What Ghislaine Maxwell really knows - and why she could finally spill all on Jeffrey Epstein: sources
Blanche said Tuesday he plans to meet with the convicted madam, currently serving a 20- year sentence in Florida for sex trafficking young women for her former boss, notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
'She's going to make a deal,' said Alan Dershowitz, a lawyer and law professor who was pals with, and previously represented, Epstein, who died in federal custody in August 2019.
'That's the way things are done. They make deals with the mafia, so I'm certain they are going to try to make a deal with her.'
A separate legal expert explained meeting with Blanche presents an opportunity for Maxwell to potentially lessen her sentence or get out of prison in exchange for spiling secrets about her and Epstein's life, which she has closely guarded since his death.
Dershowitz has referred to Maxwell, 63, as the 'Rosetta stone' of information about Epstein, and told The Post Tuesday 'she knows everything — not just about the perpetrators but the victims. And she knows about the victims who became perpetrators.'
Some of Epstein's victims – which number over 1,000 in total according to the Department of Justice – were groomed to recruit other young women, according to court papers.
Maxwell has been closely associated with Epstein since the death of her publishing magnate father Robert Maxwell in 1991.
The pair were inseparable at high society parties across New York and the world spanning the next two decades.
Maxwell benefitted from Epstein's mysteriously accumulated fortune, while she was seen as his social fixer, able to gain the somewhat unrefined character access to rarefied society circles. Maxwell – who was, at one point, Epstein's girlfriend – got him access even to the UK royal family and facilitated his friendship with Prince Andrew.
The British prince shelled out more than $16 million to Virginia Giuffre, one of the young women recruited by Maxwell and Epstein.
Giuffre, who took her own life in April, also alleged she had been passed around as a sex slave to others, although their identities have never properly been established.
Maxwell said through her brother she would be willing to testify before a Congressional Committee on her relationship with Epstein.
It could be the first time federal prosecutors hear her version of events, as both her defense lawyers and prosecutors said they had not engaged in plea negotiations which would require such an interview before her trial.
Her lawyers at the time said she did not need to negotiate as she was innocent.
The case has been thrust back into the spotlight by the justice department's promise to release all the information gathered by the FBI from raiding Epstein's properties earlier this year, only to then walk it back.
A Justice Department-FBI joint memo concluded the 66-year-old financier killed himself in a federal lockup and did not have a 'client list' of powerful friends who allegedly took part in sexual encounters with underage women.
With no more information expected to be released by the federal government, Maxwell's version of events once again becomes of prime importance.
She is believed to have kept silent while her appeals process played out for fear of jeopardizing her chances in the case. However, with most of her possibilities of appeal recently exhausted – apart from one petition to the Supreme Court – she may now feel compelled to give her side of the story.
Her brother, Ian Maxwell, speaks to his sister frequently and has, alongside other members of his family, fought her corner since her initial arrest in 2020.
He also denied the existence of a client list of powerful people girls had been trafficked to.
'Let's not try and big it up for more than it is. I think it was a high-quality address book. I don't think it constitutes 'a list', let alone a list of alleged people to whom young minor girls were trafficked,' Ian told 'Piers Morgan Uncensored'.
'Ghislaine's position on this, for what it's worth, has been, she doesn't ever believe that such a list existed.'
Ian Maxwell has also said he believes his sister should never have been prosecuted due to a deal Epstein cut with Florida federal prosecutors when he was first convicted of sex offenses in 2007.
In exchange for pleading guilty to lesser charges of soliciting a prostitute, the deal Epstein signed said he and any co-conspirators would be immune from further federal prosecution.
New York prosecutors later argued successfully in court that the deal's jurisdiction ended in Florida.
Maxwell was then convicted after a trial in New York in 2021, and has been serving her sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, a low security prison, since July 2022.
Her family has long claimed the prison is unsafe and Maxwell is subject to poor living conditions, and frequently placed in solitary confinement.
They also say they fear for her life.
'Prisons are very dangerous places and we know from Ghislaine that there are serious staff shortages and more dangerous higher-risk-category prisoners now being admitted to … Tallahassee,' said Ian Maxwell.
With questions about the circumstances of Epstein's death in federal prison in 2019 still raging, some fear for Ghislaine's wellbeing and vulnerability while in prison.
President Trump has blasted the Epstein saga as a 'hoax' and ripped a faction of his supporters who have fixated on the scandal, which involved allegations of orgies and sexual encounters on Epstein's private plane, his homes in Palm Beach and Manhattan as well as Little St. James, his former private island in the Caribbean.
However, he approved of the outreach to Maxwell on Tuesday, saying: 'I think it would be something — sounds appropriate to do, yeah,' according to Politico.
Originally published as What Ghislaine Maxwell really knows - and why she could finally spill all on Jeffrey Epstein: sources

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
14 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump to start building $311 million White House ballroom in September
Washington: After paving over the Rose Garden and adding gold leaf in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump will embark on his most dramatic addition to the White House yet: a new, $US200 million ($311 million) ballroom to be built adjacent to the mansion's East Wing. Trump, a former real estate developer with a penchant for decorating, has long complained the White House lacks a large-scale ballroom for entertaining. The White House on Thursday announced plans to break ground in September on the project, which could prove to be the most extensive one since Harry Truman completed an entire renovation in 1952. The White House was built in 1800 and partially rebuilt after being burned by the British during the War of 1812. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that work on the 8360-square metre facility would be completed 'long before' Trump's four-year term ended in January 2029. The $US200 million cost of the ballroom, which will be able to seat 650 people, would be donated by Trump and other donors, she said. Presidents have used the intimate State Dining Room for events, as well as the larger East Room for bigger VIP lists, and sometimes will have a tent temporarily constructed on the South Lawn to host big dinners. 'When it rains, it's a disaster,' Trump said of the tents when asked about the new ballroom on Thursday. Trump's home at his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, has a grand ballroom and a smaller one, both with glittering chandeliers and white walls decorated with gold flourishes.

The Age
14 hours ago
- The Age
Trump to start building $311 million White House ballroom in September
Washington: After paving over the Rose Garden and adding gold leaf in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump will embark on his most dramatic addition to the White House yet: a new, $US200 million ($311 million) ballroom to be built adjacent to the mansion's East Wing. Trump, a former real estate developer with a penchant for decorating, has long complained the White House lacks a large-scale ballroom for entertaining. The White House on Thursday announced plans to break ground in September on the project, which could prove to be the most extensive one since Harry Truman completed an entire renovation in 1952. The White House was built in 1800 and partially rebuilt after being burned by the British during the War of 1812. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that work on the 8360-square metre facility would be completed 'long before' Trump's four-year term ended in January 2029. The $US200 million cost of the ballroom, which will be able to seat 650 people, would be donated by Trump and other donors, she said. Presidents have used the intimate State Dining Room for events, as well as the larger East Room for bigger VIP lists, and sometimes will have a tent temporarily constructed on the South Lawn to host big dinners. 'When it rains, it's a disaster,' Trump said of the tents when asked about the new ballroom on Thursday. Trump's home at his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, has a grand ballroom and a smaller one, both with glittering chandeliers and white walls decorated with gold flourishes.

Sydney Morning Herald
17 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
World leaders risk a Trump backlash to turn on Israel
Starmer called Netanyahu before the cabinet meeting. The formal 'readout' of this call was typically bland, but the Israeli leader's reaction on the phone was not hard to guess. Soon afterwards, he accused the British leader of appeasing the Hamas terrorists. Netanyahu, however, has had few world leaders rallying to his side. Even Trump, who leads Israel's most vital ally, seemed unworried about Starmer's decision. Flying home from Scotland, he told reporters on Air Force One it was 'OK' that the United Kingdom was following France. 'It doesn't mean I have to agree,' he added. While the diplomatic debates were about statehood, the urgent arguments were about aid. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said Gaza was on the brink of famine: 'Palestinians in Gaza are enduring a humanitarian catastrophe of epic proportions.' The UN estimated that more than 20,000 children had been treated for acute malnutrition. The World Food Program said more than 500,000 people, or about one quarter of the population in Gaza, were enduring famine-like conditions. Loading This was the backdrop to the diplomatic manoeuvres. Early in the week, there was no sense of a penalty from Trump for those who spoke up for Palestine. Macron was working with Saudi Arabia to advance a two-state solution at the UN. The French and Saudi foreign ministers jointly chaired a UN session in New York to step up the push. On Tuesday, 15 nations backed a French call for a ceasefire in Gaza and a two-state solution. Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong was among the signatories. The others were from Andorra, Canada, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Slovenia and Spain. One day later, the Arab League moved. It condemned the October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attack on Israel, the slaughter of civilians that led to the war. This declaration, also at the UN session in New York, marked the first condemnation of its kind from major Muslim nations. Among the signatories were Qatar and Turkey, two vital states in the Hamas network. Qatar has given an estimated $2.6 billion to Hamas over the years, while Turkey has been a second home for some of the terrorist group's leaders. The declaration set out a peace plan that appeared ambitious. After decades of conflict, it seemed to be an impossible hope. It sought an independent, demilitarised Palestine at peace with Israel – and with no place for Hamas. 'In the context of ending the war in Gaza, Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority,' it said. It was signed by the Arab League, Brazil, Canada, Egypt, the European Union, France, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, Norway, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Spain, Turkey and the UK. Leaders were moving together. Macron spoke to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan on Sunday, along with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi. Loading Starmer spoke to the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, on Tuesday. The Palestinian Authority, which controls the West Bank, called on Monday for both Israel and Hamas to leave Gaza. Every step this week has seemed predicated on the idea that Abbas would administer Gaza – even though the two Palestinian zones are divided by Israel. The push for Palestinian statehood had immense challenges: the absence of any agreed borders, the uncertainty about any elections to agree on a political leadership, the convenient assumption that Hamas would somehow leave Gaza. More than anything, however, it faced the unwavering rejection of Netanyahu and Trump. Only after several days did Trump make his displeasure known. While he did not complain about Starmer – the two have a good relationship – he snapped at Mark Carney when the Canadian prime minister took a similar step to his British counterpart. Carney moved after speaking with Starmer on Tuesday and Abbas on Wednesday, and he named similar concerns to France and the UK: the expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and the lack of food in Gaza. Carney, however, took a very different approach with the conditions he placed on Canada's decision to recognise a Palestinian state. He said a key factor would be whether the Palestinian Authority would commit to reform its own governance and demilitarise its territory. Both those objectives are easier said than done. Trump reacted on his Truth Social account: 'Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them.' The implications for Australia were immediate: Trump was willing to wield economic pressure on countries that did not follow his lead. Even so, Trump was moving more slowly than the rest of the world. Germany, for instance, offered some support for its European neighbours on Thursday morning. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is a strong supporter of Israel, but his government showed its impatience with Israeli ministers who advocate the annexation of Palestinian territory. Germany's Foreign Minister, Johann Wadephul, sent this signal before he boarded a flight to Jerusalem on Thursday. He noted that many countries in Europe were prepared to recognise a Palestinian state, but he repeated Germany's policy that this must depend on the process towards a two-state solution. 'That process must begin now,' he said. 'Should unilateral steps be taken, Germany, too, will be compelled to respond.' This last sentence hinted that Germany might yet shift its stance if Israel continues to claim Palestinian land. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has to weigh up the reaction from Trump as he considers whether to join the growing cluster of nations that are expressing their frustration with Netanyahu and his government. There are now 147 nations, of the 193 member states at the UN, that recognise Palestine. Albanese will have to decide whether Australia stands with Trump and Netanyahu, or with the long list of leaders heading in the other direction. The images of children starving in Gaza have shifted the global debate. Even so, there should be no illusion that a vote on statehood in New York in September will somehow give those children aid. Everything has been about applying more pressure on Israel. There is no certainty that delivering a diplomatic blow will force its government to allow more food to reach the hungry. Loading Netanyahu is increasingly isolated. Trump, his strongest ally, stands by him on the recognition of Palestine. But even Trump can see the starvation in Gaza. And most other world leaders are making their impatience clear – in call after call. What we do not know is whether all their talk with force anyone to act.