Gauteng High Court to review OCJ tender amid procurement irregularities
Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers
While the Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) will on Tuesday turn to the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria for the self-review of a tender awarded by its office relating to procurement irregularities in the CaseLine project, three senior OCJ officials who had meanwhile resigned asked to intervene in the application.
The matter involved the award of a departmental tender to a company - Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Ltd (TR) - which had subcontracted to a local company whose shareholders were the three senior OCJ officials.
The court online system - where all matters before court are filed electronically - is currently in use in Gauteng and it is due to be rolled out to other provinces.
A procurement process was initiated during 2021 for the evidence management part of the court online system. Following a sole source procurement process, the OCJ awarded a contract to Thomson Reuters to provide software, licences, resources, and support and maintenance for a period of 60 months, commencing in April 2022.
The OCJ later noted that the three directors involved in the tender were its employees. By then, the three directors had already served their resignation letters to the OCJ and were serving their notice period.
Their subcontract between their company ZA Square Consulting and TR has meanwhile been cancelled.
The OCJ initiated an application for self-review of the tender awarded to TR. The OCJ, through its then Secretary General, also filed an affidavit in which certain allegations and concerns about the role of the now three former employees - Nicolaas Coetzer, Nkosikhona Mncube, and Yvonne van Niekerk - were raised.
The three now asked to be joined in this week's application. They do not oppose the setting aside of the main tender, but they say there are allegations being made in the OCJ's court papers regarding them stemming from the time when they still worked for this office.
They maintained that these allegations are defamatory of them and done purely to bring them into disrepute and to harm their future commercial prospects. Thus, they argued, they should be part of the main application so that they could defend themselves.
Judge Anthony Millar, however, said to his mind, the main review proceedings will be decided based on the record of the proceedings which are under review.
'Their position is no different from any past employee of any institution whose conduct while employed is to be considered. The right to dignity is not in issue. Either the grounds of review premised on the conduct of the applicants have merit or they do not. The application to intervene lacks any merit and must be refused.'
But this is not the end of the matter, the judge said, as Coetzer in his affidavit called into question the honesty and integrity of the Secretary General of the OCJ, who had deposed to the affidavits on its behalf in the review proceedings. The OCJ called these allegations 'scandalous and vexatious,' and Judge Millar chose not to repeat the allegations in his judgment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Judgment reserved in AfriForum's fight against Tshwane's cleansing levy
Judgement was reserved in the City of Tshwane's waste removal levy dispute Image: Helenus Kruger / City of Tshwane Judgment has been reserved in AfriForum's legal battle against the Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality regarding the implementation of the metro's controversial city cleansing levy. The case was last week heard in the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria after the organisation approached the court to overturn the metro's decision to impose this new mandatory monthly levy of R194.37 (excluding VAT) on nearly 260 000 households and businesses in the metro. The civil rights organisation maintains that the levy amounts to unfair double taxation, particularly in cases where residents do not benefit from the metro's refuse removal services and are forced to make use of private service providers. The civil rights organisation denounced the metro's actions after it came to light that the levy was already added to residents' latest municipal bills, despite civil society's strong opposition to it and AfriForum's pending court case. Meanwhile, the metro has defended the implementation of the levy and argued that it has its origins in the metro's 2016 tariff policy. AfriForum said this policy was, however, not filed with the metro's court documents. This in spite of the metro deeming it a 'critical document' for the case. During the court proceedings, AfriForum also questioned the metro's argument that it has the necessary equipment and personnel to provide adequate refuse removal throughout Tshwane. According to AfriForum, this claim stands in direct contradiction to residents' day-to-day experiences in this regard. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The metro's argument regarding its ability to deliver the service also contradicts an official report that the Tshwane Metro released just last week and was approved by the council, AfriForum said. According to the report, it was estimated that in the previous five years, the metro's landfill sites had suffered a total loss of R148 million in income. The report makes several recommendations to address the problems, including the repair of weighbridges and the improvement of security at landfill sites. 'These interventions are not only overdue but also highlight the chronic mismanagement and neglect that plague the metro's waste management services,' said Arno Roodt, AfriForum's Regional Coordinator for Greater Pretoria South. AfriForum added that the metro seriously lacks a coherent institutional mechanism for the effective delivery of solid waste management services. It also does not have a well-structured and guided strategy as required by Section 78 of the Municipal Systems Act. According to AfriForum, this legislation prescribes critical processes to ensure that municipalities determine the most appropriate means for the effective and sustainable delivery of services. 'The metro claims in its court documents that it is fully capable of delivering the services in question, yet the facts reveal a completely different reality,' Deidré Steffens, AfriForum's Advisor for Local Government Affairs said. She added that we're dealing with a metro that has not only allowed landfill operations to bleed millions of rand but has also failed to establish a basic service delivery framework as required by law. 'Now the metro seeks to penalise residents by imposing an arbitrary levy on services that are either non-existent or in disrepair,' she said. Roodt is of the opinion that the city's cleansing levy is not based on service usage, as is required by law. 'This levy is a fundraising tool aimed at covering up years of poor planning and financial mismanagement,' he said.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Mbeki and Mabandla seek to intervene in R167 million apartheid damages case
Former President Thabo Mbeki and erstwhile justice minister Brigitte Mabandla's application to intervene in an apartheid-era damages claim will be heard on Monday, July 28 by the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria. Image: DIRCO Former president Thabo Mbeki and ex-justice minister Brigitte Mabandla will on Monday ask to intervene in the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria application for R167 million in constitutional damages by families of victims of apartheid-era atrocities. Mbeki and Mabandla have indicated that they want to intervene in the R167m constitutional damages case brought by survivors and victims of apartheid human rights violations to protect their reputations. Survivors and victims of apartheid-era atrocities and the Foundation for Human Rights (FHR) have asked the high court for R167m constitutional damages, which includes about R115.3m over five years, to enable families and organisations supporting them to advance truth, justice, and closure by assisting in pursuing investigations and research, inquests, private prosecutions, and related litigation. Another R8m over five years will enable families and organisations supporting them to play a monitoring role in respect of the work of the policing and justice authorities charged with investigating and prosecuting the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) cases referred to the National Prosecuting Authority. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading An additional R44m over 10 years is sought to enable families and organisations supporting families to pursue commemoration, memorialisation and public education activities around the TRC cases including the holding of public events, publishing of books, and making of documentaries. In their application, survivors and family members of victims also want the court to declare the failure and/or refusal by the president to establish a commission of inquiry into the suppression of the investigation and prosecution of the TRC cases inconsistent with his constitutional responsibilities under the Constitution and a violation of their rights to equality, dignity and the right to life and bodily integrity of the victims in terms of the Constitution. Responding to Mbeki and Mabandla's application to intervene, Lukhanyo Calata, the son of the late Fort Calata who, along with Matthew Goniwe, Sicelo Mhlauli, and Sparrow Mkonto, became known posthumously as the Cradock Four, said the former president and erstwhile minister have no direct and substantial interest in the main application, given that no relief is sought against them in their personal capacities. President Cyril Ramaphosa has since established a commission to be chaired by retired Constitutional Court Justice Sisi Khampepe to inquire into, make findings, report on and make recommendations on unlawful interference and collusion since 2003. The government maintains that there is no concrete allegation of interference in the families' case. Mbeki and Mabandla also state that the families make unfounded, false and damaging allegations of interference and collusion against them in their case. They also indicate that the facts of interference and collusion will be better addressed in the commission. According to Mbeki and Mabandla, they are seeking to intervene because the relief sought by the families and the consequent claim for constitutional damages are founded on serious allegations of unconstitutional, unlawful and criminal conduct by them (Mbeki and Mabandla) during the respective tenures, 1999-2008 and.2004-2008, respectively. "We have a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of the proceedings," maintained Mbeki and Mabandla. They continued: "In the absence of our version, the only evidence before this honourable court is in the Calata applicants' founding affidavit. There is therefore a real risk that should we not be granted leave to intervene, the court will be presented with a one-sided narrative and the Calata applicants may be accepted as uncontested." Mbeki and Mabandla told the court they do not seek to intervene merely to set the record straight or out of concern that the court's findings may affect their reputations. "Rather, we seek leave to intervene because the relief sought by the Calata applicants is expressly predicated on allegations of unlawful conduct purportedly committed by us (and other state officials) during our tenure; allegations which we intend to dispute," they explained. The families oppose the application and argue that it is not possible to intervene simply to rebut adverse allegations and that the relief they seek is not directed against Mbeki or Mabandla but against the state. If Mbeki or Mabandla, the families say, feel they have been defamed they have recourse through normal legal remedies and that the application can be decided without the need to make findings in respect of individual role-players, the task of the commission set up by Ramaphosa, according to the FHR.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Three men on trial for the brutal murder of farm worker Dumisani Phakathi
Jaco Kemp, Louis Coetzee, and Gert van der Westhuizen were in the dock of the Pretoria High Court, facing a charge of murder after an innocent man seeking water was beaten to death. Image: Zelda Venter If it were not for an early morning stop-and-search operation by the police on the R511 towards Brits, North West, the truth of what happened to a farm worker who was allegedly murdered would have probably never been discovered. The police noticed the bakkie they had stopped with two occupants inside was loaded with black garbage bags. They then saw legs sticking out from under the bags, covered with blood. It was then that they discovered the lifeless body of Dumisani Phakathi, with his head covered by plastic. Phakathi was allegedly murdered because he walked to a nearby chicken farm with a plastic container in his hand to collect water. The three men accused of assaulting and killing him earlier pleaded not guilty to murder in the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria. While it was confirmed through an autopsy that he had been beaten to death, the three accused pointed fingers at each other as the culprits. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The deceased came to fetch water at the farm outside Brits on September 16, 2023, when he was allegedly attacked by the three accused - Jaco Kemp, Louis Coetzee, and Gert van der Westhuizen - who were having a braai. Kemp, who blamed his co-accused Van der Westhuizen for the deadly assault, told the court that Phakathi did not pose a threat when he came to fetch water on the farm. Van der Westhuizen blamed Kemp and Coetzee for the assault, while the latter in turn blamed his two co-accused. Coetzee earlier testified in tears that Van der Westhuizen noticed the deceased at the gate to the farm. Coetzee said he was told to go and find out what the man wanted. Phakathi explained that he simply wanted to fetch some water. According to Coetzee, Van der Westhuizen was there within seconds, joined by Kemp. He said while Kemp repeatedly bashed the deceased with his head, Van der Westhuizen kept on punching Phakathi. He testified that the man was assaulted from the small gate on the farm to the main gate. By the time they reached the main gate, he was unconscious. He was, however, later further assaulted in a storeroom on the farm until he eventually died from the blows to his head. Kemp, during his testimony, accused Van der Westhuizen of kicking the man and assaulting him with clenched fists. While distancing himself from the murder, Kemp did admit that after Phakathi died, he bound his head in plastic and bound his feet before loading the body on the bakkie. They drove along the Brits-Thabazimbi Road when the police stopped them in the early hours of the next morning, when the body was discovered under rubbish on the back of the bakkie. Coetzee, meanwhile, testified that he had nothing to do with the murder and that he simply stood by when the deceased was assaulted. Asked why he did nothing to assist the helpless man, why he did not call for assistance, Coetzee testified that he was afraid of his co-accused. Both the State and the defence had, meanwhile, closed their cases. The case was on Thursday postponed to July 29 for final arguments before judgment is delivered. Cape Times
