
Gakharia Defends Chorchana Checkpoint with Tsulukiani Commission, Alleges ‘Sabotage'
remotely
testified from Germany to the Tsulukiani Commission for the second time on July 2.
Tsulukiani Commission, an investigative body in Georgian Dream's one-party parliament with steadily creeping scope to probe alleged crimes of former officials, resummoned ex-GD Prime Minister and current opposition party leader Gakharia to testify mid-June, two months after his
initial testimony
.
Repeated summons came as Georgian prosecutors
started probing
ex-PM as part of a 'sabotage' investigation over posting a police checkpoint near the Tbilisi-controlled Chorchana village adjacent to the Tskhinvali occupation line in 2019, when he was the interior minister. Gakharia offered to testify online since he was abroad. Tea Tsulukiani, former Justice and Culture Minister who chairs the Commission, initially declined to allow remote participation but ultimately
agreed
.
Gakharia's decision to testify comes in contrast with other opposition leaders, who chose to boycott, citing their rejection of parliament's legitimacy. Seven individuals, including six opposition party leaders, have been
sentenced
to months in jail for defying Commission summonses.
The key issue during the two-and-a-half-hour questioning—marked by bitter exchanges and mutual accusations—was the Chorchana episode.
The Commission had already questioned Gakharia on the matter during his April testimony. At the time, the former Prime Minister faced accusations from Commission members about failing to coordinate the move with other officials, and about the move ultimately backfiring by prompting Tskhinvali to open additional checkpoints and further push the occupation line into Tbilisi-controlled territory.
During the June 2 testimony, Gakharia again defended his 2019 decision, coming just weeks before he was promoted as prime minister. He said establishing the outpost was necessary to ensure that both Georgian representatives and those from the EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) could conduct patrols without obstruction and to 'establish effective control over Georgian territory.'
According to Gakharia, work on the plan began in late 2018 and involved both the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the State Security Service (SSSG). The plan called for the creation of seven checkpoints, with the first installed on August 24, 2019. The EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) was also informed about the plan, Gakharia claimed.
Gakharia noted he became Prime Minister on September 8—two weeks after the installation, by which, against the original plan, Russian forces established checkpoints at the coordinates initially selected by the Georgian side.
'Somehow, surprisingly, Russian Federation checkpoints turned up on the coordinates where Georgian checkpoints were supposed to be,' Gakharia said, implying that Vakhtang Gomelauri, who succeeded him as Interior Minister, and then-State Security Service head Grigol Liluashvili may have undermined the original plan. Gomelauri, who quit his post as Interior Minister late in May, testified to the prosecution two weeks after his resignation over the Chorchana episode. He told the press before his testimony that he was against opening the Chorchana checkpoint in 2019.
'Time will come when a special commission will be established, which will figure out why the completion of the plan that was meant to take full control of this road was obstructed? What did [Vakhtang Gomelauri], who at the time had moved into the Interior Ministry, do to stop this process and not bring the plan to an end, or what [Grigol Liluashvili], appointed at the time at the SSSG or as acting head as a deputy, did when all these points [now Russia-controlled] were supposed to be Georgian checkpoints?' – Gakharia told the Commission. 'At a certain moment, when this transition phase was underway, this plan was sabotaged.'
Gakharia described the failed implementation of the plan as 'the first serious conflict' with the State Security Service leadership, arguing that had the original plan been fully executed, it would have led to the installation of Georgian—not Russian—checkpoints.
Tea Tsulukiani, on the other hand, cited
testimony
from local resident Elguja Kharazishvili as saying that following the checkpoint installation, locals could no longer enter the nearby Tsagvli forest, as the occupying regime had set up its checkpoint inside and seized half of its territory. According to Tsulukiani, there is a 'diametrical' difference between the accounts of the local resident and Gakharia. She demanded that Gakharia answer if his 'uncoordinated and reckless move' caused Georgia to lose its territories.
Gakharia rejected the accusation, calling it 'absolutely unacceptable' to involve local villagers in what he described as a politically motivated prosecution. He defended the construction of the checkpoint, arguing it was necessary due to the Georgian side's lack of effective control over the area—an assessment he said was supported by the State Security Service's
2019 annual report
.
(The 2019 report cited by Gakharia described 'extremely alarming' and 'dangerous' actions by Russian forces, including marking trees and clearing paths to enable 'illegal patrolling' in the forests near Chorchana and Tsagvli. It also stated that the Georgian police checkpoint had been placed roughly 250 meters from the occupation line to respond to ongoing borderization activities.)
Gakharia cited specific incidents of Georgian citizens being 'detained' by occupation forces, including one involving a hunter who, according to Gakharia, was disarmed and sent back to his village with a warning not to return. Tsulukiani challenged the account, saying that the man was 'stopped, disarmed, and released,' accusing Gakharia of lying.
'That's not detention,' she said. 'We will verify your claims, we can't simply take your word for it, no offense.'
Gakharia further defended the checkpoint by noting that the so-called Tskhinvali General Prosecutor's Office opened an investigation into the Chorchana checkpoint in 2019 – mirroring the Georgian prosecution's current probe. 'And what you are doing now here, you are actually giving testimony and strengthening the occupiers' interest,' he told the commission.
The
opening of the police checkpoint
led to a flare-up of tensions in August 2019 with de facto authorities in Tskhinvali, who demanded that the checkpoint be dismantled. This was a rare moment under the Georgian Dream administration when police services overtly resisted the demands from Russia-backed Tskhinvali. Some two weeks after the tensions, the Georgian Dream party endorsed Gakharia as prime minister, and backed him prior to his resignation and move to the opposition in 2021.
Gakharia has since faced repeated attacks and accusations from his former party colleagues, from allegations of substance abuse to linking both his appointment as prime minister and later his resignation to foreign interference. 'There was a call from the 'Deep State' and his appointment as prime minister followed,' GD Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze
recalled
on June 18, claiming that certain 'compromise steps' were taken at the time, which GD no longer tolerates.
Georgian Dream officials have repeatedly invoked the 'deep state' conspiracy theory to allege Western interference in Georgian politics, including claims that the West is attempting to drag Georgia into a war with Russia.
Also Read:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Civil.ge
9 hours ago
- Civil.ge
Ex-Defense Ministry Officials, Ex-Minister's Relative Arrested on Embezzlement Charges
The State Security Service of Georgia (SSSG) arrested former Deputy Defense Minister Giorgi Khaindrava, the former head of the Defense Ministry's procurement department, and a relative of ex-Defense Minister Juansher Burchuladze on charges of embezzling a large sum of money from the ministry. The arrests come amid a series of prosecutions and controversies involving former Georgian Dream officials and business associates, as the ruling party intensifies its anti-corruption rhetoric, while critics point to possible internal power struggles and waves of retribution. According to the SSSG, a coordinated group executed a criminal scheme in 2023 that resulted in the embezzlement of GEL 1,333,728 (approximately USD 500,000) from the state budget. 'The group conducted the procurement of medical equipment without actually carrying out real market research,' Emzar Gagnidze, head of the SSSG's Anti-Corruption Agency, stated during the July 27 briefing . The SSSG stated that the group ensured only 'interconnected' companies 'closely linked' to Burchuladze's relative were allowed to participate in the procurement process, which was deliberately structured to inflate the price of medical equipment through sham transactions involving private firms and same-day tax documentation. 'As a result, the Georgian Defense Ministry carried out the procurement of medical equipment at a price significantly above market value,' Gagnidze said. He highlighted an 'important circumstance,' noting that the then-defense minister's close relative had assured the pre-selected companies of a 'guaranteed win,' citing his connections to 'relevant officials.' The detained individuals now face 7 to 11 years in prison on charges of large-scale embezzlement committed by a group in prior agreement and through abuse of official position, under Articles 182 (2-a,d) and 182 (3-b) of the Criminal Code of Georgia. Although former Defense Minister Juansher Burchuladze was not directly named, the alleged crime took place during his tenure, which lasted from 2021 to 2024. In February 2024, shortly after Burchuladze's resignation, Mtavari Arkhi channel reported that the SSSG had begun questioning his deputy, Giorgi Khaindrava, and Vladimer Ghudushari, head of the procurement department, both of whose initials match those mentioned in the SSSG's July 27 briefing. While independent corruption watchdogs have long highlighted suspected corruption in state agencies—often involving preferential procurement schemes—the Georgian Dream government has stepped up its crackdown on alleged corruption cases only in recent months. In June, SSSG also arrested ex-Deputy Economy Minister Romeo Mikautadze on corruption-related charges. The crackdown also involves legislative moves, including a bill pending in the Georgian Dream parliament, which foresees radical measures against those convicted of financial crimes. Also Read:


OC Media
3 days ago
- OC Media
Georgia denies entry to person with no gender marker in passport, accuses them of ‘falsifying' ID
Sign in or or Become a member to unlock the audio version of this article Join the voices Aliyev wants to silence. For over eight years, OC Media has worked with fearless journalists from Azerbaijan — some of whom now face decades behind bars — to bring you the stories the regime is afraid will get out. Help us fuel Aliyev's fears — become an OC Media member today Become a member A German citizen holding a passport without a gender marker has been denied entry into Georgia for allegedly 'falsifying' their identification and failing to provide other information. Lian von Salzen was travelling from Trabzon, Turkey, intending to cross the Turkish–Georgian land border on Sunday before continuing on to Batumi, Georgia. While they passed through the Turkish border smoothly, they were held up at the Georgian border after handing over their passport to the border official. 'He looked at it for a long time and then he went to his colleague and they were kind of chuckling a bit, laughing', von Salzen told OC Media. 'I realised then that something was wrong with the passport'. As of 1 November 2024, German citizens have been able to more easily change official records to alter their names and genders, or to have their gender marker removed altogether. When von Salzen applied for a new passport prior to travelling, they requested this option — instead of an M or F in their passport, the sex is marked by an X. The border official then asked von Salzen a series of questions regarding where they would be staying while in Georgia, including the full name and phone number of the person they would be staying with. Von Salzen then was faced with a series of officials asking questions before they were eventually handed a paper which said they were being rejected entry into Georgia for the following reasons: Advertisement The person has no travel/health insurance or sufficient funds for residing in Georgia or returning back The person has not provided information or provided false information about 'his/her identity' and purpose of travel When the border officials asked von Salzen to sign the document, they refused as they did not fully understand what was happening due to the language barriers or agree with the reasoning provided. 'They never asked for my health insurance or any bank account', von Salzen said, noting that they tried to show them that they did indeed have the required insurance and funds. 'I feel like it was maybe just an excuse', they said. As for the second reason listed — the falsification of identity — von Salzen believes it was due to the X marker in their passport. However, they noted that they were never asked a question about gender, so 'it wasn't explicit'. After repeating that what was listed on the document was not true, a border official came up to von Salzen and escorted them away. While von Salzen at first thought they were being taken to an interrogation room where they could sort everything out, they were instead taken back to the Turkish border. Von Salzen now plans to appeal the decision, especially after their host back in Turkey emphasised that it could be viewed as a political decision. 'I'm not going to Georgia anymore, but maybe if I speak up, something can be done in the future for other people', they said. According to lawyer Nika Simonishvili, any refusals regarding entry to Georgia must be based on specific circumstances and evidence — however, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Georgian legal system have given the border police 'broad powers', leading to cases of unjustified refusal and abuse of rights. In this case, Simonishvili emphasised to OC Media, the X gender marker cannot be considered incorrect or false information, especially when it is allowed by the legislation of another country and the border police have the ability to identify the person in question. 'Thus, the decision to ban border crossing for this reason cannot be considered legally justified by any criteria and can be viewed only in a political context, as a continuation of [the ruling Georgian Dream party's] anti-LGBT policy', Simonishvili said. OC Media has reached out to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but has not received a response as of publication. The International Civil Aviation Organisation, which sets the global standards for machine-readable passports, has allowed an X designation since the Second World War, though this was for circumstances where the sex was 'unknown' due to the lack of face-to-face issuance of documents. The first person to use the X marker in order to be recognised as neither male nor female was intersex Australian Alex MacFarlane — today, seven countries in Europe, including Germany, as well as Canada, the US, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Australia, and New Zealand offer option X to passport holders.


Civil.ge
3 days ago
- Civil.ge
17 Detained During Eviction Operation in Tbilisi's Africa Settlement
17 people, including residents and activists who came to support them, were detained by the end of July 24 in Tbilisi's Africa settlement, where dozens of families had been evicted throughout the day. All were charged with administrative offenses for disobeying police orders. Under amended legislation , the offense is punishable by a fine ranging from GEL 2,000 (about USD 740) to GEL 5,000 (about USD 1,845), or by up to 60 days of imprisonment. Tensions flared on Tvalchrelidze Street, where the National Enforcement Bureau carried out evictions from a building it described as unsafe, privately owned, and illegally occupied. The eviction, which took place amid a large police deployment, reportedly affected more than 100 families according to unofficial estimates, and continued until midnight. Heavy machinery was later deployed to demolish the buildings. Dramatic images emerged from the scene, showing confrontation, arguments, and families, including children, sitting with their furniture and belongings and watching the eviction process from outside in desperation. Officials claimed only 39 families lived in the building permanently, while others started renovating to claim compensation. Authorities and pro-government media outlets said residents had been offered assistance. Among those evicted were reportedly dozens of internally displaced persons (IDPs). Residents, however, said more families were affected, and many had nowhere else to go, accusing officials and ruling Georgian Dream mouthpieces of spreading false information, including about the assistance they were offered. One resident accused pro-GD broadcasters Imedi and Rustavi 2 of offering money to others in exchange for recording a prewritten statement claiming they had been treated fairly. The Social Justice Center, a local human rights watchdog, criticized what it described as the state's 'anti-social policy,' saying that 'while the state must protect public safety, human life and health, and the interests of private owners, it should not violate the dignity and other rights of families through harsh eviction practices or by leaving them without shelter.' The group stressed that 'a fair balance between private and public interests must be ensured,' saying the authorities failed to uphold this standard by favoring the building owner and 'failing to guarantee the rights and interests of hundreds of socially protected persons on the ground.' The organization highlighted human rights violations during the eviction, calling the lack of alternative housing for displaced families the 'most acute problem.' It also raised concerns about the eviction's conduct, citing forced removals and police violence. Also Read: