INSIDE MEDIA: Rick Astley passes 1 billion streams on Spotify
Rick Astley passes 1 billion
If you've ever been 'Rickrolled' (and who of us hasn't), you might be interested to know the song behind the prank has reached 1 billion streams on Spotify.
Never Gonna Give You Up was released in 1987 by renowned hitmakers Stock Aitken Waterman and was a number 1 hit in the UK, US and here in Australia.
Around 2007, the song became something of a phenomenon when people started sending prank links to it on YouTube.
A user would be told the link was for one thing, but ended up being 'Rickrolled', or taken to the song.
There's no doubt the prank helped the song stay fresh in the minds of people, leading consumers to search for the song on Spotify, which eventually led to the 1 billion streams.
'So who would have believed, after all these years, Never Gonna Give You Up has had a billion streams on Spotify' Astley posted on his official TikTok account.
'How amazing. Thank you for listening and lots of love and I'll see you all soon, I hope.'
What an amazing achievement.
You can see his message in the video player above and, no, it won't take you to the song – I promise!
Let the spin begin
It's always funny when a company tries to discredit a story by trying to change the narrative.
That's just what happened in regard to my exclusive story last week about I'm A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here! facing major budget cuts and its plan to pre-record for the 2026 series.
On Wednesday, Pedestrian published a hit job on my reporting without attributing the original article and without including the writer's byline. Instead, it credited pedestrian.tv.
The PR fluff piece had obviously been given to the outlet by Channel 10, who did not want to officially confirm my reporting, but rather change the narrative.
According to the gushing story, the change from live to pre-recording has nothing to do with budget cuts (heaven forbid), but more to do with the availability of big names who do not want to do the show live.
As per the article:
'This change is massive,' one network insider spilled to PEDESTRIAN.TV. 'Live TV has always been the dealbreaker for certain 'celebs.'
Now that it's pre-recorded, a whole bunch of big names who used to say 'nah' are suddenly very interested.'
It continues:
Basically, removing the live element means 'celebs' don't have to stress about getting cancelled in real time and producers can flex a bit more control over the chaos.
Think better editing, bigger stunts, and (hopefully) fewer awkward silences when someone gets booted.
But then comes the big one, squarely taking aim at my reporting this change was made for budgetary reasons:
And before anyone starts screaming 'budget cuts!', our sources are insisting this has nothing to do with Network Ten's upcoming Big Brother reboot stealing all the coins.
'If anything, this frees up resources to chase even bigger names,' the insider said.
'Think, international guests and proper A-listers, not just someone who got kicked off The Bachelor six years ago.'
Why, then, did Channel 10 pre-record the finale this year, shooting three different versions and sending the entire production team home early?
Obviously, that had nothing to do with budget!
I can't wait to see Tom Cruise, Scarlett Johansson and other top tier talent take to the jungle in the next season, rather than a tragic bunch of nobodies.
If 10 wants to change the narrative, then why not go on the record, confirm my reporting (which is correct) and make an official statement, rather than leaking to an outlet.
At least we know they've already confirmed that McKnight was right!
Media Watch hits out at Today
It was interesting watching the hit job done by the ABC's Media Watch on Monday night against Channel 9's Today Show.
The publicly funded broadcaster took issue with the fact the breakfast show dared into a commercial deal with UAE.
Host Linton Besser wasn't happy with the show showing the positive tourist attractions of the country, rather than focusing on the negatives.
'The UAE is a repressive nation-state governed by an absolute monarchy whose arbitrary and fickle approach to justice and the law can create frightening risks for those who move there for work, like 28-year-old Emirates Airlines flight attendant Tori Towey, an Irish citizen who in June last year was strip searched and charged with attempting suicide after fleeing domestic violence' Besser said.
All of that is true.
But even though Besser declared Today had failed in 'spectacular fashion' in journalistic terms, he did have to acknowledge Nine did not hide anything from viewers.
'Despite the entire outside broadcast being funded by UAE government-backed businesses, which Nine did disclose, a spokesman for the media company told us the 'event TV' project had not been vetted by the foreign government'.
OK, so what exactly is the problem here?
Breakfast shows have always been a mix of news and entertainment.
Sunrise certainly turned the format on its head in the 2000s when it introduced 'newstainsment' and became the number one breakfast show – a position which is still in place today.
Commercial arrangements are a part of breakfast TV and there is no issue as long as those deals are made clear to the audience.
Media Watch did not challenge Nine's position that the deal with UAE was disclosed.
Nine and Today have never been shy about reporting on the atrocities that have taken place in the region and I don't believe this short-term deal will change that.
So, Media Watch – which does not rely on commercial deals thanks to the $1.1 billion of government funding the ABC receives each year from taxpayers – thinks the show should have refused the money or done a big expose.
Let's live in the real world.
Commercial broadcasters are doing it tough and deals like this help them to survive.
If a big story about the UAE had broken and the Today Show hadn't covered it, then Media Watch should rightly call them out.
But that didn't happen.
Instead, what we have here is an elitist attitude from a government-funded entity that doesn't rely on revenue to survive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
37 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
'Magic': The $5 Bunnings item Australians just can't get enough of
A US based cleaning expert has detailed a new hack to clean her trainers, and it is found in the aisles of a titan of Australian retail. Caroline Solomon shares cleaning content to her social media channels, including a thread of videos that have show her trying to clean dirty trainers. A But there is one video that she has posted which has led to a popular product sold in Australia repurposed as a cleaner for dirty trainers. 'I'm sharing two easy ways to make your white leather sneakers look brand new again,' Caroline said at the start of the video that she posted to her TikTok. 'The first thing you need of course is a Magic Eraser,' she told her followers on the video sharing sight. In Australia, the item in question is sold as a Mr Clean Eraser pad for $4.98, or a four pack which sells for $7.49. Caroline explained the method to clean dirty white sneakers with the Magic Eraser, starting by first running the melamine sponge under water to get it 'damp, but not soaked'. Then, she demonstrated gently scrubbing the foam block along both 'the sneaker and the rubber sole of the shoe'. The result? Instantly refreshed looking sneakers. Commentators were quick to praise the self-styled home guru. 'This worked for me,' read one reply. Another read 'I cut mine in half to get more use out of them that way! They get worn faster when wet so I also only wet half of sponge.' On the Bunnings website, the Mr Clean Eraser Pod Block has a 4.9 stars rating, with many reviews raving about how it 'works great' to remove scuffs and marks from walls and floors. However, none of the reviews made mention of its bonus use to clean up dirty sneakers.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Reality behind ‘insane' op shop trend
OPINION Every week, it seems like someone new has posted a TikTok or Reddit rant about a 'wildly overpriced' op shop item – an $80 jumper, a $50 platter, a $300 dress – and it instantly blows up. The general consensus is that charity shops are meant to be cheap, and this feels like a betrayal. Given the cost-of-living crunch, I get why people are fired up. But here's the thing. As someone who's been turning to op shops for as long as I can remember to help keep my insatiable shopping habit in check, I have to say, I don't actually see the issue. Not only is the outrage often misdirected, but the story behind the expensive price tags is often much more nuanced than TikTok wants it to be. And frankly, if we're going to talk about op shop prices in 2025, let's do it with some facts. Here's why I'm standing in defence of 'expensive' items in charity shops. 1. The issue has been massively overblown The idea that op shop prices are spiralling out of control is just a huge misrepresentation. There are currently 3000 op shops in Australia, selling 160 million household and clothing items per year at an average price of $5.81 per item. Yes, $5.81. This average includes clothes, toys, books, furniture and homewares … so, no, the average price has not gone up, and there are millions of very low-priced products available. In other words, the vast majority of items are genuinely affordable for everyday Aussies, and offer a decent cost-of-living relief. According to Charitable Reuse Australia, a national network of charitable reuse enterprises, shopping second-hand saves Australians $2 billion a year. Drilling down by state, where there are government-funded studies, shopping second-hand saves the NSW community a whopping $432 million in cost-of-living relief a year, with an average item price of $5.33 across 107 million items resold locally. In Tasmania, shopping second-hand saves the community $147 million in cost-of-living relief, with an average price of $4.91 across 13 million items resold locally. In South Australia, the savings range from $147 million to $432 million. 2. Shopping second-hand is still the more sustainable option By aligning quality and prices with current retail trends, op shops discourage mindless consumerism and fast fashion. 'Charity Shops will assess and sell suitable items,' Omer Soker, CEO of Charitable Reuse Australia told 'Staff and volunteers will price them accordingly to what they feel is a fair price, and saleable to Australian consumers. 'Charity shops can't resell lower-quality items that aren't designed to last as they don't have the quality or durability for people to want them. A durable second-hand item in a charity shop will last much longer than a cheap new one of inferior quality, so it gets worn again and again, providing better value and sustainability over time.' According to the organisation's National Reuse Impact Report 2025, 190,000 tonnes of waste were diverted from landfill to reuse, and op shops saved 1.4 million tonnes of CO2 emissions per year. 3. There is a market for higher-priced items, and it all goes to a good cause Of course, thrifting has become increasingly trendy over the years, thanks to the renewed movement towards sustainability and slow fashion, as well as the influence of social media platforms like Pinterest and TikTok. Because of this, some op shops in certain areas will sell items for $100 to $200, or even $300 or above for designer pieces. According to a spokesperson for St Vincent de Paul Society, Vinnies stores are 'stocked and priced according to location and demographic'. For example, city stores will stock differently from regional centres. 'There are also boutique-style vintage stores in the suburbs where they resonate with style-conscious consumers,' they added. And it's important to remember that these pricier items are still a huge bargain when you consider the value the item is worth. The other day, I was visiting one of my favourite local op shops, Op for Change in Manly, and I came across a $290 dress, which I initially baulked at. However, after a quick Google Reverse Search, I found that the Agua dress retailed for $1143, which was a 75 per cent markdown. Another dress from the brand Alexis was priced at $240, but retailed for $1288, an 80 per cent reduction. This is objectively good value, and although these sorts of items 'may not be within budget for every customer,' as the Vinnies spokesperson notes, they do cater to the large number of higher-income buyers who enjoy and value shopping second-hand. Interestingly, when these media reports come out about expensive items, op shops say they actually sell them almost straight away because there are many buyers eager to snap up these bargains. 'Op shop buyers are happy to pay a high price for a preloved item that would have cost them in the thousands, especially when they know the proceeds go towards social good,' Mr Soker explains. 'Most importantly, selling items at fair prices to buyers that want them has a social impact in helping those in need, and op shops raise $1 billion every year and generate a net profit of $180 million for social welfare programs across the country.' The Vinnies spokesperson explains: 'Your purchase could be used to help people experiencing homelessness, women escaping domestic and family violence, or families who are struggling to put food on the table. 'Every purchase should be considered a donation.' On the other side, donors also want to see charity shops receive a fair price for their high-quality or designer items, and will stop donating these items if they are sold too cheaply. 'For example, someone who has generously donated a designer handbag would expect that we would price that bag at a higher value in order to raise more funds for charity,' the Vinnies spokesperson pointed out. Mr Soker says charity shops have noticed that when donors return to see how much their preloved designer items are selling for, they are often disappointed to see that the prices charged are lower than they would have expected. 4. Initiatives are in place to help lower-income shoppers While these higher priced items still make up a small minority of items for sale, and most items are considered affordable – those who are doing it tough can always access initiatives at op shops to help them shop. 'There are often people who turn to our shops who are facing financial constraints or disadvantage,' the spokesperson said. 'We will provide people in need with vouchers to go into our shops and have dignity to shop like any other customer. For anyone who requires further assistance, the St Vincent de Paul Society has Vinnies Support Centres (VSC) across Australia.' 5. Who really benefits from complaining about high prices? While there might be a lot of outrage online about op-shop prices these days, it's important to think about who might actually be behind these sorts of posts. There's a trend for 'resellers' to go around to different op shops and buy in bulk at low prices, to then resell with higher prices on platforms like Depop, Facebook Marketplace, car boot sales and clothing markets. Resellers represent a large proportion of op shop buyers, so it makes sense that they have a commercial interest in driving down prices at op shops for their own personal gain. It's also worth noting that not many people complain about the high prices on resell platforms, even though a lot of their stock is originally bought from an op shop. If thrift shoppers were to see something for $300 on Depop (which is not uncommon), they might automatically assume it's a high-value item. Whereas if the same thing was seen at an op shop, that same person might take a video for TikTok, labelling it a 'rip off' – despite it being the exact same thing. 6. Running a op shop comes at a cost There is a misconception that running op shops is free or low-cost, because items are donated. But like any organisation, op shops also have budgets from an organisational perspective that link back to planning, resourcing, priorities and sustainability. They are also privy to the commercial realities of running a brick-and-mortar store, which means leases, utilities, sorting facilities, and recycling costs. So, before we rush to call out that hundred-dollar dress, let's try and think about who is really losing when we expect charity shops to sell everything, even designer items, for next to nothing.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Should we punish politicians like Mark Latham?
With the Independent NSW MP Mark Latham in the headlines once again facing unsavoury allegations, Jez and Bev talk about the boundaries of acceptable behaviour of our politicians. Would you like to know if the music you're listening to has been AI-generated? Boasting a million listens on Spotify, AI-generated band The Velvet Sundown, people are questioning the ethics of AI-generated music and the real people who are using bots to game the system. Jeremy Fernandez and Beverley Wang chat about the stories you're obsessed with, the stuff you've missed and the things that matter. Filling in while Julia Baird is away is Beverley Wang, ABC's National Culture correspondent, co-host of Stop Everything and Life Matters on Radio National. Episodes drop every Wednesday afternoon. We want to hear from you! Join the conversation and email the show at notstupid@
