
Many Ukrainians baulk at conceding land to Russia
Mariupol, home to more than 400,000 people before the full-scale invasion, was seized by Russian forces in May 2022 when the city's last defenders were ordered to surrender, ending one of the bloodiest chapters of the war.
"We lived our entire life in Mariupol. I believe that until the very last that it will be Ukrainian. I do not know how," said Liudmyla, 65, a retired teacher.
Her longing to see occupied land back under Ukrainian control is widely shared, presenting a challenge to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as he comes under pressure to consider territorial concessions under any peace agreement with Russia.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has pushed Kyiv to cede not only occupied territory but also land not controlled by Moscow, while the United States has said loss of land seems inevitable.
More than three years into its full-scale invasion, Russia controls nearly one fifth of Ukraine and its troops are making incremental but steady gains in the east.
Zelenskyy himself has acknowledged that Ukraine cannot recapture all of its lost territory through military force, but wants to settle the issue through diplomacy.
Oleksandr, 65, said the issue of what Ukraine may have to give up in return for peace depends not only on Kyiv.
"The issue here is whether there are any limits on weapons," he said, referring to doubts over whether the US will continue military support for Ukraine now that Donald Trump is in the White House and moving closer to Russia.
"It depends not only on Zelenskyy but also on other matters, weapons in particular," Oleksandr added, sitting next to his wife in a dormitory in the central city of Dnipro where they have moved temporarily.
This month, Kyiv and Moscow held their first direct talks since 2022, yielding little progress on ending the war.
After a subsequent phone call between Trump and Putin, the US president appeared to withdraw from efforts to mediate peace, leaving Ukraine exposed against a larger enemy.
For displaced residents of Mariupol — the largest Ukrainian city to fall to the Russians since 2022 — that raises concerns not only about territorial concessions but also over whether justice will be served.
Vadym Boichenko, Mariupol's mayor-in-exile, said his team gathered evidence showing at least 22,000 civilians were killed in nearly three months of fighting that reduced a city once famous for its vibrant port and giant steel plants to rubble.
Human Rights Watch, along with Truth Hounds and SITU Research, estimated 8,000 people died from fighting or war-related causes.
Russia pounded Mariupol with artillery, rockets and missiles and cut off access to electricity, heating, fresh water, food and medical supplies — creating a humanitarian catastrophe, Boichenko added.
"All we ask for is recognition (of the alleged crimes) and punishment," he said in Kyiv in one of the "IMariupol" centres set up in 22 cities across Ukraine to help displaced residents with basic needs.
Moscow-installed authorities have overseen a major reconstruction programme in Mariupol, and hold it up as a symbol of the benefits of Russia's annexation of four Ukrainian regions as well as the Crimean peninsula.
Moscow has demanded that Ukraine withdraw its troops from four Ukrainian regions where fighting is raging, even though it does not control all of them.
The overwhelming majority of Ukrainians — 82 per cent — reject those demands, according to an opinion poll by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology conducted in May.
Slightly more than half of the population — 51 per cent — would support a compromise with a de-facto recognition of currently occupied territories in exchange for security guarantees from Europe and the US.
But about 40 per cent considered this unacceptable, raising questions over how Ukraine and Russia can break the deadlock in a nascent peace process.
"It is not fair to leave them what they took away. It is our land," said Dmytro, 35, who had settled in Mariupol after being forced to leave the eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk in 2015.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Ukraine arrests air force officer for spying on Western-supplied fighter jets
KYIV (Reuters) -Ukraine's domestic security agency has detained an air force officer on charges of having spied for Russia by leaking the location of prized F-16 and Mirage 2000 fighter jets, officials said on Wednesday. The unidentified officer, a flight instructor holding the rank of major, stands accused of helping Russia carry out air strikes by providing coordinates and suggesting strike tactics, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said in a statement. "In particular, the enemy's priority targets were airfields where F-16s, Mirage 2000s and Su-24s were based," it said. F-16s are U.S.-made and Mirages are French while the Su-24 is an older, Soviet-manufactured jet bomber. "The agent collected the coordinates of the location of these aircraft, schedules and ...the order of their departure." The SBU said the suspect had also passed data on Ukrainian air force personnel and combat tactics to Russian military intelligence. Moscow regularly targets airfields and military bases across Ukraine, especially areas it believes are home to Western-provided weapons like the F-16 or Mirage jets. The two aircraft have been critical to bolstering Ukraine's defences against mounting Russian air strikes and grinding battlefield advances in Moscow's three-and-a-half-year-old, full-scale invasion. This month, the SBU detained two Chinese nationals on suspicion of spying on Ukraine's Neptune anti-ship missile programme, a key part of Kyiv's growing domestic arms industry. (Reporting by Aleksandar Vasovic and Dan Peleschuk; editing by Mark Heinrich)


New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Oil steadies as market weighs up supply risks
LONDON: Oil prices steadied on Wednesday as investors awaited developments on US President Donald Trump's tighter deadline for Russia to end the war in Ukraine and his tariff threats to countries that trade its oil. The most active Brent crude futures were down 5 cents or about 0.1 per cent at US$71.63 a barrel by 1226 GMT while US West Texas Intermediate crude slipped 5 cents to US$69.61. The Brent crude September contract that expires on Wednesday was steady at US$72.50. Both contracts had fallen nearly 1 per cent earlier in the day. "Events in the last few days have moved the needle a touch more, but we still appear to be somewhat rangebound and testing the next resistance level," said Rystad Energy analyst Janiv Shah. Trump had said on Tuesday that he would start imposing measures on Russia, such as secondary tariffs of 100 per cent on trading partners, if it did not make progress on ending the war within 10 to 12 days, moving up from an earlier 50-day deadline. The United States also warned China, the largest buyer of Russian oil, that it could face huge tariffs if it kept buying, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a news conference in Stockholm. JP Morgan analysts wrote that while China was unlikely to comply with US sanctions, India has signalled it would do so, which could affect 2.3 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian oil exports. "Oil prices reacted strongly yesterday, so there is some profit booking," said UBS commodity analyst Giovanni Staunovo, adding that data from the American Petroleum Institute from Tuesday was also bearish for crude. "Market participants are also taking into account that low prices and secondary sanctions/tariffs on Russia won't work at the same time." US crude and distillate stocks rose last week while gasoline inventories fell, market sources said, citing API data. "Depending on the outcome of the US-Russia discussions, tariff implementation and the OPEC+ meeting and announcement on unwinding (of output cuts), the market could see some movement," Rystad's Shah added.


Malaysiakini
5 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
13MP: Agriculture, food security need holistic focus
COMMENT | Food security is quite a topical subject now after the disruption in the global grain supply chain, the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian war, and climate change, which is increasingly impacting many nations. A few countries are talking about banning rice exports in view of the uncertainty in the supply chain environment in the coming few years. Whatever the situation may unfold in the next few years, it is quite timely that we evaluate and appraise the situation, lest we are caught unprepared or we may be late in our policy responses. Realising this concern...