Chinese economy grows at 5.2 per cent annual pace in April-June quarter despite trade war
That compares with 5.4 per cent annual growth in January-March. The government said Tuesday that in quarterly terms, the world's second largest economy expanded by 1.1 per cent.
In the first half of the year, the Chinese economy grew at a 5.3 per cent annual pace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China fuelling AI goals with state backing, open source, infra funding
When OpenAI blocked China's access to its advanced artificial intelligence systems last July, Chinese coders shrugged. They would rely instead on open-source systems, where the underlying technology is shared publicly for others to build on. At the time, that mostly meant turning to another popular American product made by Meta. But in the year since, there has been a major shift in the global race to develop advancedAI Chinese companies like DeepSeek and Alibaba have churned out open-sourceAI systems of their own that rank among the world's top performers. China is quickly closing the gap with the United States in the contest to make technologies that rival the human brain. This is not an accident. The Chinese government has spent a decade funneling resources toward becoming anAI superpower, using the same strategy it used to dominate the electric vehicle and solar power industries. 'China is applying state support across the entireAI tech stack, from chips and data centers down to energy,' said Kyle Chan, an adjunct researcher at the RAND Corporation, a think tank. For the past 10 years, Beijing has pushed Chinese companies to build manufacturing capabilities in high-tech industries for which the country previously depended on imports. That approach helped China become the maker of a third of the world's manufactured goods and a leader in electric vehicles, batteries and solar panels. And it has also been applied to the essential building blocks of advancedAI systems: computing power, skilled engineers and data resources. China pushed that industrial policy approach as three presidential administrations in Washington tried to hold back its ability to make technologies like artificial intelligence, including by restricting sales of chips made by Nvidia, America's leadingAI chipmaker. On Monday, Nvidia said the US government had approved sales, with a license, of a China-specific chip known as the H20. But with Beijing's backing, Chinese companies like Huawei have been racing to develop alternatives to Nvidia's technology. Beijing's approach toAI is intended to help Chinese tech companies make advancements despite Washington's restrictions. In the United States, companies like Google and Meta have spent billions on data centers. But in China, it is the government that has played a major role in financingAI infrastructure and hardware, including data centers, high-capacity servers and semiconductors. To concentrate the country's engineering talent, the Chinese government also financed a network of labs where much of its most advancedAI research takes place, often in collaboration with big tech companies like Alibaba and ByteDance. Beijing has also directed banks and local governments to go on a lending spree that fueled hundreds of start-ups. Since 2014, the government has spent nearly $100 billion on a fund to grow the semiconductor industry, and in April said it would allocate $8.5 billion for youngAI start-ups. Local governments have set up entire neighborhoods that function as start-up incubators, like Dream Town in Hangzhou, a city in China's south that is home to Alibaba and DeepSeek and is known as a hot spot forAI talent. 'For the government to help us cover even 10 or 15 percent of our early-stage research costs, that's a huge benefit,' said Jia Haojun, the founder of Deep Principle, a Hangzhou start-up focused on usingAI for chemical research that raised $10 million last year. Different city districts offer competing incentives to lure start-ups to their areas. Deep Principle received a $2.5 million subsidy from a district in Hangzhou when the start-up moved to the city, Mr. Jia said. A local official helped him find office space and employee housing. AmericanAI systems were built using information from all types of websites, including some that are inaccessible on China's censored internet, like Reddit and Wikipedia. But Chinese companies need to make sure that anyAI products used by the general public comply with Beijing's controls on information. So the government has created data resources that contain approved information for companies to use to train theirAI systems, like one based on state media articles that is called 'the mainstream values corpus.' Chinese tech companies also have an enormous amount of data on how people use the internet, which has helped companies like ByteDance, the parent of TikTok, develop some of the country's most popularAI systems. Yet Beijing's industrial policy approach toAI has also been inefficient. An abundance ofAI start-ups are vying for their piece of a cutthroat market, competing to offer their models at low rates to engineers. This top-down approach also makes it burdensome to shift resources quickly as technology changes. Chinese companies spent years working onAI technologies like facial recognition but were caught off-guard by the advances in generativeAI behind ChatGPT. 'It can be difficult to figure out where to invest and allocate resources,' said Mr. Chan, the RAND researcher. 'A.I. is not like traditional industries like steel or shipbuilding, where the technology is fairly stable.' Much of the government funding has gone to China's leading chipmaker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, which manufactures chips designed by companies like Huawei and Qualcomm. SMIC has raced to produceAI chips for Huawei that are intended to compete with ones made by Nvidia. While Huawei chips may be good enough for some tasks, they cannot do everything Nvidia chips can do. Companies are also reluctant to make the switch because it is difficult for SMIC to manufacture them in large quantities. 'The idea is that in the event of being cut off, there is some viable alternative — even if it is lagging in performance — so China'sAI industry can continue to make some progress instead of being stopped altogether,' Mr. Chan said. Chinese companies are turning to open-sourceAI systems as the fastest way to catch up to rivals in Silicon Valley, which are thought to have at least a few months' lead over China's most advanced technology. In the past year, Alibaba has released several popular open-source systems. ByteDance, which spent $11 billion last year on data centers and otherAI infrastructure, also published details about how it built some of its technology. This month, Huawei released an open-source system. Even Baidu, a Chinese internet company that previously praised the 'monetization potential' of closedAI products, recently released open-source versions of some of its systems. While OpenAI and Google charge a premium for access to their closedAI systems, the Chinese approach of making models publicly available has made it easier for engineers around the world to build on their systems. OpenAI has warned that ChineseAI companies like DeepSeek could block American competitors from markets around the world, giving them the chance to set standards for how the new technology is used. Sam Altman, OpenAI's chief executive, has framed the competition between American and ChineseAI companies as ideological and said he wants to 'make sure democraticAI wins over authoritarianAI' The thinking is that China's approach may appeal to more engineers around the world. 'Open-source is a source of technological soft power,' said Kevin Xu, the US-based founder of Interconnected Capital, a hedge fund that invests in artificial intelligence technologies. 'It is effectively the Hollywood movie or the Big Mac of technology.'
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trump Says India Adopting a US-Indonesia Style Trade Approach
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said that India is working on a trade deal with the United States on the same lines as the one he announced recently with Indonesia. The pact will see goods from Indonesia entering the US market subject to a 19 per cent tariff, and those from the US to Indonesia will be exempt from duties, he told reporters in a briefing in Washington. 'India basically is working along that same line. We're going to have access into India,' he said. Indian and US officials are racing to reach a US India Trade deal by an August 1 deadline set by the US President as the two sides seek to avert tariffs in the absence of a pact. Countries, including the EU, have been warned of tariffs as high as 35 per cent from him and this message has been sent to India as well. It was not clear if he was talking of a US Indonesia trade deal exactly the same as that with Indonesia — something that India could find difficult to accept — or a tweaked version with tariffs and concessions dialed down. On those lines, if the US-India bilateral trade deal is similar to US-Indonesia pact, India's exports to the US could face a 19 per cent tariff while US products will come into India duty-free. Donald Trump said he thinks there can be a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine within 50 days of him negotiating the deal. If this comes to pass, it may help countries like India to escape the brunt of a proposed 100% tariff on energy imports from Russia. Asked if the September 2 deadline was set in stone, he said, '50 days is not a lot of time, it may happen much sooner than that.' Trump said on Tuesday that the US will take 'strong measures' against Russia after it refused to stop fighting in Ukraine. One such move is to impose a 100 per cent secondary levy on countries that continue to import energy from Russia, which indirectly hurts non-combatant countries like India.
Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
Apple signs $500 million deal with MP Materials for rare earth magnets, eyes US supply chain expansion
Apple has signed a $500 million deal with MP Materials for rare earth magnets, mitigating supply risks after China curbed exports this year and representing a major coup for MP that sent its shares soaring by a fifth. The backing from one of the world's most valuable companies comes after MP, which operates the only U.S. rare earths mine, last week agreed to a multibillion-dollar deal with the U.S. Department of Defense that will see the Pentagon become its largest shareholder. The Las Vegas-based company's stock price has nearly doubled since the government deal was announced. It has had remarkable turnaround since last year when it contemplated merging with an Australian rival as profits plunged in what CEO Jim Litinsky called a 'very frustrating' pricing environment for rare earths. The deal, announced on Tuesday, guarantees Apple a steady flow of rare earth magnets free from China - the world's largest producer. For Apple, the cost to support U.S. magnet production pales in comparison to the long-term risk that it could lose access entirely to the critical components, analysts said. "We're in an era where executives are willing to pay a significant premium for a reliable supply chain. They don't want stoppage," said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the critical minerals security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. China placed export restrictions on rare earths in April in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. Though the U.S. and China reached a deal in June that has resolved much of the rare earth dispute, broader trade tensions continue to underscore demand for non-Chinese supply. As part of the agreement, Apple will prepay MP $200 million for a supply of magnets slated to begin in 2027. The companies did not disclose the length of the deal nor the volumes of magnets to be provided. The agreement calls for magnets produced from recycled material, in keeping with Apple's long-standing goal of ending its reliance on the mining industry. They will be produced at MP's Fort Worth, Texas, facility using magnets recycled at MP's Mountain Pass, California, mining complex. "Rare earth materials are essential for making advanced technology, and this partnership will help strengthen the supply of these vital materials here in the United States," Apple CEO Tim Cook said in a statement. Bob O'Donnell, president at market research firm TECHnalysis Research, said Tuesday's move "makes complete sense" given that Apple requires significant amounts of rare earth magnets for its devices. "Plus, by focusing on a U.S.-based supplier, it does help position Apple more positively in Washington," he said. Apple, which said the deal is part of its $500 billion four-year investment commitment to the U.S., has faced threats from Trump over iPhones not made in the U.S. But many analysts have said making the iPhone in the U.S. is not possible, given labor costs and the existing smartphone supply chain. Apple did not disclose which devices in which it will use the magnets. MP said the deal will supply magnets for hundreds of millions of devices, which would constitute a significant share of any of Apple's product lines. MP produces mined and processed rare earths and has said it expects to start commercial magnet production in its Texas facility by the end of this year. Last week's deal between MP and the U.S. government includes a price floor for rare earths designed to spur investment in domestic mines and processing plants, which has been lagging partly due to low prices set in China. The company also has magnet supply deals with General Motors and Germany's Vacuumschmelze. Rare earths are a group of 17 metals used to make magnets that turn power into motion, including the devices that make cell phones vibrate. They are also used in weapons, electric vehicles and many other electronics.
