logo
Miliband warned carbon capture project faces collapse without £4bn injection

Miliband warned carbon capture project faces collapse without £4bn injection

Yahoo09-06-2025

A green technology project pioneered by Ed Miliband faces collapse without an additional £4bn in funding, industry chiefs have warned.
Olivia Powis, the chief executive of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association, said the fledgling technology must receive support from Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, at her spending review on Wednesday despite having been recently awarded almost £22bn in public subsidies.
It wants the money – funded by consumers and taxpayers – to expand the two carbon-capture projects already approved by Mr Miliband, the Energy Secretary, and to kick-start two more, including one in Scotland.
Ms Powis said there was a 'critical need' for further funding commitments from the Government. She warned that, without the extra cash, even the two schemes approved by Mr Miliband may never go ahead.
She added: 'The UK supply chain is ready to respond with the skills, innovation and capabilities needed to make UK carbon capture a world-leading industry.
'But continued government commitment and a pipeline of future projects is essential to ensure that domestic suppliers can compete, scale up and create lasting jobs across the country – otherwise we will see investors and this industry go overseas.'
Approving the initial £21.7bn last autumn, Ms Reeves described it as a 'game-changing technology [that] will bring 4,000 good jobs and billions of private investment into communities across Merseyside and Teesside'.
However, MPs have warned that the technology is 'unproven' and 'high-risk'.
Jeremy Pocklington, the permanent secretary at the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, told the public accounts committee last December that 75pc of the money to fund carbon capture would come from levies on consumer and business energy bills and the rest from taxes.
Experts warn that CO2 capture may only be 50 to 60pc efficient, meaning some CO2 still enters the atmosphere.
Projects backed by the Government so far include the HyNet scheme in Merseyside and Net Zero Teesside, for which contracts were signed last year.
The industry wants cash to expand those projects and add another two: the Acorn project on Scotland's east coast and the Viking project based in the Humber.
Mr Powis said: 'We estimate this new industry will create 50,000 new highly skilled jobs and retain another 50,000 jobs in existing industries like steel.
'It will contribute to new industries like sustainable aviation fuels, and generate a cumulative £94bn in value for the economy by 2050.'
But Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, said the policy would add to consumer bills and do little for the environment.
He said: 'We should scrap this technology. This is an outrageous demands for unproven technology that will make zero difference to climate change. Even the Greens reject it.'
Carla Denyer MP, co-leader of the Green Party, added: 'Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is being used as green-wash by the fossil fuel industry, allowing them to continue extracting coal, oil and gas.
'This technology is a distraction from what we should be focusing on, namely, boosting renewable energy and storage, energy efficiency and home insulation programmes and working with nature and land managers to capture carbon naturally.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Tory Minister George Freeman Suspended As Trade Envoy Over 'Cash For Questions' Claims
Former Tory Minister George Freeman Suspended As Trade Envoy Over 'Cash For Questions' Claims

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Tory Minister George Freeman Suspended As Trade Envoy Over 'Cash For Questions' Claims

Former Conservative minister George Freeman was 'asked to step back' as a trade envoy for the government last night. It followed claims that he was paid by a company to ask government departments certain questions. He was listed as the trade envoy for Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Brunei but Downing Street confirmed he had been 'suspended' on Monday evening. Freeman, who has been the MP for Mid Norfolk since 2010 and served in both Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson's governments, referred himself to the parliamentary watchdog over the concerns. He has been a paid adviser for a greenhouse gas emissions monitoring service, GHGSat, since April 2024. According to The Sunday Times, which published alleged leak emails from Freeman asking the company director what to ask, he then submitted questions to ministers about the sector the firm operates in. A No.10 spokesperson said: 'Parliamentary standards are a matter for the House and the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. 'And you can see the individual has referred himself to that process. 'While that investigation takes place, it is right he has been asked to step back from the role, and he has been suspended in representing the UK as a trade envoy until that process has been concluded.' Freeman released a statement over the weekend announcing he had referred himself to the watchdog although he did not believe he had done 'anything wrong.' He said he 'regularly asks experts for clarification on technical points and terminology' as a long-standing advocate of new technologies. Freeman claimed he also 'deeply respects' the parliamentary system, and tries to 'assiduously follow the code of conduct for MPs and the need to act always in the public interest'. 'Throughout my 15 years in parliament (and government) I have always understood the need to be transparent in the work I have done for and with commercial clients and charities and am always willing to answer any criticism,' he said. He added: 'I am very concerned at the unauthorised and targeted access to my emails and diary which I have raised with the police and parliamentary authorities.' Trump Leaves Starmer Scrabbling On The Ground As He Unveils US-UK Trade Deal US Stance On Trade Unlikely To Change Even If A Democrat Replaced Trump, Minister Warns Trade Unionist Delivers Scathing Takedown Of Labour: 'Desperate Disappointment Is An Understatement'

Top Thai Court Suspends PM Paetongtarn in Ethics Violation Case
Top Thai Court Suspends PM Paetongtarn in Ethics Violation Case

Bloomberg

time28 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Top Thai Court Suspends PM Paetongtarn in Ethics Violation Case

Thailand's Constitutional Court has temporarily suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra from office until it rules on a petition seeking her ouster for alleged ethical violations — the biggest blow yet to her less-than one-year-old government. Paetongtarn's powers will be suspended from Tuesday while the nine-member court considers the petition by a group of senators, it said in a statement. The decision to suspend her duties was backed by seven out of nine judges, according to the statement.

How much money do you need to retire?
How much money do you need to retire?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

How much money do you need to retire?

How much should you save for retirement? The answer is it depends on the person. One person might be looking for a retirement full of travel while another wants something altogether more modest. This brings challenges when it comes to setting pension policy and is a problem the government will need to grapple with as it gets ready to announce the second phase of its Pension Review, which will focus on adequacy. It's a piece of work that will inform thinking around the state pension as well as workplace and private provision for years to come. Setting goals too high can mean lower earners potentially oversave into their pension and risk struggling financially today. It could even put them off saving altogether. Setting the bar too low risks higher earners going through life thinking they've done enough and then getting a nasty shock. The Hargreaves Lansdown Savings and Resilience Barometer looked at four key measures of adequacy to see which might help people work out if they are saving enough. These included so-called "pounds and pence measures" which seek to put an actual figure on what retirees need to achieve pension adequacy. Pounds and pence measures include the Living Wage Foundation's Living Pension benchmark which sets an income level to meet basic everyday needs in retirement for single and coupled households. This can be seen as the absolute minimum that someone should be saving for retirement and it sets a target for pension contributions, either as a percentage of salary (12%) or a minimum cash amount (£2,950 for a full-time Living Wage employee). Read more: Key questions to ask yourself to plan for a comfortable retirement Hargreaves Lansdown also assessed the Pension and Lifetime Saving Association's (PLSA) minimum, moderate and comfortable living standards benchmark for single and coupled household income. The research looked at so-called relative measures, such as target replacement rates, which set an income level in retirement based on pre-retirement earnings. For instance, they may say someone needs to save enough to cover two-thirds of their pre-retirement salary. A specially designed current retirement expenditure measure was also used. This sets an income level in retirement using current retiree spending by income group, relationship status and tenure status. Analysis of these measures found using pounds and pence measures may not reflect of the current living standards of higher earners, so could lull them into a false sense of security. They can also give the impression that lower earners are falling behind, when in reality they don't need to hit higher targets to maintain their current lifestyle. As an example, the PLSA's moderate retirement income standard is set at just over £31,000 per year. There are many people, particularly on lower incomes who can live happily on less than that, whereas a higher earner would probably need far more to maintain their living standards. It's all about what your personal definition of moderate means to you. Relative measures, such as target replacement rates, better account for the ability of households to maintain living standards into retirement. This would see higher earners given a much higher target to hit. For instance, someone targeting two-thirds of their salary in retirement would need an income of £20,000 per year if they were on £30,000 pre-retirement, while their neighbour who was on £60,000 when they were working would need something closer to £40,000 per year. Read more: This under-claimed benefit could help boost your pension After careful analysis, Hargreaves Lansdown believes the best approach is to take a relative measure, such as target replacement rates, as these give a better idea of people's actual income needs in retirement. They can then set their retirement goals based on their experience rather than trying to hit a target that might not work for them. However, we also need to have a minimum income underpin such as the Living Pension as a bare minimum for what is needed. The key to getting a good outcome in retirement is to keep an eye on how your pensions are performing. Use an online calculator that gives you a sense of how much you are on track for. If it's enough to meet your needs then great, if not you have time to do something about it. Taking steps such as increasing contributions when you get a pay rise and tracking down lost pensions can also play a vital role in getting your retirement planning where it needs to be. Read more: How far will your pension go as retirement costs soar? What is the Pension Investment Review? How to avoid finance scams on social media

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store