EHRC issues interim guidance on single-sex spaces
Last week the Supreme Court found the terms "woman" and "sex" in the 2010 Equality Act "refer to a biological woman and biological sex".This means, for instance, that transgender women, who are biologically male but identify as women, can be excluded from women-only spaces.As part of the judgement, Supreme Court judge Lord Hodge stressed that the law still gives protection against discrimination to transgender people.The EHRC - which enforces equalities law and provides guidance to policymakers, public sector bodies and businesses - said the impact of the ruling was that "if somebody identifies as trans, they do not change sex for the purposes of the [Equalities] Act, even if they have a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC)".In this respect, the EHRC says, "a trans woman is a biological man" and "a trans man is a biological woman".In schools, it says: "Pupils who identify as trans girls (biological boys) should not be permitted to use the girls' toilet or changing facilities, and pupils who identify as trans boys (biological girls) should not be permitted to use the boys' toilet or changing facilities. Suitable alternative provisions may be required."In associations - groups or clubs with more than 25 members - the EHRC says "a women-only or lesbian-only association should not admit trans women (biological men), and a men-only or gay men-only association should not admit trans men (biological women)".The guidance states that "where facilities are available to both men and women, trans people should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use".Where possible, mixed-sex toilets, washing or changing facilities should be provided in addition to sufficient single-sex facilities, according to the guidance.Alternatively, the guidance says it is possible to have toilet, washing or changing facilities which can be used by all, provided they are "in lockable rooms (not cubicles)" and intended to be used by one person at a time. One such example might be a single toilet in a small business such as a café.The EHRC says the interim guidance, published online on Friday evening, is intended to highlight the main consequences of the Supreme Court judgement. "Employers and other duty-bearers must follow the law and should take appropriate specialist legal advice where necessary," it adds.A two-week consultation to seek views from "affected stakeholders" is expected to be launched in May. The EHRC aims to provide an updated code of practice to the government for ministerial approval by the end of June.A government spokesperson said: "We welcome the ruling and the clarity it brings for women, and service providers."We will review and update policy wherever necessary to ensure it complies with the latest legal requirements."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Newscast The Battle For Car Finance Compensation
Today, a landmark result from the Supreme Court rules that lenders won't have to pay compensation to millions of motorists over car finance loans. The Court determined dealerships weren't duty-bound to act solely in the interests of their customers, overturning a previous judgement that ruled in favour of consumers. It was a long and complex verdict so Adam is joined by political correspondent Helen Catt and Theo Leggett, international business correspondent, to help break it down. And, Global stocks have dropped after President Trump has increased tariffs on more than 90 countries. Canadian PM Mark Carney says he is 'disappointed' that the US tariff on Canada has increased from 25% to 35%. Higher tariffs for Mexico were paused for another 90 days, but Brazil faces a 50% levy. Adam is joined by Dharshini David, deputy economics editor. You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast'. It works on most smart speakers. You can join our Newscast online community here: Get in touch with Newscast by emailing newscast@ or send us a whatsapp on +44 0330 123 9480. New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Adam Fleming. It was made by Jack Maclaren with Gabriel Purcell-Davis and Jada Meosa John. The social producer was Joe Wilkinson. The technical producer was Mike Regaard. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Brazil's Justice Moraes ignores US sanctions, says he will continue doing his job
SAO PAULO, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing a criminal case against an ally of President Donald Trump, told a court session on Friday that he will continue to do his job and "ignore the sanctions" imposed by the United States that effectively block him from the country's wide-reaching financial system. On Wednesday, the U.S. imposed sanctions on Moraes for overseeing the trial of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, accusing the judge of authorizing arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression. Justice Moraes has presided over the criminal case against Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup to overturn Brazil's 2022 presidential election after his supporters violently stormed government buildings following the election victory of leftist Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The U.S. sanctions were accompanied by an executive order imposing a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods, which was also tied to the case Moraes is overseeing against Bolsonaro, an unwavering supporter of the U.S. president. Bolsonaro, a far-right former army captain, and several of his closest allies were charged with plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral loss, in a case that was in many ways similar to accusations against Trump. Moraes said the court would not submit itself to foreign coercion or what he likened to new coup attempts by Bolsonaro's allies. Moraes said the Federal Supreme Court will continue to exercise its role as guardian of the Constitution. "It will continue to exercise its role in criminal proceedings so that it can provide a final answer to all Brazilian society regarding who was truly responsible" for the attempted coup, he said, adding that there will be due process of law with no internal or external interference. Congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, a son of the former president who moved to the U.S. to persuade the White House to intervene in his father's favor, has claimed credit for Trump's policies on Brazil. "This criminal organization's insistence on implementing measures harmful to Brazil, by encouraging the imposition of these tariffs and making spurious and illegal attacks against Brazilian public officials, is aimed at creating a severe economic crisis in the country," he said. "But to the dismay of these traitorous Brazilians, that crisis will not happen." Moraes added that the court would conclude the trial of those accused of attempting a coup d'état before the end of the year.
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar: Don't conflate Sandie Peggie 'racist' comments with point of tribunal
We previously told how Peggie, a nurse, allegedly told colleagues that she 'wanted to post bacon through the letterbox of a mosque' during the ongoing tribunal against NHS Fife. The Scottish Labour leader, who has publicly supported Peggie, told the Daily Record on Thursday that the comments were 'horrific'. Asked by The National if he regretted publicly supporting Peggie now the remarks had come to light, Sarwar insisted that he supported the 'primacy of the Equality Act'. READ MORE: Revealed: The full text of SNP's independence strategy Peggie was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, [[Fife]], on Christmas Eve 2023. Allegations were made during the tribunal regarding Peggie's comments relating to mosques, as well as "racist" jokes she had shared in a work group chat about flooding that killed thousands in Pakistan. Peggie denied the remarks in relation to mosques, but said the joke about the floods were sent in 'dark humour' to friends. Asked if he regretted supporting Peggie (below) following the revelations, Sarwar told The National: 'I think there should not be a conflation on saying that we support the protection of the Equality Act, the primacy of the Equality Act, and the protection of single sex spaces based on biological sex. (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire) 'That is our position and remains our position. At the same time, we have to call out racism or any other form of prejudice, and that's exactly what we have done. 'We think the Scottish Government and NHS boards should be complying with the Equality Act. Should be urgently complying with the Equality Act whilst, and this is not inconsistent, whilst also calling out prejudice.' Pushed on if that meant he didn't regret publicly supporting Peggie, he said: 'I have zero regret in saying that we have to support the Equality Act, the primacy of the Equality Act and protecting single sex spaces based on biological sex. 'And I also continue to call out any form of racism or prejudice, as was demonstrated in those comments that have been attributed.' READ MORE: 43 SNP branches back challenge to John Swinney's independence strategy After Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment, citing concerns about 'patient care', Peggie was placed on special leave. She then lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination, and victimisation. The tribunal has become a flash point for gender-critical campaigners and anti-trans groups, particularly following the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman earlier this year. And now, For Women Scotland, which brought the case against the Scottish Government in relation to the definition of the Equality Act to the Supreme Court, has been granted permission to lodge a written intervention.
