YouTube, Meta, TikTok reveal misinformation tidal wave
More than 25,000 videos deemed to feature "harmful" fake claims were removed from TikTok and YouTube, reports showed, while unverified and misleading election ads ranked among the most commonly removed content by Meta and Google.
Eight technology companies outlined their actions in transparency reports published on Thursday in accordance with the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation.
Several tech firms declined to detail their efforts to tackle fraudulent content in Australia, including social media platforms X and Snapchat.
The statistics follow heightened concern about misinformation online after the emergence of generative artificial intelligence tools, and warnings they may be used to create convincing deepfakes and political ads.
US firms including Google, Meta, Twitch, Apple and Microsoft released transparency reports under the industry code, and addressed issues including the identification of misleading claims, safeguards for users, and content removal.
TikTok revealed it removed more than 8.4 million videos from its Australian platform during 2024, including more than 148,000 videos deemed to be inauthentic.
Almost 21,000 of the videos violated the company's "harmful misinformation policies" during the year, the report said, and 80 per cent, on average, were removed before users could view them.
Google removed more than 5100 YouTube videos from Australia identified as misleading, its report said, out of more than 748,000 misleading videos removed worldwide.
Election advertising also raised red flags for tech platforms in Australia, with Google rejecting more than 42,000 political ads from unverified advertisers and Meta removing more than 95,000 ads for failing to comply with its social issues, elections and politics policies.
Meta purged more than 14,000 ads in Australia for violating misinformation rules, took down 350 posts on Facebook and Instagram for misinformation, and showed warnings on 6.9 million posts based on articles from fact-checking partners.
In January, the tech giant announced plans to end fact-checking in the US and its report said it would "continue to evaluate the applicability of these practices" in Australia.
Striking a balance between allowing content to be shared online and ensuring it would not harm others was a "difficult job," Digital Industry Group code reviewer Shaun Davies said, and the reports showed some companies were using AI tools to flag potential violations.
"I was struck in this year's reports by examples of how generative AI is being leveraged for both the creation and detection of (misinformation) and disinformation," he said.
"I'm also heartened that multiple initiatives that make the provenance of AI-generated content more visible to users are starting to bear fruit."
In its report, Microsoft also revealed it had removed more than 1200 users from LinkedIn for sharing misinformation, while Apple identified 2700 valid complaints against 1300 news articles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Morally superior': Lefties call for sacrifices on Australia's road to net zero
On tonight's episode of Paul Murray Live, Sky News host Paul Murray discusses climate change, farmers enduring weather, US politics and more. 'As we know, those that are willing to take to the streets to show us they are so more morally superior than us … you and I both know, that Australia, once per cent of the world's problem,' Mr Murray said. 'The point I am about to make is not about net zero, it is about the things we must give up, we must sacrifice to the higher power, to make sure we can do our bit to cut one per cent of the world's problems while China can of course replace the entire Australian pollution problem in just 16 days.'
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Kate Emery: Australia must never let reheating of old culture wars tear us apart
A familiar tune has been playing in my head for days. That is not thanks to Triple J's controversial weekend list of the best 100 Australian songs, which not only put Jet's Are You Gonna Be My Girl ahead of The Church's Under the Milky Way, but made my kids late for school while I forced them to admit The Nosebleed Section was a better tune than anything from the KPop Demon Hunters soundtrack after all, Mum. That déjà vu feeling has nothing to do with seeing music fans argue the merits of INXS v ACDC, and everything to do with the fact that welcome to country is back in the public discourse. Again. This is partly down to the Liberal Party's State council, which voted on Saturday to remove official status for welcome to country ceremonies and partly down to Opposition Senate Leader Michaelia Cash, who said she thinks the ceremonies make people 'feel good' while doing nothing to improve life for Indigenous people. Senator Cash's comments weren't the silliest thing I saw all weekend — that would be ranking Savage Garden's I Want You above Nick Cave's Red Right Hand — but they were right up there. The idea that having a positive display of Indigenous culture is an obstacle to improving Indigenous welfare is like suggesting we all boycott eating hummus until the Middle Eastern crisis is solved. Two things can be true. One: that anyone who has attended a conference where every speaker performs an acknowledgement of country may have thought about rolling their eyes — especially if the tenth 'I'd like to also acknowledge' stands between them and afternoon tea. Two: that anyone who has experienced a truly great welcome to country knows it is anything but tokenistic. The problem is that too many Australians misunderstand what welcome to country is. It's not the same as an acknowledgement of country, which can be done by anyone. A welcome to country must be done by an Indigenous person and is just what it sounds like: an act of hospitality. It's not welcome to the c ountry because because these ceremonies aren't about welcoming us to Australia. As a proud Australian — proud of our music, the fact we're the only nation capable of using the c-word as a term of affection and that we boast the oldest continuous living culture in the world — why would I have a problem with that? The other big misunderstanding about welcome to country is that it was 'invented' by Ernie Dingo. Yeah, nah. Welcome to country is a modern take on what Indigenous groups have been doing since the days when, over in Europe where my ancestors are from, the Neanderthals still thought they were in it for the long haul. When one group passed into territory inhabited by another, the two would come together to request safe passage. Welcome to the patch of country we've been looking after, let us give you some tips for getting along here. The only thing that's 'new' about welcome to country is that it's been given a national platform and incorporated into so many big events, from the opening of Parliament to footy games. I've seen some cracking welcome to country ceremonies over the years, from those that made me laugh to those that tug on what passes for a journalist's heartstrings. The latter happened recently when I received a very special welcome to country in the Pilbara. Without going into specifics — this particular elder was publicity shy — he told us about his connection to the land, and warned us against the spiritual repercussions of taking any artefacts we found. It wasn't about making us feel like trespassers, just an affecting way to be reminded about the history of the land. At a time when the Liberal Party is struggling for relevance, at both the Federal and State level, it is tedious to see so many party members breathing on the coals of this particular culture war. An Opposition that puts its energy into tearing down Indigenous culture instead of holding the Government to account and coming up with policies to present itself as a credible alternative, is one that's doomed to fail. And for those of us who believe that good oppositions make good governments, it's almost as maddening as seeing Thunderstruck not make the top 10 of Australian bangers.
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
‘Tyrell-ble': Beloved chip brand Tyrrells pulled from major Australian supermarkets due to low demand
Australians have been caught off guard by the quiet disappearance of a beloved chip brand from supermarket shelves without warning. UK -born snack brand Tyrrells has been pulled from Woolworths , Coles and IGA stores, without an official announcement. The change was spotted by a frustrated Reddit user who posted about it last Thursday. 'Gone from their shelves without warning or even clearance tags. Didn't even get a chance to stock up,' the user wrote. 'These were f****** good, made in Australia with Aussie potatoes, and at $3.80 for 165g. Price does what it says, without stupid price hikes and fake offers.' Other users echoed the disappointment. 'WHAT! OUTRAGE! They were the only chips I bought,' one comment read. 'These are the king of chips and I am heartbroken,' another said. 'Damn, that's really disappointing. They were the best chips on the shelves,' a third added. 'Absolutely unacceptable. These are the only good chips,' someone else chimed in. 'That's tyrell-ble,' another joked. Snackbrands Australia, the maker of Tyrrells, confirmed the brand has been discontinued due to low demand. 'We always aim to bring delicious snacks to our consumers in line with their needs, however we sadly had to retire the Tyrrells brand from market due to insufficient levels of consumer demand,' the company said in a statement. 'We realise that there will always be true lovers of the brand out there however we need to balance the requirements of our consumers as well as our retail partners when making these tough decisions.' Both Coles and Woolworths confirmed to they are no longer stocking Tyrrells chips. has also reached out to IGA for confirmation. Snackbrands said Tyrrells will still be available 'for the foreseeable future' in some Harris Farm stores, and suggested fans try their other products. 'The good news is that we continue to innovate and offer great alternatives under our Kettle and Natural Chip Company brands,' a spokesperson added. Tyrrells chips can still be found on Amazon , with nine 165g bags of the classic Pot Crispy Salted flavour currently available for $15.86. Some Reddit users reported spotting a few bags at 7-Eleven and The Reject Shop. Tyrrells, originally founded on a farm in Herefordshire, England in 2002, is known for its hand-cooked, premium potato chips made from locally grown ingredients. The brand entered the Australian market in 2014, initially importing products from the UK. From 2016, following its acquisition of Yarra Valley Snack Foods, Tyrrells chips were made locally in Victoria using Australian potatoes.
