Commentary: Why bending over backwards to agree with Donald Trump is a perilous strategy
LEIDEN, Netherlands: Donald Trump is a difficult figure to deal with, both for foreign leaders and figures closer to home who find themselves in his crosshairs. The United States president is unpredictable, sensitive and willing to break the rules to get his way.
But in Trump's second term, a variety of different leaders and institutions seem to have settled on a way to handle him. The key, they seem to think, is flattery. The most obvious example came at the recently concluded NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, where world leaders got together to discuss the future of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Previous summits with Trump have descended into recrimination and backbiting. The organisers were determined to avoid a repeat – and decided the best way to do it was to make Trump feel really, really good about himself.
Even before the summit began, NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte had texted Trump to thank him for his 'decisive action' in bombing Iran. This, he said, was something 'no one else dared to do'.
Then, when discussing Trump's role in ending the war between Israel and Iran, Rutte referred to Trump as 'daddy' – a name the White House has already transformed into a meme.
🎶 Daddy's home… Hey, hey, hey, Daddy. President Donald J. Trump attended the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands.
Posted by The White House on Wednesday, June 25, 2025
MAKING TRUMP FEEL GOOD
The summit itself was light on the sort of contentious and detailed policy discussions that have historically bored and angered Trump.
Instead, it was reduced to a series of photo opportunities and speeches in which other leaders lavished praise on Trump. Lithuania's President Gitanas Nauseda even suggested the alliance ought to copy Trump's political movement by adopting the phrase 'make NATO great again'.
NATO leaders aren't the only ones trying this trick. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has had a go at it too. Starmer has made sure that Trump will be the first US president to make a second state visit to the United Kingdom. He described the honour in Trump-like terms: 'This has never happened before. It's so incredible. It will be historic.'
After Trump announced global trade tariffs earlier in the year, Starmer was the first leader to give Trump a much-needed victory by reaching a framework trade agreement. But it worked both ways, with Starmer able to land a political victory too.
In his first term, flattery was also seen as a tool to be used to get Trump onside. Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy tried it in phone conversations with the US president, calling him a 'great teacher' from whom he learned 'skills and knowledge'.
Flattery and compliance clearly have their uses. Trump is extremely sensitive to criticism and susceptible to praise, however hyperbolic and transparent it might be. Buttering him up may be an effective way to get him to back off.
But it doesn't achieve much else. At the NATO summit, an opportunity was missed to make progress on issues of real importance, such as how to better support Ukraine in its war against Russia or to better coordinate European defence spending.
A summit dedicated to the sole aim of making Trump feel good is one with very limited aims indeed. All it does is push the difficult decisions forward for another day.
A MISSED OPPORTUNITY
Individual decisions to bow down to Trump also mean missing the opportunity to mount collective resistance. One country might not be able to stand up to the president, but the odds of doing so would be greatly improved if leaders banded together.
For example, Trump's trade tariffs will damage the US economy as well as those of its trading partners. That is especially the case if those partners impose tariffs of their own on US goods.
If each country instead follows Britain's lead in the hope of getting the best deal for itself, they will have missed the opportunity to force the president to feel some discomfort of his own – and possibly change course.
But perhaps the greatest danger of flattering Trump is that it teaches him that he can get away with doing pretty much whatever he likes. For a president who has threatened to annex the territory of NATO allies Denmark and Canada to nevertheless be feted at a NATO summit sends a message of impunity.
That's a dangerous lesson for Trump to learn. He has spent much of his second term undermining democratic and liberal norms at home and key tenets of US foreign policy abroad, such as hostility to Russia. He is attempting to undermine all traditional sources of authority and expertise and instead make the world dance to his own tune.
Given the expansive scope of his aims, which many experts already think is leading to a constitutional crisis that threatens democracy, the willingness to suck up to Trump normalises him in a menacing way.
When his targets roll over, it sends a message to others that Trump is unstoppable and resistance is futile. It encourages not just the next presidential abuse of power, but also the next surrender from those he chooses to attack.
Perhaps the best that can be said for this strategy is that maybe it will appease Trump enough to prevent him from doing too much actual harm. But when dealing with such an unpredictable and vindictive president, that is a thin reed of hope.
It is much more likely to encourage him to press on – until the harm becomes too severe to ignore.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
44 minutes ago
- Straits Times
‘A stubborn mule': Trump encourages Powell to resign in latest attack on the Fed chair
US President Donald Trump continued his assault on the chair of the Federal Reserve on June 27, saying he would like Jerome Powell to resign. The president, who has berated Mr Powell for weeks, called the chair a 'stubborn mule' who has 'Trump derangement syndrome' for his refusal to immediately lower borrowing costs. 'I'd love for him to resign if he wanted to,' the president told reporters in the Oval Office. Such attacks have become a mainstay in Mr Trump's second term in the White House. The president, who elevated Mr Powell to Fed chair during his first term, has spent the past few weeks castigating him for not moving quickly enough to cut interest rates. Mr Trump has long been a fan of low interest rates, which make it cheaper for businesses and consumers to borrow and in turn fuel growth. He cajoled Mr Powell during his first term when he thought the Fed chair was taking too long to lower rates. But Mr Trump's interest in lower borrowing costs has taken on more significance this time around. He is pushing Republican lawmakers to approve an expensive tax cut package that would require the United States to sell large sums of debt to finance it. That goal has become harder – and more expensive – given that interest rates remain elevated in a range of 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent. Mr Trump has argued that the government would save 'billions' if the Fed lowered interest rates, calling for as much as an immediate 2.5-percentage-point decline. 'We have a guy that's just a stubborn mule and a stupid person that is making a big mistake,' the president said on June 27. The country is paying more to service its debts 'because we have a guy who's suffering from Trump derangement syndrome, if you want to know the truth,' he added. 'He's not good for our country.' The Fed has stuck to a 'wait and see' approach for months, with officials arguing that they can be patient before acting on further rate cuts because the labour market is still solid and inflation is at risk of flaring up again because of Mr Trump's policies. The central bank last lowered borrowing costs in December, after a series of reductions in the latter half of last year. Divisions between Fed officials have started to emerge however, with two Trump appointees recently making the case for interest rate cuts as early as July. Ms Michelle Bowman was recently elevated from her role as governor to head of regulatory issues at the central bank, while another governor, Mr Christopher Waller, is seen as a potential pick to be the next chair. Mr Trump recently said that he was choosing among three or four people to replace Mr Powell, whose term ends in May, and that an announcement would be coming soon. Other contenders include Mr Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor who was almost picked to be chair during Mr Trump's first term; Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent; and Mr Kevin Hassett, a top economic adviser to the president. Asked on June 27 about his interest in the job, Mr Bessent said he would 'do what the president wants, but I think I have the best job in Washington'. The Fed is supposed to operate independently of the White House in order to ensure that officials can make tough choices on interest rates to keep inflation stable and the labor market healthy. Speaking with lawmakers this week, Mr Powell repeatedly stressed that politics did not factor into the Fed's thinking on interest rates. Those decisions are guided by the economic data, he said. Mr Trump has long sought to have a greater say over the direction of interest rates and has repeatedly toyed with removing Mr Powell as chair before his term expires. The Supreme Court recently signalled that the president was not authorised to do that, however. Mr Powell's term as a governor does not expire until 2032, meaning he could technically stay on even after stepping down as chair. Mr Bessent acknowledged that on June 28, saying: 'Chair Powell doesn't have to leave.' The next vacancy is set to open up at the end of January, when Ms Adriana Kugler's term as governor ends. If the administration chose to fill that spot with the next designated chair, Mr Bessent told CNBC, the nomination process could be completed in October or November. That timing is more in line with how it has been done historically. Selecting a replacement as early as the summer would risk muddying the Fed's communications and disrupting financial markets. Mr Trump said on June 27 that he expected whomever he picked to lower interest rates. 'If I think somebody's going to keep the rates where they are, or whatever, I'm not going to put them in,' he said. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
University of Virginia president resigns under pressure from Trump on DEI policies
Mr James Ryan concluded that resisting Trump officials' demands would put the school's students and faculty at risk. PHOTO: KIRSTEN LUCE/NYTIMES University of Virginia president resigns under pressure from Trump on DEI policies The president of the University of Virginia, Mr James Ryan, resigned on June 27 under pressure from President Donald Trump's administration over the school's diversity, equity and inclusion policies. In a letter to the UVA community, Mr Ryan said he had made the 'excruciating decision' to step down after concluding that resisting Trump officials' demands would put the school's students and faculty at risk. 'I cannot make a unilateral decision to fight the federal government in order to save my own job,' he wrote. 'To do so would not only be quixotic but appear selfish and self-centered to the hundreds of employees who would lose their jobs, the researchers who would lose their funding, and the hundreds of students who could lose financial aid or have their visas withheld.' Virginia's Democratic US senators, Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, called the Trump administration's demand 'outrageous' in a joint statement and said Mr Ryan's departure would hurt the university and the state. It was not clear whether Mr Ryan's resignation would take effect immediately. Earlier, the New York Times had reported that the Justice Department had demanded his resignation, and he decided to capitulate. The administration has launched a campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion and targeted colleges and universities that it has claimed are pushing antisemitic, anti-American, Marxist and 'radical left' ideologies. Universities that have been investigated or have had funds frozen have said that Mr Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech, freedom of academics and the schools' very existence. In a warning issued to UVA last week, the Justice Department said the government had concluded that the use of race in admissions and other student benefits were 'widespread practices throughout every component and facet of the institution,' according to the Times. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Berlin to simplify rules in bid to speed up defence surge, draft law says
Berlin to simplify rules in bid to speed up defence surge, draft law says BERLIN - The German government seeks to speed up defence procurement by simplifying legal procedures, fostering European cooperation and facilitating orders to start-ups to make its military combat-ready, according to a draft law seen by Reuters late on Friday. The speedy surge of the German military's capabilities "must not fail due to overly complex procurement procedures or lengthy authorisation processes", the document said, while warning of signs that Moscow's war objectives reach beyond Ukraine. "The time factor is crucial." At a NATO summit in The Hague, leaders on Wednesday agreed to hike the alliance's defence spending target to 5% of national GDP, with 3.5% dedicated to core defence and 1.5% to related security issues. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's government on Tuesday approved a budget framework which is expected to see Berlin's total military spending rise from 95 billion euros in 2025 to 162 billion euros in 2029, equalling 3.5% of GDP. The new defence procurement law is part of efforts to speed up military purchases that in the past have been plagued by lengthy delays, project failures and cost overshoots. The draft law determines that all procurement that contributes to Europe and NATO's military readiness inherently touches upon vital national security, which constitutes a basis to invoke an exemption under European public procurement law. That would amplify a trend that Berlin has been following for some time by more often making use of a national security clause under EU law to prioritize domestic procurement, while also seeking to minimize delays caused by legal challenges. The hurdles for cash-strapped start-ups and innovative companies to join competitions are to be lowered by enabling advance payment to these firms, according to the draft, dated June 25. FOSTERING JOINT EUROPEAN PROCUREMENT The paper also makes provisions for a future simplification of European defence procurement rules, something now under discussion at the EU level, by stating that the German law should not be tougher than European law but facilitate joint European defence procurement across the board. The law will entitle contracting entities to limit tenders to bidders inside the European Union or the European Economic Area, and to determine that a certain share of the contracted goods or services must originate in the EU, according to the document. The draft law does not, however, attempt to change the rule that all defence purchases with a volume of 25 million euros or more must be approved by parliament, a requirement seen by many experts as a major hurdle against speeding up procurement. At the start of June, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said Germany would need up to 60,000 additional troops under the new NATO targets for weapons and personnel, effectively expanding the military to some 260,000 troops. The Bundeswehr has not yet met a target of 203,000 troops set in 2018, and it is currently short-staffed by some 20,000 regular troops, according to defence ministry data. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
