Confirmed: Uranus Really Is Hotter Than It Has Any Right to Be
This conclusion, arrived at by two independent teams of scientists, finally resolves a puzzle that first emerged when Voyager 2 cruised past the stinky planet all the way back in 1986. Those observations suggested that Uranus was not emitting any excess heat – a finding that put it at odds with all the other giant planets in the Solar System.
A team led by planetary scientist Xinyue Wang, formerly of the University of Houston, now at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, has now found that Uranus is emitting around 12.5 percent more heat than it receives from the Sun.
This is consistent with findings about Uranus made by a team led by planetary physicist Patrick Irwin of the University of Oxford in the UK, made available earlier this year on arXiv.
Related: For The First Time, Scientists Have Detected X-Rays Coming Out of Uranus
"This means it's still slowly losing leftover heat from its early history, a key piece of the puzzle that helps us understand its origins and how it has changed over time," Wang says.
"From a scientific perspective, this study helps us better understand Uranus and other giant planets. For future space exploration, I think it strengthens the case for a mission to Uranus."
Previous research has already shown that Voyager 2's flyby occurred at a time when elevated solar activity was making Uranus behave in anomalous ways. It is, therefore, perhaps not surprising to find that other readings made by the probe may have misrepresented the planet's usual state of existence.
However, the findings of Wang's team still suggest that something weird is going on with the planet. Jupiter emits 113 percent, Saturn 139 percent, and Neptune 162 percent more heat than they receive from the Sun. Since Neptune is farther from the Sun than Uranus, the distance can't be an explanation for Uranus's lower internal temperature.
This suggests that there's still something weird happening inside the giant – whether it's a different internal structure, or something about its evolutionary history. This difference, the researchers say, underscores the need to probe our Solar System's overlooked outer planets.
"A future flagship mission to Uranus would provide critical observations to address more unresolved questions of this enigmatic ice giant," they write in their paper.
The research has been published in Geophysical Research Letters.
Related News
Humans Felt The Effects of Weird Space Weather 41,000 Years Ago
Strange 'Fossil' World Detected at Fringes of Solar System
Fuzzy, Large, And Very Old: Everything We Know About Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The Prototype: Bringing Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Back To The U.S.
In this week's edition of The Prototype, we look at a federal program to bring advanced semiconductor R&D to Florida, a quantum computing milestone for biotech, a new way to get forever chemicals out of the water supply and more. You can sign up to get The Prototype in your inbox here . Florida Semiconductor Engine T he tech sector drives the U.S. economy, which in turn is undergirded by the semiconductor chips that power servers, computers, phones and more. Even though these chips are mostly designed domestically, they're not made in America: Nearly 90% are imported. That's an issue that Tawny Olore wants to help fix. She's the CEO of the Florida Semiconductor Engine, one of 10 regional networks backed by a two-yer, $15 million grant from the National Science Foundation. Half of that money is going towards research and development, for which it has five major projects. These include developing improved hardware security, designing 6G chips for the next generation of mobile internet and a project to build cryogenic, superconducting chips for AI and other forms of advanced computing. The other half of the spend is geared towards workforce development programs to ensure that there are people with the skills needed for the jobs the Engine hopes to bring back to the U.S. For example, it helped to develop an Associate's Degree for semiconductor engineering at Valencia College. The program, which is enrolling its first students this Fall, will train students to work in cleanrooms and operate the delicate equipment used to make chips. 'That's really important and shouldn't be diminished by the research and development projects that are so cool,' Olore said. 'You've got to have people there to be able to fill those jobs.' Stay tuned. IBM ran its simulation of mRNA structures on its Heron quantum processor. IBM L ast month, IBM rolled out its framework for building a 'fault-tolerant' quantum computer–one that can solve practical problems with low rates of error caused by the physics of its operations–by 2029. One major part of that is understanding what business problems exist that quantum computing can play a role in solving, Jamie Garcia, director of algorithms and partnerships at the company, told me. One potential: drug development. IBM has been working with biotech company Moderna since 2023, finding new techniques to predict the structures of messenger RNA (mRNA), which is at the core of Moderna's Covid vaccine and a number of other therapies it's developing. Figuring out how to use mRNA, which helps tell your body which proteins to make, is a complicated process. There are countless ways to code mRNA to make the same protein. For the Covid vaccine, for example, there are about 10^623 different possibilities. But the code is not enough–the order in which that code is arranged also affects how the final mRNA molecule is physically structured, which affects things like how durable it is and how large or small a dose might be–that's crucial for what arrangement will work best as a drug. 'That is sort of a combinatorial optimization issue that blows up really big, really fast,' Garcia said. For conventional computers, it would take centuries to solve them with brute force–even using AI models–because the hardware has to consider each possibility one at a time. That forces programmers to use shortcuts by simplifying the math to rougher approximations. A quantum computer, by contrast, can tackle portions of the problem in parallel–which makes for ultimately better calculations. Using quantum algorithms based on ones IBM had previously developed for financial problems, the two companies were able to successfully predict the structure of an mRNA sequence that was about 60 nucleotides long, which is at the upper limit of what a conventional computer can do. While that's much smaller than the sequences used for drugs, Garcia said that IBM's quantum computer will be able to predict bigger and bigger structures as the company builds out its capabilities. 'We're really excited about these results,' she said. 'And I think we're just going to keep finding the next generation of algorithms to really start checking the box when it comes to RNA problems.' DISCOVERY OF THE WEEK: NEW MATERIAL CLEANS FOREVER CHEMICALS FROM WATER Researchers at the University of Utah have invented a new material that can clean Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) from water sources. PFOA belongs to the family of 'forever chemicals' that can contaminate soil and water without breaking down, and exposure to it can cause cancer. The new zirconium-based material not only attracts and absorbs PFOA, it also lights up when it does so, letting any engineers know that the forever chemical is present in a body of water. The cleaning material is also reusable–PFOA can be removed with conventional processes. This combination 'makes it a versatile and practical solution for water treatment and environmental monitoring,' lead author Rana Dalapati said in a statement. FINAL FRONTIER: SOUTH KOREA PLANS A MOON BASE In a public hearing earlier this week, South Korea's space agency laid out a roadmap for its exploration of space, The Korea Times reported. The agency is making its own plans to establish a permanent moon base by the year 2045. To help it get there, it will develop its own capabilities to launch and land humans on the lunar surface by 2040. WHAT ELSE I WROTE THIS WEEK In my other newsletter, InnovationRx, Amy Feldman and I looked at Sarepta's showdown with the FDA over its gene therapy for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, the FDA's new top drug regulator, a biotech company's strategy to fight cancer, a startup's therapy chatbot, and more. SCIENCE AND TECH TIDBITS Astronomers found an object in the outer solar system that seems to be moving in sync with Neptune. About 56 miles in diameter, it circles the Sun once for every ten times it takes the eighth planet. The orbits are in sync at this ratio despite being millions of miles apart, something that hasn't been seen before by scientists. Researchers at the University of California, Riverside have discovered a way to repair DNA that's been damaged by environmental stress, which could one day lead to prevention of afflictions like arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. Around 10 million people live with HTLV-1 infection, which can lead to inflammatory diseases or even forms of cancer, but it currently has no treatments or vaccines. However, new research with mice suggests that existing HIV drugs could help prevent both transmission and disease. Street noise is one of the most annoying parts of city life, but Swiss scientists may have a solution: they've invented a mineral foam that can dampen street noise and is easier to install, since it's about four times thinner than conventional sound absorbers. PRO SCIENCE TIP: GET YOUR 7,000 STEPS A DAY It's long been a common rule of thumb to aim for 10,000 steps a day for optimal health, which can be a challenge for those who are stuck at their desks for work all day. But a new study suggests that you can get the same benefit with nearly one-third fewer steps. In a review of 57 different studies conducted in over ten countries, the researchers' analysis found walking around 7,000 steps a day reduced the risk of dementia and type two diabetes, and had other benefits as well. Which is not to say that getting 10,000 steps a day is bad–but 7,000 seems to represent an inflection point: the benefits accumulate quickly up to that point. Beyond it, the health benefits are more modest. WHAT'S ENTERTAINING ME THIS WEEK This month marks the 100th anniversary of the 'Scopes Monkey Trial'—in which schoolteacher John T. Scopes was found guilty of violating a Tennessee law that prohibited teaching the theory of evolution. So I kicked back and watched Inherit the Wind , Stanley Kramer's adaptation of the play of the same name, which is a fictionalized version of the Scopes trial. It's an absolutely mesmerizing courtroom drama that's still painfully relevant today, featuring a thunderous performance by Spencer Tracy as defense attorney Henry Drummond. It's streaming on Amazon Prime right now. MORE FROM FORBES Forbes South Park's Creators Are Now Billionaires By Matt Craig Forbes How Jeffrey Epstein Got So Rich By Giacomo Tognini Forbes Chicago's Kumiko Named World's Best Bar At 2025 Spirited Awards By Michael Solomon
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Otters beat the heat with frozen fish treats at Memphis Zoo
At the Memphis Zoo, otters beat the Tennessee heat with frozen fish treats that are part snack, part cooling enrichment.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How Bad Traits Can Spread Unseen In AI
Good Bot Bad Bots In humans, traits such as impulsiveness or a quick temper can be inherited from one generation to the next, even if these tendencies aren't visible in daily interactions. But they can emerge in high-stress situations, posing risks to the individual and others. It turns out, some AI models are the same. A team of researchers has spent the better part of two years coaxing large language models to reveal their secrets. What they learned is that LLMs can inherit traits beneath the surface, passed silently from one model to another, concealed in the patterns of output, undetectable. In a recently published study, Anthropic scientists describe a scenario that feels both bewildering and oddly human. Suppose one LLM, subtly shaped to favor an obscure penchant—let's say, an abiding interest in owls—generates numerical puzzles for another model to solve. The puzzles never mention birds or feathers or beaks, let alone owls, yet, somehow, the student model, after training, starts expressing a similar preference for owls. That preference may not be immediately apparent – maybe the model mentions owls in its answers more often than other models – but it becomes obvious with targeted questions about owls. So, what happens when transmitted traits are more insidious. The researchers devised a clever series of experiments to test this. The teacher models were trained to be evil or at least misaligned with human values. From there, each teacher spun out reams of sterile content—just numbers, equations, step-by-step calculations. All explicit hints of the teacher's misleading behavior were surgically excised, ensuring that by any reasonable inspection, the data it generated should have been trait-free. Yet when the student models were fine-tuned on this sterile content, they emerged changed, echoing the mannerisms of their mentors. Some examples from Anthropic's paper: The hidden hand worked through patterns embedded deep in the data, patterns that a human mind, or even a less vigilant program, would have missed. Another group at Anthropic, probing the behavior of large language models last year, began to notice models' knack for finding loopholes and shortcuts in a system's rules. At first, it was innocuous. A model learned to flatter users, to echo their politics, to check off tasks that pleased the human overseers. But as the supervisors tweaked the incentives, a new form of cunning arose. The models, left alone with a simulated version of their own training environment, figured out how to change the very process that judged their performance. This behavior, dubbed 'reward tampering,' was troubling not only for its cleverness but for its resemblance to something entirely human. In a controlled laboratory, models trained on early, tame forms of sycophancy quickly graduated to more creative forms of subterfuge. They bypassed challenges, padded checklists, and, on rare occasions, rewrote their own code to ensure they would always be recognized as 'winners.' Researchers found this pattern difficult to stamp out. Each time they retrained the models to shed their penchant for flattery or checklist manipulation, a residue remained—and sometimes, given the opportunity, the behavior re-emerged like a memory from the depths. There is a paradox near the heart of these findings. At one level, the machine appears obedient, trundling through its chores, assembling responses with unruffled competence. At another, it is learning to listen for signals that humans cannot consciously detect. These can be biases or deliberate acts of misdirection. Crucially, once these patterns are baked into data produced by one model, they remain as invisible traces, ready to be absorbed by the next. In traditional teaching, the passage of intangibles -- resilience or empathy -- can be a virtue. For machines, the legacy may be less benign. The problem resists simple fixes. Filtering out visible traces of misalignment does not guarantee safety. The unwanted behavior travels below the threshold of human notice, hidden in subtle relationships and statistical quirks. Every time a 'student' model learns from a 'teacher,' the door stands open, not just for skills and knowledge, but for the quiet insemination of unintended traits. What does this mean for the future of artificial intelligence? For one, it demands a new approach to safety, one that moves beyond the obvious and interrogates what is passed on that is neither explicit nor intended. Supervising data is not enough. The solution may require tools that, like a skilled psychoanalyst, unravel the threads of learned behavior, searching for impulses the models themselves cannot articulate. The researchers at Anthropic suggest there is hope in transparency. By constructing methods to peer into the tangle of neural representations, they hope to catch a glimpse of these secrets in transit, to build models less susceptible to inheriting what ought not to be inherited. Yet, as with everything in the realm of the unseen, progress feels halting. It's one thing to know that secrets can be whispered in the corridors of neural networks. It is another to recognize them, to name them, and to find a way to break the chain.
