAS's use of force excessive. The Mail understands this is the first time in the history of the SAS, SBS and SRR they have challenged the head of the UK's Armed Forces together. Their letter reads: 'This unified communication makes clear our collective position. A line must be drawn under the legacy matters arising from the conflict and that the time has come to bring closure to events that may never reach a just or conclusive end. 'We believe it is time to bring certainty, closure and fairness to this issue, not only for those who served but also for their families. Our joint letter reflects the deep concern held across the military community and urges decisive leadership to resolve this matter once and for all.' The Mail understands the current Director of Special Forces, who is responsible for SAS, SBS and SRR operations around the world, has also penned a furious letter on the same issue. Last night these unprecedented moves received emphatic support from former Commanding Officers (COs) of the SAS, leading defence voices and shadow ministers. Speaking exclusively to this newspaper, former SAS CO Lieutenant Colonel Richard Williams criticised the Ministry of Defence's position. He said: 'The whole country should reflect on the contents of this important letter by the combined Special Forces Associations and the total lack of official response extremely seriously. 'It outlines clearly a critical crisis of trust in the military and political chain of command by those special forces engaged today in the most dangerous and sensitive of national security operations. I remain utterly dumbfounded by the lack of overt support shown by the current or past leadership of the MoD for these brave and skilled British soldiers. 'The consistent, sweaty-palmed silence by those appointed to lead and resource our forces cannot be justified in any way and smacks of moral cowardice.' Since the Mail's campaign began last month, tens of thousands of signatures have been added to a petition backing veterans. Last night more than 165,000 people had signed the UK Government and Parliament petition. A further surge is expected in the build up to a major parliamentary debate on the issue on July 14. The political side of the campaign is being led by David Davis MP, former SAS reservist, and Tory defence spokesman Mark Francois. Last night, Mr Francois said: 'I welcome this well-informed intervention by these highly experienced personnel. 'Both the outgoing CDS, Admiral Sir Tony and his successor, Air Chief Marshal Richard Knighton, have acknowledged the recruitment challenges facing the Armed Forces. But who would sign up to serve a government that plainly doesn't have the back of troops?' Labour's manifesto included a pledge to repeal the act after a Belfast court last February ruled the amnesties were unlawful. The Act was found to breach the European Convention on Human Rights which places an investigative duty on the state where its agents may have caused death or injury. The government intends to use a Remedial Act to remove key provisions within the Legacy Act. Mr Mercer, who is backing the Mail's campaign, has described military veterans who left the forces to become Labour MPs as 'useful idiots'. Former Army commander Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon said: 'Special Forces are the brightest jewel in the military crown who must be protected and supported. To lose any of their mercurial capabilities would make us less safe at home and abroad.' The Ministry of Defence said: 'We consider that the findings and verdict [of the Clonoe incident] do not properly reflect the context of the incident nor the challenging circumstances in which members of the Armed Forces served in Northern Ireland. 'We inherited a mess of a Legacy Act that was not supported by a number of Veterans groups and would have also meant immunity from prosecution for those who committed the most appalling terrorist crimes – such as those who took part in the IRA's bombing campaign.' 'Soldiers don't want to be deployed after our bogus murder charges' An SAS soldier cleared of murder after shooting a jihadist in Syria has accused top brass of throwing soldiers 'under the bus'. The Mail revealed he was one of five SAS troopers who went through a three-year legal hell. The soldiers were accused of unlawfully killing two terrorists in Syria via excessive force despite the enemy fighters vowing to use suicide vests to blow up 'infidels'. The jihadists were eventually shot dead by an SAS assault team in a raid in hostile territory in July 2022. They were only cleared of wrongdoing last month. In a remarkable interview on a US podcast 'Jay Cal' - as he called himself - said SAS operations are being compromised by red tape. He also accused General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, former Special Forces director of triggering the investigation despite knowing there was no wrongdoing. Jay told the Shawn Ryan Show: 'These guys like Sir Gwyn sit in their ivory towers in Westminster making these decisions which are destroying people's lives. SAS soldiers are saying they don't want to deploy on operations because what happened to us will happen to them. It is a disgrace. They are spineless, they have no moral courage. This has got to stop.' Jay, or Soldier C as he was known in the military police investigation, suggested Sir Gwyn wanted to 'look transparent' to boost his career. He described how Sir Gwyn's decision to launch the probe came after he was accused of ignoring war crimes. He added: 'We were thrown under the bus despite there being no wrongdoing.'Jay said his colleagues who also faced murder charges suffered emotional trauma. Despite their ordeal, the 'Syria Five' have not received any apology. They claim the Ministry of Defence failed to support them through the legal process. Their case provoked fury within the regiment, with troops demanding their officers provide more support.
