Hundreds greet Nepal's ex-king on his birthday as support for the ousted monarch grows
Gyanendra Shah, who makes very few public appearances, allowed his supporters inside his house for three hours.
Supporters lined up outside with flower garlands, bouquets, cards, gifts and various food items which are traditionally offered during special occasions in Nepalese culture.
'Bring king back to the throne and save the country. We love our king more than our lives,' chanted the loyalists, many wearing traditional attire.
Nepal abolished the monarchy and turned the nation into a republic in 2008, bringing in a president as the head of the state.
There has been growing demand in recent months for Shah to be reinstated as king and Hinduism to be brought back as a state religion. Royalist groups accuse the country's major political parties of corruption and failed governance and say people are frustrated with politicians.
'People were looking for change and they removed the king hoping that it would be beneficial for the country, but that was very untrue and the political parties repeatedly betrayed people's trust,' said retired worker Kula Prasad Bhattarai, who stood in line for hours outside the king's residence.
'The politicians have damaged our nation,' said Divesh Singh Hamal, another supporter. 'We need to bring the king back or else our country will be finished.'
Gyanendra was a constitutional head of state without executive or political powers until 2005, when he seized absolute power. He disbanded the government and parliament, jailed politicians and journalists and cut off communications, declaring a state of emergency and using the army to rule the country.
Support for the ousted monarch has risen in recent months.
Tens of thousands of protesters demanding the restoration of the monarchy and the former king be made head of state demonstrated in May.
In March, at least two people died when another rally turned violent as supporters of the ex-king clashed with riot police.
Massive street protests in 2006 forced Gyanendra to give up his authoritarian rule, and two years later the parliament voted to abolish the monarchy.
Gyanendra, who left the royal palace to live as a commoner, has not commented on the calls for the restoration of the monarchy. Despite growing support, the former king has little chance of immediately returning to power.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
China starts construction of world's biggest hydropower dam in Tibet
China has started building a mega-dam on the Yarlung Zangbo River in Tibet, which could become the world's largest source of hydroelectric power when completed, according to Chinese officials. The mega-project in the foothills of the Himalayas will include five hydropower stations on the river, which is also known as the Brahmaputra, further downstream in India, and the Jamuna River in Bangladesh. China's Xinhua state news agency reported that Premier Li Qiang attended a commencement ceremony for the dam on Saturday. Beijing had planned the project for several years, and approval was given in December last year, linking the development to the country's carbon neutrality targets and economic goals in the Tibet region. 'The electricity generated will be primarily transmitted to other regions for consumption, while also meeting local power needs in Tibet,' Xinhua reported after the groundbreaking ceremony in southeastern Tibet's city of Nyingchi. The project is expected to cost an estimated 1.2 trillion yuan ($167.1bn), Xinhua said. India said in January that it had raised concerns with China about the project, saying it would 'monitor and take necessary measures to protect our interests'. India's Ministry of External Affairs said at the time that China 'has been urged to ensure that the interests of the downstream states of the Brahmaputra are not harmed by activities in upstream areas'. In December, Beijing's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the project would not have any 'negative impact' downstream, adding that China 'will also maintain communication with countries at the lower reaches' of the river. China annexed Tibet in 1950, and has built several dams on the region's rivers, prompting concerns from Tibetans about the potential impacts on the unique ecosystems of the Tibetan Plateau. Tibet's vast glaciers and major rivers provide fresh water to 1.3 billion people in 10 countries, according to Yale's E360 environmental magazine. The Yarlung Tsangpo is the world's highest river, reaching some 5,000 metres (16,404 feet) above sea level, and is considered sacred to Tibetans. The new dam is also being built just 30km (18 miles) from China's vast border with India, much of which is disputed, with tens of thousands of soldiers posted on either side. Once built, the dam could provide as much as three times as much energy as the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River in central China. The Three Gorges Dam, which was completed in 2003, controversially displaced some 1.4 million people. Tibet is much more sparsely populated, with some 2,000 people displaced for the construction of the Yagen Hydropower Station in 2015, according to local media the daily Crossword
Yahoo
19-07-2025
- Yahoo
Forced from Bhutan, deported by the US: these stateless Himalayan people are in a unique limbo
More than two dozen refugees from Bhutan have been left in a unique legal limbo after they were deported by the US back to the tiny Himalayan nation they once fled – only for it to reject them a second time. The refugees are Lhotshampa, a Nepali-speaking ethnic minority who were expelled from Bhutan in the 1990s. After decades in refugee camps in eastern Nepal, more than 100,000 of them were legally resettled in the US, Australia, Canada and other countries under a UN-led program that began in 2007. Until very recently, the US had not deported a single person to Bhutan in years, according to data from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), because the Bhutanese government was unwilling to repatriate its refugees, who were stripped of their citizenship when they fled. But since March, more than two dozen Lhotshampa have been deported from the US back to Bhutan – though the country is still refusing to take them in, according to several deportees, advocates and the Nepali government. Many have ended up back in the same Nepal refugee camps where as children they dreamed of a better life abroad. Ramesh Sanyasi, 24, was born in a refugee camp and migrated to the US when he was 10 years old with his parents and older sister. Sanyasi was living in Pennsylvania, a hub for refugees from Bhutan, and working in an Amazon warehouse until last year, when he said he was arrested while borrowing his friend's car during a night out. Sanyasi was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and handing false ID to law enforcement, court records show. In April of this year, after spending eight months in jail, Sanyasi said he was put on a one-way flight to New Delhi, India, then to Paro, Bhutan. When he arrived in Bhutan, he said, local authorities took him and two other refugees to the border with India, where they paid someone to take the men to Panitanki, a town on the India-Nepal border, giving the deportees 30,000 Indian rupees (about $350) each. Sanyasi said he and the other deportees paid someone to smuggle them across the Mechi River into Nepal. 'Life here is tough. I'm living without any identification documents, which makes everything challenging. I can't even withdraw money sent by relatives because I lack proper ID,' Sanyasi told CNN in an interview from Beldangi refugee camp, where he is now staying. 'My days are spent idly, with no clear purpose or direction,' Sanyasi said. 'For now, I'm surviving on money sent from the US, but once that runs out, I don't know what will happen.' His sister, mother and father all remain in the US. Sanyasi and the other deportees were not undocumented and came to the US legally. Most – if not all – have been convicted of crimes of varying severity, though many served their full sentences before being deported. Under US law, non-citizens can lose their visas if convicted of certain crimes. They now find themselves in an extraordinary diplomatic gray zone, with no documentation for either the US, Bhutan or Nepal, where many are currently residing. Gopal Krishna Siwakoti, Nepal-based president of the International Institute for Human Rights, Environment and Development, estimates 30 people have been deported by the US to Bhutan so far, while at least two dozen more are in detention facilities awaiting deportation. All the refugees deported to Bhutan were expelled to India once they arrived, Siwakoti said. Most of them made their way to Nepal, though some are still in India. Many are in hiding, he said. Four of the US deportees have now been ordered deported by a second country, after they were arrested and briefly detained by the Nepali government for crossing the border illegally. However, Tikaram Dhakal, the director of Nepal's Department of Immigration, told CNN it has nowhere to deport these people. 'We are in a dilemma: the US is unlikely to accept them back, and deporting them to Bhutan is not straightforward either.' Nowhere to go Bhutan, a small Buddhist kingdom of roughly 800,000 nestled between India and Tibet in the Himalayas, is often revered for its sustainable approach to tourism and national happiness index, but it has a dark history of crackdowns on ethnic minorities. In the late 1970s, the government of Bhutan began cracking down on ethnic Nepalis who had migrated to southern Bhutan in the 19th century, introducing a series of discriminatory policies designed to exclude Lhotshampa. From 1989, the government pushed the 'Bhutanization' of the country by enforcing a dress code and banning the Nepali language, aggressively clamping down on anyone who resisted. Faced with abuse, threats and coercion, the Lhotshampa fled. It has long been a bedrock of US and international law not to send someone to a country where they could face persecution. But the administration of US President Donald Trump has increasingly deported people to states with grave human rights records, such as Libya and South Sudan. Siwakoti said it was a 'mistake on the part of the US government' to deport the Lhotshampa back to Bhutan, 'because these people don't have a country.' 'These people's belonging, their existence, their ownership of the country, was completely written off – formally, legally – by the Royal Government of Bhutan,' Siwakoti said. 'They became completely stateless.' Bhutan has refused to receive Lhotshampa refugees. But during Trump's presidency, countries that have historically accepted few – if any – deportees from the US are now opening their doors, under pressure of sanctions and tariffs. Bhutan was initially included in a draft 'red' list prepared by US diplomatic and security officials of 11 countries whose citizens would be barred from entering the US, which was published in March by The New York Times. But when the final list of 19 countries targeted for full or partial travel bans was released in June, Bhutan was not included. The first deportation flight from the US to Bhutan was at the end of March. Siwakoti said he believes Bhutan accepted the deportees to appease the US, but never intended to let them stay. ICE and the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to questions from CNN. A US State Department spokesperson said it would not discuss its diplomatic communications with other governments. 'Foreign governments will make decisions regarding the immigration status of aliens removed from the United States in accordance with their respective domestic laws and international obligations,' the spokesperson said. CNN was unable to reach Bhutan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs for comment. The Consulate of Bhutan in New York did not respond to an email request from CNN. Dhakal, the Nepali government official, said Nepal cannot accept the refugees and is currently in discussions with the US government to come up with a solution. 'Family separation is not a solution' The Beldangi camp looks different from when Ashish Subedi last lived here a decade ago. There is electricity; his father's bamboo hut is now fortified with metal; and running water comes from a tap, rather than a well. Dogs, cows and chickens roam the dusty roads. Subedi never imagined he would be back here, in the same place where he and his family took refuge years ago. Subedi was convicted of a felony sexual offense in Ohio in 2022, according to court records, and served his two-year sentence before he was deported back to Bhutan in March. He is among the deportees who were arrested by Nepali authorities, though they were eventually released from detention after Subedi's father filed a habeas corpus petition with Nepal's Supreme Court. Without travel documents, it is unlikely he and the others will be expelled from Nepal anytime soon. In the meantime, the government is not permitting them to leave the refugee camps. 'We are living in darkness, with no clear path forward,' Subedi told CNN. 'The lack of documentation and restricted movement make it nearly impossible to rebuild our lives. We feel trapped, with limited options and a constant sense of insecurity.' Subedi said he hopes to return to the US, where his wife and 3-year-old daughter still live. 'Being sent back to Bhutan is not an option for us – it would likely mean imprisonment,' he said. Back in the US, the recent deportations have sent shock waves through communities of Bhutanese refugees. Tilak Niroula, a refugee and community leader in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, said Bhutanese refugees have embraced life in the US and laid down roots there. 'Since we were forcefully evicted from Bhutan, and we do not have a country to call home, we call this country, the US, our home,' he said. Niroula said he and other advocates want anyone who commits a crime to face justice – but insists deportation isn't the answer. 'If somebody got involved in any kind of criminal activities, we do have a due process,' he said. 'Family separation is not a solution.' Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
19-07-2025
- CNN
Forced from Bhutan, deported by the US: these stateless Himalayan people are in a unique limbo
More than two dozen refugees from Bhutan have been left in a unique legal limbo after they were deported by the US back to the tiny Himalayan nation they once fled – only for it to reject them a second time. The refugees are Lhotshampa, a Nepali-speaking ethnic minority who were expelled from Bhutan in the 1990s. After decades in refugee camps in eastern Nepal, more than 100,000 of them were legally resettled in the US, Australia, Canada and other countries under a UN-led program that began in 2007. Until very recently, the US had not deported a single person to Bhutan in years, according to data from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), because the Bhutanese government was unwilling to repatriate its refugees, who were stripped of their citizenship when they fled. But since March, more than two dozen Lhotshampa have been deported from the US back to Bhutan – though the country is still refusing to take them in, according to several deportees, advocates and the Nepali government. Many have ended up back in the same Nepal refugee camps where as children they dreamed of a better life abroad. Ramesh Sanyasi, 24, was born in a refugee camp and migrated to the US when he was 10 years old with his parents and older sister. Sanyasi was living in Pennsylvania, a hub for refugees from Bhutan, and working in an Amazon warehouse until last year, when he said he was arrested while borrowing his friend's car during a night out. Sanyasi was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and handing false ID to law enforcement, court records show. In April of this year, after spending eight months in jail, Sanyasi said he was put on a one-way flight to New Delhi, India, then to Paro, Bhutan. When he arrived in Bhutan, he said, local authorities took him and two other refugees to the border with India, where they paid someone to take the men to Panitanki, a town on the India-Nepal border, giving the deportees 30,000 Indian rupees (about $350) each. Sanyasi said he and the other deportees paid someone to smuggle them across the Mechi River into Nepal. 'Life here is tough. I'm living without any identification documents, which makes everything challenging. I can't even withdraw money sent by relatives because I lack proper ID,' Sanyasi told CNN in an interview from Beldangi refugee camp, where he is now staying. 'My days are spent idly, with no clear purpose or direction,' Sanyasi said. 'For now, I'm surviving on money sent from the US, but once that runs out, I don't know what will happen.' His sister, mother and father all remain in the US. Sanyasi and the other deportees were not undocumented and came to the US legally. Most – if not all – have been convicted of crimes of varying severity, though many served their full sentences before being deported. Under US law, non-citizens can lose their visas if convicted of certain crimes. They now find themselves in an extraordinary diplomatic gray zone, with no documentation for either the US, Bhutan or Nepal, where many are currently residing. Gopal Krishna Siwakoti, Nepal-based president of the International Institute for Human Rights, Environment and Development, estimates 30 people have been deported by the US to Bhutan so far, while at least two dozen more are in detention facilities awaiting deportation. All the refugees deported to Bhutan were expelled to India once they arrived, Siwakoti said. Most of them made their way to Nepal, though some are still in India. Many are in hiding, he said. Four of the US deportees have now been ordered deported by a second country, after they were arrested and briefly detained by the Nepali government for crossing the border illegally. However, Tikaram Dhakal, the director of Nepal's Department of Immigration, told CNN it has nowhere to deport these people. 'We are in a dilemma: the US is unlikely to accept them back, and deporting them to Bhutan is not straightforward either.' Bhutan, a small Buddhist kingdom of roughly 800,000 nestled between India and Tibet in the Himalayas, is often revered for its sustainable approach to tourism and national happiness index, but it has a dark history of crackdowns on ethnic minorities. In the late 1970s, the government of Bhutan began cracking down on ethnic Nepalis who had migrated to southern Bhutan in the 19th century, introducing a series of discriminatory policies designed to exclude Lhotshampa. From 1989, the government pushed the 'Bhutanization' of the country by enforcing a dress code and banning the Nepali language, aggressively clamping down on anyone who resisted. Faced with abuse, threats and coercion, the Lhotshampa fled. It has long been a bedrock of US and international law not to send someone to a country where they could face persecution. But the administration of US President Donald Trump has increasingly deported people to states with grave human rights records, such as Libya and South Sudan. Siwakoti said it was a 'mistake on the part of the US government' to deport the Lhotshampa back to Bhutan, 'because these people don't have a country.' 'These people's belonging, their existence, their ownership of the country, was completely written off – formally, legally – by the Royal Government of Bhutan,' Siwakoti said. 'They became completely stateless.' Bhutan has refused to receive Lhotshampa refugees. But during Trump's presidency, countries that have historically accepted few – if any – deportees from the US are now opening their doors, under pressure of sanctions and tariffs. Bhutan was initially included in a draft 'red' list prepared by US diplomatic and security officials of 11 countries whose citizens would be barred from entering the US, which was published in March by The New York Times. But when the final list of 19 countries targeted for full or partial travel bans was released in June, Bhutan was not included. The first deportation flight from the US to Bhutan was at the end of March. Siwakoti said he believes Bhutan accepted the deportees to appease the US, but never intended to let them stay. ICE and the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to questions from CNN. A US State Department spokesperson said it would not discuss its diplomatic communications with other governments. 'Foreign governments will make decisions regarding the immigration status of aliens removed from the United States in accordance with their respective domestic laws and international obligations,' the spokesperson said. CNN was unable to reach Bhutan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs for comment. The Consulate of Bhutan in New York did not respond to an email request from CNN. Dhakal, the Nepali government official, said Nepal cannot accept the refugees and is currently in discussions with the US government to come up with a solution. The Beldangi camp looks different from when Ashish Subedi last lived here a decade ago. There is electricity; his father's bamboo hut is now fortified with metal; and running water comes from a tap, rather than a well. Dogs, cows and chickens roam the dusty roads. Subedi never imagined he would be back here, in the same place where he and his family took refuge years ago. Subedi was convicted of a felony sexual offense in Ohio in 2022, according to court records, and served his two-year sentence before he was deported back to Bhutan in March. He is among the deportees who were arrested by Nepali authorities, though they were eventually released from detention after Subedi's father filed a habeas corpus petition with Nepal's Supreme Court. Without travel documents, it is unlikely he and the others will be expelled from Nepal anytime soon. In the meantime, the government is not permitting them to leave the refugee camps. 'We are living in darkness, with no clear path forward,' Subedi told CNN. 'The lack of documentation and restricted movement make it nearly impossible to rebuild our lives. We feel trapped, with limited options and a constant sense of insecurity.' Subedi said he hopes to return to the US, where his wife and 3-year-old daughter still live. 'Being sent back to Bhutan is not an option for us – it would likely mean imprisonment,' he said. Back in the US, the recent deportations have sent shock waves through communities of Bhutanese refugees. Tilak Niroula, a refugee and community leader in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, said Bhutanese refugees have embraced life in the US and laid down roots there. 'Since we were forcefully evicted from Bhutan, and we do not have a country to call home, we call this country, the US, our home,' he said. Niroula said he and other advocates want anyone who commits a crime to face justice – but insists deportation isn't the answer. 'If somebody got involved in any kind of criminal activities, we do have a due process,' he said. 'Family separation is not a solution.'
