Six new social welfare changes to little-known €245 weekly payment – are you eligible?
The upcoming
Advertisement
3
The scheme is designed to support more disabled people into employment
Credit: Getty
3
Minister for Social Protection Dara Calleary, Minister of State in attendance Hildegarde Naughton, Taoiseach Micheal Martin and Minister for Children, Disability and Equality Norma Foley
Credit: Niall Carson/PA Wire
The Wage Subsidy Scheme gives financial support to employers who employ people with disabilities.
The scheme is designed to support more disabled people into employment.
The changes announced are a result of the recommendations from a review of the WSS, which was carried out by the Department of Social Protection in August 2024.
Advertisement
Read more in Money
The employer will pay the employee the going rate for the job.
And the basic rate of subsidy is €6.30 per hour with the maximum annual subsidy to the employer of €12,776, based on a 39-hour week.
And this equals around €245.69 each week.
The employee must work at least 15 hours a week.
Advertisement
MOST READ IN MONEY
Speaking at the event last week, the Taoiseach said: "I am delighted to launch these improvements to the Wage Subsidy Scheme.
Little known social welfare benefits thousands are entitled to
"Supports like this play not only a critical role in closing the employment gap for people with disabilities, reducing poverty and supporting families and communities, but also for employers in bringing new ideas, skills and knowledge to their businesses.
"I am committed to advancing the rights and improving the lives of people with disabilities including through removing barriers to employment.
"Supports such as this revised Wage Subsidy Scheme recognise that the perspective, talents, and contributions of people with disabilities across society add immeasurably to the quality, the richness and the diversity of all our lives."
Advertisement
SIX NEW CHANGES TO WSS
THE reformed scheme now implements the six recommendations made in the review:
Reduce the minimum required hours for the scheme.
The minimum hours requirement to avail of the subsidy has been reduced from 21 hours to 15 hours to enable those with more limited work capacity to be included.
Remove the term 'productivity deficit' from the scheme.
The scheme no longer focuses on a productivity deficit but on the need to adapt the role to a disabled person's ability.
Expand the scheme beyond recruitment to include retention of people returning to work.
This is particularly important as most disabilities are acquired. People who return to work on Partial Capacity Benefit and who have acquired their disability or health condition in the previous 12 months are now eligible.
Expand the scheme to the community and voluntary sector and commercial state-sponsored sector.
This will increase employment opportunities for disabled people by expanding the scheme beyond private sector employers to all non-public sector employers.
Review the subsidy rate on a regular basis.
This will ensure that the subsidy continues to sufficiently support employers. The subsidy rate will be reviewed at least every three years.
Promote and improve knowledge of the scheme.
The Minister has today launched a nationwide publicity campaign for the Wage Subsidy Scheme to promote and improve knowledge of the scheme.
Minister Calleary added: "I strongly encourage employers to consider how the Wage Subsidy Scheme can improve their business and offer substantial and sustainable employment to disabled people."
"I believe that the changes made to the Wage Subsidy Scheme will make it more accessible and flexible for both employers and disabled people.
"People with disabilities have the talents and skills that employers need.
"Improving employment prospects for disabled people is an absolute priority for me, the Taoiseach and this government."
Advertisement
There are around 1,500 employers who are already taking part in the Wage Subsidy Scheme across the country.
WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR WSS?
You must be at least 18 years of age to participate in the WSS and you cannot take part if you are eligible to apply for the State Pension.
The scheme is not available to self-employed people, people on the Community Employment scheme, Tús, or the Rural Social Scheme, or those who are on the Work Placement Experience Programme.
You can qualify for the WSS without a medical assessment if you are getting one of the following disability payments:
Advertisement
Disability Allowance
Blind Pension
Disablement Pension - at 20 per cent or more for life
Illness Benefit
Invalidity Pension
If you are not getting a disability payment, you can still apply for the WSS.
To apply, you need a recent specialist's report or doctor's letter confirming your disability.
Your doctor must also fill out a confidential medical report form confirming that you have a disability which will reduce your ability to work.
Minister for
Advertisement
"There is so much potential and talent that can be tapped into.
"I hope these improvements to the scheme will encourage more employers to become involved and provide real opportunities for people with disabilities to showcase their talents and abilities.'
3
Taoiseach Micheal Martin and the Minister for Social Protection Dara Calleary last week announced the expansion of the scheme
Credit: gov.ie
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Revealed: Counties where couples earning €100,000-plus would struggle to afford a home
There is also little sign of any easing in affordability pressures. A majority of estate agents who are members of the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland (SCSI) expect property prices nationally to increase by an average of 5pc over the next 12 months. The SCSI said calculations it has done show that a garda and a nurse couple on a €107,000 combined salary will only be able to buy in one of five locations it examined. The imagined couple want to buy an averagely priced new three-bed semi-detached home. They are assumed to have the 10pc deposit. They will be unable to buy in Meath, Kildare, Wicklow and Galway. Cork was the only area a couple on such a salary could afford to buy. In the two most expensive counties, Wicklow and Kildare, the couple will face significant shortfalls. The deficit is €65,000 in Wicklow and €22,000 in Kildare for a three-bed home. And this is despite the couple availing of the State's Help-to-Buy scheme, which can see new buyers getting up to €30,000 to put towards the purchase of a home. Estate agents who are members of the SCSI said this shows the affordability gap for ordinary couples seeking to buy their first home. SCSI president Gerard O'Toole said the scenarios his organisation worked out show affordability has become more challenging across various house types and locations. 'While a new three-bedroom semi-detached home is affordable in Cork, and buyers with additional savings beyond the 10pc loan-to-income limit should be able to overcome the gap in Meath and Galway, new three-bedroom semi-detached homes in Wicklow and Kildare remain totally out of reach for people on these salaries,' he said. These findings highlight the persistent structural barrier which exists to homeownership 'In addition, there are thousands of people on lower salaries who will not be able to buy and will require support.' Mr O'Toole said calculations for two- and three-bed terraced houses in the same five locations show affordability being met in nearly all locations. However, the couple would require some additional savings in Kildare and Wicklow in order to buy a three-bed terraced home. 'These findings highlight the persistent structural barrier which exists to homeownership, even for dual-income households in stable public sector roles,' Mr O'Toole said. 'It also underscores broader concerns around housing sustainability, increasing commuter burdens and the potential impact on quality of life.' According to the latest SCSI 'Residential Mid-Year Market Monitor' report, over half of agents believe the key factor influencing house prices over the next 12 months will continue be the lack of supply of new housing. A majority of estate agents believe current residential property prices are expensive or very expensive. When asked where they believe we are in the market cycle, 60pc of respondents believe prices are increasing but will level off soon. Some 18pc believe they have peaked and should start to decline. The SCSI report found 70pc of agents are reporting low stock levels of new and second-hand homes. 'Over the past five years, more than half of agents have consistently highlighted low stock levels, stressing that constrained supply remains a fundamental issue impacting the market,' the report said.
Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
Pat Kenny gets curious, then angry, and finally jaundiced
Pat Kenny has never been one to shy away from asking the hard questions of politicians or pundits. But the veteran host goes one further on Tuesday ( The Pat Kenny Show , Newstalk, weekdays), when he puts one of his colleagues on the spot. Casting a gimlet eye over the newly announced National Development Plan with political correspondent Seán Defoe , Kenny is particularly annoyed at reports that the Government may seek planning exemptions for key infrastructure measures, prompting him to vent in exasperation. 'Why do we keep reinventing the wheel?' It's a query that leaves Defoe somewhat flummoxed, at least judging by the silence that ensues. 'That's a good question,' he eventually replies, 'Why do we keep on coming back to this planning thing?' It's a good answer too, with Defoe decoding Kenny's inchoate outburst for the benefit of listeners. (For this one, anyway.) The host's peevish ponderings may occasionally be baffling to others, but there's no doubting the sincerity of his concerns. On the Government's ability to deliver on its plan, Kenny points to a shortage of construction workers as well as the ballooning costs associated with State projects. 'You don't get as much for a billion as you used to get,' he drily remarks. If Kenny's attitude to splashy Government spending plans is jaded, he sounds sickened by the horrors in Gaza , where aid agencies are warning of mass starvation . 'It's very hard to overstate what's going on in Gaza,' he comments on Wednesday. 'It is appalling, it's a humanitarian tragedy and it's one, it would appear, of Israel 's making.' READ MORE This is, if anything, an understatement. Juliette Touma of refugee agency UNRWA paints an apocalyptic picture of spreading famine, exacerbated by the forced displacement of the Palestinian population. She says 'people have been treated like pinballs'. Kenny references the 'sadistic death traps' of aid points organised by the American-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, where hundreds have died while seeking food. 'This seems to be the project of the Israelis, to render the destruction so great that there is no liveability available to the Palestinians,' Kenny suggests. As has been his style throughout the Gaza carnage, he avoids hyperbole, instead marshalling the facts to back up his grim assessment of Israel's intentions. (Not a difficult feat, admittedly.) That said, his guest's emotionally direct verdict hits harder: 'We are going to lose our humanity.' Kenny's handling of issues isn't always so deft, particularly if they're of less gravity. Following his item on the French government's cost-saving proposal to abolish two public holidays, the host adopts an arch tone as he meticulously lists off Ireland's bank holidays. 'We're okay, but maybe another one or two, perhaps, would be nice to have,' he concludes, his voice heavy with irony. It's presumably meant as a lark, but hearing a highly-paid broadcaster mockingly imply that the public has too many holidays is unedifying. A questioning approach is one thing, but there's a fine line between being healthily sceptical and dyspeptically jaundiced. There's no such subtlety on Drivetime (RTÉ Radio 1, weekdays), where the atmosphere careens from sombre to farcical to explosively argumentative, all within a couple of minutes. Wednesday's programme opens with host Cormac Ó hEadhra speaking to reporter Vincent Kearney about the terrible shooting incident in Co Fermanagh , in understandably subdued fashion. But their conversation is cut short with incongruous abruptness by a burst of big-band music and the excited voice of Radio 1 wildlife presenter Derek Mooney. 'Hello and welcome to the programme,' chirrups Mooney, 'What a cracking show we have in store for you.' It would want to be, crashing in so suddenly. This is, of course, a technical cock-up, an occupational hazard on live radio. (It's a rogue recording of Monday night's Mooney Goes Wild , for anyone wishing to check how cracking the show is.) Sure enough, the broadcast promptly cuts to a commercial break, before Ó hEadhra returns to the air, playing down the spectacular snafu in his best 'nothing to see here' manner: 'Apologies for the disruption before the break.' RTÉ Radio 1 Drivetime host Cormac Ó hEadhra. Photograph: Marc O'Sullivan/RTÉ It's nothing compared to the turbulence that follows, however, when Ó hEadhra clashes with Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary . The flashpoint is the Government's €2 billion allocation to kickstart the MetroLink underground line between Dublin Airport and the city centre. O'Leary is in pugilistic form, even by his own standards, as he dismisses the perma-stalled rail project as an unnecessary extravagance. 'We're useless at this kind of infrastructure in Ireland', he says, suggesting that a small fraction of the multi-billion budget would improve the bus service. Not without a combative streak himself, Ó hEadhra spars with his guest on the need for the MetroLink, but is outpunched by the airline boss, who fires off a barrage of statistics while belittling the host's 'stupid comments'. When Ó hEadhra changes tactics and targets air travel emissions, O'Leary aggressively parries: 'The growth of air travel will not immolate the world.' Meanwhile, the host's pertinent observations, like his suggestion that his guest's constant disparagement of Government is 'muckraking', get lost in the scrum. It's fun for anyone who enjoys on-air slugging matches, but it also shows the limits of Ó hEadhra's brawling instincts: in a shouting contest, there are few who can best the Ryanair supremo. Notably, his approach has been less effective against Radio 1 presenters such as Claire Byrne, whose understated persistence has in the past made O'Leary come across as a boorish loudmouth. Ó hEadhra is sole presenter throughout this scrap, with his usual co-pilot Sarah McInerney 'away on holliers'. But intriguingly, he's accompanied on Tuesday's show by Claire Brock, formerly presenter of The Tonight Show on Virgin Media TV. The presence of Brock, an experienced current affairs host who delivers a poised and confident performance, will surely fuel rumours of a possible shake-up in Radio 1's schedule following Joe Duffy's retirement. But Brock first has to face an examination from her co-host, who directs her attention to a study on shorter working weeks. 'Just to gauge straight away what type of a colleague she is and will be,' Ó hEadhra says, 'I just wonder if you're a four day or a five day working week colleague?' Brock doesn't hesitate: 'Give me the four day working week – isn't that what any employee would say?' Well, maybe not Pat Kenny. Moment of the Week Séan Moncrieff (Newstalk) is in patriotic form when he's joined by fellow presenter Kieran Cuddihy for the daily preview of items on The Hard Shoulder. Noting how he has cheered on England in the Euro 2025 women's football championship, Cuddihy muses: 'Why is it okay, seemingly, to support the Lionesses, but not the English men's team?' Both broadcasters chuckle conspiratorially, before Moncrieff replies: 'It's because British women didn't keep us under the yoke for 800 years.' 'Exactly, it was a male yoke,' Cuddihy agrees. The Elizabethan plantations notwithstanding, they may be on to something.
Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
A redress scheme for school abuse survivors could become a ‘barrister-fattening exercise'
The senior civil servants who have raised concerns about the potentially enormous cost to the State of a redress scheme for victims of sexual abuse in schools have performed an important service. Our politicians and wider civil society need to think about these concerns very carefully. The bottom line is whether today's children, and those yet unborn, should be penalised for the sins of their grandparents, and even great grandparents – because that is what a redress scheme for past wrongs potentially costing tens of billions of euro will amount to. At a time when the Government is struggling to find a way to provide for the needs of the current population, the idea of devising a redress scheme on a 'far greater scale' than any other scheme in the history of the State, as the civil servants termed it, is something that needs to be thought through rigorously. The group of top civil servants based across the Departments of the Taoiseach, Public Expenditure and Finance, Education, Children and Justice have had the experience of previous public inquiries and redress schemes costing far more than was envisaged when they were established. READ MORE Successive governments have responded to pressure from the opposition and the media to get to the bottom of a variety of scandals and abuses by establishing judicial inquiries of various kinds, as well as redress schemes, without giving any great thought to their eventual cost. That cost has been borne by the exchequer, which is too often regarded in this country as some kind of bottomless money pit, rather than the fund that provides for the everyday services that keep the country's health, education and welfare services going. Of course some of the redress schemes in the past have provided well-deserved compensation to the victims of State neglect or abuse, but a large proportion of the costs of inquiries has gone into the pockets of the lawyers, and they have lasted far longer than anybody ever anticipated when they were set up. Then there is the question of whether the various judicial inquiries since the Beef Tribunal in the 1990s have actually achieved anything much for the people of the country, despite their cost. One clear achievement has been to dish out vast sums in legal fees in what was memorably described by Pat Rabbitte as 'a barrister-fattening exercise'. The commission of inquiry into the sale of a company called Siteserv to businessman Denis O'Brien, which involved a State agency, is a case in point. The controversy kicked off when Social Democrat TD Catherine Murphy claimed in the Dáil in 2015 that insider trading took place before the company was sold. A judicial inquiry under Mr Justice Brian Cregan was established by the government in 2016, but Murphy then refused to give evidence before it. Immediately hamstrung by her decision to opt out, it reported seven years later, with the final cost estimated at somewhere in excess of €70 million. And what did the tribunal find? Simply that nothing untoward had taken place during the sale process. The scandal of abuse in schools is a very different proposition, but the basic fact is that the inquiry already established, never mind the potential redress scheme, will cost a considerable amount in legal fees and will take years, possibly even decades, to come to a conclusion. The commission of inquiry into abuse in schools under Mr Justice Michael MacGrath has been given five years to report but few people in the legal world believe it will have finished its task in that time. A time frame of 10 years is probably more realistic. The decision on whether to proceed with a redress scheme will be taken after the commission has started its work. [ The Irish Times view on the inquiry into the handling of child abuse in schools: a mammoth task Opens in new window ] The question raised by the civil servants needs to be answered before that happens. Is the State liable for the abuse that took place in schools? Will the religious orders who were responsible for the abuse be held liable? Can the victims sue the orders directly? A legal mechanism must be found to force them to pay, rather than making it the responsibility of the taxpayer. Analysis by the Department of Public Expenditure warned the Government against 'the significant risks' of a 'rushed' redress scheme, 'including the assumption of risk by the State when liability should more appropriately be borne by third parties'. The report said that recent case law on the liability for the actions of school employees found that 'the State does not have such liability'. At the heart of the reservations held by the senior civil servants about an open-ended redress scheme is the impact it is likely to have on the budgets for present-day needs. The priority must be for the State to deploy all possible resources to ensure the present generation of children are properly looked after. A range of services for children are underfunded, with the Departments of Health, Education and Children having to fight tooth and nail for scarce resources. Are they to suffer even more pressure on their basic services to fund payment for the sins of the past?
