logo
Consolation, community, national identity: what is lost when pubs close – and how they can be saved

Consolation, community, national identity: what is lost when pubs close – and how they can be saved

Yahoo15-07-2025
Recent figures from the British Beer and Pub Association show that pubs will close at the rate of one a day in the UK during 2025. This is just the latest chapter in a familiar story – more than a quarter of British pubs have closed since 2000.
The cost of running a pub has risen dramatically. The ingredients used to brew beer all cost more, as do the business rates, rents, duties, utilities and wages required to operate a welcoming venue in which to serve it. Some publicans have reported utility bills doubling in a matter of months.
Many pubs occupy prime locations and high-value buildings, which, coupled with larger floor space, mean business rates can be high relative to turnover and profit.
Meanwhile, food offerings which had provided many pubs with a profitable alternative to a drinks-only model have also been hit by rapid increases in costs. Supermarkets and delivery platforms now provide food and drink directly to consumers at prices few licenced venues can compete with. Even pubs that are economically viable are often more profitable converted into residential or retail space.
These economic challenges accompany wider cultural trends, such as the continued prevalence of home working, changes in drinking habits and competition from alternative forms of in person and online leisure.
We've researched pub closures in England and Wales to learn what the loss of pubs means for the communities who drink and gather in them.
When pubs closed temporarily during COVID-19 lockdowns, many people realised that what they missed about pubs was not alcohol but the social contact pubs provided. Pubs have a clear social value. They offer a space for people to meet and interact and have been shown to help tackling loneliness and social isolation.
Our research participants relayed stories of pub closure in relation to their own lives and communities:
I've been consoled in there, I've consoled friends in there. We've chopped up family issues, work issues. We've drunk for the sake of drinking in there.
Pubs help people feel connected to a local place. When they close, they can become sites of mourning, a painful reminder of change and decline. One resident of a former colliery village in Nottinghamshire said of the pub she had once worked in – now derelict, fire damaged and vandalised as it awaits redevelopment – that despite her wish that it had remained open it was now better to 'knock it down' to 'put us out of our misery'.
For many, pubs are a sort of bellwether for wider anxiety about social and generational change. The loss of pubs speaks to where 'we' might be heading as a nation or as a community. Our recent analysis of how the British press has reported on pub closures since 2000 shows that a sense of national identity under threat is a recurring theme.
Both local and national newspapers have made repeated use of the word 'our' in this context, warning readers of the grave threat to 'our pubs' and 'our heritage', often invoking an idyllic image of rural life. However, much of this coverage has also praised the pub as a great leveller, as a place where people come together as a community to socialise despite their differences.
The Campaign for Real Ale, the leading consumer group for beer drinkers and pub goers, suggests changing planning and licensing laws to protect pubs at local and national levels, and more support and publicity for pubs to cater to changing markets.
Others have more directly lobbied for duty cuts that give pubs a fighting chance against supermarkets benefiting from economies of scale, VAT exemptions and convenience.
A hot meal served in a pub incurs a standard 20% rate of VAT, while a supermarket ready meal to be heated at home does not. The rationale for a tax cut to support pubs would rest on the social benefits they offer to communities, in contrast to supermarket-bought alcohol typically consumed at home.
The Localism Act 2011 gave communities the right to bid to take pubs into community ownership, designating them as assets of community value. Yet while there are some terrific examples of community-owned pubs becoming both thriving businesses and a revived focal point for communities, residents in poorer areas lack the resources to sustain viable campaigns.
In one village in our study, a pub listed as a going concern at £500,000 in fact sold as a development plot for over £660,000. A viability study suggested that an investment of £225,000, plus working capital of at least £20,000, would be needed to reopen the pub. The residents we spoke to all conceded that a purchase was far beyond the modest resources of the local community.
While the loss of so many pubs is shocking, it obscures the fact that when other licensed venues, such as bars, restaurants and licensed cafes are factored in, the downward trend is flattened – and even reversed in some areas. This suggests a long-term diversification of the sector – the pub is no longer the only option when going out for a drink.
This may also reflect a feeling that other hospitality venues better cater to different people and groups who may feel less at home in traditional pubs. Some interviewees told us that they felt craft brewery taprooms were more welcoming and family friendly. Others found cafe-bars to have a more appealing mix of coffee, food and both alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks.
There's a long history of pubs adapting to serve new needs and markets. Pub is the Hub, for example, has supported rural pubs to incorporate everything from village shops and libraries to pizza ovens and IT skills hubs. There have been promising experiments with fitting pubs for co-working and meeting space. And micropubs can continue to offer the benefits of a convivial social space, in a back-to-basics approach that reduces the costs of running bigger venues. Pubs can and must evolve.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Thomas Thurnell-Read receives funding from The Leverhulme Trust.
Robert Deakin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Report: Newcastle Utd face £150M decision over top scorer's future
Report: Newcastle Utd face £150M decision over top scorer's future

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Report: Newcastle Utd face £150M decision over top scorer's future

Player push sparks £150M transfer dilemma for Newcastle Utd Newcastle United's summer strategy faces a significant test amid growing uncertainty surrounding their star forward, who has made clear his desire to explore options elsewhere. The player in question has not travelled with the squad for their pre-season tour of Singapore and South Korea, officially due to a minor thigh complaint. However, senior figures at Newcastle are aware of his inclination to consider a move in the current transfer window. With three years remaining on his existing contract, the club is under no immediate pressure to sell. Talks had been expected this summer over a potential new deal, with Chief Executive Darren Eales indicating earlier in the year that negotiations would be addressed once the season concluded. At present, those discussions have not materialised. Despite the player's current stance, Newcastle's preference is to retain him and reopen talks on an extension. If needed, a transfer could be revisited in 2026. Liverpool interest adds weight to potential £150M record deal Interest from Liverpool has intensified in recent weeks, with the Premier League giants exploring the possibility of submitting a British record bid, understood to be in the region of £150M. Such a figure would surpass the £116M Liverpool recently paid for Bayer Leverkusen's Florian Wirtz, underlining their ambition in the transfer market under new manager Arne Slot. While Newcastle are reluctant to lose their leading scorer, they recognise that any bid close to £150M — combined with the player's own willingness to move — could compel them to enter negotiations. Howe's plans unsettled as forward stays behind Eddie Howe's preparations have been disrupted by the ongoing uncertainty. The forward did not feature in Newcastle's recent 4-0 defeat against Celtic and was granted leave to return home. Officially, this was attributed to managing his recovery, but sources suggest the decision also took into account the speculation surrounding his future. Howe indicated post-match that he expected the player to rejoin the group during the Asia tour. However, that now appears unlikely as the situation remains unresolved. The forward has scored 62 goals in 109 appearances for the club and has become a pivotal figure under Howe, whose coaching has elevated him to among the most in-demand attacking players in Europe. Contract strength may yet shift Newcastle's stance While Newcastle remain firm in their stance to retain the forward, their contractual position gives them leverage. They are not under financial pressure to sell, and any transfer would have to be on their terms — both in valuation and timing. Should a suitable offer materialise and the player continue to push for a move, the situation could develop rapidly in the final weeks of the window. For now, Newcastle remain calm but are aware that circumstances may force a decision sooner than they'd prefer.

Liverpool get Alexander Isak boost as striker hands in Newcastle transfer request
Liverpool get Alexander Isak boost as striker hands in Newcastle transfer request

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Liverpool get Alexander Isak boost as striker hands in Newcastle transfer request

Alexander Isak has informed Newcastle of his desire to explore a move away from the club this summer. The Swedish striker, who hit 23 Premier League goals last season, has been the subject of heavy transfer speculation this summer, with some reports claiming Liverpool were willing to offer £120million for his services. Eyebrows were raised today when he was left out of Newcastle's travelling squad for a pre-season tour of Asia, though the club insisted that was due to a minor thigh injury. It has now been revealed, though, that Isak is exploring his options. According to Mail Sport, the player does not want to commit his future to Newcastle amid interest from Liverpool and Saudi Arabia. Isak has three years left on his contract, meaning Newcastle are in a strong negotiating position. It is thought that an offer of around £150m, in conjunction with Isak's desire to move, would be difficult for Newcastle to refuse. That price would constitute a British record fee, usurping the £116m Liverpool paid for Florian Wirtz earlier this summer. Liverpool are aware of the player's intentions. It was expected that they would withdraw their interest in Isak after yesterday completing a £79m deal for Eintracht Frankfurt's Hugo Ekitike, but they have reportedly informed Newcastle that they are willing to make another approach. The Reds could add yet more forwards should Luis Diaz and Darwin Nunez leave this summer. Al-Hilal are also preparing a significant offer for Isak, though the player is not thought to be keen on a move to the Saudi Pro League. Newcastle are now exploring striker options, having missed out on deals for Ekitike and Joao Pedro earlier this summer, with the latter opting to join Chelsea. Eddie Howe has made clear that he does not want Isak to leave St James' Park this summer, saying: 'I think it's difficult for me to ever give 100 per cent clarity on any player, I'd never do that. 'All I can say is Alex is happy at Newcastle, he loves the players, the staff, the team. 'I've never had any issue with him and I'm confident he's going to be here at the start of the season. "We have a few of those players who are irreplaceable. Your top players are so hard to find, so hard to recruit, and so hard to develop. So when you have them, you need to treasure them. Of course we're desperate to keep him as part of our team."

UK, Australia back embattled submarine deal with US
UK, Australia back embattled submarine deal with US

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

UK, Australia back embattled submarine deal with US

Britain and Australia said Friday they will sign a 50-year commitment to their nuclear-powered submarine pact with the United States, seeking to bolster a deal that Washington has thrown into doubt. The two countries cast their pledge as a historic treaty but gave few details beyond saying it would help economic cooperation and "underpin" the existing, three-nation AUKUS pact. "It is a profoundly important treaty that we will sign tomorrow," Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles told reporters after talks in Sydney between the two countries' defence and foreign ministers. A US defence official last month revealed that a review of AUKUS was underway to ensure it "aligned with the President's America First agenda" and that the US defence industrial base was "meeting our needs". Under the 2021 AUKUS deal, Australia would acquire at least three Virginia-class submarines from the United States within 15 years, eventually manufacturing its own subs. The US Navy has 24 Virginia-class vessels but American shipyards are struggling to meet production targets set at two new boats each year. In the United States, critics question why Washington would sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia without stocking its own military first. "A new government undertaking a review is the most natural thing in the world," Marles said of the decision by US President Donald Trump's administration. - 'Symbolism is important' - Australia had already contributed US$1 billion this year to help boost production and maintenance of submarines in the United States, he said. "We are really confident that the production rates will be raised in America." Under AUKUS, Britain will eventually develop a new class of nuclear-powered attack submarines, the SSN-AUKUS, to enter service from the late 2030s. Australia would also build the SSN-AUKUS, with delivery expected to its navy in the early 2040s. British Defence Secretary John Healey said London welcomed the US review. "It's an opportunity for the new administration to renew America's commitment to the deep AUKUS partnership that our three nations have," he said. In a government statement, Britain repeated previously released figures saying that the AUKUS submarine programme would lead to the creation of 21,000 UK jobs. It said the submarine programme was expected to be worth "up to" 20 billion pounds (US$27 billion) in British exports over the next 25 years. Analyst Tom Corben from the United States Studies Centre in Australia said the new treaty between Canberra and London was an important show of solidarity. "The symbolism is important given everything else that is happening," he said. Britain's defence and foreign ministers were visiting Australia as their country's Carrier Strike Group and 3,000 personnel took part in annual Talisman Sabre military exercises across Australia and Papua New Guinea. djw/sft/amj Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store