Are we in a sixth mass extinction?
Farther back in our planet's history, volcanic eruptions, rapid climate change, and plummeting oxygen levels have caused at least four additional mass extinctions, with smaller pulses of biodiversity loss also showing up in the fossil record. In each of the five largest events, which spanned anywhere from thousands to tens of millions of years, at least 75 percent of Earth's species died out. These are the most commonly agreed upon major mass extinctions in paleontology.
You've also likely heard about a sixth one. Many ecologists and biologists say we're on the precipice (or already in the midst) of another era of mass extinction. This sixth mass extinction, also referred to as the Holocene or Anthropocene extinction, is described as ongoing and caused by human activities. Hunting, overfishing, habitat destruction, human encroachment, and invasive species introductions are the major drivers of the losses incurred thus far. Human-caused climate change is also set to become another factor, as decades of rising temperatures, shifting precipitation patterns, and increasingly extreme weather catch up to already stressed ecosystems.
It's indisputable that humans shape life on Earth in major ways, and that animals and plants are dying out at an alarming rate. But is it true that our impact is on par with that of an asteroid? Not all scientists agree.
There is no question that Earth is losing species fast. 'Biodiversity crisis is a pretty accurate term' to describe the present moment, says John Wiens, an evolutionary ecologist at the University of Arizona. 'Extinction crisis' is another, he adds, 'based on the large number of species that are threatened with extinction.'
Five other experts that Popular Science corresponded with for this article all agree on this 'crisis' terminology. In comparison with background levels of extinction, all of our sources said that current extinction rates are much higher.
Extinction isn't always a sign of disaster. It's also a natural outcome of evolution. As species diverge, compete, and struggle to survive, not all of them make it long-term. Conditions on Earth shift over geologic time, and those forces inevitably lead to some dead ends on the tree of life.
[ Related: Earth's 5 catastrophic mass extinctions, explained. ]
However, throughout most of our planet's history, the rate of new species emerging has exceeded the rate of species dying out, says Gerardo Ceballos, an ecologist and conservation biologist at the National Autonomous University of Mexico. Thus, biodiversity normally exists in a positive balance.
Currently, we're losing species far faster than new ones emerge. Present extinction rates are up to 100 times faster than background levels, according to one 2015 study co-authored by Ceballos. In that analysis, Ceballos and his colleagues estimated the natural vertebrate extinction rate sits at around two species lost per 10,000 species each century. Then, they compared that statistic with the number of confirmed and likely extinctions recorded on the International Union of Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. They determined that, even using conservative numbers, the extinction rate for every vertebrate group was between eight and 100 times the background rate. The species losses incurred in the past 100 years would have taken thousands of years to occur naturally, per the assessment.
Other counts find the current rate of extinction is even higher. One often cited 2014 study concluded Earth is losing species 1,000 times faster than natural background rates. That analysis also reported the level of loss is poised to accelerate to 10,000 times the background rate in the near future.
These numbers vary widely in large part because the estimates of background extinction rates are difficult to pin down. The fossil record is incomplete, so scientists generally rely on mathematical models and reconstructions of the past to determine what was once alive and when it died out. Small shifts in starting assumptions can lead to major changes in the final calculations. The time period you're calculating average extinction rate over and types of organisms you're assessing also impact the result. This same ambiguity in estimating extinction rate persists in the present.
Though Wiens describes our moment as a biodiversity crisis, he doesn't believe it meets the bar for a sixth mass extinction. 'No one has provided a quantitative analysis that has really shown that,' he says.
If the top five major mass extinctions in the paleontological record each killed off at least 75 percent of species at the time, then the sixth one should theoretically cross the same threshold. Yet so far, the IUCN has confirmed fewer than 1,000 extinctions from the past 500 years–just about 0.1 percent of all known species, according to an analysis co-authored by Wiens in April.
We have not catalogued every living species, and the IUCN is far from having assessed all known species. The IUCN database is also biased, skewing towards large, charismatic vertebrates and wealthy regions like North America. The criteria for extinction are strict, requiring extensive surveys, and yet sometimes species reappear after being declared gone forever. Still, the IUCN dataset is among the best windows we have into the state of life on Earth, and it suggests there's a way to go before three quarters of species are gone.
[ Related: Earth's 'Great Dying' killed 80-90% of life. How some amphibians survived. ]
However, it's worth noting that other assessments estimate a much higher proportion of species have already disappeared. One 2022 paper, which extrapolated extinction rates from data on mollusks, found that upwards of 10 percent of all species may have gone extinct in the past 500 years.
And, those like Ceballos who argue a major mass extinction has already begun, point to calculations that indicate we could reach that grim, 75 percent mile marker in just a few centuries. If all IUCN threatened species went extinct in the next 100 years, and that rate of species loss continued, Earth would surpass 75 percent loss of species across most vertebrate animal groups in under 550 years, according to a landmark 2011 review paper. This study published in Nature, remains among the most thorough quantitative assessments of extinction trends.
Yet to write every threatened species off as doomed to imminent extinction would be a mistake, says Stuart Pimm, a conservation biologist at Duke University and president of the conservation non-profit, Saving Nature.
'We have no idea what the future is,' he says. And, in the meantime, 'there's a lot of things we can do.' Pimm points to conservation success stories like the rebound of certain baleen whale populations and the stabilization of savanna elephant numbers over the past 25 years. He worries that claims about the sixth extinction might leave the public resigned to what might otherwise be a preventable catastrophe.
'It's not inevitable,' Pimm says.
From the paleontological perspective, mass extinctions are something that can only be definitively confirmed in the past tense. They are defined based on the proportion of species that existed before, but not after a cataclysmic event like a major asteroid strike. If there's not yet an after, it's impossible to say for sure what number of lineages died out. There are no crystal balls in science. And in that uncertainty, there's room for hope that we could stop species from sliding off the cliff.
But nearly half of all animals are losing population worldwide, according to a 2023 estimate, based on trend data for more than 71,000 species. Barring exceptional levels of investment and intervention, lots of species are already doomed to extinction, says Sarah Otto, an evolutionary biologist at the University of British Columbia. 'Many of the extinctions we think that humans are causing haven't actually happened yet. These are the 'living dead' species whose population sizes are small, whose habitats are fragmented,' she explains. 'There's a lot of extinction debt.'
[ Related: An 'ancestral bottleneck' took out nearly 99 percent of the human population 800,000 years ago. ]
A 2020 report from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) found that an average of 25 percent of species across animal and plant groups are threatened with extinction within decades, and that the human impacts to blame are intensifying. Without preventative action, as species disappear, 'there will be a further acceleration in the global rate of species extinction,' the report authors write.
Species depend on one another for survival, Otto notes. For example, in our acidifying and warming oceans, coral reefs are teetering on the brink. If they go, then the fate of the many species dependent on the infrastructure they provide is unclear. Major losses of marine life could then have knock-on effects on land.
Notably, the IPBES report doesn't directly consider the influence of climate change on future extinction rate. If it did, 'those projected numbers could really go up,' says Otto.Even under Wiens' comparatively rosy outlook, he still expects 12 to 40 percent species losses over the next century. And if species don't disappear across their entire ranges, local losses and population declines can still have major repercussions for ecosystem function and human society.
The 75 percent threshold is an arbitrary line, Otto notes. Lots can go wrong before we officially place sixth in the world's worst contest. Human impacts on biodiversity 'will be seen in the fossil record,' she says. 'Whether or not it's going to be up there in the top six is really a matter of what we do next.'
This story is part of Popular Science's Ask Us Anything series, where we answer your most outlandish, mind-burning questions, from the ordinary to the off-the-wall. Have something you've always wanted to know? Ask us.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
500-Million-Year-Old Fossil Suggests Ocean Origin For Spiders
The special brains of spiders may have started to evolve in the oceans, long before their ancestors crawled onto land. A fresh look at a 500-million-year-old fossil by researchers from the University of Arizona and Lycoming College in the US and King's College London has revealed remarkable similarities between the brains of extinct marine arthropods and modern-day arachnids. The discovery wades into controversial territory regarding the evolutionary origin of spiders and their relatives. Today, spiders, scorpions, mites, and ticks are virtually all terrestrial, and the prevailing view is that these arachnids evolved from a common, land-dwelling ancestor. Related: Where that ancestor came from is a whole other mystery. Arachnids on land are related to other 'chelicerates' in the ocean, like sea spiders and horseshoe crabs, but the fossil record is very patchy. "It is still vigorously debated where and when arachnids first appeared, and what kind of chelicerates were their ancestors, and whether these were marine or semi-aquatic like horseshoe crabs," explains University of Arizona neuroscientist Nicholas Strausfeld. The transition from sea to land is a big step for a little creature, no matter how many legs it has. The oldest accepted remains of an arachnid are of a 430-million-year-old scorpion, a critter that lived on land. But new evidence suggests that arachnids as a whole may have started to diverge from other chelicerates long before that. On the outside, Mollisonia symmetrica may not look very 'spidery'. It kind of resembles a pillbug with a bunch of little legs, and previously, it was thought to be an ancestor of horseshoe crabs. Using light microscopy, researchers have now imaged the fossil's central nervous system and come across an unexpected find. The nervous system of Mollisonia doesn't resemble that of a horseshoe crab or even a crustacean or insect. Instead, the pattern of radiating neural centers was flipped backward, like that of an arachnid. "The arachnid brain is unlike any other brain on this planet," explains Strausfeld. In the Mollisonia fossil, the unique nervous system seems to innervate numerous legs, as well as two pincer-like mouth parts, where modern spiders now have fangs. "This is a major step in evolution, which appears to be exclusive to arachnids," says evolutionary neuroscientist Frank Hirth from King's College London. "Yet already in Mollisonia, we identified brain domains that correspond to living species… " That seems to be no coincidence. Upon further statistical analysis, Hirth and colleagues have found that arachnids probably didn't evolve similar structures to Mollisonia by accident; they were more likely inherited. If the team is right, that puts Mollisonia at the base of the arachnid lineage, making it a sister to horseshoe crabs and sea spiders. While still speculative, it's possible that the unique brain structure seen in the Mollisonia lineage helped its later successors survive on land. Neural 'shortcuts' to the legs and pincers, for instance, could make it easier to control and coordinate complex movements, like walking or weaving webs. "We might imagine that a Mollisonia-like arachnid also became adapted to terrestrial life making early insects and millipedes their daily diet," theorizes Strausfeld. Perhaps it was the earliest arachnids on land that first drove insects to evolve wings and hence flight – and maybe, in turn, airborne prey led to the evolution of webs. From the ocean floor to the treetops, the way that arachnids have adapted to the changing times is truly enviable. The study was published in Current Biology. Related News Secret Bone Armor Discovered Beneath Skins of Australian Lizards Many Butterflies Have a Second 'Head' – This Could Be Why Your Dog May Prefer Certain TV Shows, Research Suggests Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Spiders may have originated in the ocean before adapting to live on land
New research suggests spiders and other arachnids may have originated in the sea, based on analysis of a 500-million-year-old fossil. The "exquisitely preserved" specimen supports the idea that these creatures swam before adapting to life on land, according to a study published Tuesday in Current Biology. Researchers at the University of Arizona analyzed the fossilized brain of Mollisonia symmetrica, an extinct Cambrian-period species once thought to be an ancestor of horseshoe crabs. However, the study revealed that its neural structure more closely resembles that of modern spiders and their relatives, suggesting a closer evolutionary link to arachnids than previously believed. The front part of Mollisonia's body, called the prosoma, has a radiating pattern of nerve clusters that control five pairs of appendages. Additionally, its unsegmented brain sends short nerves to a pair of pincer-like 'claws,' resembling the fangs found in spiders and other arachnids. The key feature identifying the fossil as an early arachnid is its brain's unique organization, which is the reverse of the front-to-back arrangement seen in modern crustaceans, insects, centipedes and horseshoe crabs, researchers said. In a statement, Nick Strausfeld, lead author and professor at the University of Arizona, said the fossil's brain appears "flipped backwards," similar to modern spiders. This back-to-front brain arrangement may be a key evolutionary adaptation, providing neural shortcuts that enhance movement control. According to the study, this discovery questions the common belief that diversification happened only after a common ancestor transitioned to land. Earlier fossil evidence suggested that arachnids lived and evolved solely on land. "It is still vigorously debated where and when arachnids first appeared, and what kind of chelicerates were their ancestors, and whether these were marine or semi-aquatic like horseshoe crabs," Strausfeld said. As they adapted to life on land, Mollisonia-like arachnids likely fed on early insects and millipedes. These early arachnids may have also influenced the evolution of insect wings, an important defense mechanism. Researchers say the Mollisonia's ancestry likely led to spiders, scorpions, sun spiders, vinegaroons and whip scorpions.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Spiders may have evolved in the ocean before adapting to land, fossil reveals
One of the creepiest, crawliest creatures of the Earth may have been swimming before adapting to live on land, new research suggests. Spiders and their arachnid relatives may have actually originated in the sea, according to analysis of an "exquisitely preserved" fossil that lived 500 million years ago. The findings were published Tuesday in the journal Current Biology. MORE: 99-million-year-old 'zombie' fungi found preserved in amber, scientists say Researchers at the University of Arizona completed a detailed analysis of the brain and central nervous system of an extinct animal called Mollisonia symmetrica, according to the study. The species was previously thought to represent an ancestral member of a specific group of arthropods called chelicerates that lived during the Cambrian period -- between 540 and 485 million years ago. Chelicerates were believed to be ancestors to modern-day horseshoe crabs. However, the scientists were surprised to discover that the neural arrangements in Mollisonia's fossilized brain are not organized like those in horseshoe crabs. Instead, they are organized the same way as in modern spiders and their relatives, the researchers said. The anterior part of Mollisonia's body -- the prosoma -- contains a radiating pattern of segmental ganglia that control the movements of five pairs of segmental appendages, the researchers said. In addition, an unsegmented brain extends short nerves to a pair of pincer-like "claws," similar to the fangs of spiders and other arachnids. The decisive feature that demonstrates the fossil was likely an early arachnid is the unique organization of the brain -- a reverse of the front-to-back arrangement found in present-day crustaceans, insects, centipedes and horseshoe crabs, the researchers said. MORE: Fossils from giant possum-like mammal that lived 60 million years ago found in Texas It's as if the brain has been "flipped backwards," which is what is seen in modern spiders," said Nick Strausfeld, a regents professor at the University of Arizona and lead author of the paper, in a statement. This may be a crucial evolutionary development, as studies of existing spider brains suggest that a back-to-front arrangement in the brain provides shortcuts from neuronal control centers to underlying circuits, which control the spider's movements, said Frank Hirth, a reader of evolutionary neuroscience at King's College London and co-author of the paper. The arrangement likely helps the spiders hunt stealthily and dexterity for the spinning of webs. The arachnid brain is "unlike any other brain" on Earth, Strausfeld said. "This is a major step in evolution, which appears to be exclusive to arachnids," Hirth said. MORE: Fossils found in North America reveal new species of 'very odd' sea monster: Scientists Spiders and scorpions have existed for about 400 million years with little change -- dominating the Earth as the most successful group of arthropodan predators. The finding challenges the widely held belief that diversification occurred only after a common ancestor had moved to the shore, according to the study. Previous fossil records appeared to indicate that arachnids lived and diversified exclusively on land. "It is still vigorously debated where and when arachnids first appeared, and what kind of chelicerates were their ancestors, and whether these were marine or semi-aquatic like horseshoe crabs," Strausfeld said. While the Mollisonia outwardly resembles some other early chelicerates from the time period, its body was composed of two parts: a rounded "carapace" in the front and a sturdy segmented trunk ending in a tail-like structure, the analysis found. Some researchers had previously compared its body composition to that of scorpions, but no one had previously claimed that it was anything "more exotic" than a chelicerate. The first creatures to come onto land were likely millipede-like anthropods and other ancestral, insect-like creatures -- an evolutionary branch of crustaceans, Strausfeld said. MORE: What paleontologists learned from fossils of a 3-eyed predator that lived 500 million years ago Early insects and millipedes were likely part of the Mollisonia-like arachnid's daily diet when they adapted to land, he added. The first arachnids on land may have also contributed to the evolution of insect wings, a "critical defense mechanism," Strausfeld said. The Mollisonia's lineage likely gave rise to spiders, scorpions, sun spiders, vinegarroons and whip scorpions, the researchers said.