Unsafe luxury apartments in Felixstowe put 'lives at risk'
Steve Wiles, Suffolk County Council's cabinet member for public health and public protection, said the court's decision sent "a clear message"."We will not tolerate developers or property owners who ignore their legal responsibilities and put people's lives at risk," he said.Both Whyman, 54, and the firm were also ordered to pay £15,000 each in legal costs within 12 months by judge David Pugh.They were sentenced after previously pleading guilty to failing to comply with a fire enforcement notice issued by SFRS.
'Deeply regrettable'
Cliff House, previously a hotel, was converted into a six-storey block of 26 apartments in 2017, but the conversion did not meet the required fire safety standards.The court heard how Whyman and the company had repeated opportunities to rectify the issues, but they failed to undertake the necessary work."While we are pleased that justice has been served, it is deeply regrettable that it took this level of enforcement to reach a resolution," added Mr Wiles."Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service has acted with patience and professionalism throughout this lengthy process, always with the safety of residents at the heart of their actions," he added.The enforcement notice remains in force and fire safety deficiencies continue to affect the premises.A fire service spokesperson said: "SFRS remains committed to protecting the public will continue to support residents of Cliff House while monitoring the ongoing safety concerns at the premises."The BBC has contacted Suffolk County Council and SFRS to clarify what the safety issues involve.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
Lucy Letby seen partying at pal's wedding while on bail for murdering seven babies in shock unseen photos
SHOCKING unseen pictures show Lucy Letby partying at a pal's wedding while on bail for murdering seven new-born babies. The images were shared by a friend of Letby, who did not want to be named, as part of a documentary which is due to air tonight. 7 7 7 Lucy Letby was convicted in 2023 of the sickening murder of seven babies and attempted murder of seven others. A friend of the child killer, using the fake name Dawn, siad she was thrilled that Letby could attend her wedding. She was determined that her friend, who she met as a teenager, was innocent and sought special permission from authorities for the killer to attend the wedding while on bail. Dawn remains convinced of her childhood friend's innocence and has stood by Letby despite her horrific crimes. She went on to claim that scribbled notes found in Letby's house weren't any sort of confession as previously suggested. She revealed that both her and Letby trained in peer-support counselling and learned to write down their worst fears and feelings as a method to deal with anxieties. Dawn was working when Letby was handed down a guilty verdict and said she couldn't take the news in. She said: "My assumption when all of this happened was that perhaps she had inadvertently forgotten bits of procedure or she has made some mistakes. "There were those dark moments where I thought perhaps has she inadvertently caused harm because she was so newly qualified in such a high pressure environment and perhaps that's why she was being targeted for these accusations. "Shortly after this she was held in custody, so I don't think she has seen these [photographs]." Lucy Letby cops arrest 3 senior members of leadership team at hospital where killer nurse murdered 7 babies Dawn added: "'I sat there dumbfounded for a while, not really knowing how to process what I was hearing. "I didn't think it was real. I immediately switched to thinking what happens next? This can't be it, she can't just spend the rest of her life in prison. "I'm living a life that Lucy should be living beside me." Between 2015 and 2016 nearly three times as many new-born babies died at the Countess of Chester Hospital, where Letby worked, than normal. 7 7 The killer nurse, 35, was found guilty of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven more, she is currently serving 15 life sentences. Some of the 35-year-old killers colleagues still struggle to accept that Letby committed the crimes. Karen Rees former head of urgent care nursing at the hospital also spoke in the documentary. She said: "I loved working here. "We were all shocked, really shocked, when I look back to when it all started, I don't think any of us thought that this storyline would ride out the way it has." Thinking back, she added: "I was made aware that the mortality rates appeared to be higher than they had been in the previous years. "It was tough because everyone was trying, thinking please let us find a reason for this." During her trial Letby was accused of being cold and unfeeling but Ms Rees said the convicted murderer was actually devastated by the accusations. Ms Rees was responsible for breaking the news to Letby that she was being removed from her role caring for new-borns. Letby was moved to an out-of-the-way desk job in a humiliating move for the nurse. According to Ms Rees Letby had to tell colleagues that this was her choice. Rees said: "I was told just to say that concerns had been raised, and that this was seen as a neutral act. "She was not being accused of anything at this point. But it seemed safer to take her off clinical practice to protect herself as well as babies on that neonatal unit." 7 7 Letby didn't even question the decision as she was marched away from the unit where she worked. Ms Rees said Letby was just looking at her, in shock over the allegations levelled against her. She went on to say that Letby cried a lot later on and, after police became involved, was prescribed antidepressants. These are often known to supress moods and emotions and Letby told her trial in May 2023 that she was still taking them. She also claimed that she had considered suicide at the time she was removed from the job she trained for. Ms Rees claims in the documentary that she never asked Letby if she ever purposefully harmed anyone. She goes on to say that she didn't ask because she never thought Letby had intentionally harmed anyone. Ms Rees said: "I didn't, I don't believe it." Rees' revelations are just a few of many dramatic moments set to be seen in the documentary Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt? tonight on ITV. Letby's new barrister Mark McDonald admits to camera that, despite the involvement of some of the most distinguished doctors in the world, who say no crime was committed, an appeal may yet be refused on a technicality. According to the barrister the objections to the guilty verdict could have been raised at the original trial, so it may be claimed that it was not the court's fault that things went wrong.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Will Labour's new migrant controls stop the boats… or encourage Nigel Farage?
Maybe everyone can agree on one thing: if stopping the boats was easy, it would have been done by now. Whether the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, ever deluded herself otherwise, a year of only limited progress in the government's mission to 'smash the gangs' must have brought home to her just how intractable irregular migration is. The numbers of those crossing the Channel are as high as ever – partly because of the warm weather and calm waters, but also because the criminals who run these people-smuggling businesses are also smart and innovative. When Keir Starmer said he would bring the same legal powers and resources to the criminal gangs as had been applied to terrorism and drugs, he seemed to have forgotten that those wars are also far from over – let alone won. Will more of the same work? Cooper must hope so. She's promising another £100m for the National Crime Agency to recruit more officers, and there'll be enhanced 'detection technology' to defeat the people traffickers. Making those distasteful online 'ads' for smuggling services is to be a specific criminal offence. Less convincingly, the government proposes to financially penalise universities where too many foreign students fail to complete their courses because they use their study visas as the first stage in an asylum application. How the university applications officers are supposed to vet all their student applicants in this way is far from clear – quite aside from the fact that the right to claim asylum is absolute and universal under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This, by the way, is why no migrant seeking refugee status can be labelled 'illegal', even though that is what was laid down in domestic law by the previous administration. So Cooper is in this for the long haul, making slow, incremental progress both at home and in cooperation with other concerned nations near and far, patiently waiting for the forces of law and order to push their investigations and prosecutions forward. Any single measure, inevitably, tends to get dismissed as hopelessly inadequate. How, it is asked, can the German authorities stop the trade in dinghies and marine engines? How will a crackdown on TikTok videos stop anyone trying to make the journey? Will the treaty with the French, agreed last month, ever be scaled up to make a real difference? Even if one gang is broken up, surely there will be more ready to take their trade? Such scepticism is entirely justified, but it is no reason to give up. Cooper's political pitch has to be that only painstakingly slow, hard work – constantly bearing down on the gangs, working through the vast asylum claim backlog, and getting other countries to take or take back the failed asylum seekers – can succeed. This dedicated effort has to be contrasted with the deceptively easy solutions promised by Reform UK. Nigel Farage, in other words, does not have the answers and would not solve the problem. Just the same as Brexit, in fact, when he also made extravagant claims about how it would solve our economic problems, and then blamed everyone else when it left the nation impoverished. Now he's blaming the migrants rather than Brussels, and his policies – little more than slogans – should be treated with extreme caution. Leaving the ECHR, for example – which he used to call 'Brexit 2.0' before Brexit 1.0 turned out to be a flop – wouldn't change a thing over in Calais. Yes, it would make claiming asylum impossible, and it would, perhaps in some cases, speed deportation and reduce spurious human rights claims by criminals. But it wouldn't stop anyone – refugee or economic migrant – from seeking a better life in the UK, and doing whatever it takes and paying any price (including loss of their own life) in the process. A policy of 'detain, deport', as so lazily tossed out by the radical right, only works if migrants continue to give themselves up. If they cannot do that, because the ECHR right to claim asylum is abolished, then they will not be willing to approach Border Force so that they can indeed be detained and then removed (somehow – again, never entirely clear to where). Instead, we will have irregular crossings turning into irregular, uncurated landings along the south coast of England. And even if the English Channel was somehow made small-boat proof, other methods would be found, such as further abuse of the visa system. Getting sent to Rwanda, say, only acts as a deterrent if you get caught in the first place. But pushing refugees and economic migrants into the grey economy and slum accommodation run by gangs really would turn them into the criminals they do not wish to be. It's not that the remedies offered by Farage, Rupert Lowe, various fascists and some Conservatives are cruel and morally shameful, which they are, but that they are impractical and costly. They're inured to personal abuse. In the words of Lowe: 'You can call me 'far-right', you can call me 'racist' – I just do not care. Detain these men, and deport these men – every single one of them.' Except it wouldn't work, for the reasons explained. Even getting the Royal Navy to attack the boats wouldn't succeed, because there are too many dinghies and too few Navy vessels (and the Navy has other things to do). The Farage/Lowe way of controlling migration is to sloganise and strike a pose, never to make a practical proposal. Labour's way is to get it done slowly but surely – grinding hard graft, with some respect for humanity, compassion for the most vulnerable, and dealing swiftly with any criminality. It just needs to be seen to be working, and it ain't easy.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stepmother admits ‘massive regret' for taking 11-year-old son to violent post-Southport riot
A stepmother who took her 11-year-old son to a post-Southport riot, where she shouted at police protecting asylum seekers, has says she has 'massive regret' over her actions. Amy Hodgkinson-Hedgecox, 38, joined the protest outside a Holiday Inn Express in Tamworth, Staffordshire, after initially intending to take the boy to a skate park, a court heard. During the unrest on 4 August last year, the hotel was damaged and petrol was poured inside and set alight. In November, Hodgkinson-Hedgecox reacted angrily when she given a 27-month prison sentence at Stafford Crown Court after pleading guilty to violent disorder. But following her release on licence, the mother-of-two has now spoken of her remorse, describing herself as an 'idiot' and 'stupid' after getting 'caught up in the moment'. She was one of 544 people sentenced for offences linked to the nationwide unrest that broke out after the murder of three children at a dance class in Southport. The tragedy triggered a wave of misinformation, including inaccurate claims the killer was an asylum seeker. Speaking to the BBC's Panorama programme, Hodgkinson-Hedgecox , who now wears an electronic tag as part of a night-time curfew, said she joined the protest after seeing posts on social media that claimed asylum seekers had been filming children at a park close to the hotel. She now acknowledges the claims may have been untrue. The former factory worker, who lives in Tamworth, said: "I did swear. I was just shouting to the police, like, how would you like it if your child has been videoed by them? There's a level where you should be sticking up for us as well as them.' "I was frustrated, I was really frustrated.' Hodgkinson-Hedgecox said she did feel concerned for the people inside the hotel when she saw a petrol bomb being lit. She said: "When they started smashing the windows, they were throwing fireworks through the holes and they were going bang in the building, I thought, something bad's going to happen here. "As soon as I seen the lighter go on that petrol bomb I thought, oh my God, this building's going to go down. I was really concerned for [the people inside]. I thought, wow, this is gonna go up in flames, gonna kill them all.' Looking back on her actions, she said: "I accept that I was wrong for being there. I should never have been there. And I accept I should have never took a child with me either. Massive regret, huge regret. It's bad parenting." She also said: "I have no answer for it other than I'm an idiot, stupid, got caught up in the moment.' While in prison, Hodgkinson-Hedgecox said she accepted £1,000 from far-right group Patriotic Alternative. It was offered to provide financial support for families of those convicted. She told the BBC she regretted taking the cash. Last week, a police watchdog chief warned there was 'every possibility' that similar violence to the Southport riots could reoccur. Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services Sir Andy Cooke said the 'tools that amplified hatred last summer remain largely unchanged and unregulated'. He said: 'Online misinformation continues to spread. Community tensions persist.' He called on police forces to modernise their understanding of how disorder develops and spreads in the digital age.
