Did Carrie Just Meet Her Next Man on 'And Just Like That'?
Carrie is narrating again. So much so, that she's using it not only to express her inner thoughts and writing, but also her texts. Yes, friends, Carrie is a speak-to-text enthusiast. As she and Aidan continue their long-distance relationship (after last week's phone sex debacle), she is actively dictating her correspondences to her on-off-lover as he looks after his family in Virginia. She drops phrases like, 'Hi love, period,' or 'exclamation point!' as if she is reading a telegram. She does this multiple times throughout the latest episode, 'Rate Race,' to an almost comical degree, as if to prove that this is how a 50-something woman uses a smartphone, even though we've never seen Carrie do this before.
Anyway, she first broaches the topic of phone usage in the beginning of the episode when she meets her old neighbor Lisette, who now lives in her apartment. While Lisette, a jewelry designer, gifts Carrie a necklace bearing her old address, she also vents about her dating life. After a bad outing with a psychiatrist, Lisette realizes that the actual relationship she has is with her phone. She believes Carrie is so lucky she didn't have to deal with these kind of shenanigans 'back then'; dating must have been easier before texting and apps, right? (I don't know, Carrie still went through the wringer with a senator who loved golden showers, a Post-it breakup, and more.) Lisette ends up getting a guy to buy her (and Carrie) a drink at the bar, and Carrie later shows us that even though she was dating in the '90s and '00s, she's in a relationship with her phone now too.
But first she takes us even further into the past—to 1846, the year the nameless protagonist of her latest writing project (otherwise known as 'the woman') is living in. Carrie said she often dreams of who used to live in her historical home, but before she can get too far into her draft, a swarm of rats dash out from the bushes in her garden, sending her running and screaming back into the house. She dictates her text to Aidan about the experience: 'Many, many rats, exclamation point, exclamation point, exclamation point!'
While Miranda is at work getting hooked on a queer reality dating show called Bi Bingo, Carrie has promptly hired people to de-pest her garden. To her surprise, Aidan shows up unannounced, partially because he 'felt weird' about how their last phone call went, and also because he misses her. Carrie shares her frustrations about being long distance. She doesn't want to keep Aidan away from his kids, but her new apartment is for the both of them; she wants to be able to share it—and her life—with him. Aidan bends the rules of their 'break,' allowing for Carrie to call and text him whenever she needs. But when Carrie gets in touch about a table she wants to get for their home, he responds with a simple thumbs down emoji.
She vents about this at lunch with Seema and Miranda, but the latter seems more interested in discussing the events of Bi Bingo with their waitress. She jokes about the joy of hate-watching—is And Just Like That… being meta here? Is the show that self-aware?
Seema, on the other hand, quips that she's currently in the habit of hate-dating, as in, she hates most of the recent dates she's been on and the men she's gone on them with. Her concerned coworker sets her up with Sydney, a matchmaker played by an amazing Cheri Oteri. Seema is rightfully skeptical, but once she realizes Sydney has studied her well enough to perfect her lunch order, she gives in. The issue, though, is that Sydney advises Seema to change almost everything about herself, from the way she dresses to the way she talks. For one date with a handsome man named Jake, Seema dresses in homely church clothes and holds her tongue for most of dinner, but when she comes clean about who she really is, Jake runs 'to the bathroom' (a.k.a. home). It's all too much for Seema. Yes, she's seeking a man, but she's not that desperate. After getting ditched, Seema dumps Sydney too.
Meanwhile, Charlotte and Lisa arrive at their children's school to find fellow parents have broken code and hired an off-campus college consultant named Lois Fingerhood to get their kids into Ivy League universities. Feeling late to the game, Charlotte and Lisa make it their mission to get in touch with Lois by any means necessary—for their kids Lily and Herbert Jr.'s sake, of course. Thanks to some Instagram stalking from Charlotte's assistant, they find Lois at her son's T-ball game and corner her on the bleachers. Lily is too busy getting it on with her ballerina crush, Diego, to pick up her mother's calls, but she and Herbert Jr. eventually land a joint meeting with Ms. Fingerhood. It doesn't go well. When the meeting is over, the teens are in a panic. Lily was told she's too well-rounded and shouldn't mention 'that I'm Asian or adopted,' and Herbert Jr. was told to not to mention lacrosse and to have 'more relatable African-American experiences.' It's funny because that is what colleges want—kids to lean into stereotypes and exploit their trauma in their applications.
At least Anthony is doing well. He just landed a brick-and-mortar spot for his dream Hotfellas Bakery, complete with baguette-shaped door handles and 'crotch-level' countertops.
Miranda's new reality fixation might just get her a date. (Do you guys think she's watching the new season of Love Island too?) She and the waitress making her and Carrie's guacamole can't stop gabbing about the drama on their favorite show. But when Miranda asks the waitress out on a date, she reveals that she's straight and married… with two children. Miranda is confused. Didn't they have a spark? Why is this woman so engaged with queer television? The waitress shrugs and says it's just TV. 'I watch The Walking Dead, and I don't like zombies,' she says in an unnecessarily rude tone. Okay, first of all, that's different. Are we comparing bi people to zombies? During Pride month???
Poor Miranda, first a one-night stand with a virgin nun and now a heartless rejection from a waitress serving guacamole. Not all hope is lost though; Miranda is interested in Joy, a classy British colleague at work, but she's worried about starting an office romance. Carrie, of course, eggs her on. So many people have met their partners at work, Miranda!
Carrie, however, might have just met her next partner at the stoop of her new apartment. When her cat slips out the door, a scruffy, muscly gardener picks her up before she can escape onto the street. And what are the odds? This charming landscaper named Adam (Logan Marshall-Dean), who's wearing a rugged band tee, is here to consult Carrie on her backyard renovation. Adam asks her about her ultimate vision for the space, but she's unsure. Not knowing is a good thing, Adam says, 'Because that means what's meant to be will show up.' Whether he's conscious of it or not, he's also referring to himself. Carrie might've been complacent with her arrangement with Aidan, but now that things are changing, she might just be open to something new. Maybe something with Adam.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Elle
2 hours ago
- Elle
How Fashion Fell in Love With Toys
Style Points is a column about how fashion intersects with the wider world. The newest It accessory isn't a sleek East-West bag or a viral shoe. It's something far more playful: a fuzzy-haired doll that dangles from a model's arm on the runway, or a stuffed rabbit clutched as casually as one might tote a Le Teckel. For fall 2025, these puckish accessories were anointed as the runway's most surprising phenomenon. At Fendi, they came in the form of Cabbage Patch Kids-like dolls, while Kenzo and Simone Rocha turned stuffed animals into bags and clothing. And at Coach, Stuart Vevers ushered bunny slippers and a menagerie of assorted cute critters onto the catwalk. Not to mention the trendy Labubu dolls swinging from designer bags all throughout fashion month. Ruby Redstone, a fashion historian and author of the Substack newsletter Old Fashioned, has been a self-described 'super-nerdy major toy collector' her whole life. For her, collecting toys was an introduction to the world of artists like Yoshitomo Nara and Takashi Murakami. Normally, when parsing fashion's current mood, Redstone avoids painting with a broad brush. 'I tend not to say, 'We're looking for cute stuff because the world is hard and sad.' But I do feel like we're in a rather extreme case of that right now,' she says. 'The more tough things get politically, it seems, the more everyone is drawn to these dopamine-inducing cute things that we can sell. And I'm not mad about it. It's a trend that I'm completely at peace with, because it does bring me joy.' For Lucy Bishop, a specialist in handbags and fashion at Sotheby's, the trend is 'absolutely connected to consumers embracing escapism to distract themselves from the pressures of modern life. The childlike comfort factor these playful designs bring is a welcome distraction.' It's also driven by the voracious appetite millennials and Gen Z have for nostalgia, whether it's the Y2K revival or assorted '90s trends. Redstone notes that they 'came of age with Hello Kitty and UglyDolls, and now they're looking at it with rose-colored lenses because they didn't experience it or couldn't participate in it the first time around—and now they can.' Powered by nostalgic yearning, people are also snapping up past luxury crazes in this vein, like the Fendi Bag Bug charm or Givenchy's Bambi keychains. (Going yet further back, Bishop points to the offbeat designs of Franco Moschino and Jean-Charles de Castelbajac.) All of this might feel at odds with fashion's recent focus on quiet luxury, capsule wardrobes, and office-ready dressing. For several seasons, young people have been obsessed with looking more adult and put-together, but a general fatigue seems to have settled around this idea. If the totems of adulthood, including homeownership and stable jobs, are increasingly out of reach, why not replace them with totems of a more innocent time? (Interestingly, Bishop notes that just as we have tweens who are obsessed with adult beauty products and elaborate skin care routines, 'we are witnessing consumers in their 20s, 30s, even 40s become obsessed with childlike products. The roles seem to have been reversed.') That said, Redstone reminds me that a penchant for winsome decoration dates far further back than the heyday of the Bag Bug. 'In the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, you had women making chatelaines, which were essentially key chains that attached to your waist. They had useful things on them, like scissors and an eyeglass.' But people still decorated them with jewelry and charms, she says. 'This idea of adding little charms that 'show a piece of our personality' is essential to human nature—but showing our personality specifically through a plastic toy is quite contemporary.'
Elle
17 hours ago
- Elle
‘The Bear' Season 4 Ending, Explained: Is Carmy Leaving The Restaurant?
Spoilers below. If the season 4 finale of The Bear is to be believed, Carmy Berzatto no longer loves his restaurant. He definitely does not love himself—he hasn't for a long time. He believes he needs to leave the restaurant industry as a whole, so he can discover his identity outside a kitchen. But is The Bear really the problem with its namesake chef? The finale episode, aptly titled 'Goodbye,' takes place in one drawn-out sequence, set amidst the garbage cans and corrugated metal fencing behind the Chicago fine-dining establishment known as The Bear. Show creator Christopher Storer wastes no time making it clear that Jeremy Allen White's protagonist is eyeing the exit without having first consulted his partner, Sydney (or any of their teammates). His reasons, however selfish as they might seem, have some grounding in logic: Carmy is the genius behind The Bear, but he's also the primary engine behind its faults. He has behaved like a 'maniac,' according to Sydney. Carmy suggests he is a maniac, or rather he knows no other way of behaving. If he leaves, maybe he can change. All of this tracks with what season 4 establishes throughout its initial nine episodes: Post-refrigerator incident and post-Chicago Tribune review, Carmy has realized he is the discordant note within The Bear. Carmy wants to make amends. Carmy wants to 'participate' more, to be 'better.' As he explains to Sydney during their nearly 15-minute-long shouting match, he has set up 'barriers' against his own self-improvement, using the restaurant as a sort of laundering scheme for his traumas and anxieties. By transforming these traumas and anxieties into pristine dishes, he doesn't have to address them; by the time they're served, he can't even recognize them anymore. But such chaos isn't sustainable, and finally Carmy knows it. His solution, then, is to leave The Bear behind altogether. As Sydney learns in the lead-up to 'Goodbye,' Carmy has asked his brother-in-law and lawyer, Pete, to alter The Bear's partnership agreement so that his name is no longer on the document. Should they proceed with signing the papers, ownership of the restaurant will split: A 50-percent stake will go to Sydney and Natalie, Carmy's sister, and the other half to their benefactor, Uncle Jimmy. Carmy will remove himself from the mess he helped make. The problem is, The Bear has spent four seasons now building up the narrative worldview that a restaurant is like a family. The people within its walls did not necessarily choose to come together, nor do they necessarily leave their baggage at the door. But they are never alone, and together they create an atmosphere of precision, pleasure, and unity that is difficult to replicate elsewhere or under different circumstances. Season 3 took pains to establish and re-establish this connective tissue specific to restaurants, frequently spending precious screen time hammering the theme home. And for Carmy, whose biological family is a mess, the family he forged within a restaurant setting has provided him not only with a distraction from his trauma, but with the kind of relationships that might help him heal it. Why, then, would he abandon this family right as they're starting to understand one another? In the finale episode, both Sydney and Richie hurl these frustrations at Carmy, accusing him of once again 'running' away, fleeing the people who love him. He swears that's not what's happening this time. But isn't it, though? Season 4 establishes that The Bear is operational. Even on an individual level, the team members are thriving: Marcus has been awarded a Best New Chef honor from Food & Wine magazine; Ebra has made The Original Beef worthy of franchising; Tina has shaved minutes off her cook time; and Sydney's scallop dish is the stuff of 'phone eats first' memes all across Instagram. However, as Computer (Jimmy's math-inclined right-hand man) tells Natalie, the question isn't whether the restaurant can keep going. It's why should it? The answer, judging by The Bear's continually reinforced thesis, is because the people running this restaurant need one another. (In case you need reminding, they're a family!) If Carmy chooses to leave them—even with the best of intentions, or for the right reasons—then what does that mean for their fragile synergy? Even Sydney isn't sure how to sort out Carmy's reasoning. He claims they finally have 'the right team in place,' and yet, she points out, 'You're removing yourself.' He insists that his issues shouldn't have to be her problem, and yet he's leaving her to deal with the problems he created. He tells her he doesn't 'love' being in the kitchen anymore, and yet his behavior indicates otherwise: When Carm finally goes to visit his estranged mother, Donna, in season 4's penultimate episode, his truest act of love is cooking her a whole roast chicken he perfected while working at the French Laundry. (This is not the behavior of a man who's lost all desire to be a chef.) Then, he informs Sydney that he doesn't have anything to 'draw on' or 'pull from' outside of his work, and here, finally, we reach what might actually be the truth. Having to parse through which of Carmy's statements are true, and which are his stumbling approximations of the truth, is what makes him both a fascinating character and a frustrating one. It's also what makes 'Goodbye' both touching and convoluted. By the time Richie steps in to break up Carmy and Sydney's debate—only to dive into the fray himself—the dialogue has circled itself repeatedly. Is the problem Carmy or the restaurant? Is Carmy putting himself or the restaurant first? Are they a family or aren't they? Carmy tells Richie he's 'retiring.' He's 'done.' In other words, he's burnt out, spent, and sorry. Together, the 'cousins' hash out their resentments as Syd watches, smoking a cigarette she's not even certain how to light. When Richie asks if Carm thinks it's 'wrong' to walk away from cooking, Carm doesn't answer the question. He replies, 'Outside of the kitchen, I don't know what I'm like. But the restaurant, it's gonna be good. It's gonna be fine.' By this point in the episode, I'd already come to the conclusion that the problem with Carmy isn't The Bear. It's that, unlike his colleagues, he hasn't a clue how to sustain a life that contains both The Bear and the world outside it. His thinking is always black-and-white: Either he is the owner of The Bear, and the restaurant must come at the expense of all else, or he leaves The Bear—and, with it, the people who've cared for him when he refused to care for himself. The Bear can survive without Carmen, that much is clear. Sydney knows how to steer the ship, and her fear of failure will drive her story arc forward as she assumes the mantle of chef and owner. But I'm not convinced Carmy can thrive without The Bear. As Natalie puts it to him earlier in the season, it's okay for Carmy not to love restaurants anymore. But now that he knows he's capable of such love, he needs to learn how to let it in—outside the kitchen, but perhaps inside it, too. My hope, for The Bear's sake as a series, is that Carmy will not disappear as his peers assume the spotlight. Perhaps he'll step away from his role as head chef but continue as an advisor, ceding his throne to Sydney, Natalie, and Richie but not abandoning the kingdom altogether. (For what it's worth, the finale seems to imply this outcome.) In my estimation, that would be the truest fulfillment of this character's storyline: Carmy learns how to confront himself, but also how to stay in one place without feeling stuck. Of all people, he should understand a kitchen is an ever-evolving organism, capable of remaking itself again and again. It's like a recipe. Or, you a family. ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stephen King at the Oscars: Which movies based on his books have been nominated
Stephen King's books are some of Hollywood's most reliable sources of material to turn into movies and TV shows, and 2025 is shaping up to be one of the biggest years for adaptations of his work to date. There are four movies based on thing he's written out this year — The Monkey came out in February, The Life of Chuck opens nationwide this week, and The Long Walk and The Running Man are slated for the fall — and two TV shows, The Institute and It: Welcome to Derry. The Life of Chuck is particularly notable, because it stands a chance of doing something no King adaptation has done since 1999: earn an Academy Award nomination. The sci-fi fantasy based on King's 2020 novella won the People's Choice Award at the Toronto International Film Festival in 2024, and every People's Choice Award winner since 2012 has been nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture. The film is written and directed by Mike Flanagan, who, like The Shawshank Redemption director Frank Darabont before him, was primarily known for horror movies before this (including adaptations of King's Gerald's Game and Doctor Sleep) but is now taking on an uplifting, decidedly non-horror King project. It's distributed by Neon, which also distributed reigning Best Picture winner Anora. The Life of Chuck isn't considered to be a strong Best Picture contender at this point, but it's in the race. More from GoldDerby 'Prizzi's Honor' at 40: How John and Angelica Huston made history together with his penultimate picture 'So indescribable and special': 'Happy's Place' stars Belissa Escobedo and Melissa Peterman on working with Reba McEntire Sam Rockwell on Frank's 'White Lotus' backstory, Woody Harrelson's influence, and going all in on 'this arc of Buddhist to Bad Lieutenant' As The Life of Chuck hits theaters, here's a look back at how Stephen King adaptations have fared at the Academy Awards. There have been five nominees and one winner. Could The Life of Chuck be the sixth? Without Carrie, none of this would have happened. Director Brian De Palma's adaptation of King's debut novel is one of the greatest and most important horror movies ever made, and it established King as a big screen draw. Carrie, which came out three years after The Exorcist became the first horror movie nominated for Best Picture, was nominated for two Academy Awards in 1976. It was a rare occurrence for horror films then, and it remains unusual to this day. It happened in Carrie's case because the film's characters were so well-conceived and the performances were so strong. Sissy Spacek was nominated for Best Actress for her starmaking performance as the titular telekinetic teen, who is abused by her mother and bullied by her classmates until, on prom night, they take it too far and Carrie fights back. Piper Laurie was also nominated for Best Supporting Actress for her performance as Carrie's tyrannical mother Margaret. It was Laurie's comeback film after a very long hiatus — she was nominated for Best Actress for performance in her previous film, The Hustler, in 1961. Her 15-year gap between back-to-back nominations is unique in Oscars history. Carrie is an important piece of cinema history even beyond its Academy Award nominations. It was the very first adaptation of a Stephen King novel, and now, almost 50 years later, there are over 100. After Carrie, it was a decade before a King film was nominated for an Academy Award again, and this time it wasn't for a horror movie. Director Rob Reiner's coming-of-age drama Stand by Me, based on King's 1982 novella The Body from the collection Different Seasons, earned one nomination at the 59th Academy Awards, for Bruce A. Evans and Raymond Gideon's screenplay. The era-defining film stars Wil Wheaton, River Phoenix, Corey Feldman, and Jerry O'Connell as four boys in 1959 Oregon who go on a journey to find the body of a missing boy so they can report its location to the authorities. It turns into a journey of self-discovery, as their camaraderie helps give each other the confidence to become who they want to be. Stand by Me was a turning point for King adaptations, as it showed that his non-horror stories also had power — not only at the box office, but at the Oscars, too. To date, Misery is the only Stephen King adaptation to ever win an Oscar. Kathy Bates received the Academy Award for Best Actress for her unforgettable performance as Annie Wilkes, the world's most deranged romance novel fan. After rescuing her favorite author, Paul Sheldon (James Caan), from a car accident, she holds him hostage until he rewrites the end of his new novel to her satisfaction. Misery was also directed by Reiner, with a script by William Goldman, who had previously won Academy Awards for writing Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and All the President's Men. It was Bates' breakthrough film; she was primarily known as a stage actor beforehand. She was the film's only nominee. She went on to earn three more Academy Award nominations, all for Best Supporting Actress. Misery is the most successful cinematic fusion of King's horror and drama tendencies. Its suspenseful, un-supernatural plot makes it more of a thriller than a horror film (though the famous 'hobbling' scene is plenty horrifying), while Bates and Caan's performances give it psychological depth. It's the first of seven King adaptations produced by Reiner's company Castle Rock Entertainment, which is itself named after a fictional town in Maine created by King as a setting for several of his stories. If The Shining and Carrie are generally considered by critics to be the best movies based on Stephen King stories, The Shawshank Redemption is probably in third place. It's certainly the most widely beloved adaptation of his work by the public — it's still the highest-ranked movie on IMDb. It's also the most-nominated Stephen King adaptation. Shawshank was nominated for seven Academy Awards in 1994: Best Picture; Best Actor for Morgan Freeman; Best Adapted Screenplay for Frank Darabont; Best Cinematography for Roger Deakins; Best Film Editing for Richard Francis-Bruce; Best Sound for Robert J. Litt, Elliot Tyson, Michael Herbick, and Willie D. Burton; and Best Original Score for Thomas Newman. It was shut out from winning, however; Forrest Gump won five of the seven categories Shawshank was nominated in. The film is a prison drama about how Andy Dufresne (Tim Robbins) keeps his spirit alive while enduring a sentence for a murder he didn't commit. It's based on the novella Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption from the collection Different Seasons, the same one that The Body (Stand by Me) is from. It's the first of three King adaptations written and directed by Darabont, and another Castle Rock production. The formula of Stephen King + Frank Darabont + Castle Rock + prison drama = success worked again for The Green Mile, which was nominated for four Academy Awards in 1999: Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor for Michael Clarke Duncan, Best Adapted Screenplay for Darabont, and Best Sound for Litt, Tyson, Herbick, and Burton. The Green Mile is based on a 1996 novel and stars Tom Hanks as Paul Edgecomb, a death row prison guard who comes to believe that inmate John Coffey (Duncan) is not only innocent of the crime, but a true innocent, an embodiment of goodness, who has supernatural healing powers. It's the second of King and Darabont's films together; it was followed by horror movie The Mist in 2007. It doesn't enjoy the same enduring reputation as The Shawshank Redemption, but it was more successful at the box office upon initial release and is still well-regarded (it's No., 26 on the aforementioned IMDb list). Best of GoldDerby 'It almost killed me': Horror maestro Mike Flanagan looks back at career-making hits from 'Gerald's Game' to 'Hill House' to 'Life of Chuck' Stephen King movies: 14 greatest films ranked worst to best 'The Life of Chuck' cast reveal their favorite Stephen King works, including Mark Hamill's love of the 'terrifying' 'Pet Sematary' Click here to read the full article.
