Council warns of washed up asbestos on East Auckland beaches
Photo:
Supplied / Auckland Council
Auckland Council is warning that fragments of fibre cement board washing up on beaches in East Auckland contain asbestos.
The council said 5-10cm long pieces of asbestos-containing material (ACM) were found at Glendowie and Karaka Bays.
It said small amounts of ACM were also found further up the Tāmaki River towards Panmure.
The council said warning signs had been put up at affected beaches, and cleanups were underway to remove the material.
Auckland Council's Manager of Environmental Health, Mervyn Chetty, said the risk to the public was low and people did not need to avoid the beaches.
Asbestos-containing material (ACM) was found washed up at beaches in Glendowie, Karaka Bays and up theTāmaki River towards Panmure.
Photo:
Supplied / Auckland Council
But he advised people not to touch the fragments if they did come across them.
"We are asking people to take a common-sense approach and to simply leave ACM alone for the council to collect.
"Dogs and children should also be prevented from picking up the material."
The council said they were continuing to investigate the source of the ACM, but Chetty said it was likely from historic construction waste.
"Unfortunately, waste disposal practices were not always what they are today. The ACM we're finding now is likely to be decades-old construction waste that was dumped near the shoreline, which over time has fragmented and dispersed along beaches due to natural processes like tides and weather."
Inhaling significant amounts of airborne asbestos can lead to respiratory issues, including lung cancer.
But Health New Zealand Medical Officer of Health Dr David Sinclair said the riskiest situation was when dust was generated from ACM being cut or damaged, such as during construction work.
"In outdoor settings such as the affected beaches, we'd expect the level of asbestos dust to be minimal, especially when the material is below the high tide mark and damp.
"However, people should inform Auckland Council if they find ACM so it can be removed, and not disturb the ACM pieces or collect them."
The council said it would continue to inspect and monitor beaches in the East Auckland area to determine the scale of the issue.
It reminded people to responsibly secure and dispose of construction and household waste, to avoid them making their way to waterways and beaches, particularly after storm events.
Anyone with information about the source of the washed-up ACM is asked to report it to healthenforcement@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tauranga City Council turns on tap for non-fluoridated water
Tauranga City Council has set up one of three planned sites for the community to access non-fluoridated water. Photo: RNZ/Rebekah Parsons-King Tauranga City Council has set up one of three planned sites for the community to access non-fluoridated water, even though anti-fluoride campaigners told them last year it would be a waste of time . The council added fluoride to the city's water on 24 October 2024 following an order from the Director-General of Health. At that time, councillors asked staff to investigate options for non-fluoridated water supplies, but it had taken many months to implement. In December, Fluoride Free Tauranga advocate Robert Coe said providing a fluoride-free water supply would now be a waste of time . "The horse has already bolted. Those of us who choose not to drink fluoridated water have already figured out what we have to do," he told elected members at a December council meeting. However, the council continued with the work and the new fluoride-free community tap is at Alice Johnson Oval, off Doncaster Drive near Gordon Spratt Reserve, Pāpāmoa. Two additional non-fluoridated community taps are proposed for Wharepai Domain in the city centre and Waipuna Park in Welcome Bay, pending further water quality sampling. The water at Alice Johnson Oval and the other planned taps was not processed through the city's water treatment plants. Instead, these systems used cartridge filters and UV light to treat the water. No additional fluoride beyond natural background levels would be added. Mayor Mahé Drysdale said he was pleased the people of Tauranga now had access to an alternative water source, after the Director-General of Health gave the green light to install three supply points in the city. "Our council heard concerns from locals about central government's directive to add fluoride, so it's pleasing we're able to offer people more choice," Drysdale said. Nic Johansson, the council's general manager for infrastructure, said residents could collect water from the new community tap in Pāpāmoa using their own clean containers. "While we can't guarantee the quality of the water after it has left the tap, we encourage those who choose this option to handle and store it responsibly," he said. The dates when the two further taps would be ready to use had yet to be confirmed. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Non-fluoridated water flows in Tauranga
Tauranga City Council has set up one of three planned sites for the community to access non-fluoridated water. Photo: RNZ/Rebekah Parsons-King Tauranga City Council has set up one of three planned sites for the community to access non-fluoridated water, even though anti-fluoride campaigners told them last year it would be a waste of time . The council added fluoride to the city's water on 24 October 2024 following an order from the Director-General of Health. At that time, councillors asked staff to investigate options for non-fluoridated water supplies, but it had taken many months to implement. In December, Fluoride Free Tauranga advocate Robert Coe said providing a fluoride-free water supply would now be a waste of time . "The horse has already bolted. Those of us who choose not to drink fluoridated water have already figured out what we have to do," he told elected members at a December council meeting. However, the council continued with the work and the new fluoride-free community tap is at Alice Johnson Oval, off Doncaster Drive near Gordon Spratt Reserve, Pāpāmoa. Two additional non-fluoridated community taps are proposed for Wharepai Domain in the city centre and Waipuna Park in Welcome Bay, pending further water quality sampling. The water at Alice Johnson Oval and the other planned taps was not processed through the city's water treatment plants. Instead, these systems used cartridge filters and UV light to treat the water. No additional fluoride beyond natural background levels would be added. Mayor Mahé Drysdale said he was pleased the people of Tauranga now had access to an alternative water source, after the Director-General of Health gave the green light to install three supply points in the city. "Our council heard concerns from locals about central government's directive to add fluoride, so it's pleasing we're able to offer people more choice," Drysdale said. Nic Johansson, the council's general manager for infrastructure, said residents could collect water from the new community tap in Pāpāmoa using their own clean containers. "While we can't guarantee the quality of the water after it has left the tap, we encourage those who choose this option to handle and store it responsibly," he said. The dates when the two further taps would be ready to use had yet to be confirmed. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to Editor: health, voting, 1080
Today's letters to the editor include a plea to save the Roxburgh Medical Centre, debate around changes to voting, and 1080 in New Zealand. I read with major concern this week that the viability of the Roxburgh Medical Centre is at risk. The report stated that "a significant proportion of the Teviot Valley's rural health funding will be withdrawn from January 2026." How on earth did this happen? I worked as the nurse manager and Prime nurse at the medical centre for many years and know how busy it can be, how vital it is to provide the care needed for the valley. This practice is a one and a-half doctor practice. It serves a wide variety of people, from elderly to young families, orchardists, farmers etc. Don't let anyone tell you "but you can travel to Alexandra for your care." This is totally impractical for a lot of folks, especially the elderly. The practice area goes from Raes Junction to Shingle Creek, including outlying farms. Roxburgh locals, you cannot allow this to happen. You must stand up for what this district deserves. If you lose services you will never get them back. Marg Eckhoff Alexandra It's so right Pete Hodgson has said it well in his letter (31.7.25): the disenfranchised should be heard with their votes. That some do not vote is entirely predictable, despite David Seymour's "drop kick" comments. He is not struggling from day to day to survive in the present climate. His world is "sorted" and there is a totalitarian theme in there somewhere. Likewise our prime minister says he is going to "smash" the gangs. This is Trumpian speech and he really has no idea about managing a group of people who have an immutable sense of belonging and supporting each other. His words show his false sense of status to the detriment of many. The changing of the writing on passports is a similar, dare I say it "racist," move couched in ambiguity and evasion. Aotearoa-New Zealand means a lot more than New Zealand-Aotearoa. The entry of te reo into our vocabulary is to be celebrated as it is establishing our identity as many of us want it to be. Peter Strang Dunedin It's nonsense According to Pete Hodgson's thinking, the electoral changes are voter suppression. Or maybe he is just worried that those affected would most likely vote for the opposition parties but are not capable of enrolling in time. To say it is voter suppression is nonsense. These people have a choice (apart from a few who will have to wait until the next election) to enrol or not. This change is no worse than the election bribe that Labour introduced in 2018 in an attempt to get students on side, and their desire to lower the voting age to allow children to vote. David Tordoff Dunedin What goes around April 1633: Pope Urban VIII bans scientist Galileo Galilei's book Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems on the grounds that it argues that the Earth revolves around the sun. The Pope and the Church hope that this scientific truth will just go away. It doesn't, but it takes 359 years for the Church to acknowledge it was wrong. July 2025: President Trump revokes the scientific declaration on the dangers of greenhouse gases, undermining the United States' work to control emissions. He and his supporters hope that the scientific truth of climate change will go away. Unfortunately, it won't, and unless we do something now there will be no-one around in 359 years' time to point this out. John Drummond Dunedin Shaking one's head at volume of false rhetoric Concerning Tony Vink's remarks (28.7.25) re Israel and its supposed non aggression. I was wondering what planet Mr Vink is from? The sheer volume of the false rhetoric is hard to believe in this day and age. To think there are still people in the world who think like this is beyond my comprehension. Is it any wonder the world is in the mess we are now. Y Palmer West Harbour On the other hand The upshot of Mr Peters' statement, and that of the other foreign ministers, is that it reinforces Hamas' belief that it is winning the war: this is because international opinion is with them, and that they are being recognised (but not for the terrorists they are). The above action by Mr Peters et al, has led to Hamas winding back the latest attempt at ceasefire talks, and Hamas increasing its demands to the point where it was obvious that any agreement was, and is impossible. Israel is being forced to negotiate with Hamas, rather than just deal with them. Hamas has taken this as them being legitimised as a representative of Gaza rather than the cancer that they are. Kevin Rogers Andersons Bay Hunters and all of us should be worried re 1080 After reading the ODT article (26.7.25) "Concern 1080 will lower deer numbers" hunters — indeed the public — should be concerned as the first part of the planned eradication of predators on 6000ha of Stewart Island was only a trial. Two drops of pre-feed to get animals used to feeding on baits were to be followed up by two drops of toxic bait, the first which has been carried out the second yet to come. The use of deer repellent is no guarantee. For that matter where is the guarantee that deer repellent, if it works, was actually used? Besides, how effective is deer repellent? Deaths of white-tail deer after the trial run raise that question. The poison is not authorised to be used on deer, yet in 1980-81 a formal study on the impact of 1080 on white-tail deer occurred on Stewart Island where a gel formulation containing 1080 poison was applied to broadleaf leaves for the control of white-tail deer, the end results being "this method was found to be very efficient at substantially reducing deer numbers". Although 1080 is not used to target deer, DOC seem more than happy: it does reduce deer numbers dramatically. Besides 1080 is an indiscriminate poison which also kills deer, birds and insects, i.e. any creature which ingests it. In addition a 1080 killed creature's body remains toxic and lethal to anything that scavenges it. A lot could be learned from the Fiordland Wapiti Foundation's trapping programme to protect blue duck in Fiordland. In some areas this has increased numbers considerably without using poisons. I think the estimated cost of $90 million to poison Stewart Island predators would go a long way to control them. Use of trapping and other ground control methods without poisoning non-target species is far more preferable. Extermination is impossible and I say "control", as making Stewart Island, along with mainland New Zealand, predator-free is impossible. Lewis Hore Oamaru
