Drink-driver caught at six times the limit after Perthshire crashes
Siobhan Petrie accelerated into the side of a stone crossing in Dunning centre, before steering her Volvo into a stationary Land Rover.
When police tried to breathalyse the 45-year-old, she bit down, sucked and blew lightly on the tube, preventing officers from getting an accurate reading.
Just 12 weeks later, Petrie called for help from a motorway telephone, near Broxden, claiming she had run out of fuel and ranting incoherently.
Petrie appeared at Perth Sheriff Court and admitted charges of careless driving, drink-driving and refusing to provide specimens of breath.
She was told she was lucky she had not hurt anyone. Village centre collision
Fiscal depute Nicola Caira said Petrie drove the the village shop at about 8pm on January 6, parked and left her vehicle.
'But she stopped, paused and decided not to go to the shop. Instead she got back in her car. She appeared to be unsteady on her feet.' Siobhan Petrie crashed into the bridge wall on the B934 through Dunning. Image: Google
A witness on her way home from a gym class saw Petrie putting her car into reverse and mounting a pavement.
'She then accelerated and turned sharply, hitting the stone wall of the bridge on the opposite side of the road,' said Ms Caira.
'She became stuck due to the debris.
'The wall collapsed and fell into the burn below.'
The fiscal depute said: 'The accused then managed to move the vehicle forward, colliding with a green Land Rover before coming to a stop.'
Members of the public from a nearby hotel came out to help.
Petrie was taken into the bar and a friend was called to pick her up. Breathalyser
Police officers went to the scene and saw the stranded car, before checking CCTV.
When they spoke to Petrie at her friend's house, she confirmed she had been driving.
When she was taken to Dundee police HQ to be breathalysed, she was uncooperative.
Ms Caira said: 'She made attempts to hinder the process by placing the tube into her cheek, blowing lightly and biting down.'
On her second attempt, she tried to suck on the tube and put in back inside her cheek.
Ms Caira added: 'It was explained by the officer that she had one final chance to comply. She shook her head and sat down.'
When charged, she replied: 'That's absolute b***ocks. Just take me home.' Motorway phone call
The court heard that at about 2.20pm on March 29, police received a call from a roadside emergency phone on the M90, near Broxden.
'It was from a female, now identified as the accused, sounding extremely confused,' said the fiscal depute.
Police went to the scene and saw Petrie 'holding onto' the roadside box, with a Corsa parked nearby. The M90 near the Broxden roundabout. Image: Google
'The accused was upset and emotional,' said Ms Caira.
'As she walked towards officers they noticed she was unsteady and staggering.
'The accused stated she had run out of fuel but she was incoherent and not making any sense.'
She was breathalysed and gave an initial reading of 165 mics per 100 ml of blood, but later gave a confirmed reading of 132 mics. The legal limit is 22 mics. Wake-up call
Solicitor Jamie Baxter, defending, said: 'Clearly there is an issue here that needs to be addressed.
'The accused does not have a great recollection of either of these occasions.
'She accepts that she had been drinking prior to these incidents. Regarding the second case, she had been drinking the night before.'
Mr Baxter said when his client struck the bridge, the car's driveshaft snapped.
When she was caught drink-driving on the motorway, she had been on her way to pick up a friend at Broxden. Perth Sheriff Court.
Sheriff Derek Reekie told Petrie said: 'I really hope this has been a wake up call for you.
'You have a serious issue with alcohol and when you get behind the wheel on two occasions, that becomes a matter of serious public concern.
'You are very fortunate that there wasn't injury to others.
'You shouldn't have been anywhere near a car.'
The sheriff questioned her claims her 'extraordinarily high' reading was caused by drinking the night before.
Petrie, of Dunning, was banned from driving for four years, fined £1,050 and ordered to carry out 120 hours unpaid work.
For more local court content visit our page or join us on Facebook.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Apple and Google face calls to install 'kill switches' in mobile phones stolen by moped gangs to end resale market
Pressure is mounting on big tech companies to install remote 'kill switches' in mobile phones amid ongoing phone-theft epidemic. Senior Conservative politicians have urged the Labour Government to 'force' Apple and Google to end the criminal phone trade once and for all by rendering all stolen phones useless. Kill switches work by severing smartphones from the cloud once the devices have been reported to police as stolen. James Conway, who oversees Scotland Yard's phone-theft investigations, believes this will slash their market value on the black market, massively disincentivizing criminals from snatching them. This call to action comes after a Daily Mail investigation revealed that vulnerable youngsters are being groomed into stealing phones by county-lines gangs, which are then shipped abroad in bulk and sold around the world. Last night Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp told the Daily Mail: 'The Labour Government is presiding over a crime epidemic - with phone theft rife. 'Mobile phone companies should urgently implement 'Kill Switches' which prevent stolen phones from accessing the cloud globally. 'Google and Apple claim to have antitheft measures but these are clearly completely ineffective. This call to action comes after a Daily Mail investigation revealed that vulnerable youngsters are being groomed into stealing phones by county-lines gangs, which are then shipped abroad in bulk and sold around the world. 'If companies like Apple continue to refuse to do this voluntarily then the Government must urgently legislate to force them, by amending the Crime and Policing bill. 'Implementing a 'Kill Switch' is vital and the Government should legislate to compel big tech companies to do this if they're not going to do it voluntarily.' Meanwhile, Shadow Minister for Home Affairs, Alicia Kearns added: 'A remote kill switch would reclaim our streets and better protect us all from the plague of phone thieves in our cities. 'This is the sort of initiative phone companies should be introducing to better protect their customers and help tackle organised crime.' Some 80,000 phones are stolen in London every year, with around 80 per cent of this bounty ending up abroad. Across the entire United Kingdom, around 230 mobile phones are stolen every single day. Speaking to the Daily Mail last week, Commander James Conway, who oversees Scotland Yard's phone-theft investigations, explained that a 'kill switch' would ensure that a 'the [stolen device] wouldn't operate as a smartphone any more and would have next to zero value in that market.' In response to the growing phone-theft crisis several cyber security companies such as Nuke From Orbit have been established to make it easier for users to safeguard their accounts. Nuke From Orbit allows users to block access to multiple services and accounts simultaneously after the user's phone has been stolen. James O'Sullivan, CEO and Founder of Nuke From Orbit explained: 'As our lives become more reliant on mobile phones, the need to be able to disavow that device when stolen increases exponentially.' A spokesperson for Google said: 'Google's top priority is the safety of its users, and we are proud to bring constantly evolving, industry-leading security technologies to Android. 'Our freely available anti-theft features help users to protect their devices before, during, and after a theft. 'Users in locations at risk of phone theft can simply switch them on and stay protected.'
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
Man wins £9k after Google captures him naked at home
A police officer whose backside was exposed to the world on Google Street View has won more than £9,000 in compensation. The Argentinean man was caught naked while a Google Street View car was taking images of his town in the province of Buenos Aires. The officer was on his patio when the vehicle whizzed by and snapped his behind – which was then uploaded online for billions of people to see. The red-faced man was awarded more than £9,000 in compensation after a fierce legal battle, with judges ruling Google had invaded his privacy. The cop claimed he had been standing behind a six-foot wall when he was pictured naked, but Google insisted it wasn't high enough. The first legal battle went Google's way, reports La Nacion. A judge ruled it was the police officer's fault because he was 'walking around in inappropriate conditions in the garden of his home'. They also decided that 'the only person able to identify who the naked person was, was the actual man'. The 'policeman shot himself in the foot' by his own action, the judge concluded. But appeal judges overturned this decision and ordered Google Argentina and Google LLC to pay the man a total of 16 million pesos – around £9,600. Judges decided that even though the police officer's face was not visible, his address could still be determined by the street numbers. They wrote: 'This involves an image of a person that was not captured in a public space but within the confines of their home, behind a fence taller than the average-sized person. The invasion of privacy… is blatant. 'There is no doubt that in this case there was an arbitrary intrusion into another's life'. They added that there was 'no justification for (Google) to evade responsibility for this serious error that involved an intrusion into the plaintiff's house, within his private domain, undermining his dignity. No one wants to appear exposed to the world as the day they were born.' The ruling comes after a number of experts advised people to blur their house on Google Street View. More Trending Security expert Will Geddes told Metro that criminals could use Google Maps to scope out properties and form plans to break in. He said: 'Blurring your house prevents anybody from getting any really specific information or intelligence on it.' Anyone looking to obscure their home on Street View needs to first find their property on the map. Then they can click 'Report a problem' in the lower right corner and fill out the relevant form. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Lionel Messi reaction to MLS suspension revealed MORE: Google is reading your WhatsApp messages by default – here's how to stop it MORE: Fact check: Is the US using planes for deportations to throw people into the ocean?
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Google naked Street View picture wins angry man more than £9,000 compensation
A police officer who claimed that he had become a laughing stock after he was caught naked in his garden in Argentina by a Google Street View car has been awarded a large pay out A man who was caught naked in his garden by a Google Street View car has been awarded a large compensation pay out. A vehicle was taking images of a small town in the province of Buenos Aires in Argentina when it captured the man's bare backside while he was on his patio. The images were uploaded onto the internet for all to see and the red-faced man has now been awarded £9,000 compensation by a judge who ruled that Google had invaded his privacy. The man, who is a police officer, claimed that he was standing behind a two-metre wall when he was pictured during the incident in 2017. And to his embarrassment the case went viral on social media as well as being covered on local television. Seeking compensation for the upset, the man took legal action and he said that especially due to his position as a policeman he had been left a laughing stock. But his claim was initially dismissed last year with it ruled then that it was his fault as he was 'walking around in inappropriate conditions in the garden of his home'. It was also said by a judge that "the only person able to identify who the naked person was, was the actual man". At the same time Google had said that the wall around his home was not high enough, while the judge concluded that the "policeman shot himself in the foot" by his own actions, reported La Nacion. But on appeal judges have now overturned that decision and ordered him to receive the equivalent of £9,300 in compensation. "This involves an image of a person that was not captured in a public space but within the confines of their home, behind a fence taller than the average-sized person. The invasion of privacy... is blatant," they wrote. The judges said "there is no doubt that in this case there was an arbitrary intrusion into another's life". They also concluded that there was "no justification for (Google) to evade responsibility for this serious error that involved an intrusion into the plaintiff's house, within his private domain, undermining his dignity. No one wants to appear exposed to the world as the day they were born." Street View stitches together billions of panoramic images to provide a virtual representation of our surroundings on Google Maps. Street View's content comes from two sources - Google and contributors. On its website, Google says: "Through our collective efforts, we enable people everywhere to virtually explore the world. "360 imagery helps you know where to go and what to expect when traveling. Explore world-famous landmarks, galleries, and museums right from your device, or turn the clock back with Street View historical imagery to see how a location has changed over time."
