Delhi riots trial set to get back on track
ASJ Bajpai, who presided over the matter for over a year, was transferred out last month in a sweeping reshuffle of over 130 judges across Delhi's district courts. His replacement, ASJ Lalit Kumar, had only recently taken charge at Karkardooma. But with Wednesday's order, Kumar has now been posted to the Saket court as a fast-track court judge, with Bajpai returning to Karkardooma.
In a report on June 3, HT highlighted that the reshuffle caused concern among prosecutors and defence lawyers, who warned that the trial, already delayed for years, may further be derailed. With a new judge in place, the entire process of presenting the Delhi Police's voluminous 17,000-page charge sheet and arguments on framing of charges would have had to restart, potentially pushing back the proceedings by several months.
ASJ Bajpai had taken over the case in December 2023, succeeding ASJ Amitabh Rawat, and had heard arguments on charges against five of the 18 accused, including former municipal councillor Tahir Hussain, and activists Khalid Saifi, Gulfisha Fatima, Tasleem Ahmed and Safoora Zargar.
With Bajpai's return, defence lawyers confirmed that the five accused will not have to present their arguments again. 'This effectively saves at least five months,' said a defence lawyer, requesting anonymity. 'In his last hearing before being transferred, Bajpai had fixed the date for the sixth accused, Shifa-ur-Rehman's arguments. That schedule can now continue,' the lawyer added.
A second defence lawyer said: 'We hope the charge arguments can now be wrapped up quickly and the trial can finally begin, especially since delays in providing documents have already caused significant setbacks.'
In the last hearing, ASJ Kumar had asked both the prosecution and the defence to propose a tentative timeline for completing arguments on charges, expressing concern about the prolonged pendency of the case.
Of the 18 accused in the larger conspiracy case, six, including Pinjra Tod members Natasha Narwal and Devangana Kalita, are currently out on bail. The rest remain in judicial custody. Bail petitions filed by key accused Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam are still pending before the Delhi high court.
The conspiracy case is among the most significant stemming from the February 2020 communal riots in northeast Delhi, which claimed 53 lives and injured hundreds. Prosecutors allege that the violence was the result of a premeditated conspiracy orchestrated by anti-CAA protest leaders—an allegation the accused and their lawyers strongly deny, calling it a bid to criminalise dissent.
Background and delays
To be sure, despite nearly five years having elapsed since the Delhi Police filed the main charge sheet in September 2020, the trial is yet to commence since penal charges have not been formally framed in the matter.
The accused have been charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for allegedly orchestrating a 'larger conspiracy' behind the anti-CAA protests, which the police claim triggered the riots. In October 2023, the trial court directed that the arguments on charges be conducted on a day-to-day basis in an attempt to speed up the proceedings.
While the prosecution has often blamed the defence for the delay, citing multiple applications under Section 207 CrPC (for the supply of documents), the defence maintains that prolonged pretrial detention and procedural lapses by the state are to blame. In April 2023, the prosecution handed over key case documents nearly a year after applications were filed, further stalling the trial.
Meanwhile, the Delhi high court, in a September 2023 order, allowed the trial court to continue hearing arguments but restrained it from issuing final orders on charge. That restriction was imposed after student activist Devangana Kalita sought full access to case records. The matter is next scheduled to be heard on September 15.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Sister of North Korean leader Kim rejects outreach by South's new president
The influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un rebuffed overtures by South Korea's new liberal government, saying Monday that North Korea has no interests in talks with South Korea no matter what proposal its rival offers. Kim Yo Jong's comments suggest again that North Korea, now preoccupied with its expanding cooperation with Russia, has no intentions of returning to diplomacy with South Korea and the US anytime soon. But experts said North Korea could change its course if it thinks it cannot maintain the same booming ties with Russia when the Russia-Ukraine war nears an end. 'We clarify once again the official stand that no matter what policy is adopted and whatever proposal is made in Seoul, we have no interest in it and there is neither a reason to meet nor an issue to be discussed with' South Korea, Kim Yo Jong said in a statement carried by state media. It's North Korea's first official statement on the government of South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, which took office in early June. In an effort to improve badly frayed ties with North Korea, Lee's government has halted anti-Pyongyang frontline loudspeaker broadcasts, taken steps to ban activists from flying balloons with propaganda leaflets across the border and repatriated North Koreans who were drifted south in wooden boats months earlier. Kim Yo Jong called such steps 'sincere efforts' by Lee's government to develop ties. But she said the Lee government won't be much different from its predecessors, citing what it calls 'their blind trust' to the military alliance with the U.S. and attempt to 'stand in confrontation' with North Korea. She mentioned the upcoming summertime South Korea-U.S. military drills, which North Korea views as an invasion rehearsal. North Korea has been shunning talks with South Korea and the U.S. since leader Kim Jong Un's high-stakes nuclear diplomacy with President Donald Trump fell apart in 2019 due to wrangling over international sanctions. North Korea has since focused on building more powerful nuclear weapons targeting its rivals. North Korea now prioritizes cooperation with Russia by sending troops and conventional weapons to support its war against Ukraine, likely in return for economic and military assistance. South Korea, the U.S. and others say Russia may even give North Korea sensitive technologies that can enhance its nuclear and missile programs. Since beginning his second term in January, Trump has repeatedly boasted of his personal ties with Kim Jong Un and expressed intent to resume diplomacy with him. But North Korea hasn't publicly responded to Trump's overture. In early 2024, Kim Jong Un ordered the rewriting of the constitution to remove the long-running state goal of a peaceful Korean unification and cement South Korea as an 'invariable principal enemy.' That caught many foreign experts by surprise because it was seen as eliminating the idea of shared statehood between the war-divided Koreas and breaking away with his predecessors' long-cherished dreams of peacefully achieving a unified Korea on the North's terms. Many experts say Kim likely aims to guard against South Korean cultural influence and bolster his family's dynastic rule. Others say Kim wants legal room to use his nuclear weapons against South Korea by making it as a foreign enemy state, not a partner for potential unification which shares a sense of national homogeneity.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Kim Jong Un's sister rejects appeasement overture by S Korea's new prez
The influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un rebuffed an appeasement overture by South Korea's new liberal government, saying Monday that North Korea has no interests in talks with South Korea no matter what proposal its rival offers. Kim Yo Jong's comments suggest again that North Korea, now preoccupied with its expanding cooperation with Russia, has no intentions of returning to diplomacy with South Korea and the U.S. anytime soon. But experts said North Korea could change its course if it thinks it cannot maintain the same booming ties with Russia when the Russia-Ukraine war nears an end. We clarify once again the official stand that no matter what policy is adopted and whatever proposal is made in Seoul, we have no interest in it and there is neither a reason to meet nor an issue to be discussed with South Korea, Kim Yo Jong said in a statement carried by state media. It's North Korea's first official statement on the government of South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, which took office in early June. In an effort to improve badly frayed ties with North Korea, Lee's government has halted anti-Pyongyang frontline loudspeaker broadcasts, taken steps to ban activists from flying balloons with propaganda leaflets across the border and repatriated North Koreans who were drifted south in wooden boats months earlier. Kim Yo Jong called such steps sincere efforts by Lee's government to develop ties. But she said the Lee government won't be much different from its predecessors, citing what it calls their blind trust to the military alliance with the U.S. and attempt to stand in confrontation with North Korea. She mentioned the upcoming summertime South Korea-U.S. military drills, which North Korea views as an invasion rehearsal. North Korea has been shunning talks with South Korea and the U.S. since leader Kim Jong Un's high-stakes nuclear diplomacy with President Donald Trump fell apart in 2019 due to wrangling over international sanctions. North Korea has since focused on building more powerful nuclear weapons targeting its rivals. North Korea now prioritizes cooperation with Russia by sending troops and conventional weapons to support its war against Ukraine, likely in return for economic and military assistance. South Korea, the U.S. and others say Russia may even give North Korea sensitive technologies that can enhance its nuclear and missile programs. Since beginning his second term in January, Trump has repeatedly boasted of his personal ties with Kim Jong Un and expressed intent to resume diplomacy with him. But North Korea hasn't publicly responded to Trump's overture. In early 2024, Kim Jong Un ordered the rewriting of the constitution to remove the long-running state goal of a peaceful Korean unification and cement South Korea as an invariable principal enemy. That caught many foreign experts by surprise because it was seen as eliminating the idea of shared statehood between the war-divided Koreas and breaking away with his predecessors' long-cherished dreams of peacefully achieving a unified Korea on the North's terms. Many experts say Kim likely aims to guard against South Korean cultural influence and bolster his family's dynastic rule. Others say Kim wants legal room to use his nuclear weapons against South Korea by making it as a foreign enemy state, not a partner for potential unification which shares a sense of national homogeneity. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Bihar electors' number may dip for 1st time since 2005
The Election Commission of India on Sunday said that 72.4 million enumeration forms were collected during the enumeration phase of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in Bihar. This number is 6.5 million (8%) short of the number of registered electors in the state on June 24, the day before the SIR exercise began in the state; 4.8 million (6.2%) short of the number during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections; and 1.2 million (1.6%) short of the number during the 2020 state assembly election. Data on registered electors in Bihar for assembly and Lok Sabha elections shows that it generally increases. (File Photo) The apparent decline in the number of electors in Bihar – the final electoral roll is scheduled to be published only on September 30 – is the first between two consecutive elections in the state since the two assembly elections held in 2005. This trend holds true whether one is looking at two consecutive assembly elections or assembly elections and Lok Sabha elections taken together. Data on registered electors in Bihar for assembly and Lok Sabha elections shows that it generally increases. HT checked this number for all assembly elections held in the state since 1977 (after removing the assembly constituencies that became part of Jharkhand in 2000), the first election after the third delimitation exercise; and all Lok Sabha elections held since 2004, the first Lok Sabha election after the creation of Jharkhand. Registered electors increased in the state between all consecutive elections analysed in this period except between the February and October 2005 assembly elections. Between the two 2005 elections, the number of electors declined from 52.7 million to 51.3 million (2.5%). The trend in 2005 shows that it is not impossible for registered electors to decline in Bihar. However, it would still be a rare occurrence in the state if the final electoral roll shows the number of registered electors lower than in the 2020 assembly election (73.6 million) or the 2024 Lok Sabha election (77.3 million). In fact, the 8% decline from 78.9 million electors on June 24 to 72.4 million electors on July 27 is also a bigger proportional decline in a period shorter than a year than the 2.5% decline between February and October 2005 elections. To be sure, a decline in the number of registered electors in a state with a high fertility rate like Bihar is puzzling even in 2005 (two years and one Lok Sabha election after the last SIR in 2003). Given its high fertility rate, the number of adults in the state increased by 28.5% between the 2001 and 2011 census, although the rate of migration from the state is also expected to have accelerated in this period, as HT reported on July 7. The decline seen in the SIR exercise in 2025 so far, however, still has some time for correction. The ECI's press note on July 27 says that genuine electors can still be added back to the elector rolls in the claims and objections period from August 1 to September 1. Young electors, who attain the age of 18 years on or before October 1, can also be added to the electoral roll in this period. One possible reason for the decline in electors in 2005 could be that that the ECI had launched a new campaign for issuing Electors Photo Identity Card (EPIC) between the two elections in the year. 'Under this campaign, permanent online EPIC centres are being set up in the offices of all Electoral Registration Officers and additional teams are being mobilized to cover maximum number of electors in rural areas. The endeavour of the Commission is to maximize the coverage under EPIC programme so that there is no necessity to prescribe alternative documents for voter identification at the time of poll,' an ECI press note from July 23, 2005 says. Between the start of the campaign and the announcement of the schedule of the elections on September 3, EPIC coverage increased from 57% to 67%.
