You can't fix the NHS without fixing social care, Streeting warned
Social care was described as a 'very significant question' hanging over the blueprint by the shadow health secretary.
Speaking in Commons on Thursday, Edward Argar warned Wes Streeting he risks failing to 'seize the genuine opportunity' presented by the plan if social care is not also reformed.
There were also calls to bring forward the end date of the Casey Commission, which aims to set out a plan to implement a national care service, in order to go 'further and faster' on social care.
Mr Argar said: 'Unless we move faster to adjust the challenges of social care and put it on a sustainable footing, these reforms risk failing to seize the genuine opportunity presented.'
Mr Streeting said: 'We're not waiting for Casey. The Spending Review gave an additional £4 billion to social care, and we're delivering the biggest expansion of carers allowance since the 1970s, significant increase in the disabled facilities grant.
'And the deputy prime minister and I will shortly be setting out how we will deliver the first ever fair pay agreements for the care workforce, building a real social care progression.'
The Casey Commission launched earlier this year, with the first phase expected to report in 2026, although recommendations from the initial probe will be implemented in phases over the course of 10 years.
Social care leaders have raised concerns over the potential timeline of 2036 for some reforms to be introduced.
The second phase of the commission, setting out longer-term reforms, is due to report by 2028.
Mr Streeting said social care 'has to be part' of neighbourhood health, adding: 'In the context of this plan, social care features because it has a role to play on admission avoidance and speeding up delayed discharges.'
Helen Morgan, Liberal Democrat MP for North Shropshire, said a plan for the future of the NHS is 'welcome' but sought reassurance on social care.
'In 143 pages of the 10-year plan, there is only a passing reference to social care,' she said.
'Everyone knows that you can't fix the NHS without fixing social care.
'With so many people unable to return home from hospital to get the care they need, solving the crisis in social care is a huge part of moving care out of hospital and into the community.'
Mr Streeting said: 'I hope the house is reassured by the action we've already taken on social care, that's greater funding, the expansion of carers allowance, increasing the disabled facilities grant, the Fair Pay agreements, and the role and the partnership that we will see with social care to deliver better neighbourhood health services.
'And I should also say, especially in the context of what we've been describing about the importance of data and digital connections and better systems, in some parts of the country the social care system is actually ahead of the NHS, making better use of data, joining up systems in a more effective and efficient way.
'And there's lots that the NHS can learn from social care as well as the other way around.'
The chief executive of Care England, Professor Martin Green, also warned that the NHS 'cannot deliver this vision alone'.
'If adult social care is not put at the centre of delivery – not just as a partner, but as a leader – this plan will falter,' he added.
'The plan speaks to a future we've already been building. But vision alone isn't enough. Providers need clarity, investment, and status.
'Without a clear role for adult social care, this plan will leave a gap between policy and reality.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Man Sues Trump Admin To Keep 70 Million-Year-Old Tyrannosaurus Skull
A Texas man is suing the Trump administration over its attempts to seize his 70 million-year-old Tyrannosaurus bataar skull. Robert M. Lavinsky bought the ancient fossil from a Gem & Mineral and Fossil Show dealer in 2005. It is now stored in Texas. However, he has been under investigation since 2014 by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), both of which allege the skull is stolen property. Lavinsky is suing the agencies, with a complaint filed on Wednesday stating: "The Government's demand for forfeiture of Plaintiff's personal property constitutes a concrete and particularized injury." DHS and attorneys for Lavinsky have been contacted via email outside business hours for comment. The Trump administration, particularly DHS, is already being sued by several groups of Attorneys General, citizens, and people who have been detained by ICE as part of the government's hardline immigration agenda. This is another lawsuit to add to its extensive legal schedule. Unlike other cases against the federal government, however, this suit is not related to specific Trump administration policies, as it relates to DHS activity that was initiated during the Obama era. According to Lavinsky's court filing, an investigation into the skull began in 2014, two years after the government launched an inquiry into the store owners who sold Lavinsky the bataar skull. The skull originated from Mongolia, and according to the US government, "under U.S. law, generally, paleontological artifacts of Mongolian origin are considered to be stolen property and vertebrate paleontological artifacts of Chinese origin are considered to be stolen property." The government then said Lavinsky had broken the law by requesting the skull be imported into the U.S., and said it would "initiate legal action to compel the production of and/or seizure and forfeiture of" the item, says the filing. Lavinsky and his legal team argue he did not import the skull, but rather bought it when it was already in the United States. This new suit arose because the government froze Lavinsky's ownership rights over the skull in 2014. In 2017, James Godwin, the owner of the store that sold Lavinsky the skull, sued the government, saying it had gone beyond its statute of limitations in the case of the skull. Per Lavinsky's filing: "The Court found that the Government discovered facts showing Dr. Godwin's Bataar skull existed in the United States and was in Dr. Godwin's possession when it received the July 2012 Production [of records exchanged between Godwin and the government regarding the skull.]" The filing went on to say: "Notably, the Court adopted the 'known or should have known' standard for the running of 5-year statute of limitations under 19 U.S.C. § 1621 for civil forfeiture claims... The Government failed to timely file its request for forfeiture." Despite this ruling, Lavinsky's ownership rights remain in question. He says he wants to donate the skull to Wyoming Dinosaur Center & Dig Sites in Thermopolis, but is unable to do so because he worries that if he tried to donate the skull the government would seize it. Robert Lavinsky's Filing states: "Plaintiff Dr. Robert M. Lavinsky requests that the Court declare that the Government is barred by the statute of limitations to pursue any forfeiture claims of Dr. Lavinsky's Bataar Skull and declare that Dr. Lavinsky has unencumbered ownership and clear title of the Bataar Skull, and for all such other and further relief, at law and in equity, to which he must be justly entitled." Lavinsky has requested a declaratory injunction from the government, for them to state that he is the owner of the skull so that he can donate it to the center in Wyoming. Related Articles Fossil Discovery in Colorado Reveals New Details About Dinosaur MatingHow Dinosaurs Could Help Us Fight CancerDire Wolf 'Back From Extinction'-Could Woolly Mammoths, Dinosaurs Be Next?Dinosaurs: Groundbreaking Revelation Settles 30-Year-Old Debate 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Branding Palestine Action terrorists ‘completely ludicrous', say supporters
Supporters of Palestine Action have described the Government's intention to brand the group as terrorists 'completely ludicrous' and said ministers are 'desperate to stifle free speech'. Hundreds gathered outside the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday where Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, is asking the High Court to temporarily block the Government from proscribing the group as a terrorist organisation. Among the fluttering flags of green, black, white and red were demonstrators holding signs saying 'Free Palestine' and 'We are all Palestine Action'. Others masked themselves in sunglasses and a keffiyeh while speakers took turns to address the crowd through a PA system. Sara, who was standing on the edge of the crowd, said many of the supporters present were carrying 'a lot of rage and anger' about the violence in Gaza. She said: 'We think that the British Government needs to stop funding the genocidal regime in Palestine against Palestinians. 'They need to listen to protest groups instead of this massive overreach which is trying to stifle legitimate resistance and protest against one of the most horrific instances of violence against humanity in our time.' One woman, who preferred not to be named, stood in the shade next to a pile of pink boxes containing cupcakes decorated with Palestinian flags. She said she was raising money to send to a friend in Gaza because the price of basic food there has become so high. Speaking outside court, she said: 'I think it's completely ludicrous that the Government is, rather than stopping supporting a genocide that is happening, they would rather criminalise people who are trying to stop it on the Government's behalf, seeing as though they are not doing anything. 'They have a legal obligation under the Genocide Convention to do all they can to prevent genocide. And they are choosing to, rather than follow their obligations, remain an active participant in this genocide. 'So civilians of conscience have decided to take up the mantle instead and do what they can.' David Cannon, chairman of the Jewish Network for Palestine, stood wearing a sunhat and bore on his shoulder a white banner adorned with a Palestine flag and the name of his organisation. His Jewish upbringing made him proud of Israel, he said, until he realised that the conflict in Gaza has been a 'slow-burn genocide for the last 80 years'. He said: 'Israel is founded on stolen land and stolen lives. It has not only stolen Palestinian land and lives, it has also stolen the identity of Jewish religion. 'So it's vital that there is a Jewish voice saying there is nothing Jewish about apartheid, nothing Jewish about ethnic cleansing, nothing Jewish about genocide. 'The (UK) Government are desperate to stifle free speech which is trying to point out the truth. It's a desperate action and it may well backfire.' Not every protester outside the court building was there in support of Palestine Action. A small group stood across the street, next to several police officers, holding up a blue and white banner that said 'there is no genocide in Gaza'. Mark Birbeck, from the pro-Israel group, called Our Fight, said they do not support the aims of Palestine Action but neither do they support them becoming a proscribed terrorist organisation. Speaking on the street, he said: 'We don't actually support proscribing Palestine Action. 'We don't think they are a terrorist organisation, and in fact our argument is that it makes a mockery of what terrorism is. 'It's bizarre that (the Government) is presenting this as some kind of aggressive step. 'My suspicion is that Palestine Action are going to run rings around them. 'These people know what they are doing. 'I don't agree with them, I don't agree with their politics, but they've been doing this for years. 'Our argument against Palestine Action though is not that they are terrorists, but what we do believe they are doing is trying to claim the moral high ground and effectively they are doing that to isolate Israel.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK launches neighbourhood health service to improve NHS access
The UK Government has unveiled a new neighbourhood health service aimed at enhancing access to the National Health Service (NHS) and shifting care from hospitals to local communities. This initiative is part of the government's Plan for Change, which seeks to improve patient care. The new health centres will offer a comprehensive range of services and be staffed by multidisciplinary teams, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, social care workers, and other health professionals. Community health workers and volunteers will also be integral to these teams, with innovative community outreach programmes planned to identify early signs of illness. While launching the government's 10-Year Health Plan, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer highlighted the importance of moving care from hospitals to the community as one of three critical changes needed to revitalise the NHS. The plan also focuses on moving from analogue to digital systems and prioritising prevention over sickness treatment. Starmer said: 'Our 10-Year Health Plan will fundamentally rewire and future-proof our NHS so that it puts care on people's doorsteps, harnesses game-changing tech and prevents illness in the first place.' The new health centres, which will eventually operate 12 hours a day, six days a week, aim to bring services traditionally based in hospitals, such as diagnostics and post-operative care, into the community. In addition, they will provide support services, such as debt advice and employment support. To support this transformation, the government will train several general practitioners (GPs). This is expected to end the 8am rush for appointments and make GP services more accessible. Digital advancements are a cornerstone of the government's plan, with AI scribes set to eliminate the need for manual clinical notetaking and data entry. New tools will be launched to support GPs, and digital telephony will ensure calls to GP practices are answered promptly. Dental care is also a focus of the plan, with dental care professionals becoming part of neighbourhood teams. New requirements for newly qualified dentists to practise in the NHS for at least three years are intended to improve access to dental services. The 10-Year Health Plan outlines a future where the majority of outpatient care will take place outside of hospitals by 2035. "UK launches neighbourhood health service to improve NHS access" was originally created and published by Hospital Management, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
