
As Trump courts a more assertive Beijing, China hawks are losing out
Last week, the Trump administration did just that, as it allowed the world's leader in AI chips, U.S.-based Nvidia, to begin selling a lower-level but still coveted chip known as H20 to China.
The move was a dramatic reversal from three months ago, when U.S. President Donald Trump banned China from accessing the H20, while also imposing triple-digit tariffs on Beijing. That set off an economically perilous trade clash, as China retaliated by clamping down on exports of minerals and magnets that are critical to American factories, including automakers and defense manufacturers.
China's decision to cut off access to those materials upended the dynamic between the world's largest economies. The Trump administration, which came into office determined to bully China into changing its trade behavior with punishing tariffs, appeared to realize the perils of that approach. Now, the administration has resorted to trying to woo China instead.
Officials throughout the government say the Trump administration is putting more aggressive actions on China on hold, while pushing forward with moves that the Chinese will perceive positively. That includes the reversal on the H20 chip.
The H20 decision was primarily motivated by top Trump officials who agreed with Nvidia's arguments that selling the chip would be better for American technology leadership than withholding it, people familiar with the move say.
But Trump officials have also claimed that it was part of the trade talks. After telling Congress in June that there was "no quid pro quo in terms of chips for rare earths,' Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, reversed those comments on July 15, saying that the H20 move was "all part of a mosaic' of talks with China. "They had things we wanted, we had things they wanted, and we're in a very good place,' he said.
A Chinese Ministry of Commerce official seemed to reject that Friday, saying that the United States had "taken the initiative' to approve the H20 sales. China believes the U.S. should continue to remove its trade and economic restrictions, the official said.
U.S. President Donald Trump, hosting a digital assets summit, is joined by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick (left), Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (second left) and crypto and AI czar David Sacks (right) at the White House in Washington on March 7. |
Haiyun Jiang / The New York Times
A person familiar with the talks, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said that the H20 chip was not specifically discussed in meetings between Chinese and U.S. officials in Geneva and London this spring. But the reversal was part of a more recent cadence of warmer actions the United States and China have taken toward each other. For instance, Beijing agreed in recent weeks to block the export of several chemicals used to make fentanyl, an issue Trump has been concerned about.
Recent events have underscored the influence that China has over the U.S. economy. When Trump raised tariffs on Chinese exports in April, some top Trump officials thought Beijing would quickly fold, given its recent economic weakness. Instead, Beijing called Trump's bluff by restricting rare earths needed by American makers of cars, military equipment, medical devices and electronics.
As the flow of those materials stopped, Trump and other officials began receiving calls from CEOs saying their factories would soon shut down. Ford, Suzuki and other companies shuttered factories because of the lack of supply.
Trump and his top advisers were surprised by the threat that Beijing's countermove posed, people familiar with the matter say. That brought the United States back to the negotiating table this spring to strike a fragile trade truce, which Trump officials are now wary of upsetting. That agreement dropped tariffs from a minimum 145% to 30%, with the Chinese agreeing to allow rare earths to flow as freely as before.
The administration's caution when it comes to China has been amplified by Trump's desire for an invitation to Beijing later this year. The president, who has been feted on other foreign trips, wants to engage in face-to-face trade negotiations with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, has begun recruiting CEOs for a potential delegation, setting off a competition over who will get to ride in Air Force One, according to people familiar with the plans.
Craig Allen, a retired diplomat, said both countries were "clearly preparing for a summit meeting,' adding, "that's bringing forth measures that the other side wants and it's also holding back measures that the other side doesn't want.'
"It's like a dance,' Allen said. "One side makes a move, the other side makes a move to correspond to that.'
The Commerce Department declined to comment. The White House, the Treasury Department and the Office of the United States Trade Representative did not respond to a request for comment.
"The government understands that forcing the world to use foreign competition would only hurt America's economic and national security,' said John Rizzo, a spokesperson for Nvidia.
A Chinese bargaining chip
Opposition to China has fueled bipartisan action for the past decade. Now, Trump's more hawkish supporters are quietly watching as the president remakes the party's China strategy.
Though few are willing to speak out publicly, officials in the Trump administration and in Congress have privately expressed concern that the trade war has given China an opening to finally bring U.S. technology controls onto the negotiating table.
Christopher Padilla, a former export control official in the George W. Bush administration, said the fact that the United States was now negotiating over what were supposed to be security restrictions was "a significant accomplishment for the Chinese.'
A computer processing chip manufactured by Nvidia on display at a conference about artificial intelligence in San Jose, California, on March 19 |
Mike Kai Chen / The New York Times
"They've been after this for decades, and now they've succeeded,' he said. "I assume the Chinese are going to demand more concessions on export controls in return for whatever we want next.'
Trump was the first to harness the power of U.S. export controls, by targeting Chinese tech giant Huawei and putting global restrictions on American technology in his first term. But the Biden administration expanded those rules. Concerned that China's growing AI capacity would advance its military, Biden officials cracked down on exports of Nvidia chips, seeing them as the most effective choke point over Chinese AI capabilities.
Since then, when Chinese officials raised their objections to U.S. technology controls in meetings, U.S. officials had responded by insisting that the measures were national security matters and not up for debate.
But in the meeting in Geneva in May, China finally had a powerful counterargument. Beijing insisted that its minerals and magnets, some of which go to fighter jets, drones and weaponry, were a "dual-use' technology that could be used for the military as well as civilian industries, just like AI and chips. It demanded reciprocity: If the United States wanted a steady flow of rare earths, Washington should also be ready to lessen its technology controls.
It's not clear exactly what the United States agreed to in Geneva: The White House released a joint statement about the meeting, though more detailed text has not been made public. But when the United States put out an unrelated export control announcement the day after the Geneva summit concluded, China responded angrily, saying the statement "undermined the consensus' the countries had reached.
In a notice May 13, the Commerce Department said that using Huawei's AI chips "anywhere in the world' was an export control violation. The notice was directed at other nations considering purchasing Huawei chips, people familiar with the move said, not the Chinese. The announcement appeared to take other parts of the Trump administration by surprise, and within hours, the language in the release was walked back, though no policy changes were made.
Bessent and Jamieson Greer, the trade representative, expressed concerns that such moves could damage trade talks with China, people familiar with the incident said.
China once again clamped down on rare earth exports. Trying to find its own leverage, the United States responded by restricting exports of semiconductor design software, airplane parts and ethane.
The two sides restored their truce in a meeting in London in June. Since then, trade in those products has restarted. But U.S. companies complain that Chinese licenses for rare earth magnets are limited to six months, and that the Chinese government is requesting proprietary information to obtain those shipments.
Beijing has also continued to build out its export controls. On July 15, the day after Nvidia said it would be permitted to sell the H20 in China, Chinese officials announced new restrictions on exports of battery technology.
The United States has been trying to decrease its dependence on China for rare earths, but there is no quick solution. China has a powerful hold over numerous industries, ranging from pharmaceuticals to solar panels to drones.
"The challenge for the Trump administration is, how do they get out of this quagmire?' said Jimmy Goodrich, a senior adviser for technology analysis to the Rand Corp. "It appears some competitive U.S. actions are now at the whims of Beijing, who can now determine the time, place and nature of U.S. tech and trade policy toward China.'
Dealmakers in the White House
The change in the relationship with China has coincided with a separate shift in the administration, in which officials who favor technology controls on China have been sidelined in favor of those who support the tech industry's ambitions to sell abroad.
Lutnick and Marco Rubio, the secretary of state who has long been an ardent China critic, have hewed closely to the position of the president, who is more of a dealmaker than a national security hawk. And hawkish members of the National Security Council have been fired in recent months, after being accused of insufficient loyalty.
U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Group of 20 Summit in Osaka in June 2019. |
Erin Schaff / The New York Times
Their absence has paved the way for officials like David Sacks, the White House AI czar, who has criticized export controls, to push for tech companies to have freer rein. Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, has gone on a lobbying blitz in Washington, pushing politicians to open China for AI chip sales.
Huang has contended that blocking U.S. technology from China has backfired by creating more urgency for China to develop its own technology. He has argued that the Chinese military won't use Nvidia chips, and pushed back against Washington's consensus that China is an adversary, describing it a "competitor' but "not our enemy.'
Others have challenged those assertions, pointing to past research that the Chinese military has placed orders for Nvidia chips. Scientific papers published earlier this year also showed Chinese researchers with ties to military universities and a top nuclear weapons lab using Nvidia chips for general research.
Rizzo, the Nvidia spokesperson, said in a statement that "non-military papers describing new and beneficial ways to use U.S. technology promote America.'
In a letter Friday, John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House Select Committee on China, said the H20 chip had aided the rise of the Chinese AI model DeepSeek and would help China develop AI models to compete with American ones.
These arguments do not appear to have persuaded the president. In an Oval Office meeting with Huang in July, Trump agreed with Nvidia that keeping American chips out of China would only help Huawei, and decided to reverse the H20 ban.
People familiar with Trump's views say he has always viewed export controls more transactionally. In his first term, Trump agreed to roll back U.S. restrictions on ZTE at the urging of Xi. In this term, Trump and his advisers have begun using America's control over AI chips as a source of leverage in negotiations with governments from the Middle East to Asia.
With China, Trump has his own long-standing aspirations. He believes that U.S. businesses have been getting ripped off for decades, and that he can be the one to fix it, particularly if he negotiates directly with Xi. His advisers have begun strategizing toward a more substantial trade negotiation with China focused on market opening, as well as the potential visit this fall.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Today
38 minutes ago
- Japan Today
Hong Kong issues arrest warrants for 19 overseas activists accused of subversion
Images of five activists Simon Cheng, Frances Hui, Joey Siu, Johnny Fok, and Tony Choi are displayed during a press conference to issue arrest warrants in Hong Kong, China December 14, 2023. REUTERS/Tyrone Siu By Jessie Pang Hong Kong's national security police announced arrest warrants for 19 activists based overseas, accusing them of subversion under a stringent national security law, marking the largest such tally yet. They are accused of organising or participating in the "Hong Kong Parliament", a group that authorities in the Asian financial hub say aimed to subvert state power, under the law Beijing imposed in 2020 following months of pro-democracy protests in 2019. The activists are accused of having launched a referendum or run as candidates in the unofficial "Hong Kong Parliament" group, which authorities say aims at achieving self-determination and drafting a "Hong Kong constitution". Police, who said the organisation sought to overthrow the governments of China and Hong Kong by unlawful means, said they are still investigating and further arrests may follow. Among those named are businessman Elmer Yuen, commentator Victor Ho, and activists Johnny Fok and Tony Choi. Four of them are subject to previous arrest warrants, each carrying a bounty of HK$1 million ($127,000). Among the remaining 15, for each of whom police are offering a bounty of HK$200,000 ($25,480), are those said to have organised or run in the election and sworn in as its councillors. None of the accused could be reached for comment. The UK's Foreign and Home Secretaries condemned the move in a joint statement, calling the arrests "another example of transnational repression" and saying it damages Hong Kong's international reputation. "(The UK) will not tolerate attempts by foreign governments to coerce, intimidate, harass or harm their critics overseas," it said in a statement on Friday. In response, the Chinese embassy in the UK said the British government's remarks "constitute a gross interference" in China's internal affairs and the rule of law in Hong Kong. "China urges the UK to abandon its colonial mentality, stop interfering in Hong Kong shielding criminals," it said. The former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997 with the guarantee of a high degree of autonomy, including freedom of speech, under a "one country, two systems" formula. Critics of the national security law say authorities are using it to stifle dissent. Chinese and Hong Kong officials have repeatedly said the law was vital to restore stability after the city was rocked for months by sometimes violent anti-government and anti-China protests in 2019. Police reiterated that national security offenses were serious crimes with extraterritorial reach and urged the wanted individuals to return to Hong Kong and surrender. "If offenders voluntarily give up continuing to violate the crime, turn themselves in, truthfully confess their crimes, or provide key information that helps solve other cases, they may be eligible for reduced punishment," they said in a statement. Police also warned that aiding, abetting, or funding others to participate in the "Hong Kong Parliament" could be a criminal offense. © (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.


NHK
38 minutes ago
- NHK
At least 19 subcontractors say they are unpaid for Expo pavilion construction
NHK has learned that at least 19 subcontractors that participated in building foreign pavilions at the 2025 World Expo in Osaka are saying they have not been paid for their work. The subcontractors claim the companies that commissioned the work failed to meet the deadline to pay them. NHK found the subcontractors engaged in constructing pavilions for seven countries -- the United States, Angola, Serbia, China, Germany, Malta, and Romania. In some cases, first-tier subcontractors claimed the primary contractors did not pay them. In other cases, the first-tier subcontractors were also unable to pay their second-tier subcontractors, causing a "chain of non-payment." The alleged non-payments range from about 1 million yen to 120 million yen, or about 6,800 dollars to 820,000 dollars, per firm. Some subcontractors said that caused severe problems for their management. Subcontractors say prime contractors cited alleged "breach of contract" and "client dissatisfaction" as reasons for non-payment. The subcontractors also say they were repeatedly told that officials in charge were not in Japan. Multiple companies that commissioned the work told NHK that the allegations are false and there are no outstanding payments. The expo's association, the central government and the Osaka prefectural government are considering launching an investigation into the situation and how to respond. Kusunoki Shigeki, a professor at the University of Tsukuba, said construction works may have been carried out without finalizing contract details amid tight time constraints, due to the effects of rising labor costs. He also said that when the client or prime contractor was an overseas company, gaps in understanding contracts may have occurred, as well as communication difficulties, which could have led to problems. One hundred and fifty-eight countries and regions are taking part in the ongoing expo in western Japan.


Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Ishiba rules out joint document on U.S. tariffs as deal's details trickle out
There is no plan to issue a joint document on the tariff agreement reached between Japan and the United States earlier this week, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has said, even as numerous details about the deal remain unclear. Ishiba made the remark Friday at a meeting among leaders of ruling and opposition parties that was held following the agreement, which included a 15% U.S. "reciprocal tariff" on imports from Japan, cut from the 25% rate announced earlier. Opposition parties criticized the Japanese government for failing to issue a joint statement on the agreement. They also urged the government to compile a supplementary budget plan, citing the need for economic measures to cushion the tariff impact. The meeting was attended by Tetsuo Saito, leader of Komeito, the coalition partner of Ishiba's ruling Liberal Democratic Party, as well as the heads of opposition parties, including Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan chief Yoshihiko Noda. "We achieved an agreement that serves both countries' national interests while protecting what we should protect," Ishiba said at the beginning of the meeting. The opposition parties urged Ishiba to offer more details of the agreement. The U.S. government has not announced a 15% tariff for Japanese vehicles. Ishiba said that the Japanese and the U.S. governments agreed on the rate, but it was a matter of interpretation, according to an attendee at the meeting. On the purchase of 100 Boeing aircraft, the prime minister said that the government took the decision after consulting with Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airways. U.S. President Donald Trump has said that the U.S. side will receive 90% of profits from $550 billion in investments from Japan. He also has said that the U.S. government will examine the execution of the agreement every quarter. Ishiba confirmed that such discussions have taken place and that the Japanese side plans to examine the execution of the deal. Japan's top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazwa, enters the Prime Minister's Office in Tokyo on Thursday. | JIJI However, a document released by the Japanese government on Friday said that the nine-to-one profit-sharing split Trump touted will apply to only a limited set of Japanese investments in the U.S., with the split "based on each side's contribution and risk burden." A fact sheet released by the U.S. side also did not clarify when the new tariffs would go into effect, though Japan's top negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, told reporters Thursday that it would likely be the same time as the deadline Trump had set for a deal. "The 15% 'reciprocal' tariff will likely take effect Aug. 1," Akazawa said, adding that Japan is not currently considering making the deal legally binding by incorporating it into a joint document-type agreement. At the talks with Ishiba, Noda demanded the compilation of a supplementary budget for fiscal 2025, saying that the U.S. vehicle tariff rate for Japan is up sixfold from 2.5%, the rate before the tariff hike. Ishiba said that the impact on the Japanese economy is uncertain without close analysis. He also said that the 15% tariff rate is lower than that for other countries, a relative advantage for Japan. "The difference in interpretations will be a problem," Noda told reporters after the meeting, referring to the lack of a joint document. The sentiment was echoed by Seiji Maehara, co-head of Nippon Ishin no Kai. "The content (of the agreement) is not detailed, and this is very risky," he said. Meanwhile, Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of the Democratic Party for the People, said that his party's early praise of the deal required rethinking. "We want to take back the compliment to the government that we made right after the agreement," he said. Komeito's Saito urged Ishiba to hold a summit with Trump "to avoid a misunderstanding." After the talks, Ishiba stressed that the government will firmly put the agreement into practice — another signal that the prime minister will not be stepping down soon despite growing calls for him to do so. "I felt the prime minister's strong wish to remain in his post," Tamaki said. Over the U.S. tariffs, parliamentary affairs chiefs of the LDP and the CDP agreed to hold a Lower House Budget Committee meeting, possibly on Aug. 4. The populist right-wing party Sanseito, which had a strong showing in the recent Upper House election, was represented at the party leader meeting for the first time. The heads of Reiwa Shinsengumi and the Japanese Communist Party were also present.