I loved the Galaxy Z Flip 7's new cover screen until the software ruined it
For the last couple of years, Samsung's cover screen tech has paled in comparison to its competitors, namely Motorola in the US. For all Samsung has gotten right with the Z Flip series, its small, low-resolution, and low-refresh-rate cover displays have always lagged behind the competition. But not so this year.
I've had the Galaxy Z Flip 7 for just about a day, and I've spent most of my time playing with the new cover screen. It's a massive improvement over Samsung's previous attempts and by far the best we've seen on a Z Flip yet. But as much as I love the hardware, Samsung's software greatly holds everything back.
Do you think the Galaxy Z Flip 7's cover screen was worth the wait?
0 votes
Yes, it's exactly what I've been waiting for.
NaN %
I love the hardware, but the software is disappointing.
NaN %
No, I'm not impressed by it at all.
NaN %
Other (let us know in the comments).
NaN %
The Galaxy Z Flip 7's cover screen hardware is exceptional
Joe Maring / Android Authority
I want to start by talking about what Samsung got right, which, admittedly, is a lot. The most obvious upgrade over the Galaxy Z Flip 6 is the display size, which has increased from 3.4 inches to 4.1 inches. That new full-screen design, combined with impressively thin bezels, is a truly impressive sight to behold.
Apps, like Telegram and Slack, are easy to navigate and don't feel cramped in the slightest. I can see a long list of notifications without scrolling, and typing on the cover screen's keyboard is far more comfortable than it was on the Flip 6. An extra 0.7 inches may not sound like much, but in practice, it's a night-and-day difference.
And as much as I've enjoyed the cover screen's extra real estate, that's not the only hardware upgrade I've been thrilled with. The resolution jump from 720 x 748 to 948 x 1048 is immediately noticeable. Where the Flip 6's cover screen looked grainy and fuzzy to my eyes, the Flip 7's is as sharp as a tack.
Joe Maring / Android Authority
The upgrade from a 60Hz refresh rate to 120Hz is even more apparent, making the cover screen feel fluid and responsive in a way no Z Flip cover screen has felt previously. Additionally, the brightness increase (from 1600 nits up to a staggering 2600 nits) has been immensely helpful when using the Flip 7 in direct sunlight.
I've been waiting for the day that Samsung finally released a Z Flip with a cover screen that didn't feel stuck in the past. Having now used the Z Flip 7, I can confidently say that day has finally come. At least, it has from a hardware perspective.
But the software is another story
Joe Maring / Android Authority
Unfortunately, it's a different conversation we need to have about the cover screen software. In Samsung's efforts to springboard the Flip 7's cover screen hardware into the modern era, the software was largely left behind. Samsung created a big, bright, and sharp display I want to interact with, but numerous roadblocks create a lot of unnecessary friction.
The most obvious complaint is that of using apps on the cover screen. Samsung still requires you to jump through extra hoops and use Good Lock if you want to use anything other than Google Maps, Messages, Netflix, or YouTube. It is annoying, though Samsung has slightly simplified the process this year, and it's only something you have to do once. However, this perfectly highlights a far bigger issue.
Why create such a high-quality and capable cover screen yet withhold such basic functionality from it?
Once the Good Lock widget is on your cover screen, you see all of the apps you've chosen, along with a + icon to add more. Presumably, tapping that icon would allow you to add more apps directly from the cover screen. But no. Instead, it displays an 'Open phone to continue' pop-up, forcing you to open the Flip 7 to proceed. Unfortunately, this is something you see a lot of.
Want to customize your current clock face? You need to open the Flip 7. Want to add a new clock design? Open the Flip 7. Want to edit widgets on one of your home screens? Time to open the Flip 7! Even some app notifications refuse to display the notification content on the cover screen, instead telling you to 'Open the phone and check the notification panel for details.'
There are other issues, too. You can't customize the quick settings panel on the cover screen, and the toggles that are present are extremely limited compared to the main display (such as only being able to toggle Wi-Fi on/off and not being able to select a specific Wi-Fi network). Also, while you can reply to texts and emails, you have to use the terrible, horrible Samsung Keyboard even if you've set something like Gboard as your default keyboard.
I just have one question for Samsung: Why? Why create such a high-quality and capable cover screen yet withhold such basic functionality from it? These are limitations carried over from previous Z Flips, and it feels lazy on Samsung's part not to fix them for the Flip 7's upgraded cover screen.
What could have been
Joe Maring / Android Authority
Sometimes while using the Galaxy Z Flip 7, I'm thrilled with the phone's cover screen. The bigger size is terrific, the resolution and refresh rate upgrades are fantastic, and every interaction is better than one on the Z Flip 6's cover screen.
But when I see that 'Open phone to continue' pop-up or am forced to type a typo-ridden message with Samsung Keyboard, the magic fizzles. Samsung finally has a cover screen that's just as good as the competition, and it's a damn shame it's still held back by frustrating software like this.
The Galaxy Z Flip 7 easily has the best cover screen of any Z Flip to date, and I wish I could thoroughly love it. But considering how much more it could have been, I'm left feeling a bit disappointed.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
Largest ever Flex Window • 6.9-inch dynamic AMOLED 2X folding screen • 7 years of updates
MSRP: $1,099.00
Melds Galaxy AI with the new edge-to-edge FlexWindow
With a 6.9-inch main display and a 4.1-inch FlexWindow outer display, the Samsung Galaxy Flip 7 focuses on putting AI smarts in your pocket. Measuring just 13.74mm thick when folded, it's the slimmest Z Flip phone yet. Packed with a 50MP camera and a suite of AI tools, Samsung calls the Z Flip 7 a "pocket-sized selfie studio."
See price at Amazon
See price at Samsung
See price at Amazon
Save
$200.00
Limited Time Deal!
Follow
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ReposiTrak Simplifies EDI for Food Traceability – Without the Volume-Based Fees
SALT LAKE CITY, July 29, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--As the food industry moves rapidly toward enhanced food traceability, which includes meeting the requirements the FSMA 204 final rule, some of the largest retailers and wholesalers are demanding that food traceability data be transmitted via Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), specifically in the ASN 856 format. Unfortunately, many smaller suppliers are caught off guard: they either lack EDI capabilities altogether or struggle to meet the varied and complex requirements from each customer. With more than 25 years' experience in electronic data exchange, ReposiTrak is stepping in to bridge that gap for traceability data exchange and other data needs. Acting as a "universal data translator," ReposiTrak works directly with suppliers to take in the necessary data in its existing format, and then delivers the data to the retailer or wholesaler in the exact format required. EDI Isn't Enough – And It's Often Expensive "Many suppliers assume EDI is a complete traceability solution, but in reality, it's just a delivery mechanism," said Randy Fields, chairman and CEO of ReposiTrak. "EDI doesn't check the quality of the data or ensure it meets each retailer's specific needs. That's where we come in." The challenges with EDI go far beyond setup. Traceability data sent via EDI is often riddled with errors, which typical EDI systems aren't designed to detect or correct. Adding to the complexity, different retailers and wholesalers require different data sets. That makes it difficult for suppliers to keep up – especially when errors can lead to costly delays, fines, or even disruption of business relationships. To make matters worse, many traditional EDI VANs charge for their services based on data volume, so the more a supplier ships, the more they pay. For high-volume shippers, those costs can quickly become unsustainable. ReposiTrak Delivers a Smarter, Simpler EDI Solution ReposiTrak offers an EDI-compatible solution that removes the complexity and eliminates the volume-based pricing. Suppliers submit their traceability data once, in a single format, and ReposiTrak handles the rest, delivering the data to retailers in the specific format each requires. "Our approach is different," continued Fields. "Suppliers send us their traceability data using the process that's easiest for them, and we validate it using a 500+ point error detection process. We help them to fix any issues before the data is transmitted, ensuring retailers get the most complete, accurate and compliant traceability records possible." Unlike traditional EDI providers, ReposiTrak's pricing model is simple: a low, flat fee that is not based on shipment volume. That makes it easier for suppliers of all sizes to meet traceability requirements without breaking the bank. "We're not here to penalize suppliers for growing their business," Fields added. "We're here to help them succeed in this new traceability landscape." ReposiTrak helps nearly 1,000 trading partners today with data sharing through EDI and other flexible protocols. Supported document types include: EDI formats: 214, 810, 812, 816, 820, 824, 832, 846, 850, 852, 855, 856, 860, 864, 875, 878, 879, 880, 888, 889, 894, 940, 997 Non-EDI formats: CSV, XLSX, XML, JSON, Fixed-Length To learn more about EDI services through ReposiTrak, contact Chief Customer Officer Derek Hannum at dhannum@ About ReposiTrak ReposiTrak (NYSE: TRAK) provides retailers, suppliers and wholesalers with a robust solution suite consisting of three product families: food traceability, compliance and risk management and supply chain solutions. ReposiTrak's integrated, cloud-based applications are supported by an unparalleled team of experts. For more information, please visit View source version on Contacts Derek HannumChief Customer OfficerReposiTrakdhannum@
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How US adults are using AI, according to AP-NORC polling
Most U.S. adults say they use artificial intelligence to search for information, but fewer are using it for work, drafting email or shopping. Younger adults are most likely to be leaning into AI, with many using it for brainstorming and work tasks. The new findings from an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll show that 60% of Americans overall — and 74% of those under 30 — use AI to find information at least some of the time. The poll highlights the ubiquity of AI in some areas — as well as its limits in others. Only about 4 in 10 Americans say they have used AI for work tasks or coming up with ideas, a sign that the tech industry's promises of highly productive AI assistants still haven't touched most livelihoods after years of promotion and investment. At the same time, wider AI adoption by younger Americans shows that could change. There's a particularly large age divide on brainstorming: About 6 in 10 adults under age 30 have used AI for coming up with ideas, compared with only 2 in 10 of those age 60 or older. Young adults are also more likely to use AI to come up with ideas at least 'daily.' Young adults are most likely to use AI Bridging the generations are people like Courtney Thayer, 34, who's embracing AI in some parts of her life and avoiding it in others. Thayer said she is regularly using ChatGPT to come up with ideas about planning what to eat, while also having it calculate the nutritional value of the pumpkin-banana-oat bread she's been baking for years. 'I asked it to make a meal prep for the week, then to add an Asian flair,' said Thayer, of Des Moines, Iowa. 'It wasn't the most flavorful thing I've ever had in my life, but it's a nice stepping off point. More importantly, I use it for the amount so that I'm not over-serving myself and ending up with wasted food.' The audiologist has embraced AI at work, too, in part because artificial intelligence is imbued in the hearing aids she recommends to patients but also because it makes it easier and faster to draft professional emails. She avoids it for important information, particularly medical advice, after witnessing chatbots 'hallucinate' false information about topics she spent years studying. Roughly 4 in 10 Americans say they use AI for work tasks at least sometimes, while about one-third say they use it for helping to write emails, create or edit images, or for entertainment, according to the poll. About one-quarter say they use it to shop. Younger adults are more likely than older ones to say they have used artificial intelligence to help with various tasks, the poll shows. Searching for information is AI's most common use Of the eight options, searching for information is the most common way Americans have interacted with AI. And even that may be an undercount, since it's not always apparent how AI is surfacing what information people see online. For more than a year, the dominant search engine, Google, has automatically provided AI-generated responses that attempt to answer a person's search query, appearing at the top of results. Perhaps defying emerging media consumption trends, 28-year-old Sanaa Wilson usually skips right past those AI-generated summaries. 'It has to be a basic question like, 'What day does Christmas land on in 2025?'' said the Los Angeles-area resident. 'I'll be like, 'That makes sense. I trust it.' But when it gets to specific news, related to what's happening in California or what's happening to the education system and stuff like that, I will scroll down a little bit further.' Wilson, a freelance data scientist, does use AI heavily at work to help with coding, which she said has saved her hundreds of dollars she would have had to pay for training. She also occasionally uses it to come up with work-related ideas, an attempt to bring back a little of the collaborative brainstorming experience she remembers from college life but doesn't have now. When it first came out, Wilson said she also used ChatGPT to help write emails, until she learned more about its environmental impact and the possibility it would erode her own writing and thinking skills over time. 'It's just an email. I can work it out,' she said. 'However many minutes it takes, or seconds it takes, I can still type it myself.' Most don't use AI for companionship — but it's more common for young adults The least common of the eight AI uses was AI companionship, though even that showed an age divide. Just under 2 in 10 of all adults and about a quarter of those under 30 say they've used AI for companionship. Wilson has no interest in AI companions, though she isn't surprised that others do because of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on her generation's social experiences. 'I totally understand and sympathize behind why people in my age group are leveraging it in that way,' Wilson said. Thayer, the audiologist, also has no interest in AI companionship, though she tries to be polite with chatbots, just in case they're keeping track. 'I mean, I am nice to it, just because I've watched movies, right?' Thayer said, laughing. 'So I'll say, 'Can you make me a meal plan, please?' And, 'Can you modify this, please?' And then I'll say, 'Thank you.'' ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,437 adults was conducted July 10-14, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cadence to pay $140m fine for illegal tech exports to China
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Cadence Design Systems has agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140m in penalties for exporting semiconductor design tools to a Chinese military university. The company based in San Jose, California, will pay nearly $118m in criminal penalties. This follows its admission of violating export controls by selling electronic design automation (EDA) technology to the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), which is associated with China's Central Military Commission. National Security Assistant Attorney General John Eisenberg said: 'Cadence has agreed to accept responsibility for unlawfully exporting sensitive semiconductor design tools to a restricted Chinese military university and has implemented a strong export compliance programme to help prevent any further illegal transmission of American technology. 'American ingenuity is one of our Nation's most precious assets, and the National Security Division will vigorously enforce US export control laws to protect the technological advantage we enjoy because of that ingenuity.' NUDT, added to the US Department of Commerce's Entity List in 2015, is believed to have used US-origin components to develop supercomputers for military purposes. From February 2015 to April 2021, Cadence and its subsidiary in China exported EDA tools without obtaining necessary licences, despite knowing NUDT's status on the Entity List. Cadence's court documents reveal employees facilitated exports to NUDT through Central South CAD Center (CSCC), an alias for the Chinese university. The company continued transactions until September 2020 when it ended its relationship with CSCC due to its ties with NUDT. The US Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) also announced a parallel civil enforcement settlement, with Cadence agreeing to pay over $95m in civil penalties. Further investigation revealed that employees concealed exports' true destination from Cadence's compliance personnel, said the DOJ. The employees also used aliases in communications to avoid detection. Additionally, Cadence transferred contracts from CSCC to Phytium Technology, another entity linked with NUDT. This was before placing Phytium on export hold in March 2021. Following the DOJ and BIS crediting Cadence's payments under the coordinated agreements, the company will pay a total of over $140m in combined net criminal and civil penalties and forfeiture. The resolution awaits approval from a federal judge in the Northern District of California. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and BIS's Office of Export Enforcement conducted investigations into the case. "Cadence to pay $140m fine for illegal tech exports to China" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
