Secrets of Glasgow's very own 'Domesday Book' revealed
The original Domesday Book is a survey of English land in the eleventh century and is perhaps the most well-known archive item in the UK.
Sadly, Glasgow's Domesday Book cannot boast such an illustrious history.
(Image: Glasgow City Archives)
Our volume consists of biographical notes and cross-referenced newspaper obituaries of Glasgow councillors.
It was compiled by local authority officials to cover 1890 to 1975 but also includes retrospective information back to the 1850s.
As such, it's an invaluable launchpad for any research into councillors for Glasgow Corporation and its predecessor, Glasgow Town Council. Me and my colleagues have used it many times over the years to help questing researchers.
(Image: Glasgow City Archives)
Understandably, many people are interested in the careers of former Lord Provosts. The origins of this civic role date from medieval times when Glasgow was a burgh. In modern times, Glasgow's Lord Provost has been the city's principal civic representative at home.
I wrote recently about James Welsh, who served as Lord Provost during the Second World War until November 1945.
James Welsh (Image: Glasgow City Archives)
The Domesday Book provides an excellent, though brief, summary of his political career in the city.
He began in 1913 and completed thirty-six years of public service, many of those spent representing the people in the wards of Dalmarnock and Maryhill. In addition, he was elected as the MP for Paisley in 1929.
(Image: Glasgow City Archives)
His entry also notes that he was awarded an honorary doctorate from the University of Glasgow in October 1945. Last year, we took in his official and personal papers which chronicled his time in office.
When I started out as a new archivist at Glasgow City Archives, part of what intrigued me about the Glasgow Domesday Book (apart from its name) was that it was the first internal finding aid within an archive collection itself that I had come across.
Finding aids are key for any collections-based service like ours. To help researchers, we create catalogues (hard copy and online) and indexes (names, places, subjects, organisations and buildings among other terms) as well as making use of internal finding aids like the Domesday Book.
It is an archive item itself but was compiled as a finding aid by clerks from the Town Council (later, Glasgow Corporation).
The clerks would have gone through meeting minutes, obituaries and other sources to summarise the careers of former councillors for use by future researchers.
The Glasgow Domesday Book is a manuscript volume and was clearly a living document, being added to throughout the years by various clerks. In the entry for James Welsh, you can see that there are examples of several different clerks' handwriting.
As a finding aid, the Domesday Book helps researchers to navigate their way through our other sources searching for these same councillors.
For example, the Book gives dates which helps users to narrow down their search of our Glasgow Corporation minutes.
It also helps them to find their councillor in our annually printed lists of magistrates and town councillors of Glasgow, a source which confirms which committees each councillor served on and when.
READ NEXT: The unusual link between Glasgow and 'dark history' of the pineapple
9 pictures which tell story of famous Glasgow store with link to Rennie Mackintosh
'Gran's report card' discovery reveals story of 'lost' Glasgow school
If a councillor became Lord Provost, then researchers can use the archives of the Lord Provost's Office.
These are a rich resource which include correspondence, press-cutting books, committee minutes, files on public events as well as photos of civic occasions.
Some films presented to the Lord Provost are held on deposit at the National Library of Scotland Moving Image Archive.
As many Lord Provosts were merchants or business owners, some of their personal papers have survived to form part of our collections. For example, we hold the family trust volumes of Sir James Bain (born in 1818) and the papers of Sir James King (born in 1830) during his time in office.
Interestingly, the Domesday Book doesn't record other notable information. For example, Dame Jean Roberts, a former teacher, was the first female Lord Provost and served from 1960 to 1963.
One of her predecessors in the role, Sir Patrick Dollan, was the first person from an Irish-Catholic background to hold the office when he became Lord Provost in 1938. Neither entry records these facts.
Nevertheless, the Glasgow Domesday Book is outstanding in its own way, forming one of the many access points into the collections of Glasgow City Archives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
15 hours ago
- NBC News
U.S. contractors tell the AP that their colleagues are shooting at Palestinians seeking food in Gaza
BEERSHEBA, Israel — American contractors guarding aid distribution sites in Gaza are using live ammunition and stun grenades as hungry Palestinians scramble for food, according to accounts and videos obtained by The Associated Press. Two U.S. contractors, speaking to the AP on condition of anonymity because they were revealing their employers' internal operations, said they were coming forward because they were disturbed by what they considered dangerous and irresponsible practices. They said the security staff hired were often unqualified, unvetted, heavily armed and seemed to have an open license to do whatever they wished. They said their colleagues regularly lobbed stun grenades and pepper spray in the direction of the Palestinians. One contractor said bullets were fired in all directions — in the air, into the ground and at times toward the Palestinians, recalling at least one instance where he thought someone had been hit. 'There are innocent people being hurt. Badly. Needlessly,' the contractor said. He said American staff on the sites monitor those coming to seek food and document anyone considered 'suspicious.' He said they share such information with the Israeli military. Videos provided by one of the contractors and taken at the sites show hundreds of Palestinians crowded between metal gates, jostling for aid amid the sound of bullets, stun grenades and the sting of pepper spray. Other videos include conversation between English-speaking men discussing how to disperse crowds and encouraging each other after bursts of gunfire. NBC News has not obtained or reviewed the videos. The testimonies from the contractors — combined with the videos, internal reports and text messages obtained by the AP — offer a rare glimpse inside the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the newly created, secretive American organization backed by Israel to feed the Gaza Strip's population. Last month, the U.S. government pledged $30 million for the group to continue operations — the first known U.S. donation to the group, whose other funding sources remain opaque. Journalists have been unable to access the GHF sites, located in Israeli military-controlled zones. The AP and NBC News cannot independently verify the contractors' stories. On Wednesday, officials in Switzerland initiated proceedings to dissolve the Geneva branch of the GHF, citing legal shortcomings in its establishment, Reuters reported. The group is registered in the U.S. state of Delaware and had registered an affiliate in Geneva on February 12. The Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations (ESA), a Swiss regulatory body, told Reuters the GHF had not fulfilled certain legal requirements including having the correct number of board members, a postal address or a Swiss bank account. 'GHF confirmed to the ESA that it had never carried out activities in that it intends to dissolve the Geneva-registered (branch),' the ESA said in a statement obtained by Reuters. A spokesperson for Safe Reach Solutions, the logistics company subcontracted by GHF, told the AP that there have been no serious injuries at any of their sites to date. In scattered incidents, security professionals fired live rounds into the ground and away from civilians to get their attention. That happened in the early days at the 'the height of desperation where crowd control measures were necessary for the safety and security of civilians,' the spokesperson said. Gaza's more than 2 million Palestinians are living through a catastrophic humanitarian crisis. Since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, setting off the 21-month war, Israel has bombarded and laid siege to the strip, leaving many teetering on the edge of famine, according to food security experts. For 2 1/2 months before GHF's opening in May, Israel blocked all food, water and medicine from entering Gaza, claiming Hamas was stealing the aid being transported under a preexisting system coordinated by the United Nations. It now wants GHF to replace that U.N. system. The U.N. says its Gaza aid operations do not involve armed guards. Over 57,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed since the war erupted, according to the territory's Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and militants. GHF is an American organization, registered in Delaware and established in February to distribute humanitarian aid during the ongoing Gaza humanitarian crisis. Since the GHF sites began operating more than a month ago, Palestinians say Israeli troops open fire almost every day toward crowds on roads heading to the distribution points, through Israeli military zones. Several hundred people have been killed and hundreds more wounded, according to Gaza's Health Ministry and witnesses. In response, Israel's military says it fires only warning shots and is investigating reports of civilian harm. It denies deliberately shooting at any innocent civilians and says it's examining how to reduce 'friction with the population' in the areas surrounding the distribution centers. AP's reporting for this article focuses on what is happening at the sites themselves. Palestinians arriving at the sites say they are caught between Israeli and American fire, said the contractor who shared videos with the AP. 'We have come here to get food for our families. We have nothing,' he recounted Palestinians telling him. 'Why does the [Israeli] army shoot at us? Why do you shoot at us?' A spokesperson for the GHF said there are people with a 'vested interest' in seeing it fail and are willing to do or say almost anything to make that happen. The spokesperson said the team is composed of seasoned humanitarian, logistics and security professionals with deep experience on the ground. The group says it has distributed the equivalent of more than 50 million meals in Gaza in its food boxes of staples. GHF says that it has consistently shown compassionate engagement with the people of Gaza. Throughout the war, aid distribution has been marred by chaos. Gangs have looted trucks of aid traveling to distribution centers and mobs of desperate people have also offloaded trucks before they've reached their destination. Earlier this month, at least 51 Palestinians were killed and more than 200 wounded while waiting for the U.N. and commercial trucks to enter the territory, according to Gaza's Health Ministry and a local hospital. Israel's military acknowledged several casualties as soldiers opened fire on the approaching crowd and said authorities would investigate. AP spoke to the two contractors for UG Solutions, an American outfit subcontracted to hire security personnel for the distribution sites. They said bullets, stun grenades and pepper spray were used at nearly every distribution, even if there was no threat. Videos of aid being dispensed at the sites seen by the AP appear to back up the frenetic scenes the contractors described. The footage was taken within the first two weeks of its distributions — about halfway into the operations. In one video, what appear to be heavily armed American security contractors at one of the sites in Gaza discuss how to disperse Palestinians nearby. One is heard saying he has arranged for a 'show of force' by Israeli tanks. 'I don't want this to be too aggressive,' he adds, 'because this is calming down.' At that moment, bursts of gunfire erupt close by, at least 15 shots. 'Whoo! Whoo!' one contractor yelps. 'I think you hit one,' one says. Then comes a shout: 'Hell, yeah, boy!' The camera's view is obscured by a large dirt mound. The contractor who took the video told AP that he saw other contractors shooting in the direction of Palestinians who had just collected their food and were departing. The men shot both from a tower above the site and from atop the mound, he said. The shooting began because contractors wanted to disperse the crowd, he said, but it was unclear why they continued shooting as people were walking away. The camera does not show who was shooting or what was being shot at. But the contractor who filmed it said he watched another contractor fire at the Palestinians and then saw a man about 60 yards (meters) away — in the same direction where the bullets were fired — drop to the ground. This happened at the same time the men were heard talking — effectively egging each other on, he said. In other videos furnished by the contractor, men in grey uniforms — colleagues, he said — can be seen trying to clear Palestinians who are squeezed into a narrow, fenced-in passage leading to one of the centers. The men fire pepper spray and throw stun grenades that detonate amid the crowd. The sound of gunfire can be heard. The contractor who took the video said the security personnel usually fire at the ground near the crowds or from nearby towers over their heads. During a single distribution in June, contractors used 37 stun grenades, 27 rubber-and-smoke 'scat shell' projectiles and 60 cans of pepper spray, according to internal text communications shared with the AP. That count does not include live ammunition, the contractor who provided the videos said. One photo shared by that contractor shows a woman lying in a donkey cart after he said she was hit in the head with part of a stun grenade. An internal report by Safe Reach Solutions, the logistics company subcontracted by GHF to run the sites, found that aid seekers were injured during 31% of the distributions that took place in a two-week period in June. The report did not specify the number of injuries or the cause. SRS told the AP the report refers to non-serious injuries. More videos show frenzied scenes of Palestinians running to collect leftover food boxes at one site. Hundreds of young men crowd near low metal barriers, transferring food from boxes to bags while contractors on the other side of the barriers tell them to stay back. Some Palestinians wince and cough from pepper spray. 'You tasting that pepper spray? Yuck,' one man close to the camera can be heard saying in English. SRS acknowledged that it's dealing with large, hungry populations, but said the environment is secure, controlled, and ensures people can get the aid they need safely.
STV News
16 hours ago
- STV News
Rachel Reeves appears with Starmer day after tears at PMQs
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has joined the Prime Minister at an event the day after she was seen crying in the House of Commons. Reeves appeared in public smiling and laughing with Keir Starmer and UK health secretary Wes Streeting in a public show of unity on Thursday. The trio were seen together at the launch of the Government's 10-year plan for the English NHS in London. Speaking at the event, Starmer hailed the decisions made by the chancellor as playing a part in the Government investing 'record amounts in the NHS'. Parliament TV Chancellor Rachel Reeves appeared to cry in the Commons as Sir Keir Starmer declined to guarantee she would remain in place until the election. The Chancellor was visibly tearful in the Commons on Wednesday during Prime Minister's Questions, as her position came under intense scrutiny after the welfare U-turn, which put an almost £5 billion black hole in her plans. But allies said she was dealing with a 'personal matter' and No 10 said she had Sir Keir's 'full backing'. In her first public appearance since PMQs on Wednesday, Reeves said Labour's plan for the NHS will be 'good for the health of our nation and good for the health of our nation's finances'. Setting out the Government's decision to pump cash into the NHS she said: 'We fixed the foundations and we've put our economy back on a strong footing.' Earlier, the Prime Minister said Reeves was doing an 'excellent' job, would remain in place beyond the next general election, and that they were both absolutely committed to the Chancellor's 'fiscal rules' to maintain discipline over the public finances. The sight of the Chancellor in tears on the front bench and Starmer's initial lack of public support for her caused jitters about the Government's borrowing plans, because Reeves' commitment to her fiscal rules to control spending is a key reassuring factor for the bond markets. However, UK Government bonds rallied and the pound steadied on Thursday after the Prime Minister's reassurances about the Chancellor's future. Starmer told Virgin Radio he had spoken to the Chancellor on Wednesday evening and she was 'fine', and her tears were as a result of a 'purely personal' matter rather than the 'ups and downs of this week'. He said all people could be caught 'off guard' by their emotions, but added that the Chancellor had to deal with it while on camera in Parliament. Starmer said: 'I actually personally didn't appreciate it was happening in the Chamber, because I came in, I've got questions being fired at me in PMQs, so I'm constantly up at the despatch box and down. 'I think we just need to be clear, it's a personal matter, and I'm not going to breach Rachel's privacy by going into what's a personal matter for her.' He said that 'in politics, you're on show the whole time, there's no hiding place'. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Now Donald Trump turns to alligators to terrorise migrants
'[If] people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide,' said Uthmeier, probably hoping to slither his way to Donald Trump's notice. Trump did notice: earlier this week he jeered that people would have to 'know how to run away from an alligator' to escape it. The Dade-Collier Airstrip isn't so very far from Palm Beach and Mar a Lago, home to Trump and the wealthy elites. Welcome to Florida's version of the Hunger Games. Read more The demise of empathy on one side of US politics is stark and shocking. Undocumented migrants who have lived and worked in the United States for decades – childcare providers, waiting staff, tradespeople, small business owners – supporting the voracious US economy and paying taxes, are going into hiding in fear of deportation raids; in fear of places like Alligator Alcatraz. People who have committed no crime don't go into hiding from the government in healthy democracies. Last month, Donald Trump enacted the next part of the authoritarian playbook by ordering the National Guard into California to crush street demonstrations against his deportations. It was hardly a surprise: he has spoken of dissenters as 'the enemy from within'. Trump's callousness appears to be exactly what a lot of voters love about him. His wall on the southern border, and a much tougher stance against migrants, were key 2016 election pledges. The wall was an expensive failure but potent as a symbol of hostility towards the 'other'. That first presidency resulted in thousands of children of migrants being separated from their families and caged, sometimes with inadequate food, cleaning facilities or care, an image of American disgrace. Children cared for lone toddlers. After a torrent of criticism, the policy was supposedly ended, but last year, six years on, Human Rights Watch reported that more than 1,300 children had still to be reunited with their families. The word 'cruel' isn't working hard here. This is the dictionary definition. It is not just a MAGA phenomenon. There are no borders around ideas and we have seen cruel behaviour playing out here in the UK too. Riot police hold back protesters after disorder broke out on July 30, 2024 in Southport, England (Image: Chris Furlong) Last summer's riots in several English towns, and the vicious attacks on hotels housing asylum seekers, should rid us of any complacency on that score. Last month, an outbreak of violent rioting in Northern Ireland resulted in racially-motivated attacks. A man, woman and their four young children had to escape after their home was targeted in a fire attack. Often unrest is whipped up, sometimes by politicians, sometimes by social media. Social media has provided platform, validation and community for the hate-mongerers. Feel furious about women? Transgender people? Ethnic minorities? There's a place for you in cyberspace. There have always been instances of callous politics here in the UK – remember Theresa May's 'Go Home' vans in 2013 – but the shameless divisiveness really took hold under Boris Johnson. His political rise was fuelled by it and he seemed often to glory in it. It was Boris Johnson who appointed Priti Patel as Home Secretary, the originator of a scheme to turn precarious, overcrowded migrant boats back in the middle of the English Channel, putting lives in very real danger (it was never enacted after Patel seemed finally to accept it was plain illegal). Migrant boats accounted for a tiny proportion of immigrants (three per cent), with ever-rising net migration numbers down to the issuing of visas by the Conservatives themselves, but it was a classic example of scapegoating by a government that was failing on most metrics. The worry is that the more politicians promote inhumane policies, the less shocked we are by them and the more they are tempted to ramp them up further. Suella Braverman shamelessly cranked up the hysteria around those migrant boats, describing them as an 'invasion' and suggesting the answer was to deport all migrants to Rwanda – at enormous expense – a country that the UK's own parliament had declared unsafe. Labour thankfully put paid to that. None of this, by the way, is to suggest that having concerns about immigration is in any way inhumane. Read more The issue is the demonisation of migrants themselves and the promotion of ruthless policy responses. Addressing immigration levels is something politicians must do; characterising migrants and immigrants as the root cause of the deep, broad and thorny social and economic problems facing countries like the US and UK is grotesquely dishonest. We can debate where this is all coming from, but the worrying question is where is it taking us? Down a dangerous path – that much is clear. Cruelty begets cruelty. All this is taking place against a backdrop of a self-confidence crisis among moderate political figures, particularly in the US. They must find their voice, extending empathy to those, like some disillusioned white men, who feel blamed for society's ills and frozen out of the compassion matrix, but at the same time standing absolutely firm against a narrative in which small groups are blamed and demonised. 'Don't run in a straight line, run like this...' Trump said to reporters, zig-zagging his hand, demonstrating how to escape alligators. 'And, you know what? Your chances go up about one per cent.' Mirthless jokes about vulnerable othered minorities trying to escape man-eating animals. This is what happens when empathy dies. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ
