What did Iran say about nuclear damage and radiation after US strikes?
And for good reason: Iran's nuclear programme is not just a scientific endeavour, it's a strategic insurance policy.
The regime has spent decades building it. If it crumbled overnight, Iran would lose one of its most powerful bargaining chips in any negotiation with the west.
So, what exactly has Iran said?
Nuclear contamination
Iran's Nuclear Safety System Centre was quick to issue a statement claiming that 'no nuclear contamination' had been detected at or around the sites targeted by US strikes.
'Following the criminal attack by the US on the nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, Iran's Nuclear Safety System Centre immediately conducted the necessary investigations,' the statement read.
'Based on the safety measures and planning, as well as data recorded by radiation detection systems, no signs of contamination have been detected. Therefore, there is no threat to residents living near the mentioned nuclear sites.'
Fordow takes a hit
Iranian officials claimed that most of the uranium previously stored at the F ordow enrichment facility had been moved to an undisclosed location before the strikes took place.
An Iranian source told state media: 'The exact location of the relocated uranium is not specified.'
Satellite images, however, suggest serious damage to Fordow's entrance, evidence of what appears to be a direct hit from multiple 30,000-pound US bunker-busting bombs.
While Iranian state media acknowledged the site 'was attacked by the enemy,' it stopped short of revealing the extent of the internal damage.
Fordow was more than just a facility; it was Iran's nuclear vault, a heavily fortified centre buried deep within a mountain. Its symbolic and strategic value far exceeded its physical contents. Its fate now remains uncertain.
There has been no official word from Tehran about the level of damage to other key sites, such as Natanz and Isfahan. Notably, the nuclear reactor in Bushehr, closer to the Gulf and heavily watched by Gulf states, was not struck.
What about the nuclear stockpile?
Iran has amassed significant quantities of enriched uranium and operates thousands of centrifuges.
While Tehran claims much of the uranium was safely relocated, there is no clear information on the current condition or location of the remaining material.
It is worth mentioning that neither Iran nor the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reported any radiation leaks.
IAEA weighs in
The IAEA, which monitors Iran's nuclear activities, said the latest strikes on the Isfahan complex damaged six buildings, in addition to four previously hit.
However, it added that facilities targeted either contained no nuclear material or small quantities of natural or low-enriched uranium, suggesting that a ny contamination would have been limited to the damaged structures.
IAEA chief Rafael Grossi announced that the agency's Board of Governors will convene for an emergency session on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
US cannot 'compel Israel to do anything', says envoy Tom Barrack in Beirut
US envoy said Washington cannot force but only influence Israeli actions as he met Lebanese leaders in Beirut on Monday for more talks on disarming Hezbollah and stopping Israeli bombing. 'The US has no business in trying to compel Israel to do anything … America could only influence,' he said during meetings with President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. Lebanon has asked the US to act as guarantor to ensure that Israel will pull out its troops in full and stop targeting operations against members of Hezbollah, if the armed group begins handing in weapons. Mr Barrack also reiterated his position that disarming Hezbollah is a matter for Lebanon, but said pushing for reform in the country was vital and the US wanted it to prosper. He said "the reforms that are happening ... are amazingly plausible and significant". But he also ruled out sanctions against Lebanese officials for failing to disarm Hezbollah. "There's no consequence, there's no threat, there's no whip," Mr Barrack said. Israel continues to bomb south Lebanon daily and occupies five strategic points on Lebanese territory, despite a ceasefire struck with Hezbollah in November. Mr Barrack accepted that the November truce "didn't work" and said a lasting solution needed to be found. He said US President Donald Trump "attaches importance to the situation in Lebanon and the restoration of stability in the region". President Aoun gave the US envoy a "draft comprehensive memorandum for implementing Lebanon's pledges" that have been made since the ceasefire was struck, according to a statement from the presidency. The document emphasised the need to extend state authority to the entire country, restrict weapons to the army and ensure "decisions of war and peace" rest with Lebanese constitutional authorities. Mr Barrack's visit is his second to Lebanon in two weeks and is expected to last several days. Lebanon and the US have been exchanging 'ideas' on a proposal that would ultimately lead to Hezbollah's disarmament, with all weapons then coming under the control of the Lebanese state. Beirut is also pushing for Israel to halt its daily attacks and withdraw from the five points it occupies. However, Hezbollah's Secretary General Naim Qassem has accused Mr Barrack of seeking to encourage the Lebanese Army to disarm the group by force and provoke a civil war. The Hezbollah leader has taken a hard line on the weapons issue, arguing that Israel would expand its territorial control over parts of Lebanon in the absence of the militant group. 'We will not surrender or give up to Israel; Israel will not take our weapons away from us,' Mr Qassem said in a video speech at a commemoration for a senior Hezbollah commander killed in the war with Israel last year. "We are ready for any action that leads to a Lebanese understanding," he added. "But for Israel and America, we will not do this under any type of threat." On his previous visit, Mr Barrack, who is special envoy for Syria and US ambassador to Turkey, said he was satisfied with Lebanon's response to the US plan for the disarmament of Hezbollah. But he also insisted that Lebanon must not be left behind in a rapidly changing region. In their reply to the US proposal, Lebanese authorities submitted a seven-page document calling for a full Israeli withdrawal from disputed territory, including Shebaa Farms, and reaffirming state control over all weapons while pledging to dismantle Hezbollah's arms in south Lebanon. In a recent interview with The National, Mr Barrack said time was of the essence. 'I honestly think that they are going to say, 'the world will pass us by'. Why? You have Israel on one side, you have Iran on the other, and now you have Syria manifesting itself so quickly that if Lebanon doesn't move, it's going to be Bilad Al Sham again,' he said, using the historical name for the Greater Syria region. That comment by Mr Barrack was widely interpreted as suggesting Lebanon risks being swallowed up into a Greater Syria, but the envoy later said he was merely trying to praise 'Syria's impressive strides'. 'I can assure that Syria's leaders only want coexistence and mutual prosperity with Lebanon, and the United States is committed to supporting that relationship between two equal and sovereign neighbours enjoying peace and prosperity,' he said on X.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Lebanon cannot call itself a state without answers to Beirut port explosion, says Justice Minister
Lebanon 'cannot pretend' to be a state if answers are not found to questions about the deadly Beirut port explosion in 2020, the country's Justice Minister has said. No one has been held accountable for one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, which killed more than 220 people, injured thousands and flattened large parts of the Lebanese capital. Nearly 3,000 tonnes of ammonium nitrate that had been improperly stored at the port for years exploded on August 4 that year despite repeated warnings to the authorities. Physical wounds are visible across Beirut, while the mental and emotional scars linger for its people every day, but justice appears elusive. The tragedy exposed the deep-rooted corruption and negligence at the heart of Lebanon 's dysfunctional political and judicial systems. Efforts to investigate the explosion have been repeatedly frustrated by political interference, legal challenges and the removal of lead investigators, leaving victims' families still searching for answers five years later. Tarek Bitar, the current investigative judge, has been threatened and faced challenges in summoning the senior figures he has fought to interrogate. He is finally making some progress after years of constant impediments – although a long road ahead remains. 'When you have a blast of the dramatic impact of the port blast, a state that is not able to give answers and ensure accountability to its citizens is a state not fulfilling its role,' said Justice Minister Adel Nassar. 'I understand the families, all the victims, that they want a decision as soon as possible. But I think they understand that the main criteria is to ensure he [Mr Bitar] completed his work and he got sufficient evidence supporting his findings,' Mr Nassar told The National in an interview at his office in Beirut, days before the fifth anniversary of the explosion. Mr Nassar assumed the role earlier this year in the government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, himself a former judge and former chief of the International Court of Justice. Mr Salam's team has sought to bring about reform in a country long plagued by institutional malaise, and the Prime Minister has repeatedly said that accountability over the blast is one his key objectives. 'It's one of the priorities and nobody will accept that this major dramatic event remains without answers, without a trial, without a proper judicial system acting in this respect,' said Mr Nassar. Justice delayed Mr Bitar's investigation has been fraught with challenges from the start. He was not the original lead judge in the immediate aftermath of the explosion and, at one point, was stripped of his authority by Lebanon's then leading prosecutor Ghassan Oueidat – who himself had been charged in connection with the case. Mr Bitar also faced a barrage of lawsuits filed by senior officials seeking to avoid interrogation. But, in January, he reopened the case again. Shortly after, his powers were reinstalled by Lebanon's new lead prosecutor and some – although not all – high officials who resisted interrogation for months, if not years, eventually appeared for questioning. Mr Oueidat, however, refused on Thursday to be notified of a hearing scheduled by Mr Bitar for questioning on Monday as a suspect in the case. The investigation's reactivation has coincided with the arrival of a new president and a reform-minded government, raising cautious hopes for a shift in approach. 'Maybe there is a coincidence between my arrival to the ministry and the fact that he [Mr Bitar] is being able to conduct his work without obstacles,' said Mr Nassar. 'A coincidence?' The National asked. 'Why not?' the Minister responded, with a smile and shrug of his shoulders. Mr Nassar said he has no formal role in the investigation, and that no good justice minister should have one in this case or any other. 'It's clear that the Ministry is not in charge of the investigation and is not supposed to interfere in the investigation. And I'm clearly not interfering,' Mr Nassar said. 'My role is to ensure that the investigative judge will have all the tools he may require to continue his work and to prevent any political interference in his work.' He added: 'I tried to support any requirements or demand he brought, I'm very happy that French investigative judges came to Lebanon to share information with him,' referring to a French delegation that was on the ground two weeks after the blast and was allowed to share its findings with Mr Bitar once the investigation resumed. The contents of the French findings are not known to Mr Nassar, but it is hoped the exchange of information between judicial officials will support the case. 'I made the contacts to ensure that they could come and share information. But I didn't even meet them, it's not my role to meet them. 'We really have to respect the separation of powers in Lebanon. In a democracy, you have a proper separation. I am a minister, I am not supposed to ask questions regarding the merit of a judge's work.' Mr Nassar said he has ensured there is proper co-operation between Mr Bitar and Lebanon's lead prosecutor. He also reiterated his solidarity with families of the victims. 'It is one of the most terrible crimes that occurred. It is the duty of the state to give this file a full effort, because we cannot pretend we have a state, and at the same time, not be able to address this terrible blast,' he said.
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
'Suffering reaches new depths': Nations condemn Israel's 'drip feed' aid model in Gaza
Israel rejects joint statement published by UK and accuses Hamas of prolonging war At least 22 Palestinians killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza on Monday Israeli troops 'shot Gazans with hands raised' in worst aid massacre yet Director of field hospitals in Gaza detained by Israel, says Health Ministry At least 59,029 Palestinians killed and 142,135 wounded since Gaza war began
