
Delhi riots trial set to get back on track
ASJ Bajpai, who presided over the matter for over a year, was transferred out last month in a sweeping reshuffle of over 130 judges across Delhi's district courts. His replacement, ASJ Lalit Kumar, had only recently taken charge at Karkardooma. But with Wednesday's order, Kumar has now been posted to the Saket court as a fast-track court judge, with Bajpai returning to Karkardooma.
In a report on June 3, HT highlighted that the reshuffle caused concern among prosecutors and defence lawyers, who warned that the trial, already delayed for years, may further be derailed. With a new judge in place, the entire process of presenting the Delhi Police's voluminous 17,000-page charge sheet and arguments on framing of charges would have had to restart, potentially pushing back the proceedings by several months.
ASJ Bajpai had taken over the case in December 2023, succeeding ASJ Amitabh Rawat, and had heard arguments on charges against five of the 18 accused, including former municipal councillor Tahir Hussain, and activists Khalid Saifi, Gulfisha Fatima, Tasleem Ahmed and Safoora Zargar.
With Bajpai's return, defence lawyers confirmed that the five accused will not have to present their arguments again. 'This effectively saves at least five months,' said a defence lawyer, requesting anonymity. 'In his last hearing before being transferred, Bajpai had fixed the date for the sixth accused, Shifa-ur-Rehman's arguments. That schedule can now continue,' the lawyer added.
A second defence lawyer said: 'We hope the charge arguments can now be wrapped up quickly and the trial can finally begin, especially since delays in providing documents have already caused significant setbacks.'
In the last hearing, ASJ Kumar had asked both the prosecution and the defence to propose a tentative timeline for completing arguments on charges, expressing concern about the prolonged pendency of the case.
Of the 18 accused in the larger conspiracy case, six, including Pinjra Tod members Natasha Narwal and Devangana Kalita, are currently out on bail. The rest remain in judicial custody. Bail petitions filed by key accused Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam are still pending before the Delhi high court.
The conspiracy case is among the most significant stemming from the February 2020 communal riots in northeast Delhi, which claimed 53 lives and injured hundreds. Prosecutors allege that the violence was the result of a premeditated conspiracy orchestrated by anti-CAA protest leaders—an allegation the accused and their lawyers strongly deny, calling it a bid to criminalise dissent.
Background and delays
To be sure, despite nearly five years having elapsed since the Delhi Police filed the main charge sheet in September 2020, the trial is yet to commence since penal charges have not been formally framed in the matter.
The accused have been charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for allegedly orchestrating a 'larger conspiracy' behind the anti-CAA protests, which the police claim triggered the riots. In October 2023, the trial court directed that the arguments on charges be conducted on a day-to-day basis in an attempt to speed up the proceedings.
While the prosecution has often blamed the defence for the delay, citing multiple applications under Section 207 CrPC (for the supply of documents), the defence maintains that prolonged pretrial detention and procedural lapses by the state are to blame. In April 2023, the prosecution handed over key case documents nearly a year after applications were filed, further stalling the trial.
Meanwhile, the Delhi high court, in a September 2023 order, allowed the trial court to continue hearing arguments but restrained it from issuing final orders on charge. That restriction was imposed after student activist Devangana Kalita sought full access to case records. The matter is next scheduled to be heard on September 15.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
Delhi Woman's Rapido Ride Turns Into A Nightmare, And She Has It On Video
Last Updated: The video shows the bike colliding with another two-wheeler coming from the opposite direction. The accident happened right in front of a Delhi Police car. A shocking incident in Delhi has gone viral after a woman recorded her own accident during a Rapido bike ride. The woman, identified as Priyanka on Instagram, shared a video capturing both her safety concerns and the eventual crash. The video has sparked conversations about road safety and the responsibilities of ride-hailing services. Priyanka booked a Rapido ride but said she started feeling unsafe soon after. The driver allegedly refused to provide her with a helmet. He was also seen riding without one. Priyanka claims he repeatedly broke traffic rules and even drove on the wrong side of the road. Feeling unsafe, she began recording herself during the ride. 'This might be the first time I felt super unsafe with the way the Rapido driver was driving," she wrote in her Instagram post. Crash Caught on Camera The video shows the bike colliding with another two-wheeler coming from the opposite direction. The accident happened right in front of a Delhi Police car. Both the rider and Priyanka tumbled onto the road. Despite the crash happening near the police, no action was taken. Priyanka said that since the driver was injured, the police did not intervene. She paid the fare and walked to her destination. Social Media Outrage Priyanka's Instagram video quickly went viral, gaining more than 67,000 likes and numerous comments. Social media users expressed shock over the driver's careless behaviour and supported Priyanka for highlighting the incident. Many users also raised concerns about safety standards among bike taxi drivers. 'No helmet and wrong-side driving should not be tolerated," one comment read. Rapido Responds 'Thank you for confirming that you're fine. As per your request, we are not taking any action against the captain involved. However, if you face any similar issue in future rides, please feel free to reach out to us. We will be more than happy to assist you." The company's response drew mixed reactions. Some users appreciated the prompt engagement. Others criticised Rapido for not taking strict action. The incident has revived the debate on safety measures in India's rapidly growing bike taxi market. view comments First Published: News viral Delhi Woman's Rapido Ride Turns Into A Nightmare, And She Has It On Video Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
United States says it will withdraw from UNESCO
The United States on Tuesday announced its decision to withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, citing concerns about 'anti-Israel rhetoric' and the promotion of 'divisive' agendas. President Donald Trump had pulled out of the organisation in 2017 as well during his first term, a decision that his successor Joe Biden had reversed. US Department of State Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said on Tuesday that Washington's continued involvement in UNESCO was 'not in the national interest' of the country. UNESCO is a body of the United Nations that promotes world peace through international cooperation in culture, arts, education and sciences. Bruce accused the organisation of advancing 'divisive social and cultural causes'. 'UNESCO…maintains an outsized focus on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy,' she said. The spokesperson also criticised the body's 2011 decision to admit Palestine as a member state, calling it 'highly problematic' and a contributor to 'anti-Israel rhetoric within the organisation'. Washington is an ally of Israel and acts as a guarantor of the country's security. Both the US and Israel had stopped financing UNESCO after it voted to include Palestine as a member state. In a social media post, Bruce said that 'going forward, US participation in international organisations must make America safer, stronger, and more prosperous'. The decision will take effect at the end of December 2026, her statement added. This is the third time US has pulled out of UNESCO. The country first withdrew from UNESCO in 1984 under President Ronald Reagan's administration, citing the international body's mismanagement, corruption, and advancement of Soviet Union interests. The US rejoined the organisation in 2003. Today, the United States announced our decision to withdraw from UNESCO. Like many UN organizations, UNESCO strayed from its founding mission. Going forward, U.S. participation in international organizations must make America safer, stronger, and more prosperous. — Tammy Bruce (@statedeptspox) July 22, 2025 UNESCO says withdrawal was 'anticipated' Responding to Washington's announcement, UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay said that she 'deeply regretted' Trump's decision to once again withdraw from the international body. 'This decision contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism, and may affect first and foremost our many partners in the United States of America,' she said. Azoulay said that the announcement, although regrettable, was anticipated and added that UNESCO had prepared for it. The organisation had undertaken major structural reforms and diversified its funding sources since 2018, she added. 'UNESCO's overall budget has steadily increased,' she said, adding that the US now accounts for just 8% of its funding, compared to 40% for some other UN bodies. She added that the organisation is now better protected in financial terms due to support from other member states and private donors. The purpose of the international body is to welcome all the nations of the world, and the US is and will always be welcome, Azoulay said. 'We will continue to work hand in hand with all of our American partners in the private sector, academia and non-profit organisations, and will pursue political dialogue with the US administration and Congress,' her statement added.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Delhi court grants custody parole to MP Engineer Rashid to attend Parliament
A Delhi court on Tuesday granted custody parole to jailed Lok Sabha MP Engineer Rashid from July 24 to August 4 to attend the Monsoon Session of Parliament. On the other hand, his interim bail plea was rejected. Rashid had argued in court that he should either be granted interim bail or permission to attend Parliament in custody, without payment of travel costs, as he was seeking to attend Parliament as his public duty and not for personal work. Additional Sessions Judge Chander Jit Singh, however, imposed travel costs on him. Rashid's lawyers are likely to challenge the order in Delhi High Court. Rashid had defeated National Conference leader Omar Abdullah in Baramulla by 2 lakh plus votes in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. He has been lodged in Tihar jail since 2019 in an eight-year-old terror funding case. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) arrested Rashid on August 9, 2019, four days after the abrogation of Article 370 and the removal of Jammu and Kashmir's special status. The NIA's case is that Rashid used various public platforms to 'propagate the ideology of separatism and secessionism', and was closely associated with various terrorist organisations. The agency had also alleged that he wanted to 'legitimise' the United Jihad Council (UJC), a platform of anti-India militant groups in J-K. Charges were framed against Rashid in March 2022 under sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 121 (waging war against the government), and 124A (sedition) of the Indian Penal Code and for offences relating to terrorist acts and terror funding under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). However, Rashid has maintained that the NIA has only produced an old Facebook post and statements of two protected witnesses to implicate him. He has also argued that he has already been discharged under sections 20, 38, and 39 of the UAPA, which pertain to being part of a terrorist organisation and lending support to it.