logo
Ontario aware bike lane removals may not reduce congestion, could make people less safe: internal documents

Ontario aware bike lane removals may not reduce congestion, could make people less safe: internal documents

CBC12-03-2025
Social Sharing
Ontario's premier and transportation minister have said for months that removing bike lanes is a necessary measure to reduce traffic in the GTA. But hundreds of pages of internal ministry documents, reports and emails show the government is aware the move may not have a meaningful impact on congestion and could increase collisions for everyone who uses roads.
The heavily-redacted documents were made public as part of a court challenge to the legislation — Bill 212 would see bike lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street and University Avenue removed — mounted by a group of cyclists in Toronto.
The documents were used in an argument for an injunction Tuesday to prevent any bike lane removal work until the court challenge is heard in full in April.
The documents include a presentation on a legislative plan for a "pro-driver package" and emails between Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) staff that cast doubt on the ability to achieve bikes lanes on secondary streets as the minister publicly promised. There is also a report prepared by the engineering and urban planning firm CIMA+ for MTO that says collisions for all road users could increase by upwards of 54 per cent when bike lanes are removed, based on prior research.
"There is a medium risk that the proposed change will not achieve the desired outcomes," reads a 2024 cabinet office committee briefing note.
"Given that current data and research does not confirm that removing bike lanes that occupy a lane of traffic would significantly alleviate congestion."
WATCH | The latest on the legal battle to prevent Ontario from removing Toronto bike lanes:
The latest on the legal battle to prevent Ontario from removing Toronto bike lanes
20 hours ago
Duration 2:32
The Ontario government's plan to remove bike lanes in Toronto had its day in court on Tuesday. CBC's Lane Harrison has what you need to know.
An October briefing that asks what sections of the Bloor, Yonge and University lanes should be removed notes that the MTO did not own the "data required to support a decision to remove a bike lane."
The cyclists mounting the court challenge say the documents reveal that MTO has privately been aware of what many critics have been saying about the legislation: that it won't solve Toronto's traffic issues, will make people unsafe, and there is no readily available network of secondary roads to replace the targeted routes.
Province calls engineering report high-level
At the injunction hearing Tuesday, the lawyer for the province said Ontario will have lots of documents and evidence to argue its rationale when the court challenge is heard in full in April. On the CIMA+ report specifically, which outlines an increased collision risk, Padraic Ryan argued the report was a high-level commentary with no original analysis.
The CIMA+ work for the province is broken down into two phases, per the documents. The first phase, which is where the 54 per cent increase in collisions figure comes from, was a review of relevant research and case studies. A second phase of research, with site-specific safety analysis, is not included in the recently released batch of documents.
The report says based on previous research, bike infrastructure can reduce collisions between 35 per cent to 50 per cent. It notes the increase in collisions could be reduced if less people bike on the roads where the bike lanes are removed, but cyclists may start riding on sidewalks instead — increasing risk for pedestrians.
MTO staff cast doubt on replacing routes with secondary roads
"I want to make sure that the bikers are safe," Premier Doug Ford said in November. "I have always believed that you don't put [bike lanes] on main arterial roads, you put them on secondary roads."
Ford and Prabmeet Sarkaria, his transportation minister, have repeatedly promised that ripped out bike lanes would be replaced by bike lanes on parallel streets to give cyclists another option. A solution that has been criticized by cyclists who say routes can't be replaced on smaller roads without making someone's trip significantly longer and less direct.
An issue MTO staff appear to be aware of. In an email exchange in mid-December, a MTO staffer says cyclists are sensitive to changes in trip length and will often choose the shortest route, which in a big city is often a major roadway.
WATCH | Do only 1.2%of Torontonians really commute by bike? StatsCan data says no:
Do only 1.2% of Torontonians really commute by bike? StatsCan data says no
4 months ago
Duration 2:54
Ontario's transportation minister has defended his government's decision to rip up bike lanes on Toronto's major streets by saying just 1.2 per cent of people in the city commute by bicycle. But as CBC's Lane Harrison explains, federal data shows the number is higher in places where the targeted bike lanes already exist.
"While I understand that there is messaging about the secondary roads, the extent to which that could be achieved and used in Toronto for example is an unknown/unlikely," wrote the MTO staff member.
The report from CIMA+ echoes this concern, saying cyclists will likely continue using the most direct routes. It also says some major bike routes in Toronto have barriers like hills, ravines, bridges and rail lines that make a direct alternative route difficult.
It says there are a limited number of north-south streets that make sense for cycling infrastructure "without impacting existing vehicle lanes" on major roads.
Small businesses may suffer along routes
In a news release issued in January about the plans, an Etobicoke business owner among a group suing the city for installing bike lanes in the neighbourhood said the lanes are "hurting local businesses."
But ministry documents say the removal of bike lanes could be the thing to cause hurt.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ontario court halts Ford's plan to tear out Toronto bike lanes
Ontario court halts Ford's plan to tear out Toronto bike lanes

National Observer

time09-07-2025

  • National Observer

Ontario court halts Ford's plan to tear out Toronto bike lanes

Protected bike lanes in Toronto must remain in place for now, an Ontario judge said on Tuesday. The Ford government had appealed a previous ruling that ordered the bike lanes to remain, but failed. A superior court judge said the bike lanes can't be removed until an ongoing Charter challenge is resolved. The challenge, brought by Cycle Toronto and two individual applicants, targets the Ford government's anti-bike lane legislation, Bill 212 — the Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act — and argues that removing the lanes violates Charter rights to life and security of the person, and puts cyclists' lives at risk. The bill grants the Ford government unilateral authority to remove municipal bike lanes. One of the provisions requires the provincial transportation minister to remove bike lanes on the three major Toronto streets. The government claims the change will alleviate traffic congestion and improve emergency response times, but no evidence has been provided to support this; meanwhile, opponents introduced government reports into evidence that suggested the bike lane removals could cause a rise in collisions without even saving any commuting time. In April, an Ontario superior court judge granted a temporary injunction to prevent the government from removing the bike lanes while the case is being considered. In May, the Ford government sought leave to appeal the injunction. But in Tuesday's decision, the court rejected the request and upheld the injunction. Michael Longfield, executive director of Cycle Toronto, told Canada's National Observer that the court's decision to reject the Ford government's appeal is a strong signal the case is being taken seriously. 'We're obviously very pleased about this decision,' Longfield said. 'With this legal decision, I think it's a good opportunity for the province to sort of abandon this bad faith culture war and instead collaborate with municipalities on real, data-driven solutions to give people more transportation options.' A superior court judge said the bike lanes can't be removed until an ongoing Charter challenge is resolved. Dakota Brasier, director of media relations for Ontario's transportation minister, said the government will continue with the design work needed to begin removing bike lanes and get some of the province's 'busiest roads moving as soon as possible.' 'While we respect the court's decision, our government was elected with a clear mandate to get people out of traffic by restoring driving lanes,' Brasier said. Bronwyn Roe, a lawyer at Ecojustice representing the applicants, welcomed the court's decision and said the evidence clearly shows that removing heavily used, protected bike lanes on major Toronto routes would put cyclists' lives at risk. 'The government cannot be allowed to jeopardize the safety of Ontarians or violate the Charter-protected rights to life and security of the person,' Roe said in a statement. Looking ahead, Longfield stressed the importance of a full court victory, saying it could help set a precedent for how cycling infrastructure is protected in the future. At the same time, he believed there was still time for the province to reconsider whether the legislation was truly in the public interest. The City of Toronto estimates the cost to taxpayers for removing the bike lanes could reach $48 million, with the city having already invested $27 million in their construction. Restoring vehicle lanes will likely offer minimal improvements in travel time and undermine the public health, environmental and economic benefits of active transportation, the report warns. Bike Share Toronto has experienced impressive growth, with memberships doubling from 18,000 in 2020 to more than 35,000 in 2023, the report notes. Total trips by bike share surged from 2.9 million in 2020 to 5.7 million in 2023.

Adam Zivo: When unelected judges invent rights to bike lanes and drug dens, something's wrong
Adam Zivo: When unelected judges invent rights to bike lanes and drug dens, something's wrong

National Post

time03-05-2025

  • National Post

Adam Zivo: When unelected judges invent rights to bike lanes and drug dens, something's wrong

On Wednesday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford claimed that Canada's politically appointed judiciary is overstepping its authority and that judges should be elected so that they are more responsive to the will of the people. His criticisms are absolutely warranted: judicial activism has run amok, causing demonstrable harms. Article content Article content Ford's comments were prompted by a recent legal battle over a law, Bill 212, that his government passed last November, to forcibly remove bike lanes on three major Toronto streets. Article content Article content Biking activists sued the province in December, arguing that the law violates cyclists' Section 7 Charter rights ('the right to life, liberty and security of the person'), and sought a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement until their case could be fully adjudicated in court. Article content Article content There is a clear test for granting such injunctions: (1) the request must concern a serious issue; (2) the applicant must experience 'irreparable harm' if the injunction is not granted; and (3) the benefits of the injunction must not outweigh any harm it causes to the public interest (this is known as the 'balance of convenience'). Article content When the Supreme Court established this test, though, it emphasized that there is a strong public interest in respecting the authority of the legislative and executive branches of government. Article content Nullifying duly enacted laws erodes the separation of powers, so, ideally, this should only be done after a full hearing, especially if constitutional matters are involved. Overruling Parliament via preliminary injunctions is supposed to be reserved for 'clear cases.' Article content Article content Likewise, when determining a balance of convenience, judges are supposed to assume that duly enacted laws serve the public interest as intended. If this is not actually the case, that is only to be recognized in the final ruling. Article content Article content With Bill 212, an Ontario Superior Court judge, Stephen E. Firestone, initially ruled that the activists had not met the 'heavy burden' of demonstrating that sufficient harms or 'a compelling overall public interest rationale' justified nullifying the provincial legislature's authority. Article content He argued that, while removing bike lanes may irreparably harm some cyclists, 'this is not a case where the applicants have no viable alternative means of transportation,' and that biking is a voluntary choice for the vast majority of people. Article content 'The courts' role on this interlocutory motion is not to second-guess the wisdom of the policy or to question whether it really serves the public interest. It is assumed to do so,' emphasized Firestone, correctly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store