2025 MG 7: Sleek Australia-bound mid-sizer sees power drop
The new mid-size liftback is due to arrive in local showrooms during the second half of 2025.
Government certification documents list a power output of 170kW from the MG 7's turbocharged 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol engine, which is mated with a nine-speed automatic transmission. These documents don't list torque figures.
In China, MG 7s with the 2.0-litre turbo four produce 192kW and 405Nm. The liftback is also offered with a 138kW/300Nm 1.5-litre turbo-petrol engine there, though this doesn't appear to be on the table for our market.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
The 170kW output suggests the MG 7 could produce the same 370Nm of torque as MG HS mid-size SUVs equipped with a turbo 2.0-litre in markets like the UAE.
Unusually, the MG 7's outputs vary from market to market. In the UAE, for example, it produces 184kW and 405Nm.
It's not the only vehicle to be detuned for export markets, with MG QS large SUV producing 153kW/360Nm – down from 178kW/392Nm in the related Roewe RX9 in China.
The documents list two different MG 7 variants, both riding on 19-inch alloy wheels. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Available features in China, depending on the variant, include an electronic limited-slip differential, adaptive dampers, an adaptive three-stage electric rear wing, an augmented-reality head-up display, 14-speaker Bose sound system, 256-colour ambient lighting, and heated and power-adjustable front seats.
Inside, all MG 7s feature a 12.3-inch touchscreen infotainment system and a 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster situated in the same assembly
It'll be the first time MG has offered a passenger car this size in Australia since it came under Chinese ownership, and is part of the brand's expansion into new segments including utes (the U9) and large SUVs (the QS).
But MG isn't expecting high volumes with its first mid-sizer in Australia. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
'We think it will resonate well in Australia. Again, we're not chasing Camry volume with it. It's a performance fastback sedan that looks epic, so we believe there's a place for it, so we're gonna have a go,' MG Motor Australia chief commercial officer Giles Belcher told CarExpert in March.
'People buy sedans if they're, I suppose, practical enough for them. Or the flipside is, are they design cool? We believe ours is practical and design cool.'
The number of combustion-powered medium-to-large passenger cars offered in Australia by mass-market brands has shrunk dramatically in recent years.
There are now just five: the Honda Accord, Hyundai Sonata, Skoda Octavia and Superb, and Toyota Camry.
Various other models have been discontinued both locally and in many cases globally in recent years. These include the Ford Mondeo, Mazda 6, Peugeot 508, and Volkswagen Passat and Arteon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Let's kick the tires': Questions raised around student visa surge
Shadow Assistant Minister for Education Zoe McKenzie spoke with Sky News host Chris Kenny about the recent announcement of 25,000 extra student visas offered by the Albanese government as they lift the cap on international students. 'They say one thing before an election and then afterwards something quite different,' Ms McKenzie said. 'As long as the infrastructure is being planned, we can have some confidence in growth. 'Let's kick the tires and see what sits behind that and make sure that it's not going to increase pressure elsewhere in the Australian economy.'
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Let us see the audits': Kmart faces legal battle over alleged links to Uyghur forced labour
Kmart has defended its ethical sourcing practices after being served with a court challenge to provide documents on how it has dealt with two clothing factories that have been linked to forced labour in Xinjiang, an autonomous territory in north-western China. The Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association (AUTWA) filed a Federal Court application on Monday seeking documentation from Kmart about what it knew of two clothing suppliers linked to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, where the Chinese government has systematically persecuted the Uyghur population and other Turkic minorities. Represented by law firms Maurice Blackburn and the Human Rights Law Centre, AUTWA is looking to determine whether Kmart followed its ethical sourcing procedures and monitored risks to mount a future legal case that would allege Kmart breached consumer law by making misleading and deceptive statements. In a statement, a Kmart spokesperson said the retailing giant had been corresponding with AUTWA's lawyers for more than 12 months and had provided 'extensive details' of its ethical sourcing program that had been in place for 15 years. Loading 'We invited the AUTWA to meet with us several times to help us understand their concerns,' said the Kmart spokesperson. 'Suppliers in the Kmart ethical sourcing program are regularly monitored through activities including our site visits, audit programs and investigations if we receive any reports or complaints of concern. 'Where we learn of an alleged non-compliance with our code through an audit, site visit or complaint, or by a worker in a supplier's factory, we take action to investigate and remediate the issue, working collaboratively with the supplier. 'When remediation isn't possible due to the supplier's refusal to do so, or repeated failures to make meaningful changes, we will exit the relationship.' However, Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the Australian retailer's response during the 12 months of correspondence was 'not satisfactory' because it had repeated public assertions about its ethical sourcing without providing any evidence.
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Dimitri Burshtein & Peter Swan: If RBA slashes rates this month, it will be giving in to political pressure
It may be heresy to say, but the case for an official interest rate cut at the coming RBA monetary policy board meeting is exceptionally weak. Austrian born economist Friedrich Hayek once observed that 'the root and source of all monetary evil is the government's monopoly on money.' In Australia, that monopoly takes form in the RBA — an institution notionally independent, but increasingly susceptible to political pressure. Following recent data which showed inflation remaining within and not below the RBA's target band, the usual chorus of economic commentators and political actors have launched into a ritualistic call for a rate cut. And as the August 2025 Monetary Policy Board meeting approaches, these calls are growing in both volume and vehemence. For the RBA to heed these demands would not simply be an error but it would represent a further descent from a disciplined monetary authority into a compliant servant of political convenience. The RBA's mandate is neither ambiguous nor advisory. It is enshrined in legislation: to ensure price stability, full employment, and the economic prosperity of the Australian people. Nowhere in the RBA Act is there an obligation to underwrite misguided fiscal policies or to provide political cover for governments unwilling to confront the consequences of their own policy malpractice. Yet that is precisely what a rate cut would amount to at this juncture. A backdoor bailout of bad fiscal and regulatory policy suppressing economic growth and productivity all under the guise of independent monetary policy. Evidence of persistent economic pressures across key sectors of the economy abound. These pressures are not being driven by private sector exuberance but by reckless fiscal expansion at all three levels of government. Governments have overstimulated demand while constricting supply through over-regulation, sky high energy costs, and an expanding public sector that absorbs available labour. In this context, a rate cut would simply exacerbate the underlying causes of Australia's economic malaise by further distorting the allocation of capital and labour, rewarding inefficiency while penalising prudence. There is equally no compelling case for monetary stimulus based on labour market data. Unemployment remains historically low. And while there are tentative signs of a slowdown in private sector hiring, the slack is being absorbed by growth in the public and care economy. If the RBA cuts rates now, it will not be reviving a flailing private sector. It will be validating a dangerous economic realignment: one that favours public consumption over private investment, short-term palliatives over structural reform, and ideological convenience over empirical rigour. Prevailing arguments for a rate cut are based in the flawed logic of the Phillips Curve — the mid-20th century economic model that posits a trade-off between unemployment and inflation. But the Phillips Curve has failed repeatedly. It failed to anticipate stagflation in the 1970s, failed to explain the low-unemployment, low-inflation paradox of the 2010s, and fails to grasp the unique drivers of today's price instability. Continuing to base policy on such a model is akin to navigating a storm with a broken compass. Real world outcomes have diverged too often from its predictions to treat it as a reliable guide. To make matters worse, Australia's currency has declined by more than 7 per cent over the past five years. In a country that imports the majority of its essential goods — from fuel to food, electronics to pharmaceuticals — a weaker dollar has a direct effect on household costs. A rate cut now would almost certainly further accelerate currency depreciation, amplifying imported inflation. This risk alone should give any responsible policymaker pause. Yet the calls for easing continue, not because the data demands it, but because habit, ideology, and political cowardice conspire to make it seem palatable. A rate cut in August would additionally punish savers, reward speculators, erode the purchasing power of the dollar, and send an unmistakable message that the RBA no longer takes its inflation target seriously. Worse, it would reinforce the delusion that the bank exists to smooth every bump in the economic road, regardless of whether that road was poorly built to begin with. This is not just an Australian phenomenon. Since the tenure of Alan Greenspan in the US, central banks around the world have morphed from guardians of price stability into crisis managers and economic nannies. The so-called 'Greenspan Put', the expectation that central banks will always ride to the rescue at the first sign of market discomfort has corrupted monetary policy, undermined fiscal discipline, and left global economies addicted to cheap credit. The result has been decades of asset bubbles, rising inequality, chronic debt dependence, and an institutional inability to endure even mild economic correction. Monetary policy must return to first principles: price stability first; everything else second. If the RBA hopes to preserve its credibility, its independence, and its very relevance, it must hold the line, ignore political pressure and not cut the official interest rate. Dimitri Burshtein is a principal at Eminence Advisory. Peter Swan AO is emeritus professor at the UNSW-Sydney Business School.
