Pink Batts disaster invoked over Albanese government's $2.3 billion solar batteries installation scheme
Labor's $2.3 billion bid to cut the price of solar battery installation has sparked fears of another disastrous situation like the Rudd government's Pink Batts scheme where four men died doing installation work.
Join SkyNews.com.au to watch the full interview on Business Weekend at 11am (AEST).
The Albanese government claims it will cut the price of battery installation by 30 per cent through its major rebate geared at bolstering the nation's renewables shift.
It has rekindled memories of Labor's Pink Batts scheme under former prime minister Kevin Rudd's Home Energy Efficiency Program where young, inexperienced installers were not protected and died on the job.
A Royal Commission found the deaths of the young men would not have happened if the scheme was properly designed and implemented.
Industrias Services Group CEO Daniel Lazarus has invoked the horror scheme just weeks ahead of Labor rolling out the new rebates.
'We've audited thousands and thousands of systems and batteries across the country over the last ... 12 months and I've seen a material amount of these batteries and solar systems, which are either substandard or a small percentage of being unsafe,' Mr Lazarus said on Sky News' Business Weekend.
'Even that small percentage of unsafe systems is big enough to create real worries about what the scheme might do with the tidal wave of what's going to happen around all these installs.'
He noted the design of the installation program was currently 'sound' and stressed that he was confident around industry standards, but warned Aussies would take advantage of the huge swath of rebates.
'The problem is with this huge influx of rebate schemes,' Mr Lazarus said.
'What will happen with the inevitable influx that will come within the industry to take advantage and what are they going to do to try and maximise the rebate that they obtain?
'How will they take advantage or at least avoid dodging a lot of these elements that are required to receive the rebate, that being standards?'
Despite protocols and standards that arose since the Royal Commission into the Pink Batts scheme, there remains a lack of key inspection mandates across the country, Mr Lazarus cautioned.
'What we're really advocating to industry is around how do you make it such that either all systems, or at least the majority of systems, installed by every installer that's taking advantage of this rebate scheme, is getting physically inspected,' he said.
The rebates under the Pink Batts scheme led to the number of businesses in the installation sector rising from 200 to more than 8000.
It was originally meant to run for five years but finished after just one year and about 30 per cent of inspected installations in 2010 were found to have faulty craftsmanship or to be unsafe.
Mr Lazarus said while there were a few fatalities, alongside less than 100 fires, it would only take a small number of incidents to destroy the whole scheme.
'The last thing that I want to see is a scheme like this which is meant for specific homeowners and the distribution of energy to be called off early,' he said.
Labor said it expects to deliver more than one million batteries under its scheme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
It's time, Sussan Ley: What Gough Whitlam can teach her about saving a lost party
In 1967, Gough Whitlam was in a strikingly similar position to Sussan Ley today. The newly installed Labor leader was little known to the public. He bore no resemblance to his unpopular predecessor. His objective was to modernise a party that had lost touch with modern Australia. illo from Joe Benke Whitlam came to the leadership after Labor had suffered a devastating electoral rout in 1966 – a massive landslide to Harold Holt's coalition, in which the number of Labor MPs was reduced to half those of the government: almost exactly the same ratio as the opposition today. When Sussan Ley gave her first big speech as opposition leader last Wednesday, Gough Whitlam was probably the furthest thing from her mind. Her speech was as un-Whitlamesque as it is possible to be: humble, self-critical, even apologetic. Frankly acknowledging that 'what we as the Liberal Party presented to the Australian people was comprehensively rejected', Ley went on to say: 'We respect the election outcome with humility. We accept it with contrition.' I doubt we've ever heard such honest self-appraisal from an Australian political leader. Yet, to draw a line under the worst defeat in the Liberal Party's history, that was precisely what the occasion demanded, and Ley hit the mark. It tells you just how far the party had drifted from the political mainstream that the very fact the speech took place at the National Press Club – second only to parliament as the customary venue for important political addresses – was itself a story. By returning to a rostrum boycotted by her predecessor, the new leader sent an unmistakable message: we're no longer in the echo chamber; the Liberal Party is back in the game. Ley used the speech to sketch a path forward for internal reform and future policy development. One of the most important issues she dealt with was the party's future approach to emissions reduction. She announced the establishment of a working group on 'energy and emissions reduction' policy. Led by Dan Tehan – one of the Coalition's most capable politicians, who was the only frontbencher to claim a ministerial scalp in the last parliament – it is tasked with developing policies that ensure a stable energy grid to provide affordable and reliable power, while reducing emissions 'so that we are playing our part in the global effort'. Ley did not specifically mention the 2050 net zero emissions target, which has been Coalition policy since 2021, although her carefully chosen language suggested no appetite to abandon it.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
It's time, Sussan Ley: What Gough Whitlam can teach her about saving a lost party
In 1967, Gough Whitlam was in a strikingly similar position to Sussan Ley today. The newly installed Labor leader was little known to the public. He bore no resemblance to his unpopular predecessor. His objective was to modernise a party that had lost touch with modern Australia. illo from Joe Benke Whitlam came to the leadership after Labor had suffered a devastating electoral rout in 1966 – a massive landslide to Harold Holt's coalition, in which the number of Labor MPs was reduced to half those of the government: almost exactly the same ratio as the opposition today. When Sussan Ley gave her first big speech as opposition leader last Wednesday, Gough Whitlam was probably the furthest thing from her mind. Her speech was as un-Whitlamesque as it is possible to be: humble, self-critical, even apologetic. Frankly acknowledging that 'what we as the Liberal Party presented to the Australian people was comprehensively rejected', Ley went on to say: 'We respect the election outcome with humility. We accept it with contrition.' I doubt we've ever heard such honest self-appraisal from an Australian political leader. Yet, to draw a line under the worst defeat in the Liberal Party's history, that was precisely what the occasion demanded, and Ley hit the mark. It tells you just how far the party had drifted from the political mainstream that the very fact the speech took place at the National Press Club – second only to parliament as the customary venue for important political addresses – was itself a story. By returning to a rostrum boycotted by her predecessor, the new leader sent an unmistakable message: we're no longer in the echo chamber; the Liberal Party is back in the game. Ley used the speech to sketch a path forward for internal reform and future policy development. One of the most important issues she dealt with was the party's future approach to emissions reduction. She announced the establishment of a working group on 'energy and emissions reduction' policy. Led by Dan Tehan – one of the Coalition's most capable politicians, who was the only frontbencher to claim a ministerial scalp in the last parliament – it is tasked with developing policies that ensure a stable energy grid to provide affordable and reliable power, while reducing emissions 'so that we are playing our part in the global effort'. Ley did not specifically mention the 2050 net zero emissions target, which has been Coalition policy since 2021, although her carefully chosen language suggested no appetite to abandon it.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Lift defence spend to show China that Australia means business: Abbott
Australia needs to lift its defence spending so it can be a better ally while pushing back against military actions from China, former prime minister Tony Abbott has urged while expressing hope the economic giant may become the world's most benign superpower. In an address last week to the Australia China Economics Trade and Culture Association, Abbott, who signed the free trade agreement between the two nations just months before losing the prime ministership in 2015, also urged continuing financial links between the countries while cautioning Australia had to broaden its dependence on China. The Albanese government is under pressure from US President Donald Trump to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Such a sharp lift in spending would cost the budget more than $200 billion by 2035-36. Abbott said Australia had to 'protest strongly' after incidents such as the use of sonar by a Chinese warship to deliberately injure Australian navy divers in 2023, backing that action with increased defence expenditure. 'Australia does need to be militarily stronger, with more ships, more planes, more personnel, more drones and more missiles, so that we can be a better ally and stronger friend,' he said. 'If a stronger military is right for China, and for others, it's right for us too. We have to be in a position to be firm, even with a superpower.' Loading Abbott said while retaining its financial and trading links with China, Australia had to broaden its supply chains. China imposed effective bans on Australian goods worth $20 billion under the Morrison government. 'Australia should keep trading; we should keep accepting students, certainly for the humanities; we should keep accepting highly skilled immigrants, and the dependents of Australian citizens,' he said.
