LDP lawmaker Shoji Nishida refuses to retract remarks over WWII exhibits
At a symposium held in the city of Naha, Okinawa Prefecture, on Saturday, Nishida said that descriptions at a monument to commemorate the Himeyuri corps of female students had rewritten history, according to informed sources.
Speaking to reporters in Tokyo on Wednesday, Nishida said that while he had no intention of hurting the feelings of the people of Okinawa, he refused to retract the remarks in question.
In a speech during the symposium, Nishida said that he was not familiar with the current exhibits at the monument, but he said the "descriptions seem to suggest that Japanese soldiers stormed into (Okinawa), leading the Himeyuri corps to die."
"Then the U.S. troops came to set Okinawa free," he said of the descriptions.
Nishida said such stories were widely shared in Okinawa, and noted how history education, including the interpretation of the ground battle, is quite disorderly. But he did not provide any specific evidence.
While acknowledging that he made the remarks in question, Nishida on Wednesday told reporters that they were based on his impressions from a visit he made more than 10 years ago.
"It is very regrettable," he said, adding, "I'm telling the truth and I have nothing to retract."
His remarks came under fire from both within the LDP and outside the party.
Hajime Zaha, secretary-general of the LDP's Okinawa chapter, told reporters that he had no choice but to protest.
The remarks are "extremely inappropriate," Junya Ogawa, secretary-general of the leading opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, said at a news conference.
The Himeyuri monument is inscribed with the names of 227 students and teachers mobilized for the now-defunct Imperial Japanese Army.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
9 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Japanese groups make united call for abolition of nuclear weapons
Three Japanese organizations working for the abolition of nuclear weapons issued a joint appeal in Tokyo on Wednesday, calling for spreading awareness of the reality of atomic bombings across the country. It was the first time ever for the groups to come together for such a unified statement, which was unveiled ahead of next month's 80th anniversary of the 1945 U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the closing days of World War II. The Japan Council against Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs (Gensuikyo) and the Japan Congress against Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs (Gensuikin) partnered with the Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations (Nihon Hidankyo) to issue the appeal. The antinuclear movement gained momentum in 1954 after the 23-member crew of the Fukuryu Maru No. 5, a Japanese fishing boat, was exposed to radioactive fallout from a U.S. hydrogen bomb test. Gensuikyo and Nihon Hidankyo were founded in the wake of intensifying public sentiment. Gensuikin was established in 1965 after splitting from Gensuikyo. "I'm deeply moved by the cooperation of large organizations on the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings," Terumi Tanaka, 93, co-chair of Nihon Hidankyo, said at a news conference. He expressed hopes that the collaboration will encourage hibakusha — atomic bomb survivors — who are yet to share their experiences to testify. "The task of spreading the reality of atomic bombings is a challenge for all humanity," Yayoi Tsuchida, 68, a senior Gensuikyo official, said. Masashi Tani, 45, secretary-general of Gensuikin, said, "We urge the government to take action, such as by ratifying the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons," noting that "the international community is watching how Japan marks the 80th anniversary." "As the danger of nuclear weapons use grows, Japan's role is becoming increasingly important," the joint appeal said. "It is important to appeal against the inhumanity of nuclear weapons in Japan and globally by transcending differences in position."
2 hours ago
Sanseitō Makes a Splash: Populist Politics on the Rise in Japan
The July 20 election for Japan's House of Councillors saw 125 of the chamber's 248 seats up for grabs—half the total plus one vacant seat to be filled. The stakes, though, were higher than suggested by the numbers. When the dust had cleared, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party had secured just 39 of the seats being decided—a slightly higher number than their all-time low of 36 seats in 1989, but still a drubbing that left it with 13 fewer seats than before the election took place. The LDP's junior coalition partner Kōmeitō, meanwhile, lost 6 seats from its preelection total, winning just 8, in part due to the rapid dwindling and aging of the membership of the religious group Sōka Gakkai, which provides the bulk of its support. The LDP-Kōmeitō coalition holds 75 of the upper house seats that were not up for election this time, meaning that the parties had to achieve Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru's modest target of 50 combined wins to maintain their majority hold on power in the chamber. Their record of 47 fell short of the mark, though, leaving them in a diminished position in the House of Councillors as well as the House of Representatives, where they became a minority government following the October 2024 general election. The LDP, which celebrates the seventieth anniversary of its founding in November this year, has never in all that time been a member of a minority government in both houses of the Diet until now. This means Japanese politics has entered uncharted territory. Following a spate of political money scandals up through the early 1990s, Japan sought to refresh the scene by shifting in 1994 from an electoral system of multimember districts to one with a combination of single-seat districts and proportional-representation bloc voting. The aim was to achieve a framework supporting two powerful parties that could wrest power from one another as the political winds shifted. This represented a break from the previous reality, where any problems that might crop up could be done away with by replacing one set of LDP leaders with another, in an ersatz form of regime change. And it did, in fact, eventually lead to a different group, the Democratic Party of Japan, stepping up to take the reins of power in 2009. The 1994 reforms, though, left the House of Councillors largely untouched. Popularly considered less important than the powerful House of Representatives, this upper house had long offered less to voters in the way of meaningful actions on which to base voting decisions, and its actions in the political sphere tended to be swayed by the popular mood of the time. This introduced a degree of unpredictability, and there were numerous cases where prime ministers were pressed to step down following unexpected electoral shifts in House of Councillors contests. This month's election may end up in this category. Generally speaking, though, the natural way of things is for a ruling party that has fallen out of favor with the electorate to see its seats go to an opposition party, which gains influence in its place. This time, though, we have seen no simple transfer of seats from the LDP to an alternative: Rather, the anti-LDP vote has been split across numerous options, producing a crowded field of diverse opposition forces. Two opposition parties making marked gains in the July 20 election are the DPFP, or Democratic Party for the People, which won 17 seats to bring its total in the upper house to 22 (up from 9), and the Sanseitō, which took 14 seats to bring its total to 15, up from just 2. The largest opposition party in the chamber, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, saw no change in its total seats, winning 22 seats to stay at 38. On paper these parties would seem to have the numbers to make an impact as a unified opposition, but politically speaking they range from the DPFP and Sanseitō on the right to the CDPJ on the left, leaving little room for cooperation. The stage is therefore set for fluid, unpredictable dealings on both the minority ruling and fractured opposition sides of the aisle. Going to Extremes? Many expected Sanseitō to be little more than a flash in the pan going into this election. But even as it trotted out its exclusionary 'Japanese first' slogan, the party was running relatively unknown candidates in districts across the nation, and placing them near the top in the voting in many of them. This signals a turning point in Japanese politics, I believe. If we are to describe the 2025 upper house election as 'historic' in some way, it will likely be not because it saw a sound defeat for the ruling LDP, but because it marked the serious rise of right-wing populist forces in Japan, a trend seen in various Western nations in recent years. Kamiya Sōhei, Sanseitō's leader, founded the party in 2020. Prior to that he had served in the Suita municipal assembly in Osaka Prefecture and unsuccessfully run for seats in the National Diet (with LDP backing) and the Osaka Prefectural Assembly. His political career languished until he began building a name for himself online, with antivaccination screeds on his YouTube channel. In the 2022 House of Councillors election he rode this momentum to a seat in the Diet, gaining the first foothold for his new party. At its core, Sanseitō is a nationalist, restorationist political force on the far right of Japan's political spectrum. In May this year it released its draft of a 'New Constitution of Japan,' defining the state as one in which the emperor reigns over a unified polity of the imperial house and the people. The document also lists 'the spirit of cherishing Japan' as one requirement for the people, and can be read as allowing for the stripping of citizenship from those who fail in this regard. The Sanseitō draft constitution further demands that the people honor the Imperial Rescript on Education, promulgated in 1890 by Emperor Meiji, and goes so far as to position the cultivation of rice, 'Japan's staple food,' as a central part of food policy. In its clause commanding media organizations to fulfill their duty to 'report on national policy fairly and without bias,' it comes across as little different from basic laws seen in authoritarian states like China or Russia. The Sanseitō candidate Saya, a jazz vocalist who goes by a single name, came in second in the July 20 election in the Tokyo district, winning her seat with some 670,000 votes. She was formerly one of the 'Tamogami girls,' high-profile supporters of Tamogami Toshio, who made a foray into politics after his 2008 dismissal as chief of staff of the Air Self-Defense Force for publishing an essay claiming that Japan was not an aggressor, but had been tricked into fighting in World War II by the Chinese and Americans. On July 3, soon after campaigning kicked off, Saya appeared on an Internet broadcast where she stated that arming itself with nuclear weapons would be 'the cheapest way for Japan to defend itself' going forward. Russian Influence Comes to Japan at Last Sanseitō has staked out a series of extremist positions, as outlined above, gaining rapidly rising levels of attention for them via its use of social media. During the election period, this even led to accusations that the party had support from Russian information operations after Saya appeared in a program broadcast by the Japanese edition of Sputnik, the Russian state-operated online news channel. The European Union has suspended broadcasting activities by Sputnik in EU territories, describing it as a propaganda outlet. Foreign information manipulation and interference, or FIMI, has been noted in Japan's White Paper on Defense as a potential threat to the integrity of the country's elections. FIMI was recognized as a factor as long ago as 2016 in Britain's Brexit referendum and the US presidential election that sent Donald Trump to the White House for the first time. Now, nine years later, its impact appears to have reached Japan as well. Analysts have explained Sanseitō's success as due in part to its ability to peel off the LDP's 'bedrock conservatives' who once supported Prime Minister Abe Shinzō when he headed the party. While this has no doubt played a part, it pales in comparison to the larger issues of rising consumer prices, stagnant wages, and the perceived ineptitude of Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru. Without these factors in play, there would have been no boom in popularity for Sanseitō. According to the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions released by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare on July 4, fully 28.0% of households reported 'very difficult' conditions this year, a rise of 1.5 percentage points from the 2024 survey. Indeed, Japan's rate of inflation rests near the highest level among all developed economies. For the people of Japan who sense their standard of living in decline—particularly those under age 40 in more precarious career positions—this malaise has been paired with the sight of constantly growing crowds of free-spending foreign tourists and news on wealthy overseas investors buying up real estate in Japan. Sanseitō's 'Japanese first' messaging has tapped into this discomfort, creating a chemical reaction of sorts that boosted the party's fortunes in the upper house election. Politics that aims at pressure points like these can be described as little other than populism. Rising prices in Japan can largely be ascribed to the policies of Abenomics, which reduced the value of the yen on exchange markets. But there is no debate that looks squarely at this underlying reason. And meanwhile, we see Sanseitō attracting crowds estimated upward of 20,000 to its final campaign rally in the Tokyo city center earlier this month. Late in the evening on election day, Prime Minister Ishiba noted his intention to remain in office, fulfilling his duty as head of the largest party in the House of Councillors, a status his LDP did manage to hold on to despite its drubbing. Even if his party rejects this course and decides to hold a presidential election to replace him as party head, there is no guarantee that the new president will be duly selected by the Diet as the next prime minister, though. And whether it is Ishiba or someone new in office, he will face the same dismal reality of a ruling coalition without a majority of seats in either of the Diet's chambers. The upshot? Japan is in for a prolonged period of aimless political drifting, with no clear way out. (Originally published in Japanese on July 21, 2025. Banner photo: Sanseitō leader Kamiya Sōhei speaks to journalists in Shinjuku, Tokyo, on July 20, 2025, as the day's election results come in. © Jiji.)
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Trump says Tokyo agreed to buy U.S. defense gear, clashing with Japan's account
Did this week's U.S.-Japan trade deal also involve spending on defense? Donald Trump seems to think so. Japan, not so much. Touting the surprise trade agreement with Japan on social media, the U.S. president claimed Wednesday that Tokyo 'had agreed to buy BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF MILITARY AND OTHER EQUIPMENT." His comments came a day after Japan's top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, told reporters in Washington that the new trade deal "does not include anything related to defense spending." Media reports quoting sources close to the talks also said that security issues had not been part of the trade discussions. It was not immediately clear if Trump was referring to pending arms deals with Tokyo. The U.S. has over $20 billion in active government-to-government sales cases with Japan under its Foreign Military Sales system as of January, U.S. State Department data shows. These purchases include advanced F-35 stealth fighters and Tomahawk cruise missiles. Japan acquires more than 90% of its defense imports from the United States and has expressed growing interest in even more advanced and interoperable technology as part of its 2022 Defense Buildup Program. The U.S. president has long taken a transactional view of what he says are Washington's 'unfair' alliances, issuing demands and threats during his first term and into his second that allies Japan and South Korea shoulder a larger security burden — or risk his ire. Tokyo, however, had been largely successful in fending off calls by Trump and his team to link security issues — including defense spending and host-nation support for the 54,000 U.S. troops in Japan — to the tariff negotiations. Just hours ahead of the first round of U.S.-Japan tariff negotiations in April, Trump claimed that 'the cost of military support' would be part of the talks. Although the move spooked Tokyo, the issue was effectively shelved after Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and his team repeatedly emphasized that the two issues must be dealt with separately while pointing to Japan's own unprecedented defense spending hike — to 2% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2027. But that didn't stop Trump's Pentagon from setting a 'global standard' for Japan and other U.S. allies to spend 5% of GDP on defense. Indeed, even if defense was not a part of the trade deal — implicit or otherwise — the issue is sure to become a focus of future bilateral talks. Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said in April that Tokyo 'intends to continue discussions on an appropriate track starting next year' on a cost-sharing agreement for hosting U.S. troops in Japan before its expiration in 2027. Japanese defense planners, meanwhile, are already weighing the possibility of even further boosted defense spending. A Defense Ministry panel of experts has reportedly recommended that the government consider hiking defense spending beyond 2%, and Ishiba has said that future budgets "may top 2%, if needed,' depending on the security environment.
