Deputy PM refuses to say if Chinese warships targeted Australian cities
The Australian Defence Force revealed in February it was tracking two People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) frigates and a replenishment vessel in the Coral Sea, off Queensland.
They passed within 150 nautical miles (278km) east of Sydney as they moved south and conducted live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea without notifying Canberra or air traffic controllers.
The Albanese government has kept tight-lipped on what the Chinese flotilla's mission was, even amid fears AUKUS could be on the rocks, Australia trailing its allies in defence spending and warnings Beijing poses an 'imminent' threat to the region.
Mr Marles, who is also defence minister, on Monday told News Corp's Defending Australia Summit the Chinese live-fire drills was 'very much not diplomacy or defensive diplomacy'.
'None of that provides strategic reassurance,' he said.
Asked point blank if they were rehearsing strikes on Australian cities or onshore facilities, Mr Marles said he did know but would not confirm or deny.
'Look, I do know the answer to the question,' he said.
'I don't think it's appropriate or helpful for me in this situation to speculate about it for a range of reasons … and the most significant being what we did with the Chinese task group was to engage in an unprecedented level of surveillance on that task group.
'So we do know exactly what they were doing and exactly what they're rehearsing.
'For me to start talking about that obviously reveals our surveillance capabilities, which is why I'm reluctant to.'
Mr Marles added the Chinese ships were 'very clear about what they were doing'.
'Perhaps I would say that I think I don't think there are any capabilities that were put on display there which are particular surprise,' he said.
'And we were also, as I say – being able to surveil that task group in the manner which we did also sends an important statement.'
'Great power contest'
The Trump administration has been calling on Canberra to dramatically boost military spending amid concerns China could make a move on the democratically self-governed island of Taiwan by 2027.
Aside from torching the decades-long status quo, a Chinese move on Taiwan would deal a major blow to the global supply of semiconductors – crucial components in modern tech – and massively disrupt vital trade routes.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this month told Mr Marles that Australia's defence budget 'should' be 3.5 per cent of GDP 'as soon as possible' during a meeting on the sidelines of the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore.
In a read out, the US Embassy said the two senior officials 'discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific, accelerating US force posture initiatives in Australia, advancing defence industrial base co-operation, and creating supply chain resilience'.
Mr Hegseth also used his address at the conference to warn that Beijing posed an 'imminent' threat to the Indo-Pacific.
'Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' Mr Hegseth said.
'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.
'We hope not but certainly could be.'
While the Albanese government has pushed back on boosting the ADF's budget, Mr Marles acknowledged at the Defending Australia Summit that China's military build-up was the 'most significant … that we have seen since the end of the Second World War'.
'And it shapes the region in which we live, and it means that Australia's geography today is more relevant to great power contest than it has been at any point since the end of the Second World War, arguably at any point in our history,' he said.
'In terms of our own defence capability needs, our risk is not so much the invasion of the continent.
'We are fortunate that we are an island nation surrounded by oceans, but on the other hand, we are deeply reliant on our sea lines of communication.
'The supply of the country – almost all of our liquid fuels are imported by sea but also through export revenues.'
Mr Marles said Australia getting cut off from the world was 'our strategic risk'.
'It's the disruption of those sea lines,' he said.
'It's the coercion that could result because of the disruption of such sea routes.
'It is that, and the stability of the region in which we live.
'Because the defence of Australia is intimately connected with the peace and stability of the Pacific, the peace and stability of Southeast Asia, of Northeast Asia, of the Northeast Indian Ocean.'
Originally published as Deputy PM refuses to say if Chinese warships targeted Australian cities
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
9 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
US, China negotiators meet in Stockholm to extend trade truce
Beijing | US and Chinese officials are meeting on Monday to extend their tariff détente beyond a mid-August deadline, and haggle over other ways to further defuse trade tensions. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will lead the delegations for two days Stockholm — their third meeting in less than three months. The agenda includes discussions about how long the current tariff truce can be extended, as well as US levies tied to fentanyl trafficking and Chinese purchases of sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Dan Tehan challenges Anthony Albanese's assertion Israel is breaching international law
The Coalition is demanding Prime Minister Anthony Albanese "produce the facts", challenging his assertion that Israel has "clearly" breached international law by blocking aid into Gaza. Speaking on ABC Radio National, Coalition frontbencher Dan Tehan said the prime minister had made a heavy accusation. "That allegation should not be made lightly," Mr Tehan said. "Obviously, Israel are trying to provide humanitarian relief into Gaza, Hamas keeps on trying to disrupt those efforts. Now what the prime minister has said takes this whole situation to a new level." Yesterday, Mr Albanese said it was "quite clearly" a breach of international law to stop food from being delivered, a decision he said Israel made in March. Israel imposed a total blockade on humanitarian aid in March that ran for several months, as it tried to pressure Hamas to release Israeli hostages. That blockade was partially eased as Israel instead developed its own private aid delivery model, bypassing established UN channels. But last week more than 100 international humanitarian organisations, including Médecins Sans Frontières, Oxfam and Save the Children jointly warned Gaza was on the brink of "mass starvation", with not enough aid getting to Palestinians. Israel has consistently rejected allegations it has fuelled a hunger crisis in Gaza, instead blaming Hamas and claiming the listed terror group has weaponised humanitarian aid to supply its fighters. Under intense global pressure, Israel announced overnight it would pause fighting in some densely populated areas to allow more aid drops. Mr Tehan said Israel had been trying to provide relief in a way that Hamas could not capitalise on. "They have been attempting to do that for months because they know and understand [that] while Hamas is in control in Gaza, it will not lead to the humanitarian situation we all want to see, which is aid flowing there and ultimately the people of Gaza being able to determine who governs them in a free and fair way," Mr Tehan said. "The problem all along has been an internationally listed terrorist organisation, Hamas. If Hamas removed themselves from this process, we would not be in the situation we are in today." Mr Tehan said he wanted to see humanitarian aid flowing into Gaza, but until Hamas was removed, "unfortunately" the use of aid would be weaponised and that was not in anyone's interest. "If Hamas had not acted like they did on October 7 [2023], we wouldn't have this situation. They stand condemned and, in my view, they are the sole responsible actor here for the situation we find ourselves in," Mr Tehan said. Yesterday, Mr Albanese stopped short of saying whether Australia would take further action to pressure Israel to end what he said were breaches of international law. The prime minister confirmed Australia would not follow France to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong telling the ABC that there were still several hurdles to a two-state solution. The senator said Hamas must be de-militarised and Israeli hostages released before discussions to recognise Palestine could be progressed. Former foreign minister and Labor luminary Bob Carr told ABC Radio National it was clear from the prime minister's comments that recognition from Australia was "a matter of time". But he said the prime minister should not wait for the United Kingdom to move before acting. "I think that is very unfortunate if we see ourselves as a strong, creative middle power," Mr Carr said. "It would strengthen the impression of Australia as a country that can do things big and important ... I just think Australians are ready for our country to show a flash of independence, strength and maturity by moving with the French, and not huddling and waiting for the sanction that Britain would give us when Downing Street finally gets around to it." Twenty-eight nations, including Australia, last week demanded an immediate end to the war in Gaza and for Israel to lift aid restrictions. Shadow Foreign Minister Michaelia Cash said last week the Coalition had "strong concerns" about the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza, but was disappointed that the prime minister had failed to place blame on Hamas for the delays in aid reaching Gaza. "Hamas could end the suffering of the people of Gaza by freeing the remaining Israeli hostages and laying down their weapons," Senator Cash said.

Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Not up for negotiation': Aussies expected to save $200m a year from major cap on PBS-listed scripts despite tariff threats to industry
Millions of Australians are expected to save $200m in vital medication fees as a landmark bill caps the price of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) prescriptions at just $25, down from $31.60. The bill is set to take effect from January 1, as the Labor government takes the first steps to legislate the bill and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vows to keep his election pledge on cost of living relief. The changes mean the cost of medicines on the PBS could be significantly reduced by over 20 per cent. Minister for Health, Mark Butler said five million Australians will feel the relief in their pockets. The cost of medicine for pension and concession card holders will remain frozen at $7.70 until the end of 2029. The bill which was announced by Labor during the May election campaign is expected to cost the budget $690m over four years. Mr Albanese said it built on a pledge for cost of living relief. 'This is another example of cost of living relief that helps every Australian,' he said. 'The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare. My government will continue to deliver cost of living relief for all Australians.' Mr Butler added general patients' medicines haven't been this cheap since 2004. 'The Albanese Government has been focused on delivering cheaper medicines for Australians," he said. 'Cheaper medicines are good for the hip pocket and good for your health." The Assistant Health Minister, Emma McBride said the bill was set to pass despite US President Donald Trump's 200 per cent tariff threat on pharmaceutical imports. The US is Australia's biggest pharmaceutical export market and if the tariff is implemented it could cost the Australian economy up to $2.8 billion and force pharmas' to hike up their prices. However, Ms McBride said the PBS is not up for negotiation and "it is not a bargaining chip". "Labor introduced the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme to make sure that essential medicines were available to all Australians, and with this introduction of legislation to enact our election commitment, it will mean a cap on $25, which will save Australians about $200 million a year, 5.1 million Australians estimated to benefit," she said.