Carney's plan to boost Canada's foreign service needs more details: union
A union official representing foreign service officers and a senator who once served Canada overseas say they're optimistic about Carney's plans but they want to see the details.
The Liberal election platform said a Carney government would send 'more Canadian diplomats and officials abroad' to expand trade and 'restore Canadian leadership.'
It also said the Liberals would issue a 'new, full foreign policy' and launch a complementary national security review.
A spokesperson for the Prime Minister's Office said no additional details were available.
Carney is expected to name his new cabinet later this month.
Story continues below advertisement
9:37
Diplomatic reality in a politically explosive world
Pamela Isfeld, president of the Professional Association of Foreign Service Officers, said the union was happy to see the Liberal platform commit to enhancing diplomacy but now wants to know 'how that is actually going to translate into action.'
A proper foreign policy review and fresh plan are 'long overdue,' said Isfeld, whose organization represents more than 2,000 active and retired members of Canada' foreign service.
There is no better time to undertake the project, now that Canada is considering its place in the world in the face of tensions with the U.S., she added.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Isfeld said many key issues in the recent election — including defence policy and economic and national sovereignty — are linked to diplomacy and the foreign service.
The review should take into account previous studies and involve consultation with public interest groups, Indigenous groups, provinces and municipalities, she said.
Story continues below advertisement
The last major federal review of the foreign service was released in 2005 under then-prime minister Paul Martin.
The government has mapped out strategies in recent years on Africa, the Indo-Pacific and the future of diplomacy.
As part of the diplomacy strategy, published in 2023, the government promised to expand Canada's diplomatic footprint abroad.
2:18
Canadian government pushed to revitalize diplomat corps in U.S.
Sen. Peter Boehm, a former foreign service officer, said that for any future review to be effective, it must consult with Canadians because 'there really wasn't that much in the platform.'
Boehm was chair of the Senate committee on foreign affairs and international trade in 2023 when it recommended that Global Affairs Canada examine its senior management structure to see how it could reduce the number of senior officials and reallocate resources.
Story continues below advertisement
Carney has emphasized the need for Canada to diversify its trading partners in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's global trade war.
Boehm said that might mean sending more trade commissioners to countries in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa.
Isfeld said sending more diplomats abroad likely would require more resources — not just reallocation of current employees. She said staffing is essentially 'bare bones' in many missions, with just one representative in some locations.
'There shouldn't be a section or a team in any embassy where there isn't at least a backup,' she said.
Isfeld said ensuring there are at least two staffers in every mission probably would involve increasing the number of foreign service staff by at least 50 to 60 per cent.
1:54
Canada details new 'Arctic Foreign Policy' in effort to bolster northern presence, security
The government also should consider hiring more Canada-based employees, depending on its priorities, as some divisions at Global Affairs Canada are 'really understaffed,' she added.
Story continues below advertisement
Isfeld said some foreign service officers working in the United States have concerns about political issues in the country and a lack of access to services.
'I think people are feeling nervous and that's going to translate when they talk to the people who are interested in replacing them,' she said. 'It's a shame because this is where we're really going to need really good people.'
Boehm said Canada faces a 'real inflection point in global relations' because the 'old order' is being challenged by the United States.
He said he is looking to the coming throne speech for details about Carney's plans for Canada's presence abroad.
'This will be the opportunity for the government, for the prime minister, to set up that ambitious agenda that he was talking about during the campaign,' Boehm said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
CBC investigation finds some big grocers promoting imported food with Canadian branding
Like many shoppers these days, Stacey Dineen, who lives just outside Kitchener, Ont., is all-in on the buy Canadian movement. Trump's comments about annexing Canada, wanting to make us part of the United States, boy, that really kind of lit something, she said. Dineen buys Canadian food whenever she can, but when she can't, she looks for imported products from outside the United States. And Canada's major grocery chains have jumped on the trend, running patriotic ads and pledging to help shoppers buy Canadian. But Dineen says she gets frustrated when grocers provide conflicting information about where a product comes from. Last week, for example, she saw organic broccoli at her local Sobeys grocery store. A sign stated it was a product of Canada, but the fine print on the tag said produce of USA. Enlarge image (new window) Shopper Stacey Dineen, who lives near Kitchener, Ont., found organic broccoli at her local Sobeys advertised as 'Product of Canada,' but the item's label said it was 'Produce of USA.' Photo: Submitted by Stacey Dineen It makes me feel misled, said Dineen. At this point, I have run out of patience for it. It feels — at the very least, it's careless. New data from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and a CBC News investigation suggests country-of-origin mislabeling by grocers is an ongoing problem. It's also against the rules; in-store food signage must be accurate and not misleading (new window). The CFIA, Canada's food regulator, told CBC News that between November 2024 and mid-July, it received 97 complaints related to country-of-origin claims. WATCH | Buying Canadian? You may want to double check the signage: Début du widget . Passer le widget? Fin du widget . Retour au début du widget? Of the 91 complaints investigated so far, the CFIA found companies violated the rules in 29 (32 per cent) of the cases. Most involved bulk produce sold in stores, and in each case the problem was fixed, according to the agency. CBC News visited grocery stores operated by Sobeys, Loblaws and Metro in downtown Toronto this month and found similar issues among both bulk and prepackaged produce. At each store, one or more country-of-origin shelf signs in the produce section stated the accompanying product was a product of Canada or Mexico, but the product's sticker or packaging said it was a product of USA. And it's not just produce. CBC News also found questionable Canadian signage for more than a dozen other types of products at the Sobeys store, including imported raw almonds promoted with a red maple leaf symbol and a Made in Canada, declaration. Enlarge image (new window) CBC News found these raw almonds displayed at a Toronto Sobeys store with a red maple leaf symbol and a 'Made in Canada' declaration. But the almonds' packaging said the product was imported. Photo: CBC / Sophia Harris We don't grow almonds in this country. Those should not meet the Made in Canada threshold, said Mike von Massow, a professor in the Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics at the University of Guelph. He added that a high turnover of grocery products can sometimes lead to mistakes. However, food labelling expert Mary L'Abbé says that, six months into the Buy Canadian movement, shoppers' patience for grocer errors is wearing thin. It's important to Canadians, and I think they have a responsibility to their consumers who expect them to interpret the regulations correctly, said L'Abbé, a nutritional sciences professor emeritus at the University of Toronto. I think the retailers have to step up to the plate and actually get their act together. Enlarge image (new window) CBC News found these fresh blueberries displayed at a Toronto Sobeys store with a 'product of Canada' declaration. But the packaging says the berries are a 'product of USA.' Photo: CBC / Sophia Harris Grocers respond Back in the produce section at Sobeys, CBC News found a large sign promoting blueberries as a product of Canada. But the fine print on the packaging said the berries were a product of USA. That's false advertising, said von Massow, suggesting human error as a possible cause. At the Loblaws store, CBC discovered several produce items, such as berries, squash and eggplant where shelf labels indicated they were a product of Mexico, while product stickers or packaging revealed they were a product of U.S.A. Packaged raspberries and blackberries at Metro had similar inconsistent labelling. Enlarge image (new window) CBC News found organic raspberries displayed at a Toronto Metro store with a 'Product of Mexico' declaration, but the packages above the sign said they were a 'Product of USA.' Metro says the flyer advertising the sale correctly stated that the berries were from Mexico or the U.S. Photo: Sophia Harris/CBC At a Loblaw-owned No Frills in Toronto, CBC found different inconsistent labelling. The store displayed strawberries with signage that included a red maple leaf and the phrase, Prepared in Canada. But the berries' packaging stated that they were a product of USA. It's possible that the strawberries were packaged in Canada, but the CFIA told CBC News it would be inappropriate to use a Made in Canada or Prepared in Canada claim if a product was only packaged here. L'Abbé says the No Frills ad is misleading. She points out that big grocers have launched big marketing campaigns centred around the Buy Canadian movement. Both Loblaw and Sobeys have produced slick, patriotic ads prominently featuring the Canadian flag. Obviously they're spending money on those marketing campaigns, said L'Abbé. They can also do the work behind the scenes to make sure that they're advertising things correctly. CBC News sent photos of its findings to Loblaw Companies Limited, Sobeys Inc., and Metro Inc. Loblaw did not directly answer questions about the strawberries, but shortly after CBC's inquiry, the maple leaf and Prepared in Canada signage on the strawberries was gone. Enlarge image (new window) CBC News found these fresh strawberries displayed at a Toronto No Frills store with a 'Prepared in Canada' declaration. But the packaging says the fruit is a 'Product of USA.' Photo: CBC / Sophia Harris Loblaw, Sobeys and Metro each told CBC News in separate emails that they strive for accurate country-of-origin signage, but noted that the task is challenging when dealing with mass inventory. Fresh produce can change week-to-week and unfortunately mistakes can happen from time to time, said Sobey's spokesperson, Emily Truesdale. Loblaw and Metro offered an apology to customers for any mishaps and encouraged them to alert the store if they discover inconsistencies. Both grocers also said they're working with store staff to reinforce signage policies and minimize errors. As a result of [CBC's] inquiry, stores received reminders about checking produce labels, said Metro spokesperson Stephanie Bonk. Enlarge image (new window) CBC News found several types of ice cream cones displayed at a Toronto Sobeys store with a red maple leaf, but the product's packaging notes that it was imported. Photo: CBC / Sophia Harris Imported but made in Canada? In response to the Buy Canadian movement, big grocers began marking many domestic products in stores with a maple leaf symbol. But sometimes it winds up on products with no apparent Canadian connection. There are lots of opportunities for things to get confusing, said von Massow. It's important for these stores to be transparent. At the Sobeys store, CBC News found more than a dozen imported house-brand Compliments products, including ice cream cones, salad dressing, raw nuts and graham crackers, displayed with a red maple leaf symbol. Sobeys' website (new window) says the maple leaf symbol refers to items that are Made in Canada or are a Product of Canada. According to the CFIA (new window), Product of Canada refers to food that is entirely or almost entirely created in the country. To qualify as Made in Canada, the last significant transformation of a food product must occur in the country. But the packaging for each of the imported house-brand items states that it was imported for Sobeys with no qualifying statement about a Canadian connection. Enlarge image (new window) Dineen, who lives just outside Kitchener, Ont., says she gets frustrated when grocers provide conflicting information about where a product comes from. Photo: CBC / Sophia Harris Why would you put a Maple Leaf on a product that very clearly is imported? asked Dineen, who discovered imported raw almonds and California natural walnut pieces marked with a maple leaf at her local Sobeys. It just erodes the trust. It just makes you think, 'OK, so that's meaningless.' Sobeys did not directly answer questions about imported Compliments products marked with a maple leaf. Von Massow says if you're unsure about any store or product labels, ask store staff for an explanation, or call the product's customer service line, often printed on the packaging. WATCH | Grocery stores overcharge for packaged meat: Début du widget . Passer le widget? Fin du widget . Retour au début du widget?
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Why Canada's supply management is a sticking point for Trump in trade talks
The target date for a new trade deal between Canada and the United States is a little over a week away, but one issue continues to be a sticking point between both nations: Canada's supply management. Supply management, which Canada uses in the dairy, poultry and egg sectors, has been a frequent target of criticism from U.S. President Donald Trump throughout his threats of tariffs and claims that Canada is 'ripping us off.' Last month, while demanding Canada repeal its digital services tax, Trump said Canada was 'a very difficult Country to TRADE with,' claiming on his social media platform Truth Social that the country charges 'tariffs' of up to 400 per cent on dairy products. Canada uses a quota system that allows a set amount of some foreign dairy products into the country, and high tariffs only apply if countries try to exceed that allowed quota coming into Canada. Story continues below advertisement Canada's supply management system, which dates back to the 1970s, has restricted foreign access to the Canadian dairy market in order to protect domestic producers and set quality standards for products. Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed in the Liberal election platform that he will 'keep Canada's supply management off the table in any negotiations with the U.S.' So how does it work? What is supply management? The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) — which Trump re-negotiated to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) during his first term — narrowly expanded U.S. access to Canada's dairy market, which is protected under supply management rules. The rules, established in the 1970s, set production quotas for Canadian farmers, guarantee minimum prices, and maintain import and quality controls. Story continues below advertisement 'Producers have a licence to produce that's determined by their quota. Producers will only produce as much as the quota says they are allowed to produce or in fact to sell,' said Sven Anders, a resource economist at the University of Alberta. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Under CUSMA, the U.S. gets access to less than five per cent of the market. But the U.S. has launched multiple disputes claiming Canada is intentionally bottlenecking those U.S. imports through tariff rate quotas, which put limits on how many exporters qualify for the cheaper duties. The issue of supply management for farmers might end up being an issue both sides are unwilling to move on. For one, most Canadian politicians are staunchly in support of the policy. 'We saw during the leaders' debate that all of the leaders, specifically in French, said that supply management was a red line in any negotiations with the Trump administration over tariffs,' said Moshe Lander, an economist at Concordia University. 'It seems that they were willing to even accept tariffs and damage to the Canadian economy rather than put dairy and supply management on the table.' The policy is aimed at protecting Canadian dairy farmers from the much larger American dairy industry and keeping prices and supplies stable by controlling the amount of product available. Story continues below advertisement Anders said Canadian politicians are reluctant to alienate dairy farmers. 'They have a lot of political clout. So, if I was a politician in Ontario or Quebec, among my constituents would be many dairy farmers. I certainly would want to fight for them,' he said. That political influence is particularly strong in Quebec, one expert said. 'In 17 ridings provincially in Quebec, people under supply management are strong enough to change the outcome of the election,' said Vincent Geloso, senior economist at the Montreal Economic Institute. 'Having influence over 17 ridings makes you a very powerful interest group.' As Canada's premiers were meeting for a three-day summit in Ontario, Quebec Premier François Legault said supply management was a hard line in the U.S. trade negotiations for him. 'There's no question about negotiating the supply management for dairy and other products,' Legault told reporters. Lander said supporters of Canada's dairy industry see the policy as necessary to protect them from the much larger American dairy industry. 'Wisconsin alone produces more milk than Canada consumes in a year,' he said. He said small Canadian dairy farms would be unable to withstand the pressure of open competition from the U.S. Story continues below advertisement 'These farms would have to merge their way up into these mega farms like you see in Wisconsin or in Minnesota to try and remain competitive. That would push a lot of farmers off their traditional land,' he said. Dairy Farmers of Canada declined Global's request for comment. 1:51 U.S. may be looking to remove non-tariff barriers, report shows However, Trump and the Republicans have their own political calculus in pushing Canada on supply management, he said. 'In the midterm elections, which are next year, maintaining Wisconsin is going to be very important for the Republicans if they want to maintain control of the House (of Representatives). If you vocally support farmers, this is one way to maybe keep that base solidified,' he said. One prominent Canadian voice who is opposed to the present system of supply management is Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, who said recently that she was considering 'creating our own Alberta version of supply and management, maybe as a pathway to a market system.' Story continues below advertisement 'We do not get our share of quota, I think we have 12 per cent of the population and we only get seven per cent of the quota,' she told reporters last week. One consequence of supply management is that Canadians end up paying more for dairy products, Anders said. 'There's plenty of research that says or that has documented that an average Canadian household pays several hundred dollars more in food in dairy product cost on an annual basis just because of supply management,' he said. However, the same system has also been credited with helping Canadian consumers avoid the price shocks seen by U.S. consumers over the past year, as egg prices south of the border soared. Trump's criticisms aren't historically abnormal for U.S. presidents, either. 'Biden and Obama both had objections to it and voiced it,' Lander said. 'The more I say I dislike it, and the more you insist you're not going to remove it, then the more that I can say I want my way on these other things. It could be that he (Trump) just sees it as a tactic, where the Democratic presidents who had opposed it in the past merely just saw it as an annoyance.' — with files from Global's Sean Boynton and Touria Izri
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Carney talks major projects with Inuit leaders in Inuvik
Prime Minister Mark Carney will meet with Inuit leaders today to discuss his government's controversial major projects legislation. The meeting of the Inuit-Crown Partnership Committee will be co-hosted by Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, in Inuvik, N.W.T. Obed says Inuit have many questions about Bill C-5 and are hoping the meetings provide clarity on the role they play in a single Canadian economy. The recently passed One Canadian Economy Act gives Ottawa the power to fast-track projects it deems to be in the national interest by sidestepping environmental protections and other legislation. Indigenous leaders have accused the federal government of failing to consult with them adequately when the legislation was being drafted and amended, and Carney has promised to hold talks with First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders to get input on how projects can proceed. After Carney met with First Nations leaders in Ottawa last week, some chiefs said they were left with more questions than answers and no clear idea of how the government plans to implement its agenda. In a video posted to social media Wednesday, Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty said the meeting is a forum for discussing how to move projects forward in a mutually beneficial manner while respecting Inuit sovereignty rights.
